US Presidential tier-list

He's only is C-tier because of the highway system

>JFK
>Not SSS tier for being a martyr trying to fight and expose (((them)))
>Trying to stop Israel from getting nuclear weapons, trying to destroy the FED and not supporting glow in the dark CIA niggas from getting air support in the Bay of Pigs invasion

Look at this man. LOOK AT THIS MAN'S EYES.

He knew more than everyone on this board could ever imagine. He knew things that would make everyone in the entire world have nightmare's and put them in mental hospitals. He sacrificed everything to try to take (((them))) down. He will forever be /ourguy/.

IF ONLY YOU KNEW HOW BAD THINGS REALLY ARE.

Attached: 482b9c08c746f274e818b8e0ac17bc4160079a95a1577e073a7783c64617b278.jpg (511x675, 70K)

William Henry Harrison was the only perfect president.

JFK wanted to liberalize immigration policy and gave a speech about it to the ADL. He even wrote a book about it.

>JFK, Nixon, Reagan at bottom
list immediately discarded

>JFK wanted to liberalize immigration and the Bay of Pigs was a disaster
>Nixon removed the gold standard
>Reagan legalized spics
Defend this faggot.

Reagan should be even lower you stupid cuckservative. Literally the most left-wing president in our history (no, letting big business take over a nation is not conservative).

That didn't mean importing loads and loads of low-skill workers from 3rd world country. "A Nation of Immigrants" is so misinterpreted, and JFK was very strong on borders then. He was also a life-long member of the NRA. JFK gets slandered so much after his death, same thing with the so-called extramarital affairs.

Gee, I wonder why so many vociferously oppose him. Maybe because he got (((them))) right in the jugular with Executive Order 11110. And why he had to be immediately deposed.

Cause lowering taxes and beating communism is left wing policies

Jelly beans!

>lincoln sss
>jfk remove from history

cringe and bluepilled

Reagan shitposted the Soviet Union into going bankrupt and ending the Cold War.

>"A Nation of Immigrants" is so misinterpreted,
>Gives zero proof
Johnson and his brother pushed to liberalize immigration. JFK had asked Congress to liberalize it and they refused but his death helped push it through in his honor.

Lincoln wanted to deport all niggers back to Africa. The reason why we have so many niggers in the first place is because Southerns panicked and started importing tons of niggers before the federal law passed in the early 1800's disallowed anymore imported slave purchases. You faggots are responsible for niggering up America because you were too god damn lazy to pick the cotton yourself.

Operation Wetback

Hello boomer

That too. Integrating schools was his biggest mistake. I think he even said he wouldn't allow a nigger to court his daughter so I don't know what he was thinking.

Lincoln gave up any plan for colonization by 1863. You Yankees repeat the same lies over and over again hoping that no one will call you out on your shit. And even if his COMPLETELY VOLUNTARY colonization plan was put into action your radical republican congress and senate was determined to see the white south perish under a freeman bureau boot. Fuck you hypocritical and lying jackasses.

Lincoln's position is obvious bait

Attached: 1534936052123.jpg (640x502, 65K)

You have a point about southern elites being responsible for niggers being here, but Lincoln wavered on the question of what to do with blacks. He was all over the place, largely depending on his audience.

>"I want to free niggers and send them back"
>"I want to keep niggers enslaved so that when industrialization comes around and they're not needed anymore, we can easily send them back."
Now which one makes much more sense?
Thank you for playing user.

Attached: best girl 2.jpg (616x462, 36K)

Trump belongs as #1

I like FDR, his fire side chats are great to listen to. Teddy was good, hey just didn’t have anything great to do as president.

this

Get out of here, iDubbbz. You may be a funny little faggot but you live in California so any political opinion you have is automatically fake and gay.

FDR saved America from communism and or fascism. (B4 the fascist ass-boys chime in recall the big 3 fascist countries at the time ended up with America & Russia's boot up their ass in total defeat.)

Why wilson woodrow?

Gotta put my nigga James Polk in S tier dude was a fucking beast and in only 4 years.

Thank God we never went fascist

Attached: thepresent.jpg (822x548, 199K)

You can clean & lock out the gutter-trash without going full blown fashy. The irony of your comment is muzzies love Hitler and fascism.

Lol Apologies. My mistake.

What was wrong with Bill Clinton faggot?

Bill Clinton was the king of the neo-tards, be it lib or con.

And hell! On a personal level I like Bill Clinton. I've met him 3x. He's cool as shit, but his actions were shit.

