We need more Windfarms

Windmills are not inefficient. As a Democrat who is interested in science, believes in a involved federal government that drives us into the modern age (as Galbraith said we would have in this year), more progressive scientific advancement, and infrastructure. The government can easily borrow access funds without causing inflation by using surplus capital created by large corporations with perpetual positive net income. What are the downsides to this?

>b-but muh taxes will go up
Yeah? And? In a large industrial or post industrial economy you need a large income tax as an automatic stabilizer. It prevents the economy from overheating by overtaxxing when wages are high and undertaxxing when things are low. High consistent government spending balances the taxes by boosting aggregate demand. And let me ask you this; What would this "tax money" have been spent on? Oh yeah, hookers and coke, yeah i think the environment is a better spot for it.

>b-but muh windfarms are inefficient oil is better
Nope
carboncounter.wordpress.com/2015/03/09/the-old-myth-that-wind-turbines-are-inefficient/

>b-but muh abiotic oil theory! Oil is actually renewable
Yes I agree, but it's still shit for the environment and I would rather not live in a world of smog. I want the environment protected.

CONTINUED NEXT

Attached: windfarms.jpg (1000x450, 242K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=No1Qzx1sQyc
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>You leftist cuck
Reminder that one of the first environmentalists, even before Teddy Roosevelt (who was based), was Madison Grant, Hitler's hero. Madison Grant wrote "passing of the great race" talking about Nordicism and how America's supremacy is brought about by it's Nordic elitism. About as far-right as you can get.

Lets pull the United States out of wars, which is actually an investment (neoconservatives bank on the military bringing in more resources than it costs through corporate contracts, and control of the petrodollar), and change are investment to something more ETHICAL. The CIA's black budget is massive, imagine if instead of trying to overthrow socialist countries and take their oil, we became socialist ourselves and invested our war money into ourselves and the future?

Attached: windmillss.jpg (1920x1080, 366K)

>As a Democrat who is interested in science
Have you ever heard of the bell curve?

Windmills cause climate change by sapping and altering global wind currents

Yes I fully agree with it. And that's actually WHY I support mass migration but that's a whole different thread topic.

Someone tell this retard how many birds that shit kills.

You realize how utterly stupid that idea is right? If that was the case a building would alter the climate a thousand times more.

The amount of birds killed by windmills is significantly less than the amount of nature killed by fossil fuel emissions and oil spills.

Buildings don't sap much energy from the wind currents... It goes around them.

They aren't "sapping energy". Wind is just hitting the metal blade and spinning it, a building would "sap" just as much energy.

The kinetic energy is being transferred from the wind into the blade of the windmill.... This doesn't happen with a static building