Have you ever noticed that sometimes the key to changing someone's mind is to simply change up your wording? It is a technique (((they))) use all the time. It is part of the reason why (((they))) can get away with things that should be considered immoral or illegal, but are able to romanticize them instead and call anyone who disagrees a bigot.
Why not use this tactic against them? Normies love the idea of being a revolutionist and fighting for a cause, but they hate anti-antisemitism, racism, etc. I have redpilled many of my normie friends by simply telling them facts, but wording it in a way that sounds nice to them and doesn't directly target anyone.
Instead of saying "illegal immigration is bad" say "We can barely support ourselves and we won't be able to support all these families coming in; if they come in to the states they will be exposed to a new culture and both sides will lose their cultural identity. It is better if we remain separate to preserve our identities, but we can still maintain good relation with them from a distance."
Instead of saying "Jews control the media and corporations" attack the media without attacking the jews directly. Instead say "Corporate corruption is rampant in America and the media controls us and our lives. We need to put a bigger emphasis on controlling the banks." This is already known to most Americans, even normies. Just take out all the racial-related stuff and embellish your points. Sell yourself before you sell your argument. You're still taking the fight to (((them))) anyway, so what does it matter if it's a direct attack? With the right wording you can convince anyone of anything. Make an appeal to emotion if you have to, as normies think with their emotions, not their heads.
Good idea. One trick to pulling this off in any situation is to speak as if you have the same views/ideology as the person you are trying to convince. If you're trying to redpill a liberal...convince them that you yourself are a liberal just by the wording you use. They will be much more receptive and less likely to put up a subconscious barrier.
Gavin Garcia
Heilo fellow liberals
Joseph Foster
No, the joo has gotten into the hegemony that he is solely by directing attention away from himself and identity. It's critical to identify the root cause before you can effectively treat the symptoms of an infection. Passing the buck further on down the line keeps us on the covert slavery path, and proposing to makes one saying that appear to glow fluorescently.
Jason Russell
he's right you know
i've turned left vegans into right wing ecofascists with this trick
Wyatt Taylor
It would be more accurate if you guys did this as it's not just Jews in charge. We only have Jews in charge of these organizations because we are the most intelligent of Western cultures. But power corrupts and those at the top will control the majority beneath them. Welcome to human society.
I have used this technique as well I tell them “it’s better to help in their home countries feeding, clothing, housing 1 refugee in Sweden could do that for 20 in their war-torn countries” and they have to concede. Sometimes they say “Why can’t we do both?” And I have to educate the beta leftist on the definition of FINITE resources
Joseph Powell
HUGE BUMP FOR AUSTISTS DISCOVERING HOW TO JEW NORMIES
Owen Powell
Using diction as a means of producing a desired response only works on weak minded low IQ people that are unaware of their own reactionary nature.
Aaron Sanchez
So the vast majority of the public.
Christopher Nguyen
yes. it's predictive programming in real-time
Ryan Rivera
Another trick. Say the normie person you're trying to redpill already knows you have a different political viewpoint than them. They will already have a psychological barrier up and you probably won't be able to turn them to your side. So I do this instead... Make ideological statements which are perfectly rational but seem extremely contradictory. An example... "I think that forced multiculturalism and integration of different races is unnatural and creates unnecessary conflict." THEN SAY... "Bigotry is wrong and nobody should be discriminated against just based on the color of their skin."
Doing this is fun because it confuses the hell out of a simple minded liberal and makes them more likely to contemplate your "unique" philosophy.
Isaac Torres
I don't think it works any more but they're sure doubling down on it.
Evan Ortiz
Edward Bernays and Gustave Le Bon are interesting reads.
Jaxson Stewart
In the end it is an exploit of the human mind, not a sound logical argument. There are some people it won't work on, many people that it will work at first until they sense the fallacious nature of the underlying logic, and some that will never sense that and continually suckle at the teat of ideological fodder. The ongoing subversion has divided these categories, and to continue doubling down is only waking up the 2nd category of people even more. It's worse than diminishing returns, it is beginning to backfire.