I don't give a shit about muzzies, how is that even relevant? The fact that we went to war on behalf of the Soviet Union guaranteed that they would have a lasting influence for the next century. We went to war to save Europe, then left half of it under the red boot of Stalin. We saved nothing. That picture is the direct result of America defeating fascism.

Thank god we saved the west from HItler

Attached: ArentYouGladTheGoodGuysWon.jpg (702x1408, 302K)

Bobby Kennedy wasn#'t JFK

Why was Lincoln a good president?

Bullshit. Fascism was doomed from the start. That picture is the result of neo-liberalism, not a lack of fascism. You're jumping to the extreme like all pseudos.

Except it wasn't easy to send them back. The Industrialization in the US started occurring decades prior, and by the time of the Civil War, the South was still completely reliant on agriculture. Nigger population blew up during those 5 decades.

You're just like commies. You endorse a repeatedly failed system, and blame every failure on some externality instead of the inherent weakness of the system itself, while claiming your magic formula will solve all of the world's ills.

The fact is those weak Western Liberals & Reds beat the shit out of fascists and made their countrymen our niggers. Deal with it.

Nothing can change the fact that America saved the Soviet Union. Your country sent men in the prime to die on foreign shores for Europe to be enslaved by communism. You can't shift the blame to neoliberalism. You won against fascism, this is the result. Years upon years of soviet subversion and American fear that a return to the morals and virtues of the past is fascist. Face the music. This is what victory against fascism and tradition looks like.

iDubbz's chart was horrible faggot. He put Jackson and Regan on the same tier

>Not using kushner's picture instead of trump

Traditions are born to die. Human social evolution never stops, nor should it. Retards who think they can put the breaks on permanently are destined to fail and history proves they always do.

>New thing bad
Man if you were alive when those other presidents were around you'd probably hate them too.

America didn't save the Soviet Union, you tard. If anything the Soviet Union saved Western Europe with America's help.

Anyone who doesn't think Trump is an absolute failure in every sense of the word is delusional.

>traditions are born to die

>America didn't save the Soviet Union
>Literal millions of dollars in aid and military equipment
>entering the war to draw away troops from the Eastern front
>The soviet Union saved western europe
Saved from German domination only to become future minorities to their own colonial subjects.

You have no roots or values. Ask the world if tradition and heritage matter and every continent will answer back in the affirmative. the "west" is unique in that it does not care if it lives, dies, or passes on its values and greatness to the next generation.

Attached: tgwstw.jpg (1268x1364, 827K)

This

Yes but when the south eventually industrialized (Birmingham came about 5-10 years after the civil war) niggers will become less and less important so eventually the south will just have to end slavery from internal pressure of niggers being all around with nothing to do and international pressure to end slavery. The south would of not had slavery past 1900 or even 1890. They would of ended it at around the time Brazil ended slavery probably. But the point is the south would of industrialized shortly after the war because Birmingham would of came around away and be the Pittsburgh of the south.

Now again, let me ask you again

Is it easier to transport enslaved niggers which are accounted for or free niggers who were now protected under the consitution? This would also mean that every nigger deported would have to have a trial before they left. Not only this but also free niggers are not tracked and accounted for which means getting niggers to leave would be quite difficult even involuntary.

Attached: tarrant-chan.png (1851x2355, 711K)

Considering Brazil had slavery until 1888 I highly doubt what you're spouting.

>ike at c
>nixon as remove
blue-pilled.

>he thinks nigger loving south would willfully send their property back to Africa.

>slave accounted
implying people gave a shit to account for every slave.

This like asking if people willfully give away their homes, and their guns for the betterment of the USA..

>past 1890
>brazil ended slavery in 1888
>Birmingham founded in 1871
so how is any of what I said wrong plus I am quite aware brazil ended slavery in 1888, kinda why I said even before 1890.

Is 1888 not before 1890?

I'm saying since the south loved niggers there's no way they were going to give them up.

It's that very adaptability that has largely contributed to the west's success. It's how we went from an ag to an industrial to an information based society in such a short period. Traditions have value, until they dont.

Hitler had already divided his forces before the US entered the war. It certainly helped, but to say we 'saved the Soviet Union' is a complete misrepresentation of history. Just admit you're a dumb fascist fuck who will use any pseudo bullshit you can come up with to defend a failed system of faggotry. Just like Commies.

>loved niggers
they loved the free labour on plantations. Nobody in the south actually liked niggers.

