Why haven't I accepted Christ as my personal Lord and Savior?

What's even more telling is that you can trace the rise of extreme western degeneracy with the rise of Atheism

Jew worshipping Christians have so embarrassed the Aryans that their claim of being white can no longer be acknowledged. When stupidity reaches such severity that a danger is posed to congenital health of the race, that infection religion and the mongrels who endorse it must be combated.

You pagan niggers are retarded, you describe the absence of Christianity with the replacement of Atheism or Paganism as some kind of ethnic bulwark. When in reality, all Atheists and Pagans are rampant degenerates, and the only Christians you can refer to are retarded Christian zionists and evangelicals. There is no measure in Atheism or Paganism that protects 'race' and in the centuries of Christian European history there was no Christian driven race-mixing, in fact all the complaints of genocides were done by Christians. Fuck off fedorapagan.

Attached: 1549795005035.png (1084x656, 283K)

Imagine trying to assign concepts like race to God. In fact, the first jew was abraham, who left the priesthood in Ur, a city of Babylon because God spoke to him, telling him to go to the desert because he had a special task, to remember and record the Word. That's the covenant that created jews from Babylonian stock. So saying God is a jewish god is stupid.

Also, I'm curious OP, how do you positively assert there is nothing outside of our current knowledge? How much of the total knowledge of the universe do we possess? Also, God tells us in the bible that he is the creator, and beyond all possible conceptions and realities, and is a spiritual thing, so how cab you assert his non existence using empirical sensory data?

God isn't a dick cutter and I am so absolutely, astonishingly sure of that fact that I'm willing to bet my soul on eternal torment and damnation over it. And that's the main reason why I'm not a Christian anymore.

>There is no measure in Atheism or Paganism that protects 'race'
Negative.
There's nothing in Christianity that protects this.
It is inherently a globalist multiethnic religion built around racemixing.

Attached: DjN4ZtXV4AAt4QJ.jpg (1030x781, 183K)

>There is no "Hell"
Where do you think I you are right now, user?

Because I'm not retarded?

Attached: Christcuckery.png (885x808, 93K)

Underway. Hell is much much worse than you can ever imagine.

There were kikes in ancient Athens, Rome and even Sparta. Try again, even Christians have theories like this, implementing them is the problem. There is nothing in Paganism or Atheism that protects ethnicity or diminishes degeneracy. Nothing at all, modern tranny/leftists/SJW/faggots are the most pagan-like people than the actual LARPers here with their intense sexual degeneracy

>There is nothing in Paganism or Atheism that protects ethnicity or diminishes degeneracy.
I get it you're retarded, but I just fucking showed you. Pythagoras, Plato, and Aristotle all had systems of ethics with eudaimonia as the goal, which is human prosperity and well being as a result of virtue.

You dumb nigger.

God loves you enough to let you make that choice. One day i pray you'll reconsider but ultimately that's between you and God.

Show me how that was a product of paganism you fucking idiot. This is like saying all the scientific advancements that were made by pagans are pagan because they were invented by pagans

throughout the bible, the punishment for idolatry, which is to say, believing a bunch of stuff that you know isn't true or sustainable, is separation from the real and tangible blessing of God

you can expect 'hell' to take this form, and its not that hard to document, starting with the meaning of 'hell' in many of the verses, which is actually the burning trash heap outside Jerusalem

the next tier of punishment is actually annihilation, which Satan experiences in Ezekiel 28

(1/2)
>There is no God
There is some kind of supreme being, but not necessarily aligned with any man-made religion.
>There is no objective reason to believe in religion X over religion Y
If it makes you feel better, improves your life, why not?
>You can't rise from the dead
You got me there.
>Life after death is just a coping mechanism
Maybe. Have you ever had a near-death experience? Or a shared near-death experience with a dying relative? I think there's more going on here than the material reductionists would have us believe.
>The concept of sin is merely a way to control society
Calling evil by its right name should not be cast aside for comfortable conformity. That's how we get clown world. I agree that the concept of original sin is bullshit however.
>You can't have eternal life
Maybe not in this life.
>>Souls do not exist, and consciousness is fundamentally based on the mind
I disagree with this based on my first-hand experience. I practice evocation of spirits/demons and astral traveling, so I'm mighty biased. Yet these experiences lead me to believe our consciousness is much more than the sum of our physical parts.
>"Immaculate conception" is not possible without biotech
Immaculate conception is a borrowed pagan archetype. It's not supposed to be literal.
>There is no "heaven" or "hell"
Maybe not in the strictest sense of those words. I believe our cultivated belief systems cause us to align with their respective paradises and places of torment. Again, based on my own experience, I believe these religious locations exist as thought-forms in the sphere of the afterlife, but they're ultimately fake.
>The Earth wasn't created in 6 days
We weren't there, so we can't know for sure. Though I find the Genesis creation story to be quite similar to the Greek and Mesopotamian myths. It's probably not meant to be a literal interpretation, unless you're a die-hard biblical literalist.
>The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old
Maybe.