At some point you have to man the fuck up and Name The Jew. Exactly WHEN you should do that is a judgement call. But there's no skirting the issue. When the time is right, NAME THE MOTHERFUCKING JEW.
Aaron Myers
This is all "How to Win Friends and Influence People" shit. That book is a goldmine if you can get over the "fug dat gai book!!111" stigma from brainlets.
Gavin Taylor
NO. This is very stupid and something I would expect to hear from a subversive shill.
Hunter Adams
Wow! I have been thinking about this a lot recently. I share many views with Alex Jones and others about globalist rape of our identity, individuality, families, and culture.
However, why in the absolute f*** do you guys blame it on Jews?? That sounds like uninformed racism. You people are pointing to the problem but labeling it in a mongoloid fashion.
wow youre just now grapsing the basics of discourse, good on yap
Cameron Roberts
I see very few citations in this post. However, let's assume that it's all true. In this, when it refers to Jews, are we talking about ethnic Jews, or Jews based on religion?
I know that Orthodox Jews hold many values which clash with /pol's "Globalist Jew" meme.
Ethan Parker
Yeah, you're right. No one should EVER, EVER name the main culprits. Let's just keep quiet about them and hope that people will eventually put two and two together. Except that they hardly ever do.
By the way, I've had excellent success in redpilling patriotic normies about the JQ by bringing up Israel's attack on the USS Liberty. The first thing they want to know is WHY Israel would deliberately attack our Navy ship and try to kill everyone on board. Then they'll want to know WHY our government swept it under the rug. This is a very well-documented incident that cannot be dismissed as a hoax or a crackpot theory. Once they understand that "our greatest ally" is so treacherous, it's simply a matter of careful, patient explication of Jewish power, the Jewish agenda, and basic geopolitics.
Joseph Ward
Let me also clarify that I am firmly against Israel as a State. I think it's really messed up how it was created and their warmongering nature is despicable. However, I still don't see a direct ((connection)) to a specific race or religion.
Elijah Brooks
The correct words in the right order will change the entire world. It's like a cheat code, working on figuring it out personally.
Jason Fisher
>are we talking about ethnic Jews, or Jews based on religion? A jew is a jew is a jew
After informing patriotic normies about Israel's perfidy, I like to go back to Bolshevism and its leaders and financial backers. Ashkenazi Jews were a mere 4% of the population of the Russian Empire yet they made up about two-thirds of the top leadership positions in the Bolshevik Party. Lenin and Trotsky were financed by the Warburg Jewish banking dynasty in Germany and the Wall Street Jewish banker Jacob Schiff. Now why on earth would rich Jewish capitalists like Schiff and the Warburgs want to finance the Bolshevik Party (whose leadership also happens to be mainly Jewish)? What could they possibly have in common? How could their goals possibly overlap?
Connor Morris
some compelling numbers here, especially of over representation. it always gets lost in the exaggerations, having a jewish spouse does not make you a jew.
have the guy run the numbers again without the spouses, or are the jews so supreme that spouses completely control their christian husbands?
also the only thing wrong in this world is trump
if you guys are unhappy than do something different with your lives and stop blaming other people for your failures
Alexander Brooks
>it always gets lost in the exaggerations, having a jewish spouse does not make you a jew. No, but with the point being that Jews are such a small population yet are in higher society in such numbers (yes, being a spouse of elite makes you part of the elite) is the point when talking about over representation >have the guy run the numbers again without the spouses Nah, you're free to though
>Secular (ethnic) (((Jew))) = Reform (sellout) (((Jew))) = Orthodox (based) (((Jew)))? I see three different types of one species of rat >but just because he said that Because he said what, Jews control the worlds news sources? Looking at the people in control of the MSM in the US would indicate that he wasn't wrong. >That's like saying Muslims in Indonesia are the same as goat f***ing Arab Muslims. They're both Muslims, yes
spouse of an elite? you're an elite because you are in a high position, what your spouse is matters not.
and what is wrong with the elite? there are plenty of christian elites, elites seem to be derogatory phrase for successful people.
