youtu.be
TED talk of a Jewish lady “denying Holocaust denial”
Her talk brings up no arguments supporting the existence of the Holocaust. She doesn’t cite a single piece of evidence despite claiming to have researched for years. She does not cite the arguments of Holocaust deniers; instead she attacks their person (which is a logical fallacy used to silence your opponent in a debate). Also notice that the comments and like/dislike buttons are disabled. What are they hiding?
Oy vey
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.is
youtube.com
twitter.com
Show some respect for those that lived through that horror.
Yep. One guy had his organs removed so that means every aspect of the Holocaust is true. Fucking moron
How about you shut the fuck up, and respect what they went through.
“Hey Hitler the masturbating death machine has been malfunctioning lately. What evil contraption shall we build next”
“Hmm. Big fucking chair. That’ll show the Americans.”
I’m not sure it was real anymore. But I’m sure they’re genociding whites now.
Show some respect, imagine if this was you. Seeing everyone die around you, all your friends perish.
>the masturbating death machine
asnyone citing the masturbation machine is not a seious participant in the debate.
archive.is
stop talking about this shit - it just makes you look stupid and a liar
question thirteen is the only one that isn't easy to answer.
the rest are disingenuous shit.
Glow niggers everywhere.
Your time would be better spend fighting windmills than trying to seriously argue with holocaust deniers. Every piece of evidence you present is forged, every witness account a lie and every Nazi openly stating their intent to kill jews assumed to be the result of allied pressure. It's tiring to refute their constant assault of ancient, debuked jpgs.
Just this very thread you have retards talking about ballpoint pen ink, jesus christ.
holocaustianity can never be questioned, how fucking dare you.
also the other 7 million people who got murdered in the camps are not relevant
only the 6 gorillion matter and anne frank too
Jews were being really abused by Germany though
forced into ghettos, then taken on trains to the labor camps, basically blamed for everything bad in the society and turned into pariahs, shipped out of the country en-masse to some distant foreign desert
Photoshop was a military product that existed before WW2.
this has been debunked every time you have posted it in the last three weeks.
why do you continue to post this lie?
of course the King of Evil Ganon would survive the gas chamber, you need to use the Master Sword to seal him away
this has been debunked every time you have posted it in the last three weeks.
why do you continue to post this lie?
IT WAS REAL IN MY MIND, GOY
IT WAS REAL IN MY MIIIIIIINNNND
Thank God they didn't do a masturbation machine electric fryer pool double whammy.
Jews are worse than niggers.
Coward. Fuck off.
this actually debunks are you so stupid that you can't see that? the book was published in 1947, before ballpoint pens were available. your claim it was written in ballpoint is ridiculous - unless they had a time machine.
why do you post this shit?
frog rabbi patrolling pol early this morning
Every single TED talk is gay and I hate when my job makes us watch them for training purposes.
Everything posted has been debunked, what difference does on image make?
Saying "debunked" doesn't actually debunk anything. Everyone knows your JIDF, you get BTFO in every holohoax thread you post in and then you scurry off like a little rat every time.
Those alternate photo's were made by trolls much after the fact. Look it up for your self.
>comments and dislikes disabled
imagine my shock
Hey it's the masochistic French kike who wants to get btfo in yet another thread.
The good stuff was for the german officers.
this has been debunked every time you post it. Why do you continue to post these lies?
(the NYT say they censored the phot as the naked man was too shocking for their magazine audience of families) the original was printed months before the NYT sunday magazine censored version.
Yeah it's strange history textbooks and wikipedia will use the fake image, although what I don't understand is the goal. What does adding an extra yid change? Did the guy claiming to be the extra yid have a fair amount of power and influence and so he decided to cash in on the victim bucks this way?
At lease I couldn't possibly how this would help them push the holocaust narrative.
fuck them and their burnt offering.
>its one of "those" threads
can't wait to see all the convincing completely verifiable evidence!
this has been debunked in every thread you post it in.
why do you continue to tell this lie?
(they used 1939 data until 1949, in the sports trivia and other facts book this comes from. they say so in the book, but deniers try to lie by cutting the bit off the top. pic related - bit underlined in red, 1948 edition.
>shipped out of the country en-masse to some distant foreign desert
where?
don't you mean "to extermination centers where they were gassed"?
An excuse isnt debunking you retard.
There are 0 nazi documents referring to the holocaust. There is 0 proof that it happens
Inb4 French kikes posts documents that say people died in the camps, but dont mention killings, thinking we wont notice.
bit of a yikes
see or how about you actually give a source for the claims in your pic? show us the report that supposedly says it was written in ballpoint and not her handwriting. because I bet you cannot do that.
your pic is fake, the claims are false, you have no proof of it.
menawhile the book was published six years before ball points existed, the manuscript can be seen, and isn't in ballpoint, the handwriting can be compared, adn was, and is identical.
your claims are false. unless you can prove otherwise. go on try.
otherwise, admit it - debunked, shit like the rest of your posts.
also, JDIF - really? conspiracy theory is the first thing you reach for? please, have some self respect.
nearly three oclock in the afternoon.
