Truth about the F35

Most of you see the F35 as a shitty overrated plane, but today I will try to prove to you that it's infact a good deal.

The F35 is a stealth BVR plane, it means that it's meant to fire his missiles at great ranges, the missiles it can carry ( AIM-120B/C/D) are really good.

It has a magnificent radar and it's able to use the datalink to direct missiles, this means he can fire while still hidden and the radar is off.

The RCS, is really good for what you're paying for, infact it's around 0,02 to 0.012 mm^2, much smaller than the planes in Russia's arsenal, even that shitty Pak57.

The americans have the F22 which is better than the F35 but they aren't willing to sell it to anyone, even Israel.

But considering the plane's capabiity, it's a really good plane.

Now, don't claim it's shit in a dogfight, it's not meant for it. Was the B17 a bad plane because it couldn't dogfight? No.

Attached: testflyging_av_forste_norske_f-35_-_22492943335_14_1.jpg (1486x876, 86K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=TLUS3KlAAvg
wired.com/2016/05/israel-can-customize-americas-f-35-least-now/
lockheedmartin.com/en-us/who-we-are/leadership-governance/board-of-directors.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It's overpriced dogshit.

It created work opportunity for people smarter than you, duh.

Most of you think of the f-4 phantom as a space age marvel. It's missiles are so good it doesn't need a Gatling gun

>yfw Gatling gun installed as phantoms were dropped by Viet migs
>yfw the f-35 has a Gatling gun for when the missiles fail.

> 1 trillion R&D budget
Yeah, a great opportunity for smartasses to buy drugs, condos and whores.

A stealth fighter with sub par dogfighting capabilities is just retarded.
Okay so you have a multi-million dollar stealth fighter that can detect and shoot down planes at long range with a low chance of being detected. What happens when the enemy uses a stealth fighter?
Suddenly being able to fire at long range with radar guided missiles is useless. Now you're only hope is to make visual contact and fire heatseekers. Well what happens if the other guy has the exact same idea but his plane isn't dogshit at maneuvering during a dogfight?
>Mayday! Mayday!
I hope they sell them all in the next 10 years because if they're still in the arsenal when the rest of the world catches up there's going to be a lot of airspace the enemy gets to control. We are talking about the airforce though and of all the branches I expect the least from them. They're so cucked they lost out on Top Gun to the fucking Navy.

It's a phantom expense and the real aircraft is black side.
Screenshot this. It releases in 6 months.

People assume fighter jets are for dog fights. Should be called the B35 or M35 for some Missle or long range aircraft.

Most of these niggers are retarded
It's not a fighter, fighters are becoming obsolete, the air force has the shield project, 10 years every plane will have one and wont need a fighter jet
This is a stealth fighter, it hits and sees the target further than the target can see it, besides we still have the v12, this was just used for some coke and condos

The F35 wouldn't run straight in a dogfight, it would harass the enmy at long range with missiles, then, thanks to his stealth capability, it would run away undetected.

Enemy could even use an IRST pod, but if the missiles fail to lock they are pretty much useless.

FLYING TOILET
SELL THEM TO INDIA

So is the f-22 better?

The F-35 is a multirole combat aircraft, of course it's going to lose a one-on-one dogfight against a dedicated air superiority fighter, that's not its purpose.
I think you're misunderstanding the change of doctrine the F-35 is intended to fulfil. Its job is to act as an aerial communications suite; directing UAVs, decoys and cruise missiles.
>youtube.com/watch?v=TLUS3KlAAvg
No matter how good these enemy stealth fighters are, they're more likely to be facing swarms of X-47s, Taranis', Phantom Rays, and firing at MALDs etc. rather than F-35s.
Even so, the F-22 is the most capable fighter jet on the planet, barring your more exotic birds like the Belgian Triangle.

My expert opinion is that F-35 is a beautiful thing indeed. I'd paint mine blue or red.

Attached: aAcd6jrCF.png (540x540, 656K)

I just think it's dumb to make a mid/long range bomber and not make it a drone

You can't be stealthy with BVR because you need your radar on. If your radar is on, you are no longer stealthy.

