Would the typical house become affordable after boomers die?

Attached: 1545942023297.jpg (887x370, 292K)

Other urls found in this thread:

zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Jackson-MS/pmf,pf_pt/3056869_zpid/32179_rid/globalrelevanceex_sort/32.47617,-89.954682,32.144804,-90.423661_rect/10_zm/
youtube.com/watch?v=TIXV2NhLb_0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Not unless we get rid of beaners too

this particle board garbage will die with them

That’s a brick house.

most boomer lairs aren't

So? Isn’t the majority of houses made of bricks?

euro hates american freedom houses so much they can only see wood where there is none

No, because they will be bought up by gook and towelhead land investors or be issued to shitskins as section 8 housing

Only if the population decreases which it wont thanks to mass imigration... ow i said too much

I want to buy property so bad. Considering packing all my shit into my car and taking off to Boise to purchase some property.

29, White, 60k saved up. College degree and no debt....NO CAREER THO.

Thoughts?

housing market topped, wait 2 years and it'll be half price

Boomers gonna boom

Attached: 1557077970828.jpg (1800x750, 499K)

>sour grape the post

kek

>zoomer can't understand why a roof is angled.

Attached: 1537322929559.jpg (704x904, 101K)

We will have to take them apart and build shanty towns so we can live with all the Mexicans they let in.

Attached: Soweto_township.jpg (1600x1200, 1.34M)

how do you have a degree and no career?

They will be raided by niggers and migrants

Is it that far fetched? Need to start applying to some real jobs i guess.

Green is an ugly color on you.

zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Jackson-MS/pmf,pf_pt/3056869_zpid/32179_rid/globalrelevanceex_sort/32.47617,-89.954682,32.144804,-90.423661_rect/10_zm/

>sour grape

No, not really. I actually work in real estate and I've been working with some people, attending meetings with their architect and interior designers and so forth, so they can design their own $1.5 million house. They plan to build it and flip it, so I'm trying to help guide them toward an attractive house that will have strong aesthetics and sell quickly. Narrow dormers, tiny windows, spending too much/too little on stone facing, running out of money for the driveway, and cheaping out on things in the living area, like make the center island so small you can only seat 3 at it, seem to be consistent themes.

I'm referring to that one point. I assume it's some sort of spire behind the main roofline, but even so, it seems poorly thought-out.

kek, ok post some good designs then

lol no the boomers spoiled rich kids just get them

We want carbon taxes
We want health and safety
We want a living wage
OMG WHY ARE HOUSES SO EXPENSIVE ITS THE BOOMERS FAULT

>spend 4K a month to heat the place

>Jackson, MS

and the poo in loos and the gooks.

why would anyone want a home like that? when shit hits the fan how will you ever repair a roof like that? it will collapse within 20 years

Depends if you think $2.5 million is affordable.

The Boomer aren't dying fast enough to fulfill the demand of foreign land investors. Home sales dropped because there are too few houses for sale. Does that look like a sign of what you want?

FPBP

Here's a design. I think it's done pretty good.

Attached: Crop525x350.jpg (525x350, 29K)

I wish I could get paid to design houses in Roblox

No, because homes are not expensive in boomer strongholds, they're expensive in young hip towns.

San Francisco, LA, Seattle, NYC, Chicago, etc.. are filled to the brim with young people making 150k/yr+. These are the people driving your home prices up actual legit demand and not enough supply,

Not if reverse mortgages and foreign investors have anything to say about it!

Attached: 1553825076642.jpg (425x286, 33K)

As a bricklayer I like bungalows, two fast brickies could throw that up in days and only one lift of scaffold. Lovely

The McMansion meme has some credit to it, but it's way overblown. Even if they're not symmetrical they often still look fairly attractive.

White people don't live in suburbia

Middle class whites will move into big houses in rural areas and there will be bigass bullet trains running from 50 miles away from the cities bringing those people from rural shithole, nowhere county into the city to work. Rich whites will live in tiny apartments in the cities/immediate suburbs.

Non-whites will reside in the outer suburbs around the cities and the outer suburbs, once known as suburbia and the land of white people, will become a massive shithole.

Unless the non-whites are removed, in which case poor whites will reside in the suburbs.

That's why we need mass immigration, goy. Can't hurt the economy now, can we? We need consumers.

No because America is cucked to globalists and rich poo and chink investors will buy them all up because zion don promised more immigrants to guarantee a good return on the investment

This. In the future, we will all be renting from Sheckelbergs and Pajeets.

mcmansions are fucking degenerate

Attached: 1555791446134.jpg (434x532, 25K)

>1.5 million for that
yikes

>It’s not the boomers holding onto their nest eggs goy!