>Show me how that was a product of paganism you fucking idiot
Their view of science and ethics was that it was also a spiritual pursuit. It is part of their pagan view.
>This is like saying all the scientific advancements that were made by pagans are pagan because they were invented by pagans
In this case it actually is. Pythagoras and Plato were initiates, their entire philosophy and the product of it were all very much a religious exercise.

The irony being that Christians do this all the time.
>All scientific advancements that were made by Christians are Christian because they were invented by Christians
Even though there's nothing in the Bible that actually contributed to any kind of development of man, and all the great European thinkers of the Renaissance were picking up where pagan Greeks left off.

Fucking tard.

>>There is no God
Speculation
>>There is no objective reason to believe in religion X over religion Y
Correct. Most religions talk about the same supreme God. The rest is just noise.

>>Life after death is just a coping mechanism
Life after death is an inevitability. You came into being once. Based on this n=1, what exactly would suggest that it will never happen again?

>>The concept of sin is merely a way to control society
People sin all the time, how does something being sin control society? The concept of sin is about deeds that bring you towards or away from the God.

>>You can't have eternal life
Speculation. You exist now. What about the current moment suggests that you will ever stop existing?

>>Souls do not exist, and consciousness is fundamentally based on the mind
Speculation

>>"Immaculate conception" is not possible without biotech
To think this, you have first to not comprehend what God is supposed to be.

>>There is no "heaven" or "hell"
Depends. What is "heaven" and how does it differ from heaven?

>>The Earth wasn't created in 6 days
>>The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old
>>Everything we know about geology and biology confirms evolution
Correct

>>Prayer doesn't do shit
For you.

Attached: 1555893496188.jpg (736x884, 169K)

Nihilism is the only logical conclusion if you truly believe that the universe has no objective value. You cannot have objective value without God, only illusory value.

Because my faith is the faith in which I have grown up in. I still believe in the same God Jews, Hindus, Muslims and Christians believe.

>Everything we know about geology and biology confirms evolution
A strong case has been made, but I feel there are still pieces of the puzzle missing before we can say anything for certain. Let's not completely disassemble the mystery and magic of life in one statement!
>Prayer doesn't do shit
Objectively not true. Call it a coping mechanism if you want, but prayer helps people. I also believe certain individuals are especially gifted in prayer because their will and conviction is sufficiently strong. A person with true zeal and tenacity for their faith is an unstoppable menace for the powers that wannabe. Even moreso when a large group of people are joined together in prayer or meditation. The specifics and dogmas of the religion are not what makes this possible. I believe it's all about that conviction. "If you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you can move mountains, etc."
>Christianity and all other kinds of organized religions are absolutely nonsensical.
Religion is the noble lie.

I admire your faith Fin but the Christian God is distinct from a generic universal pantheistic diety. God is personal and identified with Logos or Christ. Because other religions do not accept Christ as God, they do not share the same faith as Christians.

Consider that Christ is mightier any label you could attach him.Christ is the interface between Man and God. Obviously you don't need to call him Christ in order to find him - why else would 'Christ' have a different name depending on the language? It must thus be the intention that matters, not the way you label your intention.

Consider also that Christian God as a whole is defined with the same terms the supreme God of all other world religions is:

Buddhism: God is self-existent, infinite, eternal and omnipresent source of all existence
Hinduism: God is self-existent, infinite, eternal and omnipresent source of all existence
Judaism: God is self-existent, infinite, eternal and omnipresent source of all existence
Christianity: God is self-existent, infinite, eternal and omnipresent source of all existence
Taoism: God is self-existent, infinite, eternal and omnipresent source of all existence
Sikhism: God is self-existent, infinite, eternal and omnipresent source of all existence
Islam: God is self-existent, infinite, eternal and omnipresent source of all existence

Did you just try to fash up Jaysus with these motherfucking scanlines?