I don't know what datalink would mean in the context of stealth - because BVR missiles require your radar to be on.

Unless of course you datalink with AWACS and use its radar instead. But of course anti-AWACS missile tech is around the corner.

Anti-Awacs missiles are kinda already out here, for example the AIM-54C or the russian R-33 have ranges of more than 120KM, but they are easy to deal with.

An AWACs with good ECM systems could easily avoid one.

It's going to die when Turkey gets kicked out of NATO

It's shit. Not going to read your ad vertisement.

How much is Lockheed-Marstein paying you, Enzo?

And while the AWACS are evading, its not providing radar datalink to the F35s. Leaving the F35s to fend for itself.

The situation wouldn't be that simple, first you would have to detect the incoming planes, AWACs have ranges of hundred of KMs, the F35 would scramble and shoot down the plane before it can fire.

Else, if the AWACs detected a missile inbound and had to go defensive, the F35s could just switch on their radars (even only one) and assume the role of temporary AWACs.

>What happens when the enemy uses a stealth fighter?
>America ever getting in a war against an country whose airforce isn't at least 2 generations behind

Attached: 1543430890725.gif (320x240, 2.65M)

Oh but BVR stealth is oh so simple according to you.

Anti -AWACS missile would be fired out of range of intercept. That's the point of anti -AWACS missiles.

That is what the F-22 is for.

I only care if it starts killing mutts and brings world war 3 already.

The F-22 is the best fighter on the planet. That is why we will already sell F-35s to our allies, but we will not sell F-22's to anyone.

Attached: Lockheed_Martin_F-22A_Raptor_JSOH.jpg (2736x1822, 3.74M)

Long range missiles need costant adjustments during their flight, the plane would have to keep the AWACS locked until the missiles goes pitbull.

>It's overpriced jewshit.
ftfy

Well, it sure looks cool.

>Should be called the B35 or M35
Attack craft typically have an A, like the A-10, A-6 etc. The F-117 stealth should have been the A-117. I have heard people speculate they gave it the F name to confuse enemies as to its true role when it was still top secret.
The F-35 should be the A-35.

WHY ONLY ISRAEL CAN CUSTOMIZE AMERICA'S F-35 (AT LEAST FOR NOW)-so they can't be hijacked to malfunction...

wired.com/2016/05/israel-can-customize-americas-f-35-least-now/

Its quite possibly the biggest boondoghle in human history. We could have built a desal plant every three miles up the coast of California or put the entire country on safe modern nuclear and solved the energy crisis and put a massive dent in climate change or rebuilt every single at risk bridge or public structure for the same money.

No wonder China is kicking our ass, they put money into public works and growing real business instead of corporate welfare

Because Israelis know that it's a trojan horse otherwise. That's why Europe will keep using Rafale and Eurofighter while banding together to develop FCAS.

Attached: file.png (755x425, 465K)

Haha, nah, preparing for war is better

>implying there is a country whose aircraft aren't 2 generations behind

t. I have no idea how modern air combat works

lockheedmartin.com/en-us/who-we-are/leadership-governance/board-of-directors.html

>Daniel F. Akerson
>Director since February 2014

>David B. Burritt
>Director since April 2008

>Bruce A. Carlson
>Retired U.S. Air Force General
>Director since July 2015

>James O. Ellis, Jr.
>Retired President and Chief Executive Officer, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
>Director since November 2004

>Thomas J. Falk
>Executive Chairman, Kimberly-Clark Corporation
>Director since June 2010

>Ilene S. Gordon
>Retired Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer, Ingredion Incorporated
>Director since June 2016

>Marillyn A. Hewson
>Chairman, President & CEO

>Vicki A. Hollub
>President and Chief Executive Officer, Occidental Petroleum Corporation
>Director since July 2018

>Jeh C. Johnson
>Partner, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
>Director since January 2018

>James D. Taiclet, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer American Tower Corporation
>Director since January 2018

Attached: hfuw-board-of-directors.png (800x531, 556K)

>stealth
There's a pretty good chance that hypersonic flight is already mastered and stealth tech is already outdated. Some people speculate that the US, China and Russia figured out hypersonic flight a decade ago but nobody has shown their cards yet for obvious reasons.

