Daily reminder that
Taxation is Theft
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
mises.org
twitter.com
Cringe. lolbertarianism is nothing but a childish fantasy.
Makes sense that homosexuals are statists. They love taking it up the ass anyway.
>TaXaTioN iS ThE pRicE wE PaY foR liViNG iN a CiViLicED sOcIeTy
Not an argument
I wait for the unrealistic strawmans and incomprehension.
>Taxation is Theft
I prefer it that way
>when your ideology is so ridiculous that even communism is taken more seriously
If libertarianism, or reducing the role of government to defence of property rights and against aggression, doesn't seem like the best possible role of government, then you are retarded or just haven't thought about it enough. There is a reason Socialism keeps low IQ countries whose wealth became propped up by capitalism. How in the fuck did Venezuela end up as an apocalyptic shithole with the most oil in this hemisphere? Socialism.
It takes like at least a 100 IQ to vaguely understand how we all get wealthier under Objectivism, Individualism, and Capitalism. Lower than 100 IQ and you can't think past "They have 1000x more money than me, they are not 1000x stronger than me or do more work than me, so they stole it from us, let's steal it back for the common good". Very appealing.
This but unironically.
>not realizing that Libertarians make fun of themselves more than any other group
>not realizing that all the "who will build the roads" and Libertarian meme threads are started by Libertarians
Sad but true.
All forms of govt are childish fantasies, random people elected to save the world because you agree with their opinions, then these people are given almost conplete control over your life because enough other people agreed with them. Thats the fucking joke faganon, you vote for whoever offers you the most comfortable set of chains and walk around crowing about liberty
How did America get to the point where people are so used to the government cucking them that they think the principles of objectivism, liberty, and individualism, are outrageous? Humanity had one good spark in the 1800-1950s where progress boomed and then we just kind of started going back to our old values.
but at least they have their promised unefficient services and stolen free-stuff ... right ?
>Taxation is Theft
Yeah and what are you gonna do about you little bitch
Most people prefer that though. Freedom and liberty just doesn't resonate with them. I talk to exchange students from China and they honestly think their government putting ten cameras on every street corner with facial recognition technology is a good thing. Either I'm bad at explaining liberty and government abuse of power or some people just have NPC genes where the concepts of Individualism just don't exist.
"Libertarians" who support free trade are the biggest useful idiots in the history of mankind. It is no surprise that as trade got "more free" the state decided to seize the incomes of it's residents instead.
>Forced Indoctrination Camps when child
>Lost Blow Effect
>Stockolhm Syndrome
>Ignorance
>Not Enough people supporting it
>Empty Self
Imagine being a fan of (((ayn rand)))
lmao
>we don't have multiple paths between towns already
How retarded do you have to be? Guess all objectivist principles are discounted in favour of collectivism and Marxism because people didn't realize the roads meme was a joke.
Roads are a natural monopoly, just like a lot of things. A border for example can't exactly have competition with that
First road is 10 times more expensive,
And not even properly kept, because of monopoly.
The others, in a free market, only exist if there is good reason for it.
And there is already many roads for going to a destination you know ..
Acknowldge it you faggot
You mean by University kikes with an agenda to achieve and consensus stuffing?
If taxes are the price we pay for civilization, then we should at least all pay the same price. Rather than a flat tax rate, how about a flat tax AMOUNT?
What I gonna do ?
Oh ... But that's simple,
I already do it,
I go offshore and I don't pay any taxes.
Because people like me don't pay taxes.
And that way I have an unfair advantage on you.
Cuck.
Natural monopolies never arose without government intervention. Example:
>In 1880 there were three competing gas companies in Baltimore who fiercely competed with one another. They tried to merge and operate as a monopolist in 1888, but a new competitor foiled their plans: "Thomas Aha Edison introduced the electric light which threatened the existence of all gas companies."21 From that point on there was competition between both gas and electric companies, all of which incurred heavy fixed costs which led to economies of scale. Nevertheless, no free-market or "natural" monopoly ever materialized.
>When monopoly did appear, it was solely because of government intervention. For example, in 1890 a bill was introduced into the Maryland legislature that "called for an annual payment to the city from the Consolidated [Gas Company] of $10,000 a year and 3 percent of all dividends declared in return for the privilege of enjoying a 25-year monopoly.22 This is the now-familiar approach of government officials colluding with industry executives to establish a monopoly that will gouge the consumers, and then sharing the loot with the politicians in the form of franchise fees and taxes on monopoly revenues. This approach is especially pervasive today in the cable TV industry.
>mises.org
My city pays a shit-ton for water and there is nothing we can do about it because the government is the monopoly. They literally charge us twice, once for delivery, and again for draining the water. Hydro costs also skyrocketed because of corruption and nothing could be done because of the government monopoly on hydro.
You complain about natural monopolies that never arose in a free market, yet you have real monopolies, the government, the ultimate monopoly, setting whatever price they want on anything with no competition at all. Or go live in Flint, where they thank God everyday of the government's monopoly on water.
