Attached: OC1.png (899x726, 552K)
Kek
Adam Scott
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
everydayconcerned.net
twitter.com
Gabriel Harris
Based and synagoguepilled
Hunter Sanchez
Based jews. Get the whitey!
Levi Miller
>The anti-Semitism definition also includes expressing hatred for Jews, calling for the killing or harming of a Jewish person, criticizing the collective power of the Jewish community, or accusing Jewish people or Israel of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
>criticizing the collective power of the Jewish community
Sebastian James
Jaxson Green
this bill is going to get struck down in the supreme court so fast you might as well say oy vey 10 times
Evan Miller
>Inb4 europoors respond with memes.
Won't pass a 1st amendment challenge.
Oliver Adams
LAND OF FREE
Nicholas Williams
>The Constitution
Hold my beer.
Joseph Wright
Merchant Americans everywhere should rejoice!
Ryder Fisher
the hard times haven't even begun yet
Luke Evans
The shit has already passed in a good number of states already man, they passed the laws with no regard for the 1st amendment
Zachary Moore
yea but they can still be challenged
Noah Adams
thank god those based MIGApedes won the courts
Jonathan Fisher
Good point but do you think anyone will challenge it, besides that Muslim woman.
Brody Lee
They'll still be challenged. It doesn't have any teeth to it because the moment it's actually challenged it'll falter. No way down playing the Holocaust or pointing out Jewish influence on a per capita basis being a crime will stand a legal challenge. Obviously, you can't advocate gassing people, but that's different.
Leo Roberts
someone will challenge it, muslim brotherhood, ALCU shit david duke could even challenge it
Nicholas Moore
Palestinians are semites
Therefore kikes are anti Semitic
Oliver Wood
This guy’s entire website is hilarious
Alexander Morales
>this bill is going to get struck down in the supreme court so fast you might as well say oy vey 10 times
Lmao no the supreme court will just decide to not hear the case
Like they do with all the gun control cases
Eli Sanders
Yes you can, you just can’t be specific.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Daniel Clark
>mightwhitesoapco.com
>the gentile mercantile
Jackson Hall
B-u-t but..
I thought that only the super Eiropean calaphite was willing to engage in this type of blatant censorship.
I thought burgers were safe because of MUH CONSTITUTION!
Gavin Fisher
I was a bit sloppy with my characterization, you're correct.
Jaxson Fisher
It's the difference between saying someone deserves to be killed versus stating you will kill that person (or people), I should have clarified.
David Bennett
amerimutts BTFO again by based shlomo
Angel Robinson
This is anti-goyimism:
Josiah Flores
No, I can say “I will kill you” and that’s not illegal because it’s not a credible threat. I cannot say “I will kill you at 10pm Tomorrow”. Likewise, I can say “we should gas the jews” I cannot say “let’s gas schlomo after work”. One is a credible threat and one is not.
Nathaniel Smith
"I will kill you" is a credible threat.
"You deserve to be killed" isn't.
William Jenkins
It’s literally not because it wouldn’t be considered “imminent lawless action” as clarified in Hess vs Indiana
>The Supreme Court reversed Hess's conviction because the statement at worst "amounted to nothing more than advocacy of illegal action at some indefinite future time. This is not sufficient to permit the State to punish Hess' speech
Robert Green
>Can I eat dis?
Camden Mitchell
>anti-Semitism
>antiseptic
what did they mean by this