Based zizek btfo's MeToo movement
youtu.be
Leftist roasties btfo
Other urls found in this thread:
no wonder this shit was so retarded it came from blacks.
I don't get why people say he BTFO'd Jordan Peterson. He just used the typical Muslims apologist tactics by saying: "I don't follow these parts of Marxism witch I do not agree with". Therefore I am not a radical leftist Marxist. Muslims always use the same logic when being confronted with radical quran verses. They say exactly the same: "I don't follow these parts of the quran thats why I'm not an radical muslim." You can never make a case for any of the two ideologies. So Zizek lost when he even started the debate.
And sho on and sho on
i dont need some spluttering communist to explain what's wrong with the metoo movement
Jewrdon Patreonstein didn't even stay on point or argue relevant shit
I have been saying this shit on the pol for years now you mother fuckers neva got it
i mostly agree with him up until like the 8 minute mark, when he says men act out their perceived impotence when acting violent towards women and that whole thing about psychoanalysis. up until then he's right
He sounds a little coked out.
Wow, it's almost as if actual commies hated liberal bullshit.
I dont agree with you on that user
look at incels for example who have acted violent out of percieved impotence
this is a relatively new phenomena.
incel is a buzzword friendo
Negative Actions have come from this group who identify as incel so i would politely disagree with you
You mean Rodger? the 1 self-identified incel?
fucking pathetic larp flagger
Here is Zizek for all his understanding, being once again blinded by his own conceptual lens. Psychoanalysis by design, positions the locus of the problem inside of the subject, not necessarily analyzing the context which produced such outcomes.
TL:DR psychoanalysis is psychological projection with fancy words
there's an entire board of them on Jow Forums alone you retarded newfag.
I’ll tell him “good job” just before his plunge from the heli
prove it
Yeah, but Peterson didn't press him on it. And his arguments against Marxism were shit to begin with.
He's basically talking about jews. Maybe unintentionally.
if by 'parts of marxism which i do ont agree with' you mean parts which were completely made up and fabricated by CIA liberals and never occurred in a single piece of marxist literature then yes.
(((CIA)))
he names jews regularly.
It's not a religion. With religion, it's all or nothing - if the Quran is the literal word of Allah, you don't get to pick and choose.
But Marxism is more like a vague family of ideas, often times contradicting ideas, that come from many people over a long period of time. At they're just people, not prophets or holy men. Karl Marx has no greater authority than I do, I am completely free to agree with some stuff he wrote and dissmiss other stuff.
Was the Soviet ideology a religion in practice? I'd argue yes. And it's precisely that reverance and orthodoxy that Zizek disagrees with.
>With religion, it's all or nothing
>what is Protestantism
>Protestantism
A bastard version of Christianity for women.
its about doctrinal vagueness
Based