Why has the left turned on Mr Zuckerberg

>2/3

Attached: 2_basedComment.jpg (1080x539, 238K)

Facebook has always put market share above political ideals... they'll grudgingly let conservatives use their service for the sake of user base size

Obviously this is intolerable in today's age where nothing short of unpersoning is to be visited upon anyone to the right of pol pot

>3/3

Attached: 3_basedComment.jpg (1080x678, 316K)

Are the leftards finally realizing their corporate masters are not their friends?

Why does this journalist think he's in a position to determine which CEO's he gets to dethrone? What the fuck is wrong with people, why do they think they have any say in any of this.

>It's time we dethrone...

Who the hell is "We" and why has this nobody assumed a position of leadership over us? I cant fucking stand these LARPing socialists who think they represent working class peasants as if it's 1917

>Facebook has always put market share above political ideals

Uhhhh, no

Attached: BBBAC98F-C879-41B9-B0F9-3E9E3C65CBC1.jpg (1966x1180, 668K)

Dems dont care about that. Compliance with China is the only thing theyd hold him in contempt for because he bans all the bad goyim from facebook.

he's a fuckup, basically

no, dipshit, they're whining because jewbook and others aren't thought policing aggressively enough

maybe he's not contributing enough money to democrats this election season.

He dared to claim his donation back from Hillary's "no win, no pay" clause

That is a based comment

If only. Chances are they'll never realize capital left the right wing coalition though.

last person in controll other than the sharholders?

Very.

you didnt prove anything for yourself with that image

Demos dont have a problem with boards of directors/largest shareholders. They usually cater to the masses.

Pawns get sacrificed in 4D too.

>What did he do wrong that enraged them so?
He's rich, just like Trump.

can someone just gas this kike already holy shit

Attached: 1510554210518.png (230x230, 74K)

Unironically muh Russia. Facebook immediately got blamed for the meme "hacking"

he got Zucked

who's next

Attached: snake-eating-its-own-tail-wide.png (600x197, 211K)

>dethrone
how much of the company does he own?

They want his Giga Jew sister in charge

Zuckerberg is a scapegoat. By publicly sacking him people will think that all of the Silicon Valley woes have been dealt with. Or so these retards think, at least.

that image

Attached: 1511796708784.jpg (700x420, 27K)

Since OP is a fag.
archive.is/v9cnl

He look and acts like a God. When he dies we'll build a pyramid in honor of him.

Pelosi. She keeps speaking out against impeachment at present but the collective wants to virtue signal because it would make their talking points stronger in 2020 how they tried to impeach Trump but it failed so now the only option is to vote for a new president.

this user comment pretty much explains it. look at the battle against "racism." it went from actually fighting against legit racist who truly hate someone for their skin color, think they are subhuman and need to be purged. while the racist think their skin color makes them "superior" to now the definition of racism is "lol, chinese people have squinty eyes" type shit. just normal jokes, poking fun to have a good time type shit. can it be annoying? yes, but its context is harmless fun. but now the goal post was moved. then suddenly "shocked" there are rampant "racism" everywhere and why we need to now indoctrinate kids about their "inherent" bias and "racism" based on their skin color. notably skin color being "white" and their "privilege" of being white needs to be checked.

Mark Zuckerberg supported the alt right all along, and we should be thankful for that.

He could have censored facebook during the 2016 election but he didn't on moral grounds, it has to do with his aspergers autism, he doesn't like to be too unfair.

In the past 5 years, I always felt that he is with us in a way, him and Sheryl. Sheryl really liked Milo, they really clicked on an intellectual level.

They are liberal in the sense that they don't feel comfortable with 100% censorship or the deep state.

They are fighting in their own limited way. Mark said no to Merkel when she asked for censorship, and I respect Mark for that.

Good comment. I am going to repost right now just so it is easier to distribute altogether instead of three separate caps.

Radical activists have a tendency to keep moving the goalposts the minute they get what they originally fought for, once they realize that they can get away with a lot more. The ‘rigid’ establishment they are fighting inevitably turns out to be a lot more fragile than they anticipated; a fact that traditionalists have always been acutely aware of. As it turns out it is often the radicals who are the most rigid in their worldview, and so the revolution can only escalate regardless of its achievements. This kind of thinking is the reason communist leaders who have consolidated totalitarian power for decades still describe themselves as active ‘revolutionaries.’ In the same way the mainstream left still paints themselves as undergraduate draft-dodgers fighting against 1950’s ideology; a battle they won a long time ago, many times over, as evidenced by the cultural landscape we live in today. The struggle literally never ends, because there never is an explicit end goal to begin with. The objectives simply become more grandiose, vague, and ultimately unreachable over time. Utopia is always one more violent purge away. Whatever moral authority they once held is repeatedly dragged from its crypt and used as the justification for increasingly ambitious and ruthless power grabs. And when all their enemies have eventually been annihilated, they have no one to aim their turrets at besides their own loyal comrades.

