You could argue that sites like you tube are "privately owned" however the parent company alphabet/google has received tax payer subsidies and tax cuts globally.
Given this how can they justify shadow banning free speech unless its a literal call to violence?
Even saying "I disagree with antifa" got me permanently banned from one account and shadow banned from commenting on another.
Other urls found in this thread:
>how can they justify shadow banning free speech
They literally can't, the laws haven't caught up to them yet.
Why don't you file a lawsuit. I'm sure your legal case is airtight.
Fucking checked
EVIL
AAAAAHAHHAA you fucking dumb ass. "Where's MUH REGULASHUN??"
Now that's a first post
The barriers to entry in that market are too high.
Fpbp
They are the thought police. Conform, or you won't exist.
Facebook, Google were created by the intelligence agencies, just indirectly. I remember reading an article that showed that Google had more secret clearances than any other corporation in the US. They are deep state assets and exist to circumvent the first amendment.
>They're a private company so they can do what they want
Are the NPCs who say this aware that they're in favor of some tech billionaires controlling all human communication? It's amazing what propaganda can do to people.
It happens here too. But that was the plan. Anyhow that fag trump needs to boycott twitter and start posting at an alternate platform. People will follow, hes potus. But no, hes a jew so he cries in pain as he strikes you
how long til Hiro starts shadowbanning in order to deal with ban evasion?
Hmm bunch of captive women segregated from the men and protected by armed male guards turn up pregnant....
must have been a fluke
They don't seem to ever consider the possibility that the bullfuck authoritarian laws and practices they gleefully sign off on, while beneficial for them right now could be used against them in the future. Even after this exact scenario played out with Trump getting control of the sweeping presidential powers Obama gave himself they still don't get it. Like a little kid wanting to touch a stove, but never figuring out the stove being hot is what made his hand hurt.
And they have babies. Supposedly all Jews were tortured, gassed and burned? I don’t understand
The government doesn't own any means of communication besides internal comms so this argument implies that everything can be censored.
Bump
>Thoughts on shadow banning?
Get fucked nazis.
>he thinks tearing down monopolies makes it a nanny state
Not just that.
By banning political opinions they stopped being a platform and are legally edited.
That means the owners are PERSONALLY liable for what is post.
So, either the owners of YouTube allow all legal speech, or they should be arrested for child pornography, and treason (for hosting terrorist content.)
All it takes is a DA to actually charge them.