Because I stopped doing stupid stuff on my own before it got out of hand?

>Consider that Christ is mightier any label you could attach him.
mightier than any label you could attach to him*

I think you have a flimsy understanding of the difference between a personal god(Christianity) and absolute impersonal forces.

God by definition is a contradiction of itself. Every time we say, god, we mean a Lesser-God. No faith claims that their God is a "God", no complete attributes are placed on their deity of choice. If they truly said that Their version is God, then that would mean that being cannot be, something below even a Lesser-God.

The very attributes which establish what a God is to be, is something akin to a loop. If this is so, then this cannot be and if this cannot be than this is so.
When 2 is divided by itself it will always result in 1, so will 1 divided by itself.

The can be a "machine mind" which controls everything, but never a "machine god"

user, you sound like a smart guy. Read physicist Frank Tipler's The Physics of Immortality. Then read his follow-up book, The Physics of Christianity.

Long story short, it is inevitable that mankind will create an intelligence that fits every description of what could be called God. You will then start to understand that God wanted this outcome, so we're not creating Him, only discovering Him.

Attached: 1409362727517.jpg (343x343, 70K)

Follow your leader. Only way to get out. Honk honk!

Attached: 980x.jpg (980x1225, 441K)

I think trying to describe God as either personal or impersonal is a fallacy. God is an infinite being, thus capable of taking whatever form you as an individual will most benefit from. If you require a personal God, God will become personal for you.

>OP
>his hat

Attached: 143320610764.jpg (350x466, 38K)

>God is an infinite being, thus capable of taking whatever form you as an individual will most benefit from. If you require a personal God, God will become personal for you.

Here is the definition for you
>A personal god is a deity who can be related to as a person instead of as an impersonal force, such as the Absolute, "the All", or the "Ground of Being".
>In the scriptures of the Abrahamic religions, God is described as being a personal creator, speaking in the first person and showing emotion such as anger and pride, and sometimes appearing in anthropomorphic shape

If you think of God impersonally, you've thrown out the Bible and do not believe in Jesus.

Attached: 1554463843265.jpg (470x960, 167K)

>Why haven't I accepted Christ as my personal Lord and Savior?

Why would I accept a Jew into my life?

Attached: based (2).jpg (960x960, 266K)

Luckily, most of the atheists don't care. They find the meaning in their children or the advancement of their civilization for example. Humans look at life from human perspective, we don't need some ultimate purpose to exist. And who knows, perhaps we are yet to find such a purpose in the distant future, in some other dimension...
By the way, there is absolutely no guarantee that what you perceive as objective value isn't illusory as well.

While it is wrong to try to label God the Father because we can never fully grasp infinity, Christ the Son became incarnate so that we could know him. He was fully a man and taught us directly in ways that we could understand.
This perenial view is a great oversimplification and I'm sure that practicers of any of those religions would disagree with being lumped with the rest. The Joseph Campbell model is a poatmodern viewing of religion that borders on being intellectually dishonest in it's equation of all faiths.

>Why haven't I accepted Christ as my personal Lord and Savior?
Christianity is dumb and propped up by jews and nogs

Kikes sure hate Christianity. It’s literally a threat to them.

>Here is the definition for you
An absolute God capable of taking a personal form does not make this God personal or impersonal. You are taking on face of God and projecting it onto all that is God.

>If you think of God impersonally, you've thrown out the Bible and do not believe in Jesus.
Jesus was a human form of Christ, and as such worshipping Jesus is little more than an idolatry. Consider that you are not your body, but your soul. When you die, your body loses all the substance that made you you. Same is true for Christ. I worship Christ, not the earthly body of Christ, and I trust that this is enough.

>on face of God
one*

I agree that what I percieve may be ultimately illusory. I cannot prove God but I'm saying that without God, transcendental ideas and objective truth are not logical. Thus everythings illusory or God exists.

>the refugee and white genocide religion is a threat to (((them)))
lol

Most faiths have the same core values like the golden rule. I don’t think god is easily understood by mortals and think there is a big difference between divinely inspired and the words of god.