We really thought Mark had our best interest at heart...the son of a bitch sold us all out to the russian

bump

This is not exclusive to the left.

Look how fast the cuckservatives in the republican party go after their own to appease the people that hate them.

It's funny that the left wants him out because Facebook doesn't ban all people who don't agree with their retardation.

Attached: AOC.jpg (480x528, 17K)

>finally realizing their corporate masters are not their friends?

But will Republicans ever wake up to this fact?

I still don't get the attention Facebook and Zuck get.

He's no business genius. He's just some twerp with so-so programing skills who wouldn't be where he is today had he gone to another school.

Facebook's social and economic worth are overvalued and it's user base is exaggerated. It's a fad stock which is why it's priced so high.

I really don't get Facebook and and Zuck at all. No one should really care IMO.

the Zuccbot strikes again

Attached: 1557340519215.jpg (1140x1425, 485K)

facebook is an extremely powerful tool and makes billions of dollars. i know because i pay them well over $10,000 a day to run ads for me and I make 3:1 on ROAS. Companies like wish pay roughly 60 mill/month. Facebook is a godsend

He’s just a public relations social media figurehead for people to direct their hatred and grievances towards. He’s not the head of the snake

Whats your industry

>Radical activists have a tendency to keep moving the goalposts the minute they get what they originally fought for, once they realize that they can get away with a lot more. The ‘rigid’ establishment they are fighting inevitably turns out to be a lot more fragile than they anticipated; a fact that traditionalists have always been acutely aware of. As it turns out it is often the radicals who are the most rigid in their worldview, and so the revolution can only escalate regardless of its achievements. This kind of thinking is the reason communist leaders who have consolidated totalitarian power for decades still describe themselves as active ‘revolutionaries.’ In the same way the mainstream left still paints themselves as undergraduate draft-dodgers fighting against 1950’s ideology; a battle they won a long time ago, many times over, as evidenced by the cultural landscape we live in today. The struggle literally never ends, because there never is an explicit end goal to begin with. The objectives simply become more grandiose, vague, and ultimately unreachable over time. Utopia is always one more violent purge away. Whatever moral authority they once held is repeatedly dragged from its crypt and used as the justification for increasingly ambitious and ruthless power grabs. And when all their enemies have eventually been annihilated, they have no one to aim their turrets at besides their own loyal comrades.
sure have a bump

Obviously his data got Trump elected, they may feel it was intentional. Yet, how could it not be?

They need to blame SOMEONE for Hillary's loss, and absolutely can not blame Hillary or the DNC for it.

Attached: Screenshot_20190508-152812_Adblock Browser.jpg (720x1135, 437K)

That's odd. P&G cut it's online advertising budget and saw no negative impact.

adweek.com/brand-marketing/when-procter-gamble-cut-200-million-in-digital-ad-spend-its-marketing-became-10-more-effective/

I'm guessing you're primary customers are click farmers.

online coaching/artificial intelligence

The left hates anyone who is successful. If successful people do not continually capitulate to them, they'll agitate for their downfall. Even if they do capitulate, eventually they'll throw them under the bus for not going far enough. Shit happens constantly. For years there was lots of good stories about Amazon, shortly before Bezos became the wealthiest man, all the sudden there were tons of stories about how terrible is to work at Amazon, that it is killing brick and mortar stores, etc. People hate the successful, especially the left, they are full of envy. Communism/socialism is not an ideology that wants the poor to become rich, they want the rich to become poor.

Two things.

1. He clearly WAS planning on buying the Demo nomination outright but he didn't have the blessing of Dem financiers and powerbrokers.

2. He thought censoring facebook was bad for business (its not that he was good but he cared more about his shekels then being woke) and originally told the glow in the darks to fuck off.

Then things started happening to him.

the zuckbergbot is a deepstate creation. a test. the first android already walks among us.

Attached: 1557061811573.jpg (1200x1184, 341K)

> primary customers are click farmers

what are you talking about? I don't understand. If they buy my product and become a happy customer, how can they be apart of a click farm? I don't think you understand what I originally said at all. Let me repeat:

I spend over 10,000/day (sometimes more) on FB ads. I make a 3:1 ROAS. I also spend the same on Google Ads, though roughly 2:1 ROAS. Do you understand?

Not his biggest fan but zuck's a big boy, he'll be ok

Did it take a long time?

>facebook is an extremely powerful tool and makes billions of dollars.

So is Youtube but it's a money loser for Alphabet.

nypost.com/2018/02/01/youtube-ad-woes-hurts-profits-at-google-parent-alphabet/

Attached: 778B4B44-A673-4604-84CE-1F7D38F1F9CC.jpg (367x568, 33K)

youtube is also great for ads. running a Facebook conversion ad and a youtube ad of a product can basically make you a millionaire if you know what you are doing.

