THIS

Been wanting to make a point about this so thanks for bringing it up, OP.
>Is America ready for an X President?
This question is often used to frame those opposed to the Agenda as regressive reactionaries who are simply “not quite there yet” when it comes to accepting the Agenda.
It is effective in this role, but also exposes the fundamentally anti-democratic nature of the Agenda. Since when do the citizens of a democratic republic need to “get ready” for their elected officials? Do the citizens themselves not select these officials? Is this popular selection not the basis for any legitimacy those officials might claim? To suggest the citizens need to “prepare their hearts” for a certain ruler is utterly opposed to any democratic tradition.
Subjects must prepare to receive their ruler. Citizens select their own rulers. It is the officials (and their camp followers) who must be prepared to accept our selections, not the other way around!

I wonder what this thread is sliding.

I used to go to raves, all night dance parties.
I used to think this was a new movement, a new expression of the will of humanity.
Now I realize the truth.
It was just a way for democrats to poison children and recruit them to brainless socialist liberal politics.
It was a way to recruit people to believe in unlimited government.
It is a simple fact that the Republican party now stands for the true values of the West. The democrats lack the intelligence to realize that they are addicted to socialism and addicted to thuggery.
Since they lack the intelligence to grasp these facts, they cannot be allowed to seize power.
CIA, NSA, FBI - if you think the democrats are a legitimate political party, then you are wrong, and you do a disservice to the American people
socialism is not a legitimate political theory, it is the rallying cry of drug dealers who want to weaken the American people and make them helpless

so far, the Republican party has lacked the will to disrupt the operations of the enemy socialists in the democratic party
do we need a far right challenger to break up the democrats
are the Republicans too weak to deal with the threat the democrats pose

Is that the "you wouldn't steal a car" font?

What we need is an Anti-Socialist Party. We need a party that recognizes that socialism is a drug that has infested the USA. Treatment means identifying socialist laws and repealing them. It means dismantling the nanny government policies of states like California. It means adopting laws that prevent and inhibit the passage of socialist laws.
What the USA needs now is a war on socialism.
This is a war just like the war on totalitarianism fought in the 20th century.

We cannot allow socialists who are at war with the American people to control the economy.

The democrats are socialists who are at war with the American people.

>ZIRP for a decade because Obama

Durr Trump doesn’t know about economics.

Okay.

Maybe if you’re retarded and don’t understand what socialism is. Meanwhile trump passes corporate welfare tax and my poor white rural brothers are honey potted into believing it helped them, when in reality all of that money will be indexed into stocks whose profits will be taxed at half so the rich can raise trust fund babies who never work a day in their lives but are taxed at less than 50 percent less on capital gains in comparison to my fellow middle class whites.

Enjoy being ignorant and ranting about muh socialism. Also, the only candidate who proposes capital gains tax on the rich being equal to your labor tax? Liberals. Elizabeth Warren.

Income tax increases on the rich do nothing because all of their money is made in capital gains. That’s why AOCs 70 percent tax on the rich is fucking retarded, but not less retarded than anything trump does.

After 9/11, what happened? The USA activated article 5 of the NATO treaty. This article states that an attack against one member of NATO is an attack against all members.
Now, did 9/11 happen because a NATO member wanted the USA to activate article 5?
Did France, a socialist country, attack the USA in order to activate article 5?
What we face in 9/11 is a threat of socialism, a threat that socialist European countries will destroy the laws that make the USA independent and free.
On 9/11, a socialist country attacked the USA and tried to bend the will of Americans to socialism.
We must recognize that 9/11 is the work of socialist animals, and that article 5 of NATO is a pledge to protect these animals that attacked us and murdered our citizens.
Socialism is the destruction of human dignity, and it resulted in the 9/11 attacks.
We must recognize that socialism is evil and that socialists are animals, not people.

FPBP

You’re retarded. Socialism = failure. How many more nations will have to fall before you realize it?

There is some talk now of war on Iran. I think we need a war on France. We need a war on European socialism. We need to destroy the animals that attacked us on 9/11.

>love of dictators

Dumbest criticism ever made, everyone loves dictators. Both left and right admire dictators.

I’m not a socialist faggot.

Honestly don’t think you understood a thing I said.

Here’s some terms for you to look up: capital gains, current capital gains tax, how the rich use capital gains to avoid taxation.

Have fun, trumpster baby

56% of people enjoy the economy this retard created

So, is this advocating a vote for Joe Biden?

Attached: image.jpg (500x500, 45K)

ha ha ha

Attached: kekmemes.png (722x622, 929K)

>Nobody asked.
How about that election a couple of years ago?

And the most amusing thing is that it's yours and the other delicate little flowers fault that he won .
Lol