Quick question faggots

In terms of assets? Trillions. It is rather large chunk of industrialized earth.

I'm just trying to figure out how California would place as a separate country...

Why would you start by selling all the bits more desirable than California?

Californians are too fucking stupid to survive without external help

Probably similar to somewhere like Canada or Ireland. Same goes for places like Texas.

this is quite possibly the most retarded fucking question i have ever heard

youd have to measure in something other than USD. also, we have reserves of untold amounts of resources that are only worth a fortune if the market is favorable. oil and coal, for one.

When you owe a thousand dollars, then it's your problem. When you owe $22 trillion, then it's the bank's problem.
What are they going to do about it? They may have the money, but we have the guns

Attached: It's agout time.gif (162x227, 566K)

Privatize the profits and socialize the losses.

A capitalist will eventually turn into a fascist.

We don't make the decisions, jose

who would pay for this shithole?

-$9001

This is a pretty retarded question. However, a single state would suffice to pay the entirety of our national debt if ever it was sold with all assets attached. NYC alone would be enough.

Hundreds of trillions if not quadrillions.

Explain? Why is ny worth more, than say, Alaska?

? NYC is developed and can produce income instantly. The real estate alone must generate over a trillion dollars a year.

Quick answer yes, but it would be better to just start using the $3.3 trillion the US gov't collects each year in revenues to pay it down over the next decade or two.

USA Federal Reserve Act of 1913 states:
>When the organization committee shall have designated the cities in which Federal reserve banks are to be organized, and fixed the geo-graphical limits of the Federal reserve districts, every national banking association within that district shall be required within thirty days after notice from the organization committee, to sub-scribe to the capital stock of such Federal reserve bank in a sum equal to six per centum of the paid-up capital stock and surplus of such bank,
National Banks are the Fed's Bitch
>No individual, copartnership, or corporation other than a mem-ber bank of its district shall be permitted to subscribe for or to hold at any time more than $25,000 par value of stock in any Federal reserve bank. Such stock shall be known as public stock and may be transferred on the books of the Federal reserve bank by the chairman of the board of directors of such bank.
PRIVATE Corporations can buy Stock OF A NATIONAL CURRENCY.

True, but wouldn't the natural resources in AK make sense in the long run for a foreign nation wishing to acquire?

This

>to wipe out our national debt?
Just like in post WW1 Germany, the debt will be destroyed by inflation. Question is when will hyperinflation start, and do you have any gold buried in the backyard?

Sure, or you could take the income you are generating from the city and just buy/stockpile the resources. Or pay mercs to take over the resources if the seller is no longer willing to sell.

The US is easily worth $22 trillion, the east or west coast alone is probably worth that

O
You got me there...

money is very real and also very flawed. Money is an illusion to keep your attention towards human reality only.

If you looked at the bigger picture, money is the least of everyones problems. But nooo, people insist money is 100000% real which is true yet also very false