Attached: AC3FD956-66AF-4C28-ABD6-203F9FF9FD24.jpg (1242x1184, 512K)
Big tech is fucked
Nathaniel Perry
Jackson Parker
So Trump recognizes that big tech is censoring conservatives. Now, is he going to use his power to do something about it?
Lucas Thompson
Trump will do nothing to end online censorship
once he loses in 2020 the first thing that's going to happen will be him getting banned from Twitter
Ian Morris
>Trump
>power
His only power is Twitter tantrums.
Aaron Gray
the problem is they are private businesses and we really don't want to open the door with precedence of federal government telling them what to do. we need a bigger conversation of social media's place in our society. this shit is still very very new.
Camden Carter
what constitutional powers do you think the president has over business?
or, to ask another way, how, in your opinion, could trump use his constitutional powers to "do something about it"?
Ryder Campbell
Its not going to be a problem much longer. We are abolishing the IRS. Social Security will give us our money and the money they stole from our fathers.
Nolan Hernandez
>Trust-busting isnt a time-honored Republican Tradition
Adrian Kelly
Fed govt has already mostly thrown FOA laws into the trash, so they could just extend that.
Cameron Moore
Definitely
Jonathan Cox
>We are abolishing the IRS.
what are you smoking? it's got to be out of this world shit
Jace Brown
he's only speaking up now because they're banning Zionist shills like Woods, Jones, Loomer, and PJW.
He needs his Zionist shills.
Robert Long
Unless he moves to Gab first
Mason Rivera
>What’s the FCC
Get the off of this board.
Justin Price
I love Trump, but I need to see more than talk on this. I've heard plenty of talk. Let's see some action.
Ian Stewart
all talk while doing shit
expect when sucking the jew cocks
Liam Roberts
conservashits are pussies.
trump is all talk.
you losers are all talk.
Grayson Adams
>trump tweets something
Wow, I feel like I've seen this before?
Nathan Taylor
Trump’s the head of the Executive branch of the government. The other two branches being legislative and judicial.
As head of the executive branch he’s also head of the Justice Department so he can order an investigation into anything he wants. He can also fire anyone who does not want to carry out his orders.
So he can do a lot but he won’t.
Parker Collins
Declare them a utility, so they can't deny service to people
Robert Russell
Courts already ruled that twitter is a public space with free speech rights. It’s up to trump or woods to sue twitter to get a SCOTUS ruling on bans.
Nathaniel Lopez
>Write an executive order saying 2nd amendment applies to online forums. Supreme court upholds it because of republican majority
Was that so hard?
Ryder Martinez
>i-its all talk, conservashits
holy fuck this is going to be another liberal buttfucking blowout saltfest
Isaac Cook
Since they're controlling content, they are now publishers and should be legally responsible for content
Logan Lopez
>Big tech is fucked
All talk. No action.
Benjamin Jackson
link
Elijah Morales
Does anyone else hate it how Trump's comments are either (((Jack Posobiec))) or the (((krassensteins)))? Never any regular users though.
Liam Gray
>we need a bigger conversation
Kys faggot
James Stewart
>liberal buttfucking blowout saltfest
95% chance there is a video on pornhub
Kayden Young
>but not ISPs!
William Diaz
Kayden Fisher
the demoralizing shills are on
Cooper Taylor
Is Jow Forums ready to take the socialist-pill? finally realized corporations aren't your friends retards?
Cooper Gutierrez
I gotta run but someone should screen cap that shit. Totally going to happen and they will all clap.
Angel Perez
>All these conservatives getting pushed off public platforms close around election time
Whats the game here?
Samuel Nguyen
>so, he can do a lot but he won't.
things he can do include...?
i'm not trying to be argumentative, just trying to get at actions that he could actually do that would help.
Dominic Edwards
They're a publically traded company. they can ban and remove users as they wish.
I had this idea in essence. A government ran system like twitter. but that would cost tax dollars.
no different than fox news putting a right wing spin on a news story, or choosing not to show news that makes their chosen party look bad.
Charles Reed
it's also the biggest podium to speak to Americans from
Elijah Morris
Hdh
Matthew Jackson
thread song
youtube.com
Joshua Mitchell
i think you meant 1st amendment... at least i hope you did.
that would be a start, but couldn't that executive order just be tossed out by the next executive?
Logan Gomez
Want to know how I know you are from /leftypol/?
