>Global Warming isn't real

How come people here actually fall for this on here. Not all of you, but a lot. You know that thinking global warming/climatic change is exactly what oil companies want you to believe (despite the fact that many of them are planning for an oil/coal free future).
>Oh but they said in the 70s we were gonna have a global cooling
Wrong. Some scientists thought this but the majority thought the earth would warm, which it did.
ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/global-cooling
>Oh temperatures haven't risen
Yes they have, 0.8c since the 1880s. 2016 was the warmest year ever recorded, and 2018 was the 4th. The last five years were the warmest years ever recorded
nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/02/2018-fourth-warmest-year-ever-noaa-nasa-reports/
earthobservatory.nasa.gov/world-of-change/DecadalTemp
>But there was a CO2 ppm of 4000 600 million years ago and the earth wasn't 30c warmer
Yes, because the sun's output decreases the more you look into the past. The earth received 94% the energy 600 million years ago as it does now.

Attached: 1527551869076.jpg (1280x960, 138K)

Other urls found in this thread:

news.utexas.edu/2010/11/11/medieval-warm-period-not-so-random/
climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
youtube.com/watch?v=v_RuverrEZ4
youtube.com/watch?v=r7aZ6vqCk2E
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/67d5/bd9f9db18f4e4ee4bf2eda8680b5cfcc6908.pdf
qz.com/531899/exxonmobil-facing-uncomfortable-ghosts-of-its-climate-change-past-is-attacking-the-media/
ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/global-cooling
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Oh but you're not zooming out far enough, look at the past million years
While the climate has changed in the last million years, these happened by other means we aren't seeing now. Ice Ages are caused by Milankovic cycles, which are relatively gradual cycles that take thousands of years, which doesn't explain the warming we are seeing now. The medieval warm period was caused by a decrease in volcano activity (volcano ash makes the world colder) and increased sun activity. Currently, solar activity has decreased, yet temperatures continue to increase. This is because CO2 in the main culprit. CO2 ppm has increased from 280ppm to 410ppm from the industrial revolution to now. In the last million years, CO2 ppm have not increased 300.
news.utexas.edu/2010/11/11/medieval-warm-period-not-so-random/
climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/

Attached: 1556153276585.png (275x308, 108K)

>cia is still posting

>everything i don't like is CIA

Attached: DahyunLaughing.jpg (1000x800, 73K)

REPUBLICAN DEATH CULT

youtube.com/watch?v=v_RuverrEZ4

Look you stupid schizo, even if it's not anthropogenic it's still a looming threat. Many in the MENA region are already being affected. Give it a few decades and we will see a surge of refugees.

You're a Canadian so of course you don't care. But people living below the equator and or in areas relying on certain climates will undoubtedly suffer.

youre full of shit

Keep crying about liberal agendas bitch. I hope the world bakes every last human.

youtube.com/watch?v=r7aZ6vqCk2E

>the amazing arguments from the opposition

>current CO2 is 415ppm
>IPCC's goal in 2018 was to reduct it by 45%
>use chemtrails to reduce to 235ppm
>fuck up because government fucks everything up
>CO2 drops to 215ppm
>getting chilly man and the crops are giving 10th of their yield
>CO2 drops to 180ppm
>trees and phytoplankton starts dying as we enter the last days of all life on earth
>snowball earth
The fact that you even mention CO2 as an argument for Global Warming proves that you're a shit brained mutt.