Nathan Russell
Huh. My dad gave me that book and I only ever skimmed it. Maybe I need to give it another read.
Owen Morales
>you're an elite because you are in a high position, what your spouse is matters not. If that's what you want to consider elite that's fine, you can use that definition in your infographic > there are plenty of christian elites That's why I showed statistics which pointed out that the number of Jewish elites vastly outnumbers Christian Elites despite being a much much less significant portion of our population. >b... but Christians did the crusades!
my dad did too, and I skimmed it as well. it is written in a way that would resonate with the masses of the time which can make it feel obtuse, but it describes a lot of basic social manipulation tactics that the average person won't pick up on. There's a whole chapter on reflecting and amplifying the other person's interests, pretending to be interested or of the same viewpoint, using the same terms, etc.. That and "Think and Grow Rich" by napoleon hill are some of the best books of the era, or all time I might argue (at least think and grow rich)
Jason Davis
well i certainly agree with the statistics showing over representation, i simply abhor exaggerations and falsehoods.
as for the problem, maybe more christians need to go to college?
and also what is the problem with the US as it stands today?
Hunter Campbell
>i simply abhor exaggerations and falsehoods. Thankfully the statistics I posted were neither considering I don't care about what your particular standards for each are. >as for the problem, maybe more christians need to go to college? Sure sure, maybe the nepotistic jews can get the chambers again? >and also what is the problem with the US as it stands today? The media mostly, and would you look at that, it's owned by jews. Might make you think
outside the fact that CNN is obsessed with trump and just talks shit about him day in and day out. I hate trump but i can't watch CNN
what news are you not seeing that you feel the media is burying? and no, i don't buy that any of it is fake news, the stakes are too high in journalism to produce a fake story, it's a struggle now with so many outlets that news organizations can't afford to lose a ounce of credibility.
William Sullivan
>the stakes are too high in journalism to produce a fake story >it's a struggle now with so many outlets that news organizations can't afford to lose a ounce of credibility. lmao
Well, YOU'VE certainly found an easy way to make a living. I hope it pays enough for you.
Christopher Allen
how far did that get them?
again that list is a total exaggeration. and as far as trump goes, i give them a pass, he has no business in office.
Nicholas Martinez
here comes the nonsense where anyone who disagrees with you is a shill.
can you just keep the retarded crap out of the thread. what part of my statement you find wrong?
Connor Walker
>how far did that get them? I don't know, have they been running for 2 years straight on the 'fact' that Trump is a russian puppet? Sounds like that integrity you espouse to them is an exaggeration and a falsehood which you supposedly hate.
I mean I've already pinpointed that you're an actual kike
>I see three different types of one species of rat. So you would lump people who were born into the title the same as those who have a code of ethics based on a different title, just because the same word is present in both. Illogical.
>Jews control the media Once again, I find it difficult to accept such a blanket statement when you can't even define terms. If you see no difference between an ethnicity and a religion, you're probably sub-110 IQ.
>They're both Muslims Aye, they accept the same 5 precepts, but Indonesia does not have Sharia Law. Muslims that think morality can be 100% legislated are still Muslims but they are not THE SAME as Muslims who just worship in that peculiar way without finding it necessary to legislate every single moral precept.
Color me unconvinced.
Bring out your 150 IQ Autists if you want to convince me.
Eli Torres
It's not too difficult once you get the hang of it. Try to focus on remaining likable over being right. Try to go out and meet some people, make some friends, don't talk about politics for awhile. Try to introduce yourself as a positive stimulus. Once they trust you, begin with small things. Don't start with big things like differences in racial iq. Tell them things they already know in a way that sounds agreeable to them. Start by talking about the corruption of the banks and the unhealthy relationship the media has with society. Word it in a way that introduces the redpill subtly (subtlety is the key here) and once they've accepted one idea, move on to the next.
