Why are Leftists unable to recognize any of the aspects of culture that are Difficult to See?

Friendly reminder

Attached: PicsArt_05-09-12.44.56.png (2289x2289, 953K)

I like this one

You have no place here faggot

You know what? No one else reply to this fucking faggot. If he talked shit to you in the school lockeroom, would you actually stand there and debate this dork or would you slap the shit out of him and shove him in a locker?

No one voted for Trump as a moral paragon. They voted for him because 1) He's is (rather was) a temporary wrench thrown into the system, and 2) He was will to talk openly about immigration.

Attached: 1500946904165.png (1044x794, 395K)

Is this pretty much another take on neitzche and spenglers concepts of low and high cultures?

Because they base their life around shallow things as well. I was talking with a friend about how whites have been responsible for creating such a great culture (well aside from the shitshow in the last 50 years), and you know what he said? He said "I'd argue that Rock music, which was invented by a black man, had more of a cultural impact than anything whites produced".

Like, what do you even say to that?

You mean right wingers. Marxists have made more books about this shit than you could read in your lifetime, right wingers just say "tradition good" and that's it.

Attached: usa.jpg (1125x916, 220K)

no idea. i haven't read either author.
but the image does summarize how someone can sincerely enjoy travelling abroad or encountering other cultures within their own country in small doses. but how that same acceptance can be overwhelmed by unease over what seems indescribable to the average person when the ratio increases high enough.

Attached: 1521391483670.png (1063x945, 51K)

Canada and the USA are not "nations", they an illegitimate wallpaper over the indigenous nations that existed prior to colonization.

By that logic, there are no nations in africa (current inhabitants aren’t of the same tribe and ethnicity), neither do humans have a right to assemble and inhabit territory because we are all awful meanies who took the land from the animals who had the territory before us.

The reason they have to make so many books is because their ideology was pure shit to begin with so it needed that many revisions

Traditionalism literally stands the test of time

>Went downhill as soon as they started letting loads of eastern europeans in.

There's the problem

this statement makes as much sense as claiming that 'Turkey' doesn't contain the 'turkish' nation because Anatolia was natively inhabited by Greeks.
Which is fucking retarded. Which makes sense, since you've have to been actually retarded to publicly identify as a totalitarian communist.

Attached: 1516970311993.jpg (680x694, 119K)

Hahaha bro
They recognize them. They just want to destroy them all. That's actually what Postmodernism is. It's that every system we set up is mediated by the fact that we are white, males etc and that this all that "Hard to see" culture is actually oppressive and does violence to others. Identitarians then take this to mean all suffering is created by white men, which is actually not postmodernist which is the rejection of grand narratives.

Its not about ethnicity, its about settler colonialism. Stop being an idealist.

No it doesn't. Traditionalism gets swept away by the winds of time, dialectical materialism is immortal.

Attached: stalinondm.png (1779x904, 118K)

They are deconstructionists by definition. The more narrow-minded the leftist, the more likely it is he will throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Ahhh old Edward T. Hall hey?

Remember that leftists never argue in good faith and have every intention of destroying every European ethnic group

>Marxist
>dialectical materialism is immortal
Isn't your whole world view based off of oppressor vs oppress complex?

Turkey wasn't "natively" inhabited by Greeks, there was no "Greek" nation in antiquity. Stalin gives us the definition of a nation in Marxism and the National Question:

>A nation is a historically constituted, stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life, and psychological make-up manifested in a common culture.
marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1913/03.htm

This is not what the USA and Canada are or ever were. They only exist and the only common binding factor of them is that they united in genocide and imperialism.

No. Dialectical materialism is a logic that things change through contradiction. Contradiction isn't "you say the sky is blue, I say its green", a contradiction is when two things depend on each other, but at the same time cannot mutually exist. There is a struggle, and then out of it there is a change. This is how evolution works, there is change, say in the ecosystem or environment that makes it no longer possible for an organism to exist within it, there is a struggle (natural selection) and the outcome is that the organism develops. Marxism is this applied to humanity.

I feel like most of the "hard to see" parts of my culture are devoid and fucked.

Attached: 1557268388365.png (170x170, 38K)

>The Cultural (((Iceberg)))
Nice try

if this theory is true when is the proletarian revolution coming then lol?

In the first world? Probably when the third world no longer needs the first. The contradictions in the first world have been dampened by outsourcing, but when China doesn't need US bourgeoisie anymore and is developed enough, what the chinese are subjected to is going to come back to the first world, in fact it already is the rise of neoliberalism. But varies proletarian revolutions are ongoing and in progress, such as the bolivarian revolution.