Russian propaganda would have us believe that it is, of course if they can kill it in committee before they are delivered it would be a great victory for the technological underdog.

Don't be a commie stooge.

Attached: Pierre Sprey.jpg (1236x888, 202K)

Remove Russia from that list, they can barely afford to keep their old jets running, mind creating new tech.

Hypersonic weapons are pretty much garbage on paper, the fact that they go fast isn't enough to compensate the cons.

Fighters became overpriced shit the day people invented guided missiles.

Need a man on the trigger so to speak

my paper airplanes don't crash

Your the user who deeply believes nations have fully developed hypersonic tech and are hiding it for “reasons”?

Depends on the mission, operating costs vs minimum capablities required.

Since when does global powers show their cards with shit like this? The US public didn't know much about the B-2 or Blackbird for years after they were already in the skies.

We still don't know what the fuck the X-37b's is being used for. We also know China has been developing hyper sonic shit but nobody has seen anything.

If anyone benefits for the perception that the US armed forces are weak, it is the US amred forces. Get the people scared and spending

Attached: GXWdZ4YVn.jpg (782x810, 146K)

This.
While the X-32 would've been better, you have to be an idiot to hate the F-35

the F-35 makes literally no difference to our force posture. It will never see a meaningful combat role beyond the occasional Superbowl flyover.

However, it is an excellent way to raise funds for private military contractors to make boatloads of cash by selling them to foreign regimes

>since when do global powers make their nuke capable platforms public
Since Hiroshima m8. It’s a basic deference principle.

>it means that it's meant to fire his missiles at great ranges
Have you ever heard a story about the F-4 Phantom gun pods

Attached: IMG0087.jpg (1280x1920, 600K)

>1960s tech required gun pods
>this applies to 2019
This argument is so pol.

We can't even make F-22s any more because the kikes in Congress ordered the tools destroyed. The F-35 is a flying hunk of shit that will cost us a war in the near future.

Nice Lockheed shill thread

>F35
>Most expensive military program in military history
>Not a fighter air vehicle, see f22
>Due to RCS requirements, insufficient loadout to perform A-designation role
>hideously expensive to operate on a per hour basis
>low flight hours before maintenance
>literally unsupportable due to Lockheed's logistics software

It literally serves not role other than being a low RCS plane

Aviationfag here.

What's important is the fact that the F-35 is a flying comms hub, they don't necessarily need direct radar to get a solid lock on a target, they are being beamed information from a minimum of 3 military satellites which helps paint a live 3D picture of the enemy, once it's in close enough range, the flight guidance system is handed over to the missile's own tiny radar and it closes in for the hard kill.

Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. How's that for an argument, chump?

Attached: 1544579490512.jpg (222x227, 12K)

>>yfw the f-35 has a Gatling gun for when the missiles fail.
only the air force version has the gun installed internally. The rest use stealth gunpods for air to surface support if the mission needs it.

tl;dr we should be exploring space

It’s not one. It’s a fortune cookie level saying. The idea that history repeats itself is one of the dumbest concepts that came from the Marxist camp.

Canadian next fighter offered at the end of this year. In the running are

> F35
> Super Hornet
> Eurofighter
> Gripen

The first two can be wrote off - F35 is political poison up here because of the $ cost, and the Super Hornet is produced by Boeing who fucked over Bombardier.

That leaves Gripen and the Typhoon. Which will it be? Airbus and Bombardier have a close relationship now so there is potential to produce them in Canada.

>good deal
Assuming your points are correct, none of them can justify the amount of money spent on this fucking plane. It is just another scam to funnel more money into the defense industry. An aircraft like this will never serve in any significant capacity other than dick waving. Basically what said. In any case, the days of winning wars in a traditional sense are long gone. It's all about creating perpetual states of instability by funding and supplying third world proxy forces. Explain how the F-35 will contribute anything of value in the current state of warfare, even in a hypothetical muh Russia or China scenario if that's all you can come up with.

Attached: 1479226551626.png (497x576, 1.09M)

>The F-22 is the best fighter on the planet
Agreed, for now. Wait until UCAV come onto the scene and are capable of pulling >9g sustained maneuvers.

