Could the far left and the far right find *some* unity if we all just understood that who the left calls "capitalists"...

Could the far left and the far right find *some* unity if we all just understood that who the left calls "capitalists" and the right calls "Jews" are the same people?

Attached: 1540217694265.jpg (474x573, 72K)

Other urls found in this thread:

repeal.io
marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1950/jun/20.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I'll just address your picture cause it's really dumb.

It's not that x or y might have a preference towards working women.

Back when the economy was quite basic, agriculture-based mostly, women didn't work because them working was a fucking waste of resources anyway, a well-fed man whose kids are attended can be way more productive than a man who has to take care of menial things by himself.

Enter technology and now women can actually be productive and actually get shit done in a level that is superior to the increased productivity a man could have if he had the wife at home.

tl;dr
Basic economy:
Man working -> x productivity
Woman takes care of house -> Man increases productivity to 1.5x
Total productivity per household -> 1-5x

Modern economy:
Man working -> x productivy
Woman working -> x productivity
Total productivity per household -> 2x

Want women out of the workforce? regression will be needed.

Btw that's why I'm surprised feminists are such anti-capitalists, guess they want to go back to the kitchen deep down.

But the far right keeps attacking actual Jews in synagogues, even when they don't own shit, and ignoring goy capitalists. I definitely see elements of anti-capitalist critique in right-wing rhetoric about Jews, but projecting capitalism's ills on an ethnic group they don't like is worse than useless.

I mean, that's why I'm looking for some unity. All the complaints regarding Jews won't be fixed by attacking synagogues, just like most things the left considers anti capitalist won't fix the problems inherent. Both groups seem intent on shooting themselves in the foot.

You're missing the point.
Women were sold work as "liberating." It is not liberating in any sense, no more than child labor is "liberating."
The picture isn't dumb. You are.

Attached: 1465303624307.jpg (480x515, 16K)

you forgot a step
>man working = x
>woman working = x
>children's capabilities = 0

I assume that argument labels work liberating as it eliminates dependencies, meaning, relationships are now based on affection or convenience instead of economic dependency.

Certainly things like alimony, child support, welfare, etc, decrease dependency even further, so women in the workforce is not a completely natural process, it's partially forced by government policies too.

What happens to productivity when the birth rate drops below replacement and the next gen of workers are disloyal turd workers who vote socialist and have an average IQ of 80?

Would you sacrifice long term growth on the altar of short term growth?

That's true. We are subsidizing it from the checks of healthy families.

>What happens to productivity when the birth rate drops below replacement

Shouldn't be a problem. I was always talking about marginal productivity.

>The next gen of workers are disloyal turd workers who vote socialist and have an average IQ of 80?

Not sure how one can manage lower IQ people having more children than higher IQ people, it's never going to happen, they have more sex due to less hobbies and ambitions. What do you suggest?

>it's never going to happen
You sure about that?

Attached: ED61451B-C204-4DC7-9EBE-37DF33047A83.jpg (250x174, 5K)

Fuck off you jew fag
Women only work useless desk jobs

Zanzibar revolution bitch

There doesn't seem to be indications of it, no.

Without welfare life expectations between low IQ and high IQ people would be way more different than today, but birth rates would still be in favor of low IQ people for sure. It's like trying to outbreed rabbits or cats, the only balance god offered us for eugenics was our ability to keep what we produce, to give an edge to the smart over the dumb, without it, with socialism, it's just impossible to not fall into a dysgenics scenario.

The final redpill is realizing that even saying the word "jews" dooms you to failure. You can just as easily attack the "global banking system" or "hollywood" or "the nepotistic ruling class" without permanently disgracing yourself in the public eye.

Blatant anti semitism and racism is a trick to funnel out the more brash and less calculating wrongthinkers straight into the grinder.

Great if you want some anonymous catharsis. Not so great to base your entire worldview around and preach publicly.

Remind me again how you (((people))) are any different than communists?

One needs to split the Left up into groups that can be turned against their Jewish Slave Masters.

For example, Blacks might be turned against Jews because Jews are the majority of the slum lords taking black wealth fare rent. Jews also work the hardest to avoid paying taxes.

But how to dumb this down so niggers get that whites are giving them money just to have Jews steal it. I don't know. Probably, not calling them niggers would be a good start.

blaming shit on "jews" is so fucking stupid and de-legitimizes you and other rational points you might make.

