Why are they talking about the genocide of the Indians so far no one film is not removed...

You can't really control disease. The Black Death rolled in from China, and the natives gave Yaws to the Europeans in return. Wherever people interact (even indirectly through animals, as with what happened in America, I believe it was either otters or beavers that spread it so widely) disease will have a chance to leap and take root.

>100 millon

there were just over 5 million naitives in usa when the pilgrims arrived and over 90% died from diseases

No, once again people with low-IQ and highly motivated reasoning fail at basic reasoning. Those numbers are based on average populations given city level societies and farming which was not occurring outside of mexico in colonel times. Also, by most first hand accounts most native populations where disseminated by diseases. And Europeans had no understanding of Germ theory of disease. The idea of carriers of disease was an unknown concept. youtube.com/watch?v=WNHKDJzgqJg

1492 Columbus sales the ocean blue.
He encounters Indians in central America.
To celebrate his arrival they perform human sacrifices and worship snakes.
To the 1500s Catholic, it would appear that they worshiped Satan.
A few conquistadors (couple of 1000s) were sent, who converted and rallied the tribes that Aztecs had enslaved to fight the Aztecs. Similar story with the Inca / Mayans. This is were most war deaths occurred, by Indians supported by Europeans.
Additionally diseases were exchanged, they got small pox / measles, and we got syphilis (which killed 100+ million but is never mentioned).
Over the course of the next 100 years, there were very few Europeans in the Americas, but during this time 3 plagues swept across the land. One was small pox / measles, and the other two were the plague and a hemorrhagic fever both native the the Americas.
At the start, there were ~70-90 million Indians in North and Central America.
By the time the settlers began arriving in 1600, there were only 7-9 million.
For context greater London was ~10 million.

For context on who did what in the treatment of Indians, you need to ask which European country and which tribe.
Over time, relationships were vastly different.

Take the Dakota, who lead raids and murdered 1000s of settlers after the Minnesota territories bought land from the Dakota. Also if you think the Indians didn't have a concept of land ownership, treaties, and what they traded you are not the sharpest spoon in the drawer. Then they executed ~35 Indians that had murdered men, women, and children.
Fast forward today, Minnesota is not bending over to apologize for executing murderous Indians, and renaming stuff to the Dakota language. Because we cannot have things named after people who supported segregation or owned slaves, because the Dakota totally didn't do such things.

>there were 100 million natives in the US and Canada

Not. Even. Close.

>American soil

This is your way of saying the AmericaS, plural, correct? Disingenuous trickster-wannabe.

Attached: !!!!!!!.jpg (652x653, 70K)

>the diseases should have arrived before the carriers of said diseases

Oh my fuck are you ever retarded.

Attached: ...............jpg (256x256, 11K)

London did not have 10 million inhabitants in the 1600's you fucking clinical case.

SO MUCH STUPID ON THE CHANS TONIGHT HOLY SHIT.

IT MUSTA BEN DA JOOS

>100 million savages who need 4 squarekilometers to feed themselves per capita

Fake and gay.

They didn’t even have agriculture in any meaningful way, and they lived a completely nomadic lifestyle, but retards still think they’re were over a hundred million of them, complete bullshit.

The greatest argument against immigration is straight from apologist leftist rhetoric.

Speak English what the fuck

Nigger

Bullshit, claims of huge death by disease are only used to support these ridiculous population estimates

In reality the populations in America was very small, 2 million max.

They had big cities. But they were destroyed to hide the fact of genocide

Blood Meridian, best book ever.

Funny cause so did the Jews and so did your people Guinness McPotato

Imagine being so useless that you were even cheaper than a nigger

Because Native Americans aren't cucks that spend all their time blaming everyone else.

100 million?, that’s a good start!

Here, for example the ruins of the ancient cities of native Americans in North America, it proves that they were not nomads.

Attached: IMG_140594.jpg (1000x667, 103K)

Attached: White God.webm (714x304, 2.92M)

we wuz conquerors n' shieeeet

Vae victis

yes they had some settlements and this has been well known for a long time now but still even then they did not settle that much for example I believe your photo comes from the Southwest and possibly Hopi will hopi settlemenets can even date late into the 15th century and een 16th century - in some cases even AFTER Columbus sailed to the Americas so it doesnt make them particularly "native" to the region at all. kind of stupid.

Vae vicits indeed

Attached: blood-omen-legacy-of-kain-kain-1.jpg (422x469, 37K)

>100 million
No. Although, that many did deserve to get wiped out of existence.

Attached: IMG_1630.jpg (604x451, 51K)

Not arguing these points but would appreciate some sources.

Attached: better luck next time.jpg (1280x960, 866K)

1492 Columbus was an Italian Jew

There were 100 million natives?
1. Doubt.
2. Disease.

Live next to a reservation. Most injuns are closer to talking animals than people. I have no doubts that they got killed because they were raping, robbing, and killing us first. They have 0 self control. Like they just walk into a store, drink an entire bottle of fireball, and go attack people in the parking lot if they don't give them money. It's actually quite interesting, like a glimpse into the past brought forth into the future. Yet all they do is get drunk, steal shit, assault, and rape. Like is that all primitive man did?

You forgot about the child trafficking and meth

and black

>Muh 100 gorillion
We have no reliable estimates of what the native population of America was.
Stop repeating Jewish lies.

Elsaß-Lothringen is rightful German clay froggy

Literally, demonstrably falsifiable.

Enjoy the (You).

>a city is one building

Come on Pavel, this is beneath you.

The "Trail of Tears" wasn't a genocide. It was a legal relocation voted on by Congress. We spent something like the equivalent of $400 million today to send some, not all, Cherokee to Oklahoma. And they weren't forced at gun point to go, if you didn't want to you didn't have to.