Why keep a group of people you don't like? South would have grown just as the north did had they gotten rid of the niggers

You can't deny it any longer. It was America that gave the Soviet Union tanks, ammunition, money, supplies, everything it needed to fight back against Germany, Italy, and the rest of the Europeans. We went to war to save Europe from fascism and left it in the hands of Stalin. You misrepresent history when you say America did anything less than pull the architect of Holodomor out of the fire and turned him into a world power that would haunt the rest of the globe for another century. You are a rootless cosmopolitan, like a fish that claims that water is unnecessary as he swims around in the ocean. Do you even know why communism is evil? Why the nazis loathed it like you claim to? Fascism did not fail in Spain remember, Franco lasted until he died.

Because they provided free labour, once free labour became useless, they would of simply shipped them back.

The south was vehemently against losing slaves and considering how they helped give the south power in Congress they were never going to give them up. They would just make up excuses.

>FDR at the top
>JFK at bottom
For fuck's sake can you possibly get more retarded?

Actually, (((they))) are responsible for the niggering of america. (((They))) owned the majority of slaves.

Untill eventually they couldn't, if they loved niggers then why has the south throughout history grouped together to hate niggers?

You keep saying that based on no proof other than your belief the south would have changed their economic interests. Even if they did, as I said, they would justify keeping them because they would lose power in Congress otherwise. If you remember your history the south wanted to make niggers count as a full person for complete political dominance in Congress but the north didn't want them counted at all. So the three-fifths compromise was established but even then the south clearly had the edge. By removing niggers, if the south would even do that to begin with, the south would lose political power, which they don't want.

Wait a second you fucking nigger, If the CSA HAD WON THE FUCKING WAR, THEN WHY WOULD IT MATTER? DID YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT IT?

Attached: get me the pistol.png (788x718, 1018K)

bump, stupid nigger who forgot we were talking about how the CSA would eventually end slavery anyway single handedly killed this thread.

Yes, it would have, because they would have spread niggers to the western territory and there was a massive debate as to whether the west should have slaves WHEN LINCOLN WANTED THE ENTIRE WESTERN TERRITORY FOR THE WHITE MAN AND TO KEEP NIGGERS IN THE SOUTH

>Lincoln shilling this hard
>thinking Lincoln cared about the white man
>implying the west was anything more than Texas, Oklahoma, and Arizona
Ya so 3 states with low populations would of been crying that they want more population so they can have more votes. Meanwhile the VAST majority of southerners and southern states could easily outvote Arizona, Texas, and Oklahoma, hell let's just include Arkansas. If the rest of the south industrialized, not alot the western states could do but go along with it.

Keep in mind the states which fought for the confedracy are the ones who would of been in. Nothing outside of that would be part of the confederacy. So really the only western territory that would of become confederate is the Arizona Territory.

Attached: best girl 3.png (410x290, 182K)

Nobody is this dumb. This is post-Mex-Am War retard

Attached: 1550255506524.jpg (1439x952, 1.42M)

Soviet communism outlasted Franco's Spain. Did that make it a good fucking idea? Did that make it any less of a failure?

America helped, but giving the US credit for the ultimate allied victory is revisionist American-centric bullshit. As Americans we should be proud of our contribution, but we shouldn't delude ourselves or sell our fmr allies short. Besides, Hitler's dumbass didnt have to declare war on the US at all. He did because he gave into Jap pressure.

All other territories were Union. Unless the South wanted to fight again most of that would of stayed in the Union, if the South wanted to expand it simply would of gone into Mexico.

Yes you're right they did want slavery to expand west but once the civil war happens and the CSA wins, now it's an actual thing between 2 nations, not just different political groups. So if you want to know the western bounds of the confederate states of america, it'd be Yuma, Arizona (unless they take all of mexico.)

>He forgets the part in the Civil War when the CSA invaded US territory.

From the thumbnail, I thought the gears were Jew stars, and ranking how jewish they were.

That's honestly the only way you should do any ranking list.

Literal treason with the Iran/Contras affair

Jackson was the best President in American history and y*nkees are nigger loving race traitors.

>George Washington
>SSS

OP is probably still in high school.

hahaahahaahah
it's a shame you're too far gone to feel regret when your pipe dreams inevitably collapse

Eisenhower is at least A tier, you fucking punk.

We are talking about post civil war. All they could really do is get the area cicled in red, the other territories would simply just not work. It would be better to just take the rest of the arizona territory and head to Mexico. Most southern politicians wanted to spread west but only to a point, their eyes were also on Mexico and the rest of the Caribbean. The point wasn't to take slavery as far west as possible but to keep expanding slavery. If a place isn't suitable for slavery then they would of just gone down to mexico and centeral America. (and this was in the talks before the civil war by the likes of Jefferson Davis.) Sure they didn't like how the union denied them quite a few territories but it's not like the confedracy could simply claim places like Nebraska and Kansas where they had their own little war over slavery.

the point of the war was that the CSA wanted independence from the United States, the United States wanted to recapture the south. So when the south marched into Union territory, the point was to put pressure on washington to stop the war. The confederates were not trying to take over the United States, they were just looking for Independence.