Its a small percentage of BANKERS manipulating the system to their advantage

And theres nothing wrong with becoming filthy fucking rich, its what you do with those resources that defines you.

hell, some of the richest people in the world are mexican...or white, or asian, etc. and yes some are jews. but the guy down the street selling bagels isn't scheming against you.

Attached: trump emperor 6.jpg (790x516, 86K)

OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN

>Shouldn't be a problem.

Attached: 143DD661-15A4-4FB2-A83A-202AE144B2B7.jpg (1200x1090, 84K)

Attached: llumi-betaruga-uitardedretari-my-power-level-is-none-of-your-16304449.png (500x514, 124K)

>White race is dying
>but muh gdp
fuck off meme flag kike.

Attached: phpThumb_generated_thumbnailjpg.jpg (760x570, 68K)

Prominent black nationalists hate Jews. Despise them. But because they are considered powerless they can socialize with powerful politicians - see Bill Clinton and Louis Farrahkhan sitting on the same stage at times.

Attached: 1555153867631.jpg (996x1024, 160K)

>Shouldn't be a problem
This is literally the problem in Japan though. Women don't want to have children because they are too focused on their jobs and think having children would get in the way.

>He doesn't know chabad is a cult of Jewish supremacist and that HIAS is exploiting proletariat.
Those two were revolutionaries.

This all of the civilized world - inability to meet replacement rate. Japan is just an extreme.
But who cares! There are so many people in the world! Just send half the jobs overseas and import people to take any remaining jobs. There is a labor shortage, goy - look at these numbers from the FED . . .

>Back when the economy was quite basic, agriculture-based mostly, women didn't work

Well that's just crass ignorance. On the contrary, for most of history women did work, because they couldn't afford not to. You think farmer Joe's wife was just watching the kids while he was working the fields ? No, she was in the fields too. And so were the kids.
And when industrialisation hit, what did she do ? She got a job at the mill.
Only a small minority called the bourgeoisie could abstain from work.

Then in the 50s that minority grew and became a social ideal, and advertisement tailored for them created and spread the cliché of the stay-at-home wife.
But that only lasted two or three decades before rich women joined the workforce that the poor never left.

Attached: 1280px-Jean-François_Millet_-_Gleaners_-_Google_Art_Project_2.jpg (1280x958, 346K)

And not naming the Jews doomed for failure.

>don’t you dare name the Jews goy, you can say whatever you want but DONT GO THERE

Taking care of children, educating them, cleaning the house, and preparing food are all very much socially necessary labor that still needs to be done. The only difference is that now what was once a social relationship between two individuals has become an alienated commodity relationship. Women are too tired from working to make food so we have to buy it from fast food joints or microwave shitty frozen shit. We are either taxed or pay to have our children taken care of and educated. Now a lot of middle class houses will even have maids or just leave their houses in a state of filth until they have company.

Literally the only difference between then and now is that everyone is overworked, our kids are dumb assholes, we are fatter, and our houses are messier. And what do we get in return for all this? Nothing except the fact that changing everything to commodity relations helps capitalist accumulate more capital.

it's because they're frustrated since they can't physically get access to the synagogue of satan turbokikes running this shitty clownworld so they take out their frustrations on the poor dumb saps who continue to allow these rats to hide among them - ordinary jews

if jews self policed and purged these satan worshipping rotschild scum from their own ranks, there wouldn't be any antisemitism in whites

Couldn't help but notice that this cartoon is revisionist.
Comrade.

Attached: Karl-Marx-Jewish-question-quote.jpg (640x916, 153K)

Is it a problem that a country loses a bit of population density though?

I believe the issue with it is only due to public pension systems which inevitably lead to politicians demanding immigration to maintain the ponzi alive.

I mean

Try “ruling class” or “rootless cosmpolitan” and name names. People connect the dots on their own

If we don't share the same goals there can't be unity. I'd argue the same for shared values as well.

yes and you'll still get slanged as antisemetic so you may as well just name the jew off the rip.

Nope. There can't be far right and left unity, its a contradiction. The proletariat and bourgeoisie are mutually exclusive.

Good point. I can always counter with tying the "implied Jew combowords" to "Jews" and then accuse anti-semitism anyway. It's equally effective.

I don't believe that's entirely accurate. Sure they did work but it was mostly the low effort jobs like gathering the wheat into shives, feeding the chickens, spinning clothe, etc. They really did do a good deal of just house work and childrearing.