The Indian elders at the time even supported the idea, since living among white settlements put their tribes in danger of conflict with the settlers. Which is why Jackson proposed the idea, because he saw the Northeastern tribes disappear through conflict or integration. He wanted Indians to be able to live and keep their heritage.

Almost 15,000 Natives were relocated, willingly, and something like less than 500 died along the way from disease or starvation, which are better odds than Oregon Trail. They weren't genocided. And Jackson's the only reason there are still full blooded southwestern Indian tribes throughout America today.

>wypipo get the eternal blame for gorillions of deaths because they introduced a few diseases centuries before science even knew what a disease was

So does this mean we can blame modern China for the 200 million who died in the black plague or Africa for the million a year who die from AIDS because of that one monkey fucker from Senegal?

Being legal in no way keeps an act from being a genocide. Many acts of genocide were done by the governments of those countries and were considered legal at the time. That’s actually one of the most horrible parts. A country identified a group of people for slaughter.

It wasn't genocide because the intent wasn't killing off a group of people, it was relocating them to save them. It's actually the opposite of a genocide.

There are roughly the same number of Native Americans alive today as there have always been. There just weren't a whole lot of them to begin with.

teh fuck ?
native Indians in Northern America didnt even make up 12.5 Million at best because pre European Settlement the place was a steppe like mongolia
You talking about Southern America or something ? cause thats mostly disease and them overfarming until their Empires collapse, thats a cicle that was in place there 1000 years before the fucking europeans even set foot on South america

Every country on this planet was colonized and taken by force.
Sorry if you can't handle the truth.

technically speaking, genocide means purposeful elimination of an ethnic group. The indians - not native Americans as I'm a native American ie. someone who's native to the country America, were a group of 160 different tribes who were constantly at war with one another then the whites came and many tribes sided with whitey to kill the other tribes until only the Sioux (the indians in your picture, dumbest of the bunch) were the last ones standing in defiance. Then the dumb indians blamed whitey for the fact that they lost, even though whitey didn't just exterminate them all nor start the Indian War of 1875 in the first place. The end.

stop fucking calling them "native American" they are not native god damnit. FUCK it boils my god damn blood that you retards use leftist terminology like "native Americans" to refer to the fucking aboriginals or indigenous tree niggers that you know nothing about. There is nothing glorious about living life like a tree nigger

It's funny how there was no germ theory of disease back then

>People native to a place arent natives
what Kind of fucking drugs are you on ?
do you even understand my fucking post ?

Attached: 1pol.gif (295x216, 2.38M)

The Indians didn't have a country you retards. God damn, you don't even understand the technical details of what occured it just makes us all look like idiots.

Look, there were 160 different tribes, there were no "nations" as nation implies nationality. There were lands occupied by various mostly nomadic tribes with few exceptions such as the Iroquois (who were like the Mongolians and had a tribal confederation). The Cherokee, Iroquois, Aztecs, Maya, Peruvians and Sioux are the only Indian groups that even matter because they were the only ones who were organized enough to even have loose confederations but a confederation is not a nationality. Nations are organized groups of cities, often around a monarch, head of state or parliament. The only indians with a monarch were the Peruvians and Aztecs, the rest lived like literal savages who would eat each other unironically. But even merely having a monarch does not make a nation, the Aztecs and Peruvians were more like the Hittites or Sumerians of antiquity, groups of cities which would maybe sometimes come together for war but for the most part had nothing to do with one another.

Suffice to say , you cannot "colonize a nation" when there doesn't exist a nation to colonize. Colonization refers explicitly to mercantilist system of going into a region like Africa and exploiting the locals, there is nothing even remotely comparable to this in the Americas apart from French Guayana.

Fuck off Ivan worry about your own shit hole

Super weird the progenitor of the Holodomor thinks 100 million is the high score.

How in the fuck is anybody native to the western hemisphere ? Natives came across the Bering straight, they are from Siberia. Why do you think alcoholism is so rampant with them?

My bad, I get fucking triggered by this stupid shit. You're good German bro

then you arent native there either, youre just making a case against your own fucking self being there. Google it, they marched over there 15 000 years ago, they lived there for over 15 000 years, Germanic tribes settled Germany 2500 years ago, and we call ourselves Native Germans, then how the fuck arent they natives ? care to give a definion other than "hurr durr not a Nation" ?
Im not even shitting on Burgers for taking the free space, since the death toll is highly exagerated and most Indians becam Burgers by choice, but your Argument is really shitty
By your Argument the Open Borders advocates are right in every point

Peruvians had a system of public labor that required participation by all villages that were part of their empire. When a village joined, people from other villages would show up and start building infrastructure. Similarly the people in the village would be tasked to go to other parts of the empire to do the same. The Inca were on a completely other level from the rest

>genocide
>yet millions of Indians still exist
>as made evident by their constant bitching

It’s called being conquered. And the total number was nowhere near 100 million.

Actions that disregard the safety of a group of people and end leading to mass death are also considered genocide.

The first settlers were wiped out by a natural disaster, those called 'native americans' came later.

Fuck off with your cultural Marxist critical theory bullshit Schlomo. Definitions exist for a reason, so filthy kikes like you can't muddy the waters with your backward ass Neanderthal understanding. Hitler should have put ever last one of you in the ground. That's the only way the Holocaust could have actually happened. Sorry your grandpa survived being sodomized with twelve centimeters of wood by other Jews.

>why didn't they get sick BEFORE europeans came to america???

The fact is that the world was being traveled and explored, this would have happened sooner or later in america and everywhere else, and if not by europeans than from some place else.

100 million.. jfc OP kys. might as well have said 100 billion

Europeans use bio warfare against natives.

history.com/news/colonists-native-americans-smallpox-blankets

>Slaughtered

ok