Wyatt Perez
He's been indoctranted into "All regulation is communism" school of thought by neo-cons. He's hopeless. He's been reduced to complaining about it on twitter even though he is president and could realistic do many actions to at the very least cripple these companies
Angel Robinson
Private, but soon make up all of the Internet.
Christian Reed
it will be his plafrom for 2020 election
Aaron Nelson
If businesses can't discriminate on race how cann they discriminate political ideologies?
Blake Murphy
Republican claiming that business has too much power and is being unfair
This faggot is a fascist and if he actually could, he would censor media
Landon Ross
The Nationalist Socialist pill.
Nathan Hall
>Instruct the DOJ to investigate
>Use Warrens plan to breakup big tech with bi-partisan support
>Cancel all contracts with these companies
>Introduce regulation
no but instead he literally complains on the site
Ryder Lewis
Where did I suggest that? Anything that's so ubiquitously used that consumers don't have any real option to not use the company should be a utility specifically so that company can't refuse service over petty shit
Dominic Nguyen
>This faggot is a fascist and if he actually could, he would censor media
You know what's fascism? NGOs and Big Tech working to censor AMERICAN CITIZENS in order to push their agendas.
Justin Diaz
Yeah user, I'm sure big tech is shaking in their booties, just like the deep state and the clintons and the illegal immigrants. They're all scared.
Zachary Evans
>Assuming trump is capable of doing anything about anything that doesn't involve sucking shit out of Israel's asshole.
Luke Nguyen
But as a publisher, Fox News corporate entity can be sued for defamatory content and held criminally responsible for illegal content.
Now that Kikebook and Twitkike have chosen to be publishers instead of neutral hosts of third party content, they're publishers. This will shut down Kikebook and Twitkike because there is so much defamatory and illegal content that the corporate entities will be sued out of existence and maybe prosecuted out of exist for publishing illegal shit. They chose this fate.
Isaac Morgan
THIS
IS
PURE
EVIL
Ian Sanders
No.
Thomas Bennett
the door was opened a long time ago you stupid motherfucker. we've all been under the thumb of leftist technocrats and democrats for decades
Parker Smith
Agreed. There's plenty of precedent now. Big Social have set themselves up by on one hand claiming to be like common carriers who have no responsibility for the content they carry, and on the other hand taking responsibility by censoring it. Not to mention the stolen patents and anti-competitive practices and likely involvement in selling private data illegally, perhaps to foreign agencies. It would have been a no-brainer in the days before the WSJ types took over business regulations. Start fucking them up already.
Joshua Evans
>we need a bigger conversation
gee i wonder
Hunter Gray
>Now that Kikebook and Twitkike have chosen to be publishers instead of neutral hosts of third party content, they're publishers. This will shut down Kikebook and Twitkike because there is so much defamatory and illegal content that the corporate entities will be sued out of existence and maybe prosecuted out of exist for publishing illegal shit. They chose this fate.
You know you actually have to prove that in court against them? Potentially against liberal judges or neo-con judges against an army of lawyers. Good luck
Isaac Jenkins
Ruled to be a “public forum”. Someone just needs to sue.
cnbc.com
Wrong. Twitter banning woods is the same as Trump banning woods. Twitter is fucked.
Jaxon Gray
How do I bear arms on the interwebs?
Luis Morgan
>I had this idea in essence. A government ran system like twitter. but that would cost tax dollars
Being a utility isn't the same as being government owned. I get my power from an electric company, but they can't shut off my power because they found out I owned a MAGA hat.
Grayson Cox
delusion
Adam Martin
>visit forum
>get shot
Isaiah Taylor
They're going to be treated like publishers and sued out of existence almost overnight. Imagine thousands of Nick Sandmann-size lawsuits immediately filed the second FB/Twitter lose CDA immunity
Christian Gomez
>Ruled to be a “public forum”. Someone just needs to sue.
That was an official government account, and it ruled that Trump can't block people as the Goverment will be doing it. You got a long way to go to prove that twitter has the same obligations as the Goverment or even publishers. New laws are needed.
Cameron Torres
then private businesses? have the RIGHT to refuse to sell GASOLINE across the United States, to anyone who cant "prove" they are not a democrat. *shrugs* its a political protest against high gasoline taxes, and besides? its a private company, sweetie. Free market !!
Ryan Jenkins
Now that they are objectively controlling content, they will lose CDA immunity. It's coming. They did this to themselves.