You are correct about how that ideal developed into the 50's. But the "jobs" that poor women did in agriculturalist societies were of an entirely different character than the ones they are expected to do today.

>attempting to find common ground with people who you have fundamental disagreements on

why even bother with politics at this point? just go get friends. all these lonely losers who treat this shit like a hobby are a plague

You first. I don't want to see you post here anymore. Just drop it and make friends.

There is nothing wrong with a woman working in some sense. But now while mother works at Walmart, the kids are off at schools being indoctrinated under the Prussian method or wandering the streets.
That picture may depict the life for only the higher stratum, but those are the same people who have been sold the nonsense about the empowerment of feminism to break apart families and thus have more power over each individual within that former nuclear or extended unit.

>who the left calls "capitalists" and the right calls "Jews" are the same people
Capitalists only engage in cultural subversion if it's profitable. Jews seem willing to do it even if it means a financial loss. So they're not identical.

Attached: 1mwbso.jpg (296x335, 37K)

You're all completely lost in philosophical materialism. Capitalism and communism have this feature in common. The left and the right are both driven by a materialist worldview. But the left is more consistent with it (which is why it always "wins" every battle). Just listen to this user's analysis as a perfect example of what I mean...


>tl;dr
>Basic economy:
>Man working -> x productivity
>Woman takes care of house -> Man increases productivity to 1.5x
>Total productivity per household -> 1-5x
>Modern economy:
>Man working -> x productivy
>Woman working -> x productivity
>Total productivity per household -> 2x
>Want women out of the workforce? regression will be needed.

Fundamentally, both sides are based in this sort of thinking. So, when the right raises its impotent objections about, "b-b-but muh gothic architecture... muh traditional values... muh nuclear family"... there's a deeper level on which they'd throw all that shit away to have access to more useless, material agitation (which is viewed as the gold-standard of personal and societal value by both the left and the right).

The proof of this is that they talk endless bullshit about birthrates, and tradition and family... but overwhelmingly reject it in their own lives.

Attached: 1556649078430.jpg (640x948, 163K)

No, because the right wing is just a negative reactionary force that would shit on their own salvation. (I bet Trump will win 2020 again just like how Bush beat Kerry).

Things will change when most of those reactionary dipshits die off (the boomers)

I think the Jews are just surviving under the parasitic systems that they have found a niche in, but the worst capitalists, who are the ones people hate, live in the same niche - if it walks like a Jew and talks like a Jew than for all purposes, treat it in the same fashion - like we should treat Jews based on millennia of knowledge from the Roman Empire and Jesus chasing merchants from the temple to the modern era.

I'm gathering intelligence and studying enemy patterns of behaviour while having a laugh. I'm not treating it as a social gathering.

PJW doesn't have a clue what he's talking about. Post-modernism and marxism are fundamentally opposed.

Leftists focus on removing productive people
Right wingers focus on removing parasites

Expecting generational change to make things better is not something I would suggest for most.

>Post-modernism and marxism are fundamentally opposed.
In theory, yes, in practice they borrow from one another

So, in other words, a "lonely loser treating this as a hobby?"

Basically another one of those memes with people confused about who is on one side and the other of a tug of war.

No they don't. There are "marxists" who claim pomo and marxism are reconcilable and make stupid idealist meme versions of marxism, but these are usually first worldists and intellectuals who do not put marxism into practice. Marxism-Leninism, Leftcommunism and Trotskyism, the main strains of marxism throughout the world, are incomparable with pomo because marxism is a fundamentally materialist worldview.

Embarrassing
They are very much linked by this absurd conclusion that the nature of something can be changed by calling it something else

Attached: 2E714497-7E64-4684-AFC0-260D5E00DE61.png (500x544, 153K)

Yea the guy who owns a landscaping company is your enemy, trust Bernie Sanders goy, he'll make America a paradise.

This doesn't even fucking make any sense. Stop watching PJW and other assorted idiots.

>Could the far left and far right just unify against neo-liberalism?
Anprim circles are lit

The far left ARE the jews and their thralls. They meme the 'capitalist' as a WASP to hide his true identity.