Attached: 1548010590237.jpg (620x948, 72K)

Why should you care? It is impossible to stop this. Consider that 1.3 billion poojeets are now driving or are in the process of getting automobiles. Their demand for oil/coal and other fossil fuels is rising. They could really care less about global warming. The same thing is true with China. African countries that are capable of industrializing won't care about global warming either. The only way forward is to further globalize the economy, and hence accelerate total economic collapse and hence threaten the viability of the technological-industrial complex. At that point, all measures must be taken to dismantle the technological-industrial complex. Any other outcome will result in the total environmental destruction of the earth by nations that are entirely unconcerned with their environmental impact that historically are only constrained by their lack of ability to totally consume the resources in their local area which was changed by the introduction of industrial mining, farming, and manufacturing techniques. The only way forward for humanity in general is to embrace the collapse, embrace the death and suffering that may come from it and consider that as the sacrifice that provides retribution for the hubris of mankind, and ensure that nature can rejuvenate itself over time while the remaining humanity can learn to live with nature once again and participate in the power process. There are no alternatives. Any means to help sustain the current population and the now billions of people who live the technological-industrial life will ultimately be a detriment to wild nature. Wild nature cannot sustain such large human populations. Any means to help sustain the current population and the now billions of people will lead to the continual population growth of third world nations. They cannot reverse their growth trends before it's too late.

How come you’re so retarded you believe everything the tv tells you without question then acts smart because not everyone is a sheep like you?

>muh global warming
Don’t you mean climate change? Seeing as how there hasn’t been any warming for about 15 years I’m sure you guys tried to put a PR spin on it and now you call it climate change

>some scientists said this but the majority said otherwise
And? The climate models they use are consistently wrong. The ice caps are supposed to have melted, were supposed to be having higher climate related disasters when in fact thanks to our use of fossil fuels climate related deaths are at an all time low

>they’re risen by less than 1 degree since the 1880s
Amazing. And what about the warming before that (before the industrial revolution)

>the suns output decreases the mor eyou look into the past
Any evidence of this? And are you admitting that it’s mainly the suns activity which is driving this?
And increased solar activity
So it is the sun that’s been driving this then?

T. Retarded beta male who wants to flood the US with niggers who kill people

>this is because CO2 is the main culprit

Really? I though you guys said green house gases were the problem? Of which water vapour makes up the vast majority

Completely retarded. People are safer than they’ve ever been thanks to fossil fuels

A large part of the world is still shitting on the streets including Pajeets on this board. Global warming, if even real, is by far the least of the worlds issue.

>the amazing strawman of a retarded leftwing beta male whose only here to virtue signal

Try looking up Alex Epstein or William Harper if you’re actually serious

Try living in the MENA region. 120F during the day, natural water sources depleting and agriculture being impossible.

It's already a threat in even the most oil rich nations.

It would mean we will see a giant surge of refugees, it doesn't matter what YOU think, we're going to be invaded by them, and your government will GLADLY take them.

That being said, the only reason I say that it is impossible to stop this is that it may be too late to stop this. Humanity is too dependent on technology at this point. The amount of truly wild nature has shrunk to only a few pockets in places no one wants to live near. Most """wilderness""" areas such as national parks in the US, nature reserves in Europe, and so on, are practically just parks and cageless zoos. They are all too well maintained and regulated. In their current state, even if they are not wiped out now, they will be wiped out in the future as the demands of the technological-industrial complex demands coal, iron, etc. in order to maintain itself and maintain the growing population that enables it. You can see the destruction of the wilds in this way by the continual development of urban sprawl outside of major cities, the real estate development of once open lands far away from cities, the destruction of the Appalachian mountains to access coal in the most industrially efficient way possible, and so on. We can only hope that a major economic collapse together with an anti-technological, pro-nature ideology takes hold in a significant portion of the population and enables the the digging of the grave of the technological-industrial complex. One can only prepare for this outcome so that they have a better chance of surviving the collapse.

>And? The climate models they use are consistently wrong. The ice caps are supposed to have melted, were supposed to be having higher climate related disasters when in fact thanks to our use of fossil fuels climate related deaths are at an all time low

please provide a peer reviewed study that was wrong

>Any evidence of this? And are you admitting that it’s mainly the suns activity which is driving this?
There are 3 factors which drive global warming. Greenhouses gases, solar output, and aerosols.
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/67d5/bd9f9db18f4e4ee4bf2eda8680b5cfcc6908.pdf

Total bullshit.

There are more factors than that in the climate.