Grayson Wilson
name one instance where the media called him a russian puppet, they have made the suggestion that he could be, and with all the high level campaign meetings and the moscow tower details it's not a huge leap.
not a kike, not a shill, but i am successful and own my own house so that's where I'm different than you.
Adrian Miller
>So you would lump people who were born into the title the same as those who have a code of ethics based on a different title Yes, a jew is a jew is a jew. Gas them all >Once again, I find it difficult to accept such a blanket statement when you can't even define terms. If you see no difference between an ethnicity and a religion, you're probably sub-110 IQ. I don't care about defining terms to your satisfaction as I already know that to be a trap. >Aye, they accept the same 5 precepts, but Indonesia does not have Sharia Law. Okay, and Sharia law only exists in Muslim countries. Show me a non-muslim country with Sharia law >Color me unconvinced. Color me not interested in convincing you
>name one instance where the media called him a russian puppet >and with all the high level campaign meetings and the moscow tower details it's not a huge leap. I'm not sure who you're trying to convince here by blatantly ignoring the last 2 years of media coverage. >not a kike, not a shill, but i am successful and own my own house so that's where I'm different than you. You are a kike, not a shill, but your inability to use the shift key makes me completely disregard any serious opinion you'd accidentally have
How to not ruin your relationship with friends and family 101 right here. Be as subtle as possible and their wording then the truth slowly reveals itself.
the media coverage drives me crazy too, but it's the public that drives the media content, it's all about ratings, you would understand that if you participated in any business. call me a jew all you want if it makes you feel better, you just can't handle that someone might have a different opinion than you and not be a jew. you have convinced yourselves that all your opposition are jews or spouses of jews. good luck with that
Alexander Gonzalez
What are you on about? All these marxists are jew haters to the last pinko. The dogwhistle is 'zionisim', and 'BDS', and 'boo-fucking-hoo philistines something'. So, join the democrats, become a antifa brownshirt, and suck some muslim cock. Even your beloved Adolph sucked muslim cock. Hit the knees and open wide. Muslims will love you, because you're 12 years old, or 'beardless', which means any slave of allah can use you like a white bitch whore until your asshole becomes a manhole. Go ahead. Muslims hate jews, too. Do it! It's ultra hip. Just think of how much fucking you're going to take.
Josiah Gonzalez
>but it's the public that drives the media content So you're saying RT is driven by the public? That's a terrible argument to try and make but I'll see you try
Interesting, so you're saying there's something other than the public that drives media content? Is 'western' media immune from this somehow?
John Reed
Oh dear fucking jesus, are you guys telling me you legit, unironically, sperg out when you're trying to convince people instead of pretending to be on their side on working them to yours?
Oh god damn you are all fucking hopeless afterall.
Lincoln Roberts
OY VEY don’t do this my fellow gentiles
Leo Bennett
I've never understood this idea that the Liberty incident was a deliberate attack. Like, why would the Israelis do that? The IAF has had a long history of friendly fire incidents involving Israeli Army troops. Isn't it simpler to assume they were firing on what they thought was an Egyptian spy ship rather than an American one?
there is no deep state running the media if that's what you are alluding to. most media companies are privately owned and are driven by profits derived from ad revenue, it's as simple as that. now with the over representation of jews in the media you won't see much criticism of israel if any. that's a problem and a direct result of editorial discretion. does it matter? your guy trump is the most pro-israel president in history, and the media is against him, it could mean that the media will finally turn against israel too.
Lincoln Brown
>there is no deep state running the media if that's what you are alluding to I didn't say that, but interesting that you would bring it up. >now with the over representation of jews in the media you won't see much criticism of israel if any. that's a problem and a direct result of editorial discretion So it's not the public that drives the media content, it comes down to who owns the paper and editorial discretion. Thus my images But I don't trust you to be anything but a slippery kike, I'm off to bed now. Thanks for the practice
i said part of the content was subject to editorial discretion, and that's where it comes to palestine. and once more i see an exaggeration, the washingpost is not owned by jews, it may have been in 1933, can't you stick to facts?