>Giving women the right to work doubles the number of people looking for jobs while keeping the number of job positions available the same.
The 19th Amendment was one of the most catastrophically damaging pieces of legislation ever enacted to our lawbook. Repeal the 19th Amendment
repeal.io

Attached: why-women-should-not-vote.png (1500x3719, 595K)

Its called National Socialism for a reason not all porkies are jews but a vastly disproportion number are they are a necessary but not sufficient condition for globohomo capitalist gayplex.

The pro-worker left is such a tiny and irrelevant minority that it's not worth the trouble. IDpol is what your average far leftist cares about, if it had to choose between "eating the rich" and a utopian fantasy capitalist world where people telepathically knew its pronouns and straights were loaded into tranny breeding camps it would choose the second. The rich know this and that's why they sent feminists and woke minorities to infiltrate Occupy Wall Street.

>Sure they did work but it was mostly the low effort jobs like gathering the wheat into shives, feeding the chickens, spinning clothe, etc. They really did do a good deal of just house work and childrearing.
So they did shit that needs to get done but doesn't take up a ton of time or effort and allows them flexibility to handle issues in the home. I think we can agree that it would be a good compromise in theory, but women don't see it that way. They want to breadwin while rearing children, and if they have to choose between the two they choose breadwinning and compensate with pet ownership.

I used to be all in on the free market ideal. I'm still libertarian but today I focus much more on family building and well being, filtering the bad things of the modern world. Market and money is not that important to human psychological health.

The left will never come to this conclusion, they are envious materialists, they think people find happiness by what they can buy and their financial status. They ignore spirituality, human relations, everything. The only thing there is to them is the conflict of classes.

Attached: 1555936457827.png (599x581, 837K)

Regular jews have no incentive to excise the cancer jews

Because the cancer jews still act in the best interests of the regular jews. Regular jews get to star in cancerjew movies, they get to benefit from cancerjew policies like making antisemitism illegal, or laws that allow jews and only jews to own firearms.

When you keep making off like bandits for allowing your cancerjews to run amok, no shit there won't be any self policing - and more pointedly, none of the regular jews are intelligent enough to see that what the cancerjews are doing is detrimental to all jews in the long run. They're content to enjoy the fruits of cancerjew exploitation of their host population, right up until that host population has enough and kicks all the jews out - cancerjews and normal jews alike.

Fundamentally the problem comes from jews seeing themselves as an in-group. They will never work to the benefit of others, only what helps jews. They are more ethnocentric, racist, and racially minded than ANY other group of people in the world.

I don’t need to watch that retard to recognize that both of these groups make extensive use of pilpul and general lingual kikery

Based. MIGA.
Pardon anti zionist wikileaks editor? No, pardon fraudlent jew making bank at the expense of the tax payer.
Simply eric.

Marxists don't give a shit about language in a cultural sense because language is not part of the base or superstructure. Fucking read Stalin before making silly comments.

marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1950/jun/20.htm

Its wack seeing neocon-lite boomers and zoomers go off about moderate islam supporting terrorism but sucking off jews whos only country directly supports isis and warmongering at the expense of american soldiers.
>muh secular jews
You need to be ethnically jewish to return to israel

Ancap is jewish.

Attached: 33458729_1771363259553561_9183505278534942720_n.jpg (494x667, 52K)

>WIGGIDA WIGGIDA WIGGIDA WACK
Why hello, my fellow negro. What's "up?"

High quality argument my fellow conservative

It was a question, not a statement. Illiterate nigger.

false equivalence

Attached: 1555834225761.jpg (682x722, 137K)

YES

FUCK THE FAKE DEBT FOREIGN FIAT MONEY KIKE BANKERS CONTROLLING POLITICS, MEDIA AND THE ECONOMY.

FUCK
THE
TRAITORS

OVEN
THE
FED

FUCK
THE
SHADOW
KIKE
FOREIGN
BANKERS

Attached: no_jews.png (576x768, 993K)

Whats with all the commie spam lately?

I would assume something to do with the news cycle, but I haven't been paying enough attention to the news to take a guess. What's strange though is that even infowars is talking about everything other than what's going on in the world, except for Owen once in a while trying to re-explain how Israel din du nuffin.

'Productivity' is fake and gay and Jewish.
None of this is good for the family and therefore none of it is good for the nation.

woman working = total wage / 4
total productivity per household -> 1/2 x

you talk like a fag and your shits all retarded

productivity is important but having kids is also important

If jews had a conscious they wouldn't be jews.

The left and right are honestly for the large part complaining about the same things. Jews did this.