What do you think about the Russian oppositionist Alexei Navalny

I like him as a journalist, but I would never ever give him my vote.
I could elaborate further, if needed.

You do know that the HDI of ethnic Russian regions above and left of the east caucausus is higher than chechnya and dagestan? Obviously they take the most spendings since they are the biggest shitholes. Chechens and dagi's should just be purged like Stalin was doing. The millions of churka meme is dumb especially or like how China is colonizing Siberia etc. Just some dumb Jow Forums meme/propaganda

I heard he posed himself as a nationalist and that he would put Russians first from some Russian 2 years ago. When watching speeches of him he seems like a cuck that would suck EU dick, let Ukraine get away with it and let chechnya+dagestan separate. Even that zhirinovsky or whatever seems like a better candidate

He's a liberal and I think that liberalism is fundamentally incompatible with Russia.

I think we have a completely different mentality to the Western European one, a different set of traditions. Human rights, egalitarianism and liberalism are purely Western European constructs and as such have no place here.

I have lots of things for which I could criticize Putin, but I would never choose a liberal "muh human rights and wealth inequality" faggot as my president.

>Human rights, egalitarianism and liberalism are purely Western European constructs and as such have no place here.
You know, I really wish I could disagree with you, but I just can't. Your history proves that your character is totally opposed to these things, and you've rejected them every time they've been forced upon you.
Enjoy your dictatorship, I guess.

found the khohol

иди нaхyй, чиcтeльщик нeмeцких тyaлeтoв

я eбaл твoю cecтpy, oнa paбoтaeт в дeшeвых мocкoвcких пpитoнaх

Probably, but the neat part is a lot of them are honest about it and just accept it in their comfy fatalistic way. That actually makes it easier to build trust since they're not caught up in pretending it don't be like it do.

Chechnya should be free.

But you have no right to invade neighboring territories like Ukraine.

Let Ukraine get away with defending it's sovereign territory?

Just goes to show how incompetent Trotskyite neocon Jews like Victoria Nuland are. There was no reason to corner Russia into defending its port. They're so stupid.

So stupid. Russia initiated hostilities in Ukraine. I don't care about what happened before. Before Iraq was invaded you had 9/11. So what?

I don't care if the pro-Russian leader was thrown out by protests. It doesn't give Russia the right to seize territory.

And no, Hitler had no right to invade Danzig either.

That would work out fine, if we were to universally assume, that egalitarianism, liberalism and human rights are good things.

I think they're not. Egalitarianism is not only unnatural, as animals have hierarchies, but also harmful to the society. It slowly erases the boundaries: it equates men and women, the poor and the rich, the smart and the stupid under the assumption that it is inherently good and just.

Obviously the vote of a political sciences professor is highly likely to be worth more than a vote of a bum on a welfare, but not in the "just" democratic system.

Egalitarianism slowly breaks down the gender boundaries, the citizenship boundaries. It is the driving force behind your decline. From the assumption that a professor and a welfare leech may have equal political rights, you slowly go further into assuming that the citizenship itself mustn't be a requirement to vote. Slowly, but steadily. Until your society descends into this high entropy mess.

I support freedom of speech and predominantly market economy, but I oppose the egalitarianism in the forms of socialism and liberalism.

The war criminal Victoria Nuland, who should be tried and hanged by the neck until dead, instigated it. Do you want to talk about Joe BIden's son next?

What does the "right" mean in this context?
By whom should it be given?

In a country the subject of right is a citizen. The state gives that citizen rights and protects them in exchange for obedience. Te state ensures the citizen plays by its rules.

On a geopolitical level there is no issuer of rights, as there is no collective entity, which stands above all countries and guarantees that individual agents, in this case countries, conform to the rules.

The UN is a progressivist mirage. It is not an entity which stands above countries, but an assembly of countries. It does help in resolving certain countries, but it can't make the big players play by the rules.

This is why the US can violate whatever the fuck they want. This is why Russia can violate stuff to a certain degree. There is no entity to handle big countries and punish them for what they do.

So, ultimately, there's no "right" needed to do anything, if you're a big country, as there's no entity above you to punish you for breaking the rules.

temporarily dislocated russian here.
He is some insignificant fly. Media is just trying to make him look like a much bigger thing than he actually is.

>Let Ukraine get away with defending it's sovereign territory?
Wow. That's ignorant.

Attached: 1553793944324.png (218x231, 6K)