Humans have to write down revelations the best they can. Human language is limited. but beneath it I think you can see the Holy Spirit behind it

They were mocking Jesus by calling him king of the Jews.

Hmmmmmm

>>There is no objective reason to believe in religion X over religion Y
Did you even search for evidence at all?

There are four gospels so you have four different perspectives of the same thing. But it’s the teaching themselves that are important really.

If you live life with bitterness for the suffering you must endure to make life even possible you will be less happy than if you live life with gratitude for the good things god has given you along with them

That is why we have a personal god, and i believe most of the peeps here agree. But if we meant in absolutes in the literal sense, Would god, still be God?
And I do not take that we are just creature who cannot comprehend things which are beyond us. Large numbers might even confuse us, but we can imagine it, we can compare it to what we have in real life. But I will give you this, if there isn't enough understanding behind it, then even if we can compare it something, we might not truly understand it.

I guess you are right. I just wanted to point out that not having an ultimate purpose doesn't mean you have to fall into negativistic, nihilist trap. But I think you understand that.

And what exactly is the objective value in the worship of a specific god beyond the carrot at the end of a stick or fear of punishment? Would you still worship without the promise of reward or damnation? I don't think so. It's the most conditional love there is.

Do you respect people who are stronger, bigger and more intelligent than you?

Now imagine a being who is so much stronger, bigger and more intelligent than you that he is directly responsible for your continued existence even in this very moment. How much respect does he deserve from you? How much fear? What would you say if this being expressed that he wants to fully support you and wishes only the best for you? How would you react: with cynicism, or gratefulness?

The problem is that this being never appears in front of anybody and there is no proof of its existence. If such a being appeared in front of me and proved it is worth worshipping, then sure, it can have my worship. But the way things are now, the only reason we are given to believe are some vague promises and warnings in some book that has been, as far as I'm concerned, written by humans.

im guessing you haven't read any of the arguments for his existence

>The problem is that this being never appears in front of anybody and there is
Multiple people have had supernatural beings appear in front of them. Who are you to say what's true and what's not?

>no proof of its existence.
What would you view as a proof? I often ask this from people like you, but no one ever gives a clear satisfying answer.

>If such a being appeared in front of me and proved it is worth worshipping, then sure, it can have my worship.
Either everything you experience is of God, or nothing is. The choice is of course yours. I would argue such being already lies not only in front of you, but behind you, inside you, above you and below you. He is not going anywhere. You are just committed to keeping your eyes closed.

Only someone with inner life can answer your questions. Although, Christianity is the most esoteric religion of the world... Most of the history are metaphores and alegories to attempt to restore the perfection of men.

It's not about "reason", but perception.

This post is pure autism and makes no sense. It's sad that this person pretends to have "knowledge"...

None of the arguments are logically sound. If a convincing argument existed, we wouldn't be arguing here today.

>Multiple people have had supernatural beings appear in front of them. Who are you to say what's true and what's not?
In your own words: Speculation. I don't claim I know anything. I'm not convinced your God exists and I'm not convinced he doesn't exist. Even if I was convinced he exists, I still wouldn't know what does he want of me. There are hundreds of religions and their branches with different and often contradicting views on this. There is absolutely no rational reason for me to worship a certain God in a certain way. What makes you sure you know the right answer? That's what the original argument was about at least.

>What would you view as a proof? I often ask this from people like you, but no one ever gives a clear satisfying answer.
A little miracle wouldn't hurt. Take the cup I have in front of me and throw it against the wall, for example. Should be easy for omnipotent and omnipresent being to do. After all, it was him who made me a rational person and a natural skeptic, so above all, he should understand.

Ah, a metaphysician on Jow Forums.
Tips hat.

>In your own words: Speculation. I don't claim I know anything. I'm not convinced your God exists and I'm not convinced he doesn't exist.
Fair enough.

>What makes you sure you know the right answer?
ALthough it would be nice to know that I have arrived at the right answer, I think it would largely invalidate the rest of my life, since I'm naturally geared towards "seeking the truth", as I bet many anons are. I'm more interested in searching for the right answer than basking in the glory of having found it. The views I have brought forth are only my current views and subject to change.

>A little miracle wouldn't hurt. Take the cup I have in front of me and throw it against the wall, for example.
At the very least, this would be a proof of an unexplainable physical phenomena. But how exactly could you view it as a proof of God?