And do you honestly think Youtube is going to shut down? Do you think the CEO is going to close it down because "its time to get a real job"?

few reasons: while the media covers how social media is banning figures like alex jones, loomer, etc, they dont even mention how facebook also bans many left wing anti-israeli people/groups they deem 'far left' too. so THOSE people are also pissed, because in a way, they're correct, anti-zionism IS NOT hate speech/anti-semetism anymore than alex jone's anti-globalism is hate speech/anti-semetism either.

and as others have said, he 'didnt do enough' to help clinton, and he sold facebook data to institutions like cambridge anayltica that trump(and supposedly da russians!!!) used to 'steal' the election. they believe its 100% it would be alright for facebook, google, and twitter to openly ally with the left and alter their algorithms and shill for the left, and give all their data to the left for free, but heaven forbid they sell some of that data, that they were manipulating, to a small third party organization that worked for the trump campaign. they falsely believe they lost the election because of cambridge analytica to the point where they have made it into some new giant boogeyman of 'data' whilst ignoring the fact that its a small fry operation versus the actual data mongers: facebook, google, twitter, amazon, etc, which were all openly, SEVERELY biased.

so its pretty funny any way you look at it. facebook is pretty much dead in the water, they'll fuck with the upcoming 2020 election, but this time, trump has the FCC and various watchdogs waiting and watching to catalog all their bullshit this time to drop the hammer on them after the fact using mountains of evidence from the 2020 election. facebook wont be a thing by 2024.

Attached: emmarobertsclap.gif (268x268, 1.48M)

I guess someone is making money off of Facebook. It doesn't mean Facebook itself is making bank. Youtube losses money but Youtubers are raking in the cash.

But like I said P&G cut it's online advertising budget and saw no difference. The juries out if online advertising if even that effective.

This is the purity spiral, leftism is at its base just wanting an excuse to rob people and take their stuff without any justification which is why unless someone like a Stalin stops leftist purity spirals eventually when they've robbed everyone else they start killing each other.

It makes you money. It's not making Alphabet any. Does that sound like a good business plan to you?

BTW very very redpilled comment. You should check out Jim's blog if you aren't a fan already... most redpilled political site on the internet.

Married a woman.

> The juries out if online advertising if even that effective.

No offense, but you are absolutely insane dude. Do you understand how Amazon grew so fast around 2000's? They became the top spenders of Google Ads and mastered them. Amazon is still the number one spender of Google Ads. All business, big and small, run some kind of FB/Google Ad strategy. It is mandatory if you have a small biz (obviously some biz won't, like trucking etc). But I make 99% of my wealth because of those ads. You have a very limited understand of business.

You dont understand why Google does the things that it does. I can tell you that they are fine financially. Most of their products dont make money. Yet. Google continues.

> You dont understand why Google does the things that it does.

Google glows in the dark so much it can be seen from space.

Amazon was a money loser for most of it's history and I doubt paying for online ads had anything to do with it becoming profitable for once. You're jumping to conclusions.

As for Google it survives on ad revenue I grant you that since but that's because it positioned itself is the go-to search engine and people are too dumb to discern between a sponsored link ad and a regular link.

>obviously

Attached: b7b3a1f1a52a0b9384a6cba0475307e548c9f674c3323360f7f13e27aa7a1947.jpg (600x429, 87K)

>what he do?
Zuckerfuck was supposed to sacrifice the little reputation that his company has for the sake of muh russia investigation, but instead he went with
>is all just anonymous aggregated stuff

no you actually are completely wrong. You are talking like these are things are side hobbies like a mom selling soccer tshirts. Just because something "loses money", doesn't mean anything at all. That's not how this works. Cashflow is king. If I were wrong, how has Amazon kept growing, yet lost so much money? Do you think investors are able to foot the bill all the time? Or do you think Amazon makes money, they just reinvest back into the biz?

These are multi-billion dollar companies that have reshaped the world. Amazon grew so fast because of Google Ads. That is a fact and they still are the number one spender of ads. Wish.com is doing the same with FB ads, and they spend roughly 60 mill on FB ads/month. Why?

Because it fucking works thats why. Radio/TV/Newspaper/Direct mail, its all dead. Digital Ads are way cheaper, faster, and better results by FAR.

I make well over 25 million (net) a year. I have multiple residences in USA and Japan. I have a staff of about 55 people and we are on track to hit 50 mill this year.

We do this because of Google and Facebook Ads. Full stop. That is not a meme, lie, or whatever. We would be broke without Google/FB. That is how powerful their AI and ad system is.

People click on ads that are relevant to them. If its spam, then they will not click on it. But if it's extremely relevant, they will click. You don't understand what you talking about no offense

>Do you think investors are able to foot the bill all the time?

Yes. Look at Theranos.

>We would be broke without Google/FB.

You're making money. They're not.

Furthermore I've never heard of Wish.com until you've mentioned it. I guess those ads are really paying off huh?

SV people don't give a fuck about Facebook anymore. It's literally a boomer website.

Zuck bit my dick