Attached: best girl 4.jpg (640x480, 61K)

Independence to spread niggers everywhere and anywhere. Secession was unconstitutional and the south was nothing but a nigger loving aristocracy.

Attached: Theodore Roosevelt on the white race.jpg (2407x768, 504K)

Deal was Amnesty, but e-verify. They passed on the e-verify. Didn't implement it. Large Farmers wanted more pickers. Surprisingly, no one talks about illegals being the source of e-coli in the produce.

They poo in the fields of broccoli and lettuce. Inspectors shutdown farms if they find toilet paper in the fields. You notice the press never talkabout the source of the e-coli, only the farms. The left would be outraged if you told them why there is e-coli in the produce.

Whats wrong with Nixon?

I think it's safe to say that FDR was the worst US president in history, right?

Nixon had no choice, the US didn't have the gold reserves and France and West Germany were calling our bluff.

Woodrow Wilson
>Signed the Federal Reserve into law
>Brought the US into World War I
>Didn't fight hard enough during the Versailles peace treaty and screwed over Germany when they didn't even start the war
Wilson led to World War II. Wilson single-handedly ruined everything

NAFTA, turning the Democrats into another party completely controlled by Wall Street Jews, Waco, the Assault Weapons Ban, bombing Serbia for no fucking reason, selling military secrets to China.

>Lincoln lover
Who set them free? Who let them be niggers out of control? Who was the president which ran on an abolitionist platform? Who was the president which killed 600,000 good men and burned half the nation down? Who was the president which decided that, even though the south had seperated from the union which means 97-98% of niggers in the country were now not in America, fought a war to get them back?

Yes I believe it was Lincoln who did all of that. I don't get any yankees love lincoln so much, Lincoln is the reason you have so many niggers, if only he didn't fight the south they would of not been in the USA. Reguardless if niggers stayed in the CSA or were sent back to africa, they would of not been in the USA.

Attached: best girl 6.png (540x590, 620K)

I typed out that trump should be put in the "remove from history" tier but realized it's probably a good thing for us to be reminded that elections stop meaning anything when your government becomes truly oppressive and openly aims to replace you

Who kept bringing them over here? Who let niggers stay in the country? Who ran on a platform wanting more slaves? Who seceded illegally and started a war and Fort Sumter? Who was the part of the country that went from majority white to minority white for as much slave labor as possible decided they were going to fight so that they can keep niggers?

Yes I believe it was the south who did all of that. I don't get any southerners love the Confederacy so much, the south is the reason we have so many niggers, if only they got rid of them then the US would have been almost 100% white. Regardless, if the CSA would have won or didn't spread them into western territory, there were niggers on this continent they wanted to keep.

>Who kept bringing them over here?
Slave traders who then sold them to people
>Who let niggers stay in the country?
Lincoln and every president after him
> Who ran on a platform wanting more slaves?
slaves, not free niggers
>Who seceded illegally and started a war and Fort Sumter?
The United States fought a war aginast the UK for a 3% tea tax, I think the USA can't say anything about "illegal secession."
>Who was the part of the country that went from majority white to minority white for as much slave labor as possible decided they were going to fight so that they can keep niggers?
Okay so when they're slaves, they're under control, then they're SET FREE (by yankee doodles) they become a problem. You think we let niggers out in society? They were in chains, they were not able to be niggers.
>the south is the reason we have so many niggers
The Plantation owners and slave traders are why we have niggers, Lincoln is the reason why they're not under control, let alone still here in the first place.
>if only they got rid of them then the US would have been almost 100% white.
Ya and we see how a Union victory totally achieved that to this day
> if the CSA would have won or didn't spread them into western territory, there were niggers on this continent they wanted to keep.
In chains and were much easier to handle. Ya and how would you ship free black men away from the united states? How are you going to round up people under the consitution and find, capture, and ship hundreds of thousonds of people across the atlantic to where? We didn't even have a colony over there that shit ended before the civil war. Do you think it's easier to gather together slaves in chains and ship them away to africa or free men who probably didn't want to go back and would fight pretty damn hard to stay here?

Ya tell me how Lincoln planned to go through with this plan?

Attached: nagisa.jpg (403x403, 21K)