>After all, it was him who made me a rational person and a natural skeptic, so above all, he should understand.
I'd like to think so too. There must be many ways to God. If God is infinite, as it is said, then surely he is capable of appearing to each of us in the form we need him to appear as, right? Since each human is unique, the relationship between God and every one of us must be unique too.

what is logically unsound about the following?

1.Everything that exists has an explanation of its existence, either in the necessity of its own nature or in an external cause.
2.If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is God.
3.The universe exists.
4.Therefore, the universe has an explanation of its existence (from 1, 3).
5.Therefore, the explanation of the universe’s existence is God (from 2, 4).

If god has a plan all of us, then is he not responsible for us going to hell? Why would god purposefully send us to hell?

It's not that hard.. see 2nd post in image

Attached: 1529716420.png (1280x1148, 170K)

Do you have a whole lot else going on? Why not giving up being autistic and correct about one small area of your life, so you can be happy, and get along with a large group of traditionally minded white people with large families? Don't you see how you have built a cage for yourself? What if it's true, and you've wasted your only chance at happiness?

I was an atheist until very recently. (I'm an oldfag)
I have learned that God (even the concept) is far too complicated and complex for me to understand.
And....
We are here to learn individually IF we accept him.

Finding god (or having him find you) is somewhat like window blinds. If your position is off a little, then you cannot see out of the window. Change your position ever so slightly, and you can see everything.

people like to project their own limitations on what they "think" God should or should not be.

The answer to this depends on what you view hell as. My answer would be different from majority of Christians, since I'm an universalist who believes that in the end everyone will get to be with God. Hell I view as a place where the marks of your sins are painfully burned away from your soul. It's essentially a place of purification (in the bible it is described as "fire and brimstone", brimstone is another word for sulphur, which in greek was known as a highly purifying substance). If you believe in Christ, the burden of your sins is transferred onto him, so that you may enter heaven without having to pay the just penalty for your sins in hell. Since God is just, no penalty is eternal. Another way to look at it is that since we have free will, we are out of God's reach only as long as we want, even after death. In this view, it's not God who is sending you away from him, but you out of your own volition.

>What does God want of me?

God wants to give you the gift of eternal life out of mercy by accepting Jesus as your lord and savior. That's it. Once you recognize Jesus as Lord with all your heart, you enter a covenant with God that cannot be broken, no matter what you do on Earth.

God does not expect anything of you, because everyone is a sinner and will be a sinner until the day they die, no matter what good they do. Nothing here truly matters.

>people like to project their own limitations on what they "think" God should or should not be.
I think that's an astute observation.

We are not here to necessarily understand the nature of God, but to understand the nature of the relationship between us and God.

>God does not expect anything of you, because everyone is a sinner and will be a sinner until the day they die, no matter what good they do. Nothing here truly matters.
Have you ever thought that it's funny how in some ways Christians and nihilists have a lot in common? Neither believes that there is much utility to earthly existence in itself.

>...The views I have brought forth are only my current views and subject to change.
Well user, I don't think your views are bad or invalid any less than mine. I was just trying to defend why I believe there is no reason for me to worship except for some vague promise of eternal bliss or fear of eternal damnation.

>At the very least, this would be a proof of an unexplainable physical phenomena. But how exactly could you view it as a proof of God?
I guess I wouldn't view it as the ultimate proof, maybe you are right and nothing such as ultimate proof can exist, but that much would at least be enough to tip the scales in God's favor for me personally. Even if it possibly could be rationally explained somewhere in the future, It would be too much of an accident if this would happen right as I demanded proof.

How do we have free will if we end up in a part of God’s plan no matter what? Either his plan doesn’t exist, or we don’t have free will and as a result, he forces us to be nonbelievers.

>If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is God.
Why?

Jewsus would have been placed in the oven in Nazi Germany

>Once you recognize Jesus as Lord with all your heart
Jesus was not a real person.

The Romans called Jesus King of the Jews because he claimed to be king of the Jews.

And they correctly crucified him.

Well, I can't be sure it's truly what he wants, it might as well be ramblings of some schizo from the ancient times.
What if he wants the exact opposite?