An even graver sin than a McMansion: using comic sans.

I'm not going to post the plans for the house I'm involved with out of privacy and I don't have a bunch of house porn stored on my PC. Too much hassle to look through Google Images, so you're going to have to make-do with roblox.

Wood with brick facade

>america
>bothering to finally catch up with the rest of the world and make bullet trains
Keep dreaming.

You will all be living in pic related in half a century, only the top 1% of the population will be able to afford traditional homes. It's the American way. Go get those bucks, or live within your means!

There will be a curfew too, due to political unrest in the coming decades. You'll need to be in your designated cuckpod by 8pm or Emperor Yang's task force will cart you off for 3 months in the labour camps.

Attached: podscraper.jpg (781x2627, 713K)

In theory but that's why we have mass immigration, so the prices only go up.

Boomers are the primary factor holding back the trains because boomers need people to buy their 1970s-era suburban trashheaps. Millennials are clearly splitting into the "dude just buy 10 acres of rural land lol" and "muh gentrification" groups, neither is interested in suburbia.

Thus the suburbs will die, and when Millennials are middle aged the USA will begin investing in fast trains so that Jow Forumsacks living in West Virginia can commute into Washington, D.C. in 20 minutes or less.

i'm a millennial and i simply would not pay more for a house like this than i would for a regular 1800 sq ft 3 bed / 2 bath, all other things being equal. if boomers can find intergenerational mexican families or chinese investors to buy these for $1.5 million, good for them. if they're relying on people like me paying more than $150 thousand to buy these, they're gonna have a bad retirement.

lmfao no way. Why do you think they bring in so many immigrants? The housing market is based on perpetual never ending population growth. If you think the (((bankers))) would let the population decline and lose out on their (((loans))) and (((investments))) you havnt been paying attention.

That's all Boomers. They bought the house for $20k in the 60s. Now it's worth $1.5 million.

The reason we don't have bullet trains has to do with keeping non-whites contained, if we built those they would flood literally everywhere.

*Oh and if you think you will inherit anything, let me bring you back to reality with two words jewish invention. "Reverse mortage."

if suburbia dies though then it becomes cheap and rural and people from the first group would start buying suburban property at cheap rural prices.

Let me rephrase that for you:
>will real estate investors receive a negative return on investment?

and the answer is of course not. The state will do everything in its power to prevent that from happening, of which mass immigration is probably the most visible.

Now, some individual unconnected "small" investors will get screwed. But the mechanisms of the FIRE crony economy will ensure that anywhere that sees a serious fall in home prices will be somewhere you don't want to live.

all markets are based on ever growing populations. gotta keep year over year gains in positive territory. exponential growth must continue forever, this ship is unsinkable.

4 u

Attached: 1557077970828.jpg (1800x750, 505K)

Don't forget estate taxes that force heirs to sell property at below "market value".

This is already the case you fucking retard. Look at places like Orange county. The suburbs are completely overrun.

The future is gentrification of the cities and migration to rural areas, with suburbs becoming a pool of shit-colored people.

That isn't how it works. No one wants to live in the fucking ghetto unless it becomes gentrified. Nigger suburbia is undesirable because it would just be a big spaced out ghetto.

Whites will live in rural areas or in the urban cores, with suburbs in between being a pool of shitskins.

No, but it will be affordable when all the kike bankers will be wiped off the face of the planet.

Attached: sa m.png (1920x1080, 871K)

This. Big cities unlike towns are for working, not living.

>typical house become affordable
no. get a job nigger. save money nigger. buy a house, nigger. if you cant afford it where you live, get a better job or move, NIGGER.

Now how do the two foundations compare?

It truly is a clown world.

Attached: 1549837009585.jpg (250x250, 8K)

making bullet trains now in America would be the dumbest investment. Self driving cars are on the horizon and we already have planes/good highway system. Bullet trains are worth it in super dense Japan/China. America doesn't have that level of density anywhere.

It's worth $1.5mil because of the youth moving in.. And they outnumber boomers in these areas, they just continue to vote for nimby bullshit like morons.

>he thinks the better jobs can be moved
yikes

Yes, at the end of the day the bank takes it all back. Ownership is an illusion.