Asher Nelson
The left openly hates Israel but as far as hating usa kikes they've softened it up by calling them "the 1%". potato/potahto - they're just too pussy to call a spade a spade
William Smith
1. The Israelis jammed the Liberty's tactical and distress frequencies. If you know which tactical frequencies to jam, then you know who it is you're about to attack. And jamming distress frequencies is a war crime. So is strafing the Liberty's life rafts in the water, which the Israelis also did.
2. It is documented fact that Israeli pilots had positively identified the Liberty as a USN vessel. They were ordered to continue the attack.
Why the hell do you think? It's called a false flag operation. It was designed to draw the U.S. into the conflict on Israel's side. It's not as if Israel was a stranger to carrying out false flag ops.
Turns out they have a long history of these sorts of things.
Zachary Rodriguez
>there is no deep state running the media
Look up "Operation Mockingbird".
Jeremiah Johnson
The ship was flying a big American flag and at least one of the pilots positively identified it as an American ship, and was ordered to attack anyway.
The plan was obviously to blame the sinking on the Arabs, except Israeli torpedoes were duds.
Benjamin Sanders
You can still be openly right wing while finding common ground early.
Jacob Collins
>the washingpost is not owned by jews, it may have been in 1933, can't you stick to facts? Oh speaking of which, Washington Post was bought by Bezos for half of what the CIA had just given him to run their servers >>there is no deep state running the media en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird Night night, Chaim
Evan Allen
The Kabbalah teaches us that all of existence, at one level, is wording. Thus, changing wording is changing physical existence. However, all of existence is also (aspects of) G-d, and G-d is eternally perfect and unchanging. Thus, it must be understood that the wording is not changed by changing to equivalent wording.
More important than appealing to normies is appealing to Jews. As we all know, normies are utterly powerless. Why not redpill the powerful instead?
More importantly, the tenants of Judaism and Warhammer 40k are equivalent aspects of G-d's eternal creation, as both call for conquest of literally the entire Universe, by literally You the Reader (yes you user) so that everyone can be brought to love the LORD together.
mockingbird was exposed and it was an attempt by the cia to influence the media, if the deep state was already running the media there wouldn't have been a need for mockingbird
Mason Adams
>attempt they had the top 40 publications by circulation as well as all three tv networks as well as their radio affiliates and admitted to it
they totally dominated the entire media
Zachary Anderson
and yet watergate happened and how was the cia controlled press on vietnam? your conspiracy does not hold up to history
Cooper Lopez
Dismantling all kingdoms in Europe. First France, then Austria-Hungaria then Russia czars. The British monarch were safe because they're Jews themselves. But behind every revolt to overthrow a king there was the element behind financing it.
Thomas Jones
cia wanted nixon out and they wanted out of nam so their golden triangle could flow
Logan Ramirez
The Director of Central Intelligence is a presidential appointee, he hires the Deputy Chief of Operations and the Deputy Chief of Intelligence. The CIA does not act independently of the sitting administration
Caleb Watson
Right. The CIA just stopped planting stories in the media and manipulating news coverage because they realized it was unethical.
Jordan Evans
I am a proponent of this. There is a line with how far you can explain something to someone. In the Soviet Union or North Korea reporting bad news can get you killed sometimes.
I had two very type A parents and although they were very successful. They would fly into a rage if you said the wrong thing. So both my brother and I grew up careful about their words we said. At some point in school some teacher was worried I was dyslexic, final report said I was above average intelligence, but I took longer than average to choose words. Im much more disagreeable then my brother but I know peoples boundaries pretty well. My brother is conflict adverse but has the temper of my parents.
I took political science classes so I can read up on issues, when I talk to a leftist I often make it seem I agree with them, then try to shift their opinion slowly. The Democrats at work think im center left and Republicans think im center right. Im actually extremely libertarian on economic and extremely conservative on everything else.