>Well user, I don't think your views are bad or invalid any less than mine. I was just trying to defend why I believe there is no reason for me to worship except for some vague promise of eternal bliss or fear of eternal damnation.
I understand that.

>I guess I wouldn't view it as the ultimate proof, maybe you are right and nothing such as ultimate proof can exist, but that much would at least be enough to tip the scales in God's favor for me personally.
Yes, it's probably unsatisfying to realize that in the end it all comes down to making a leap of faith, regardless of how close to "proving God" you get. This realization in itself can make you even more reluctant to follow anything but pure rationality. I think you have to first truly want for God to exist, before you area ready to find the ways to rationally justify his existence to yourself. Likewise, if you don't want God to exist, you will find ways to justify this view to yourself. It's kind of like the cliche "reality is what you make of it"

Indeed. When you consider the 4 dimensions of the universe, it stands to reason that everything within the universe is pointless, because everything is transient, finite, and fleeting.

Ecclesiastes 12:8:
Vanity of vanities, saith the preacher; all is vanity.

>>There is no God
you don't know that since you don't know everything
>>There is no objective reason to believe in religion X over religion Y
yes there is, cutting someone's hart to praise the gods is worse than going to church/mosque etc.
>>You can't rise from the dead
literally can
>>Life after death is just a coping mechanism
you haven't died so you can't argue that
>>The concept of sin is merely a way to control society
yes, concept of gunpowder is merely a way to create fancy fireworks
>>You can't have eternal life
again, you haven't lived forever so your argumentation is limited
>>Souls do not exist, and consciousness is fundamentally based on the mind
ask neurologists about that
>>"Immaculate conception" is not possible without biotech
kek, >muh current technology is so superior to your beliefs
>>There is no "heaven" or "hell"
you don't know that
>>The Earth wasn't created in 6 days
talking about metaphores, uses them as arguments, kek
>>The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old
ok
>>Everything we know about geology and biology confirms evolution
ok
>>Prayer doesn't do shit
it does but you don't know that
>Christianity and all other kinds of organized religions are absolutely nonsensical.
like atheism and scientism

tips fedora
op btfo

Think of how quantum physics speculate that there exist an infinite amount of parallel timelines. I imagine that God sees all these timelines occurring at the same time. As such, in his eyes, it doesn't matter whether the 'you' of this timeline, or the 'you' of some other timeline gets saved, because in the end there will always be a timeline in which you find God and fulfill his plan. From your perspective, on the other hand, there only exists this current timeline. It's thus up to you to make your timeline the one that will end up with you finding God and realizing his plan.

Is this understandable?

Yes exactly.
>Ecclesiastes 12:8:
>Vanity of vanities, saith the preacher; all is vanity.
My mother used to quote that passage to me all the time in my edgy nihilistic phase.

He probably wasn’t, but I like to pretend he was just to insult him for being a kike.

The bible is real because it says so

Attached: Circular_reasoning.jpg (604x523, 57K)

The bible is real because God has fulfilled prophecy time and time again, and the Word is shown to be inerrant. Glad it took you hours to post a bad strawman meme though.

Exodus 6:3:
"And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them."

Jehovah means "I AM, THAT I AM". God IS, has always existed, and will always exist.

Attached: 1547683720013.jpg (700x6826, 600K)

It's not like that. When discussing God, I seldom use the bible. Personally, I use it my deeper questions regarding character and for my own growth.
God, however, is far deeper than you CAN imagine.

For example, how do you know everthing that existed before today was a real experience and not just an upload? You path begins now.
Right and wrong.
Truth vs lie.
This is your journey user.

Get saved frens

Attached: 1543854886771m.jpg (1024x425, 174K)

>Think of how quantum physics speculate that there exist an infinite amount of parallel timelines.
Quantum Physics is not a being and does not speculate.

>I imagine that God sees all these timelines occurring at the same time.
so fucking what??? you're a retard

Well, you haven't really addressed the whole "God's plan" thing. Either we can change our future (practically making us God), or we can't and we don't have free will (something God insists upon).

And also, in your hypothetical interpretation of the bible that I've never heard before, why would God give a shit about trying to save us if we always end up believing in him in another timeline? Why would God flood the earth due to our mischief if there's another infinite amount of timelines where we are perfectly sinless? Your interpretation practically removes all of God's power and as such, he isn't God anymore. It's contradictory.