It would be more expensive in a free market for sure
this
literally what was talking about
WTF I LOVE COMMUNISM NOW
What bigger monopoly is there than the state?
>Think they charge you too much for that toll road or bridge?
Too bad, they have a monopoly on not just the road and bridge, but the right to build them too.
>Think they take too much money for how shitty the postal service is?
Too bad you are forced to pay for it.
>Don't like that you're spending money to pay for shitty public schools that makes the curriculum catered to the pace of the least intelligent children?
Too bad, the state has a monopoly on public schools and is allowed to take your money to fund th
Compare this to a Libertarian society:
>Bridge sucks, always clogged, charges too much
Someone builds buys land for another bridge a mile away, now, tolls on both bridges goes down, less congestion during peak traffic hours.
>Postal service sucks?
Use another one, not like you are getting robbed to pay for a shitty postal service in a Libertarian society.
>Public school sucks?
Go to another one. In a Libertarian system the government isn't stealing your money to pay for schools you don't want your kids to go to. Competition emerges in schools where you get to decide between the success its graduates experience weighed against the cost you have to pay.
BASED AF DESU
Isn't that back when you all had the most badass flag in the world too?
I really like your posts user,
well done
who makes this cringe shit how awful
>More competition for a service when the government specifically controls the conditions of competition
Stopped reading right there. Brainet tier shit.
Did you get poopoo stuck in your brain gay man?
Based. Good to see an ancap thread every now and then. Keep it up OP. Soon enough, the boog will start and then we can take out the authoritarian garbage. (((Communists))) and National (((Socialists)))
must burn.
taxation is not theft but you mite like NatCap!
Ancaps have a similar problem to commies in that they moralize anything but an impossible society as being evil.
>ancaps
>not useful idiots for Jewish control
Nope. The government doesn't provide effective services and the free market produces most of the effective solutions that the people demand, thus rendering government obsolete. I wouldn't want some bureaucratic fuckers to decide what services they think i need. I should be able to decide that by self. I vote with my dollar, not with my life, not with my freedoms, not with my blood. Nationalism is better preserved by the civilian population. Private funding for border security and strict immigration is more efficient and cost effective than slushfunding stolen money into big projects every year.
see
Taxation is not theft if the goddamn document our government is formed on says it isn’t in the sixteenth amendment
top kek
Whites absolutely flourished under the principles of free markets, individualism, and objectivism under a whole. Why on earth would white nationalists want socialism for their state? I'm not even a white nationalist, but I can't see why Libertarianism wouldn't be favourable. Without the state handing out welfare and making everything racist, whites would probably be much better off since they are the only race that has a net negative when paying into the welfare system.
>20% + 20k free tax
That's just subjectively defined,
why not 1%, 2%, 25%, 50% ?
why the tax free limit at 20k but not 0k, 5k, 100k ?
When it is fair, and when it is not ?
That's why it's just inconsistent
This. Advocates of Socialism are fucking stupid. fat poor, lazy NEETs.
>government forcing mortgage lenders to buy mortgages from unverified and low-income people in order to not look racist, causing the 2008 crisis, and then taking over a trillion dollars from the people that suffered most and giving it to huge banks, run mostly by Jews
Tell me again how Libertarianism is for the Jews when it wouldn't have caused the crisis in the first place and wouldn't have stolen money from the poor to give to the banks.
kek at all the government slaves crying about needing "muh taxes" still at this point, fucking sad.
This. Weak faggots.
marxism is seen as a meme by economists since the austrian school btfo'd it more than 70 years ago
corporatism (banks,lobbying etc ...) =/= capitalism
What if there is no one to force you to use their paper money ?
(The inevitable thing of the future (crypto, silver, gold ...))
We already live in an ancap society. The free market just happened to breed government and corporatism. Now get over it.
>free market are government
I get over it myself, do not be worried, because I don't pay taxes anymore...
After all ... if paying useless taxes to your local mafia is what you want ...
Got to pay for armies somehow, also everyone get the 20K tax free; so someone earning 100k only pay 20 on 80k, seems like a good idea to me.
Freemarkets dont exist buddy & never have, even in the old days when cash was gold (((people))) just bought the gold mines & limited the supply of gold to make themselves richer.
Dont fall for the little government libertarian meme, only a strong white controlled government could ever stop the shit that is going on now buddy!
Well I think the idea is you need a big white system to fix the current anti-white system
To me a 20% flat tax seems fine to me, I rather them be in charge & be in a authoritarian white system than the current system myself personally.
Based
daily reminder usury kills all systems and you have jewish cock in your mouth faggot
You should be telling people how to evade taxes then. Why waste time with shilling for ancap when we got it now?
Also this.
armies, police or security defense in general can be privatized, and already is to some extent, there is alerady many people that think about it, and there is not one good solution for achieve it
If you can choose your money, there is competition between the means of exchange between people, and usury disappear, maybe completely
that's long, difficult, depend on your situation and demand money from start,
you are against govs after all.
it's not that it's taken more sriously, it'st that is easier for retards to grasp. being a communist, by definition, requires 0 effort
That picture already reveals such limited understanding what constitutes economics