But yeah, africa will have to be nuked.

Want to know how i can tell you are a virgin?

Underrated argument

>Total bullshit.
>There are more factors than that in the climate.
Those are the big three. Care to share any other examples. You can include the earth's orbit around the sun to but solar output, given that the further we are from the sun, the less energy we are receiving.

>>IPCC's goal in 2018 was to reduct it by 45%
Where did they say that? Do you mean the IPCC wanted to reduce our greenhouse *emissions* by 45%?

>oceanic currents
>position of continents
>milankovic cycles
>short term solar variation
>volcanism

>>oceanic currents
which are caused by?
>>position of continents
this is something that takes millions of years, not something we are experiencing now
>>milankovic cycles
related to solar output
>>short term solar variation
solar output
>>volcanism
Aerosols

Thinking climate change is real is what the left want you to believe because fear sells. Imagine the funding that would dissappear overnight if data found no climate change? Side note God promised to destroy the world with fire not humans do maybe climate change is real but its not how we're going out.

Because most people aren't willing to admit they're wrong about something. Also, shills are up 100% as we get closer to 2020. Jow Forums is always annoying to deal with around elections.

also, man-made global warming isn't real you stupid fuck. the global climate is ALWAYS changing and always has been

Exxon and the Trump Administration found that climate change was real, despite it being not in their best interests. Also "God" isn't an argument.

qz.com/531899/exxonmobil-facing-uncomfortable-ghosts-of-its-climate-change-past-is-attacking-the-media/

I can only hope

4 gallons of petrol have been deposited into your Exxon account

Attached: 14844.jpg (1280x842, 64K)

>also, man-made global warming isn't real you stupid fuck. the global climate is ALWAYS changing and always has been
So climate change isn't happening get the earth's climate is always changing? Do you not understand that excess CO2 into the earth's atmosphere is what sometimes caused climatic change prior to humans. Now that humans have been doing it on a massive scale, it's causing the earth to warm up. It's not that hard to understand, CO2 is a greenhouse gas.

Saying climate change isn't real because it happened in the past before is like saying humans cannot build/create land because land has always been created naturally.

I don't care if it is true or not, the supposed solutions cost money out of my pocket through taxes and I am against that, therefor I am pro doing nothing about it, I'm not willing to spend one dime on improving the state of the world, it can all burn for all I care.

>he supposed solutions cost money out of my pocket through taxes and I am against that, therefor I am pro doing nothing about it
So you're okay with most of your country flooding? Don't you think that it will cost lots more money that simply not burning coal and using Nuclear/hydro/solar instead?

>implying the glow in the dark niggers aren't pushing the climate change hoax
well meme'd fren

INFALLIBLE SCIENCE GOD

Attached: wrong-predictions-by-wrong-cucks.jpg (960x720, 91K)

Couldn't care less, wouldn't pull a hair to prevent it. My country buys "emission rights" from third world countries which is just a convoluted way of giving money to the third world.

We need WWIII in order that a dominant empire can emerge to rule the world in its totality before any global policy can be implemented effectively.

Any effort we make is undone by the third world and china.

>A few wrong preductions in the 70s is proof climate change is wrong
WOAH, it's like they didn't have computers and you cherrypicked a few quotes

ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/global-cooling

You absolutely have to be falating a dog right now.

>worry about environment
>worry only about climate change

this is evidence of brainwash

Attached: 1542811467163.jpg (598x554, 20K)

>when you don't have arguments, attack
lmao

Bro it's of chan consensus that CC isn't real. About as valid and peer reviewed as scientific consensus. So just deal with being wrong, having no data and a being useful idiot. Science is further along trying to make Canadians be able to have dog offspring than they are at predicting the global climate

Please enlighten me.

All the oil companies support the legislation that comes from the global warming lobby. The entire things a fraud.

Look at the CIA calling out another user for being CIA.

>All the oil companies support the legislation that comes from the global warming lobby. The entire things a fraud.
source?