Okay, well, then have fun losing air battles in a really expensive way.

>That leaves Gripen and the Typhoon
we're not that gay
it's gonna be the super hornet and enough f35s to not piss off sam.
and if we're talking north american air defence, let's also build a bunch of those latest f15s on the cheap please.

Attached: thicc.jpg (559x314, 53K)

>it's gonna be the super hornet
Are we fuck going to buy Boeing.

that's like saying are we gonna shop at walmart

Holy shit. A knowledgeable guinea. Color me impressed.

Isn't the whole point of the F35 that it's an amazing computer and radar, with a subpar plane attached to it?

First it was awacs, now it's satellites, will they have God whispering into their ears next?

>"Yeah, that cunt took my name in vain."

This, some parts are being made in Erdogan's shed. When USrael refuses Turkey the F-35 he'll rage quit and is going to buy Russian stuff.

To be this committed to a bad argument is impressive.

I am pretty sure they are just playing Washington and Moscow off of each other to get the best deal.

I don't know, why did the US refuse to supply the Patriot system?

For the price it should be able to transform into a walking robot.

For this price it should have a coating that doesn't wash off in rain like with the F-22.

So are drones and 1000x cheaper, argument discarded

>into the trash it goes

This is why I say that the USA is already a socialist regime, it just happens to be one that doesn't happen to like its citizens

>The F35 is a stealth BVR plane, it means that it's meant to fire his missiles at great ranges, the missiles it can carry ( AIM-120B/C/D) are really good.
>It has a magnificent radar and it's able to use the datalink to direct missiles, this means he can fire while still hidden and the radar is off.

None of that should cost 10 trillion dollars, rabbi

like this hasn't been common knowledge for at least 10 years. if you live near an air force or navy base and look up at the sky on clear nights there's a 50% chance you've seen a TR3B

so this is what hit the Pentagon, huh.

Yeah unless you've seen it fly you cant talk shit. Its fucking impressive

i can't believe people haven't realized that the entire human race could be fed, clothed, sheltered, and educated for half the money we spend on developing pointless weapons and maintaining useless overseas military bases.

the coming awakening will be quite painless because all it will entail is a simple awakening to the truth that war is outdated. once technology is advanced enough, it's pointless to try to blow each other up.

Fuck humans. We want war planes. Brrrrrrrrrt

The amount of pollution and environmental destruction the world's militaries get away with is absolutely criminal. It would be one thing if they actually fought each other total war style and we had half a billion population reduction and end up with new cutting edge advancements that actually make it to the public. Instead all you have is a ton of giant barges shitting up the ocean not killing anything except marine animals while cocksuckers in the US government are telling me my shitty old Delorean is destroying their planet

Brrrrrrraaaaaaaaappppppp

F35 being a shit plane is a perfect example of a psyop in action.
Btw the actual cost of each plane is $135million
You will never believe where the rest of the money goes...

>The americans have the F22 which is better than the F35
that's the point idiot

No plane is going to out maneuver the F35. Sorry just not going to happen. Who cares what it costs..not like we Americans have any say in what our tax dollars go to. That plane is bad ass and all of 3rd world countries should be scared as fuck

seattle?
underrated post

>Truth about the F35

The truth is that your government cancel the order because they are crap.

The other thing people aren't realizing is it can essentially be the targeting for other peoples missiles.

All you need is a cargo plane as missile truck near by firing an endless barrage of missiles.

All those sensors aren't there for no reason. Range on AA/AGM these days is crazy. 35s are an adhoc network of somebody getting F'd in the A.

Work on cleaning all the human shit of your sidewalks

Because linking up a Russian system and a US system would be a huge security risk.

Off

>"Stealth"
>Over reliance on missile techm ignoring potential for counter measures either current or future
>Slower and larger than the plane it's supposed to replace
>Repeating the same mistakes of the F4

F35 is the definition of a sitting duck.

The F35 could knock Kangarooland off the map in 30 minutes..go put that on your barbie.

What? I thought they bought the Russian system after the refusal.

Attached: wait-a-sec-28037193.png (500x400, 82K)