I admire your tenacity but why bother? You're not gonna get a serious engangement on the topic or change anyone's mind and come tomorrow, the same retarded images will be posted without question anyways.
oh look the yank that thinks he is soooo funny he screencapped his pathetic ad hominem to post it again.
wow, so funny. so hilarious. so clever.
(pro tip for americans - this is sarcasm)
Why were there no death camps in the west, only in areas "liberated" by the lying fucking Soviets?
Actually been soft redpilling normies with this one.
better than the self hating Lying Leaf who regularly blows himself away with graphics that cite papers which contradict his lies.
Sorry boys,
Looks like War is back on the Table...
oh don't be silly. Of course all 90,000 prisoners got a dip int eh pool everyday, while drinking beer, cuddling bunnies, going on pony rides, and sending postcards to their loved ones saying "wish you were here".
they all loved it. it was disneyland.
or so the deniers would tell you...
“Ummm and there I was, at the gas chamber, this was my.... well this was the sixth time they sent me to the gas chambers. The gas worked on 6,000,000 of my brothers, but not me. Haha no I’m too tough”
>What are breaks and free time for 200, Alex
You're extra pissy today shlomo
but old almanacs are often wrong.
unless of course you want to say that the 1949 American world almanac isnt lying, (pic related - your graphic is wrong that figure is from the 1948 almanac, not the 49) but suggest that actually the number in 1948 was correct for that year (despite it saying int eh book that they were printing the 1939 data - see ) and that somehow millions of jews died in 1948, for no reason.
see how stupid your argument looks?
All serious researchers say the Holocaust killed at maximum 100,000 Jews.
Kek
It's not adhom if I'm just making fun of you and not trying to attack your character to discredit you. Adhom would be this: Look how disingenuous he is about being made fun of, now imagine this went beyond mere banter and into all his arguments? How could anyone trust the word of someone so dishonest as to erroneously accuse another of a logical fallacy despite there being no formal argument in which to perform that fallacy? How we're you ever an investigator if you don't even know these things, or can't bring yourself to be honest about them?
>She doesn’t cite a single piece of evidence despite claiming to have researched for years. She does not cite the arguments of Holocaust deniers; instead she attacks their person (which is a logical fallacy used to silence your opponent in a debate).
This is typical of their schemes and scams, taking a big game with nothing of substance to back it up. They are VERY aggressive in their style of pushing a confidence game, so aggressive that it seems inconceivable that they could be lying or mistaken. The method was to pound the holocaust myth into the heads of children so violently that questioning it would feel as absurd as questioning gravity.
Jews have written about how goys are very agreeable and easily manipulated. They exploit this to the hilt.
Oy fucking vey, they look 50% like Dumbo and 50% like mental retards
>An excuse isnt debunking you retard.
what do you mean "an excuse"?
the original is widely printed. If you examine the photo it is clearly original with the man in it.
the NYT censor it and say they did so, because it was a family magazine. this isnt an excuse, it is an explanation of why they censored it.
in any case, the picture of the barracks is original, and that is how it looked. if the man wasn't in the picture originally (he was, but let us play along with the deniers) how does that in any way cast doubt on the holocaust? the man was from the camp, photographed int eh camp, lived in the barracks, or one like it, probably stood on that spot at some time. so if (and this isn't what happened, but if) they has taken a picture of the man from the camp and shopped it into the barracks picture - what deception is being done? what is the lie here? the man was from teh camp, the barracks are as they are, nothing is untrue about this.
but deneirs suggest that the fact that the NYT censored it means the whole thing is faked? the holocaust never happened? no barracks ever looked like that? no prisoner was ever that emaciated?
just what do think it proves?
If it was faked it proves nothing. and since it wasn't faked, it proves they are liars, desperate for anything that could possibly sow a seed of doubt, because they have nothing real to do that.
Guys, as much as i hate most jews, what the fuck. I and most of my friends, families have AT LEAST one member of family that was hiding them / giving them food etc. They were risking their lives for them, and now they are saying that WE WERE THE ONES that killed them cause Germans built death camps on PL land. We need holocaust v2.0 but IT HAPPENED
>the shear lack of brain cells in this thread
you know why.
it was a huge prison camp, a slave labour camp, a prison for political prisoners, POWs and hundreds of thousands of non jews.
a place where hundreds of thousands of healthy young women of child bearing age were taken, many of them pregnant.
and you also know what happened to their babies. the vast majority killed at birth. a few given away in adoption.
so what is your point? what are you trying to suggest - that they were happy families, bouncing babies, girls having fun sex and bringing up healthy kids?
all of that would be lies. you are lying by suggestion.
I can’t get over the fact that you said “debuked jpgs”
every day you post this lie.
every fucking day.
every day you are told that these are not death totals for the camps. not totals for any camp. not totals for all camps. not even totals for jews.
you know they are the ITS internal totals for persons of german origin traced tot eh camps ont eh bahelf of their relatives, using the fragentary archives at Bad Arolsen. Records that they ahve froma few camps, none of them complete, which far exceed in number those totals given in this picture.
the RED cross have never given a death count.
you know this because you are told every day. but you lie with the same lie every day.
why?