The Worker

UBI would do nothing but raise the bar, like increasing minimum wage so walmart workers get priced out of state health plans.

>Free Market Capitalist have destroyed our countries
No pluralism has

Meaningless word salad. Other than sitting around doing absolutely nothing what do you suggest people do to support themselves in this society?

This is an interesting point though, about being forced to work. The Obama admin figuratively shit the bed by not creating jobs and generating productive value. A lot of us lazed around or borrowed money through that entire two terms. I would have been glad to be forced for the sheer dignity of it. Someone seems to think that if you’re not STEM you have no economic value at all save as organ donors for war or protected classes.

No.

What he explained was taxing the companies so they Gov can pay the worker a higher wage.
The companies would no longer pay wages.

This will FORCE the individual to be beholden to the state. Sooner or later you will be forced to work at whatever they tell you to do.

This is literally 1984.

Meaningless to you, because you have unearned expectations of me to wow you with something your authoritarian antisocial personality disorder would emotionally grasp as edifying. Fuck yourself.

That's why we need to make companies compete for the worker because then ALL possible positions are valuable and not "Walking Organ Donors."

Pipe dream. They’ll relocate to less developed soil.

>authoritarian
There is nothing wrong with being an authoritarian

Not if you drop business tax.

So just pseudontellectual bullshit. Checks out. Back to the fries.

But how does automation draw attention to said value? Corporate types only respect what increases short term earnings. Government’s role is to buy up these enterprises and do something about it? I’m missing the part that makes this cogent: being assigned a role, versus choosing one’s niche, would seem to go above and beyond taxing at a higher rate and putting non-STEM on the dole. I admit to being uninformed.

Authoritarianism has a context. I’m not sure this is it.

you

If the concepts of civilization and barbarism seem intellectual to you as binary options for survival, you might be a fucking retard. Pseudo is about demarcation, so civilization v barbarism as opposed to what? You have no ideas; you’re a typical neetsoc bully. Your type are a dime a dozen here.

If they’re not paying those taxes they’re expanding infrastructure. At some point they have more power than regional governments and there needs to a global power to keep them in check, no? How does this play out? Why do they need to employ anyone whose job can be automated?

Automation is coming, it'll allow companies to make a greater profit, the issue is it'll remove jobs as well as low skilled jobs which many immigrants rely on, this will have those people rely on the Gov's teet.

The Gov's role shouldn't having to do with business other than opening up channels for business' to be created. The shouldn't even bail companies out.

I think saying choosing one's niche is wrong, most choose a job they somewhat enjoy. I'm saying this.

>Create worker scarcity
>This will force Companies to compete with other companies for the limited worker
>They will have to raise wages, offer better benefits, and so on
>This will give people more opportunity to make more money, as well as opportunity of training
>Households would be able to survive off one income
>One income means woman at home
>Woman at home means higher birth rates

> Free Market Capitalist have destroyed our countries.
Commies get the rope

>automation is coming
bull shit

How do you create global worker scarcity?

Attached: A64D6284-6526-46CD-9662-6799D3B84170.jpg (256x197, 7K)

Not all jobs will be automated, this IMO is fear mongering from elites. You will still need techs, millwrights, laborers, mechanics and so on.

You will also have to have the Gov regulate business. Making lobbying illegal, politicians taking bribes illegal is the only thing you can really do.

Also, with limited workers companies can only expand so much.

I'm only asking you what you suggest we do as a society. Because apparently getting a good job that demands skilled workers makes you a house nigger in a gilded cage. I only wanted suggestions to free myself but you keep just dancing around the question. I don't think you have any solutions personally.

I'm not worried about Global, I'm worried about National.

You have to stop all immigration completely.

BUT like you said earlier how do we keep companies here? The only way to do that is to allow freedom for the Business by dropping taxes.

Creating your own business is your only option. If you want to work for someone IMO my view is better.

Then how do you prevent them from overthrowing you when they get more power than gov and want to hire mercenaries so they can make more money?

That is an option but the market I'm in isn't exactly something you can jump into (mining). It could also be agrued that at that point youre just a house nigger for the investors.

Nice reddit spaced blog post nigger. Nobody believes your crap.

That is an extreme hypothetical situation imo and highly unlikely.

Unless a company buys out the competition and gets so massive that it has the potential to do that, it would be illegal and the military would interfere and shut down the company.

I don’t think you can free yourself by giving people money created by your labor to make bad investments with, even if you spend yours carefully. Starving the beast is all I can imagine to bring it down since there is no technological weapon that I know of and people can’t exactly ask them to please stop. Even if they’re brought down another empire will fill the vacuum. Escaping into the woods or the desert and living as breatharians seems like the strongest option to buy time. Yeah, that’s not a solution, so I’m open to seeing one.

>They've given all the rights to the company and not the worker!
workers don't own the company
starting a company is easy, even workers can do it, and many do.

I envision automating everything humans, great and small, can do as a thought experiment.

I think it’s already happening. First we got oligarchy, then, I think, we’ll get global governance and eventually government. My paranoid belief is that the federated states like Russian Federation and EU are part of the militaristic evolution of all this. But yes, I’m dealing only in logical terms as only glimpses of what’s possible have come to pass.

Every possibility has the possibility of happening.

If our society collapses, we only have a few options imo.

>Military takes over
>China Russia invade
>E.U Takes over
>Balkanize into separate independent states

A societal collapse would seem to be no big deal, but I read about Western Civilization dying. No more language, culture, or history survive into the future, the conquered European races are conquered, and so-called whites become an historical footnote. Basically, Huntington’s clash of civilization. Our Ashkenazi financiers would pivot to Eurasia with the bulk of the West’s wealth and buy time to raise Greater Israel as a huge empire, maybe. They’d get a couple hundred more years of technological development and usury out of China/Russia and go on business as usual while the West rots.

But who knows, not me?

I don’t know how fertile are the lands and nigger cattle of Eurasia, or why it should matter where a global corporate entity is located, for instance in such a populous and polluted region that it seems counterintuitive. But there is a ton of rhetoric about business opportunity and resource availability there. I’ve no idea.