You are now debating Destiny. Do you win?

>Do you win?
Yes, because I only debate people over 5'4" tall.

Is this the queer with the fucking weird head bobbing shit like he has a parasite from Africa or something... Fucks kids eh... Not after the DOTR.

Attached: 1547486718149s.jpg (125x82, 2K)

>looks around the room
>sees no one
>leave

Destiny caves and pulls the "I'm not educated enough for this discussion" card whenever faced with someone like John Lott

L O L
CAUSE HES A MIDGET I GET IT LOL

Attached: HAHA.jpg (600x404, 35K)

First thing I do is change the format from short form to long form

>debate begins
>i stare up at him, not many people know how tall he really is, he's around 6'3, the manlet shit is a meme
>immediately feel intimidated
>take a knee and surrender
>your fierce aura and intellect is too strong, master. i cannot hope to beat you
>master smiles and pats me on the head, wipes the onions from his lips
>the only time i feel happy is submitting to my master
>the only time i feel at ease with the universe is submitting to destiny, to beauty himself
i lose

Attached: 1556686607401.png (600x580, 360K)

why do these faggot e celebs even debate each other? its not like they are running for some position in goverment. fucking man babys

It's almost like if your logic can't stand up to some basic hypothetical then it's shitty logic

>trying to debate a force of nature
good one

Attached: Desticity.png (720x494, 352K)

Everytime someone starts hammering on his retarded logic he starts yelling and tearing up. Imagine what would happen if he debated someone who isn't scared of being banned from platforms.

>if your logic can't stand up to some basic hypothetical then it's shitty logic
"And then some space aliens come down"
Hypotheticals need to have a basis in reality.

Not really, if you're building a moral framework it should be consistent regardless of what the context is. This might too big of an idea for you to understand.

Aliens are real

who's that?

is that him trying on an adult male shirt?

ok but what if hypothetically your wrong

Why would I debate a stripper?

I would win. destiny is quick and squirmy which allows him to "win" against retards he chooses to debate. he is still a scumbag father.

I would just sock him in the mouth and tell him to shut the fuck like the faggot he is.

Attached: proudfrog.jpg (400x400, 29K)

>when you don't have your horde of retards to google shit for you

Attached: ass_blasted.jpg (1439x896, 67K)

he advocates for political violence that way you can kneecap him from anything mainstream

Found it pretty funny how sargoy of cuckad BTFO'ed him.

Easy, just call him out on his "bad faith" deplatforming position and the fact that he supports "art" (movies/tv/etc) that has problematic elements in it, which is inherently bad faith when art is used to try to manipulate an audience by pulling on their heart strings, propagandizing, being one sided, etc without being upfront about it.

So you agree with me then??

I'm not even sure who that is but there is something to be said for males who's parents gave them girls names.

>hypothetically your wrong
Then I ask him "Have you even read Locke?"

>evaluating reality should have a basis in reality
>NOT REALLY

it's a good thing that people like 'destiny' exist, they are magnets for subhuman filth.
Kill them all in one swift stroke.

Anything other than killing jews is a waste of time.
If you disagree you are a jewish convert.

he said he supports preemptive violence against nazis and then proceeds to call anyone he doesn't like a nazi.

Attached: come_on_just_call_him_a_nazi_and_win_the_debate.jpg (658x860, 37K)

rekt

Attached: chad_dive.webm (480x600, 659K)

Nice, let's debate

> T. 5'6

on ralph's stream he literally said that fucking your siblings should be legal because alcohol is.
>incest is bad for society
>so is alcohol and its legal
DESTROYED WITH FACTS AND LOGIC

Attached: 1488.jpg (489x490, 13K)

Glare at him and then drop kick him through the nearest window

Hypothetical arguments are useless. Argue the facts. Nothing can be extrapolated 100% from a hypothetical, and that little bit of play in the facts is what destiny uses as a cudgel. If destiny stuck to the hard facts, rather than hypothetical nonsense arguments pulled from his ass, then he would lose every time.

probably. i have degree from STEM field, he is carpet cleaner wiki warrior.

Imagine thinking the Kill Stream has anything important to say. Incest isn't bad for society, BTW.

Marquis of Queensbury rules?
Hang on, it's impolite to "punch down" have you got a pair of lifts you can wear?

...

>Blue peacoat

>Correct fit should end just before groin area

>Fits him like an anorak

Ethical Child Porn.

Hypotheticals are literally how you avoid emotional arguments. If you can't apply your principles to a hypothetical, then you don't have any principles.

>STEM

Not relevant to the ethical and social topics Destiny talks about

Sounds reasonable to me.

no he wanted violence against anyone on the right

About what?

Depends on the subject, if it's carryforwards, transfer pricing and consortium interest I will win like I would against 100 % pol. If it's about games then meh I accept defeat.

Attached: Home-decoration-marie-rose-dead-or-alive-the-game-eyes-tails-Silk-Fabric-Poster-Print-XD022.jpg_640x (640x400, 46K)

>Transform into naked ape
>win instantly

Not true, hypothetical arguments are fake bullshit rooted in nothing. ARGUE THE FACTS ONLY. You cannot extrapolate anything 100%, DETAILS MATTER.
>emotional arguments.
Yeah, because destiny is a robotic psychopathic bugman devoid of human emotions.

"Let's kill all niggers, no we can't kill all niggers, they're humans too! Well that's an argument from emotion, so therefore we should kill all niggers."
Destiny can BTFO of random losers on twitch, but he cannot do that to a seasoned debater. Hypotheticals have no rooting in reality, and every time he uses one just say that you are not going to argue fantasy nonsense. Only argue the facts, you cannot allow destiny to frame the conversation.

In all seriousness, that pic of JLP DesTINY and the Red Elephants guy is how you beat him.
An actual structured debate with time limits, no interruptions allowed, and a structured question period.
His "debates" that I've seen are just "free for alls" that he sends way off on tangents.

>Destiny starts by talking about incest
>I say its wrong and not another word
>he flails his arms around and talks for another hour
>I still win
Fuck destiny, can't even make scene of the concept of "Taboos"

Attached: Destiny holding gamecube cd.jpg (500x400, 23K)

Arguing hypotheticals is useless waste of time. Just argue the ACTUAL arguement as opposed to a second fabricated argument rooted in nothing. Why bother to waste time arguing nonsense when you can just cut the fat and argue the ACTUAL argument. Destiny does this to create distance from the actual argument so he can tear down a strawman because he is incapable of arguing actual facts. He can only argue a hypothetical strawman fabricated in his own delusional mind. Arguing a hypothetical strawman is a waste of time, and destiny does this to wear you down so you eventually just give up. Destiny wants to debate for the sake of arguing, that is not good debate decorum. He doesn't want to open people's minds up or god forbid DESTINY learn something, no. You can't win every debate, so destiny has to create a hypothetical fabricated strawman in order to "win." This is childish.

>"Let's kill all niggers, no we can't kill all niggers, they're humans too! Well that's an argument from emotion, so therefore we should kill all niggers."

You literally just used a hypothetical to make a case against emotional arguments. I thought they were fantasy nonsense? Are you really this dumb?

Debates are for idiots who can't decide for themselves.

One day you will all understand soi is not a meme and makes you a weak hormonal imbalanced manlet.
>Destiny is a meth and soi enthusiast

Attached: 1556558631485.gif (272x206, 1.99M)