>No one wants to live in the fucking ghetto unless it becomes gentrified.
I've lived and worked in urban, suburban and small town settings. It's nice to be able to take a 5 minute drive, bike ride or even walk to your place of work from your home, and then an equally short distance to go out to lunch/dinner or get groceries. If there are no niggers around, then there's not a huge drawback. When peoples homes and workplaces are confined to a few square miles like that, it's possible to leave the surrounding undeveloped land pretty wild and easy to access by car, since it can be pretty close.

Living in the suburbs has the drawback of making everything so far away. You might need to go to the store or drive somewhere on a week day after work, but guess what, rush hour traffic lasts from 3:30-6:30 and it takes forty minutes just to drive the 12 miles to the next municipality over, where you need to go.

People moved in during Boomers age too. Doesn't change the fact that the median home price used to be 3x income and now it's 16x income.

The bar of greed will be extremely difficult to correct. Even after the boomers die off, there will be greedy zoomers that think it's OK to rip people off just because they can.

Bullet trains are best when used as an extension of general transportation, not as a simple airplane replacement, as they'd be used in America. In Japan, you can get on the train at your local station, 4 minutes by foot from your house, transfer one or two times, if needed, until you get to a major station, and then just walk to the bullet train platform. There is generally less fanfare to reserve your train ticket than an airplane ticket, and you don't need to screen your luggage. You can also get off the train at stops along the way to grab some lunch at the station, or if you decide to change your destination mid-trip, you won't be penalized if you get off early.

In America, it would just be an airplane replacement. Luggage would still be screened rigorously (no pointy items, goy!). MAYBE, you could buy a train ticket on the day of travel, maybe. No guarantee you'd get a good price, though, since airplane companies have gotten Americans used to the idea of variable ticket prices. Travelers would need to park their cars at the station and pay for parking. The station would therefore need huge lots for parking, and also need to plan for rental car agencies parking their own cars and operating their shuttles, as well as third party parking garages with their shuttles. Not having this extra space available would just create a station no one would use because it's impossible to get there or get from there.

Attached: 1528679213631.jpg (719x982, 184K)

Why?

-.1 sheckel.

The real problem is that too many people invest in real estate and not in other asset classes. It leads to an overpriced property market.

In a way it 's good, because housing problems will push more voters, more young voters to the far right.

Good post.

>housing problems will push more voters, more young voters to the far right.
How?

It's typical modern conservatard logic

>Step 1: Get assfucked for decades by an openly hostile establishment with unlimited power and privilege
>Step 2: ???
>Step 3: Take over this bitch

The price of household will only go up as more and more people will gather to the bigger cities for the last few jobs

Maybe in some states in America you have a less of a problem with that thanks to your 2nd amendment

But in the rest of the world this is ongoing hard

I agree that it's not logical. Progression to conservative political views is usually something that follows earning your own money and paying your own taxes. Since you don't pay property taxes when you rent, and if you can't afford to buy a home, you probably don't make much anyway, therefore not paying a huge amount in taxes, it seems illogical that zoomers would be pushed right by just not being able to afford a home.

No, it's not, only the outer walls are brick, not even structural but just decorative. I lived in one.

Roastie mentality. Am i also sour grapes for not wanting to date single mothers? Criticism=/=jealously

Never, because the corporations and investment groups are the only ones with enough money to pay boomer asking prices and once they die off wages are still way too low for the average person to even dream of having one. They'll be vacuumed up and held in front of your eyes on top of a required hamster wheel of debt. And no the problem isn't the gold standard because this only happened after the 90s, when boomers had their last round of kids.

Attached: 1555543495287.jpg (839x775, 91K)

when everything is done and it will be quiet and peacefull again i think i will take this one.

youtube.com/watch?v=TIXV2NhLb_0

Attached: 77778.jpg (1200x816, 336K)

that's the same as libertarian logic

Which "right"? The one who bailed out the subprime mortgage lenders and bought into "too big to fail" so we have zombie companies that have the shittiest products and services possible because nobody wants to deal with the economic fire sale that will follow with their collapse? The one that gave these same corporations less regulation and more tax cuts as they continue to fuck not only their consumers but also the wallet of the government dry?

>zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Jackson-MS/pmf,pf_pt/3056869_zpid/32179_rid/globalrelevanceex_sort/32.47617,-89.954682,32.144804,-90.423661_rect/10_zm/
Mississippi - you can live there for 1 whole year before you are murdered

No you’ll still be a loser poorfag

cringe

no it's a plywood shitbox with a think brick veneer

NO. why do you think they are importing immigrants to replace the dying boomers??? keep housing prices high and labor costs low!