Eli Butler
He should shut down the internet.
Colton Martinez
Yes, but that's not a reason not to do it. No political or social action is permanent, but that doesn't mean you give up and don't try. Plus, it's not necessarily that easy for a president to undo the actions of a predecessor if the action was popular or became the status quo.
Asher Butler
Josiah Myers
>Very unfair >:(
Then either do something about it or throw this tweet into the pile of other ones complaining about Jack and social media where you did nothing.
Xavier Evans
Checked. God Bless Trump
Ayden Ortiz
Robert Clark
I'll see it when i believe it, even if they did they would just lobby the gov to reverse it easily with free market platitudes
Nathaniel Lee
Interesting decision. Twitter/Facebook are interesting because they are effectively the modern town square, except they're owned privately. So, imagine you had a public square back in the day where everybody gathered to give political speeches, but somehow the square was privately owned. Odd situation. Not sure how far this ruling goes to make this officially a public forum, but it's promising.
I think loss of CDA immunity is the big one that's going to take down social media, and they did it to themselves because they are leftist authoritarians who cannot help but shut down dissenting views. Self-pwn
Jackson Howard
hi shill. post you adddress, a representative will be with you shortly. *wicked smile*
Cameron Walker
Lets see if the Jews try to frame the internet for more. false flags to push more censorship.
Benjamin Reyes
Dawg this is literally what Trump is trying to do lol.. as president of the United states.
Why does he think it’s ok that people who burn the flag should have their citizenships revoked
Aaron Russell
>they can ban and remove users as they wish.
They're welcome to make that argument. Then the government is welcome to hold them responsible for all the content they chose NOT to censor, including every bit of child porn that ever crosses their network, and anything that violates the hate speech codes they've helped to promote.
Charles Lewis
There’s no reason to fuck them up. Just stop the arbitrary bans so operation redpill the normies can continue.
Josiah Lewis
Then Judge Goldberg sides with company.
Wyatt Gutierrez
isn't bringing attention to the issue a good move anyway?
the Power is with The People, after all, fucking shill rat
Caleb Foster
>There’s no reason to fuck them up. Just stop the arbitrary bans so operation redpill the normies can continue.
Break up big tech.
Dominic King
social media giants are all federal contractors. they should be obligated to abide by the same constitutional limits as federal agencies.
Josiah Campbell
>So, imagine you had a public square back in the day where everybody gathered to give political speeches, but somehow the square was privately owned. Odd situation
This was exactly the situation with company towns where a business literally owned the entire area where their workers lived. It was still ruled that the workers have free speech in such a place.
Jaxon Brooks
That's fine too, just so they can't keep having it both ways.
Blake Rivera
That's the Cincinatti Childrens museum. Neat
Jose Miller
>if you take your own side you lose
fucking lolberts
Nolan Rodriguez
>glow niggers work in every facet of society
>conservatives silenced in every facet of society
>glow niggers are executive branch
Fucking do something already
Jose Robinson
Two years ago, yes. Today, after Trump's many appointments, it's not as sure.
Austin Gomez
his only big goy is a rothschild banker lol
Ethan Ward
Just imagine 10,000 Nick Sandmann lawsuits each for 250 million. Every time somebody is defamed causing serious damages. That happens 100x daily on Twitter/Facebook. Once the site is treated as "publisher" of content, it's totally fucked
Easton Murphy
It's gotten so pathetic that one has to wonder if Trump's real goal is to continuously whine like a helpless angry baby on social media, constantly complaining in an effort to expose the average American to the powerlessness of the POTUS. The real red pill is that the POTUS has no real power. He's using code to admit that he can't take out the deep state.
Kayden Howard
Yes. he's using his power to use Twitter to complain about Twitter, forcing people to use Twitter to see his Twitter complaints. 10d chess
Robert Hernandez
does it do all memeflags
Connor Rodriguez
well there you go
Joshua Taylor
>Being this delusioned.
These are just Mitch McConnell free market or die shills. They don't believe in country, they believe in safe guarding profit
Isaiah Nelson
Trump works to maintain illusions of progress, as his main promises go unfulfilled
latimes.com
>Yet the bill included just $1.375 billion to construct new bollard fencing on 55 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border — far short of the $5.7 billion he demanded. So far, the only construction underway has been repairs to existing stretches of wall, built under his predecessors.