>"“The historical perspective that you get just tells you that things change, things are in flux, and what may seem as a cemented truth, that people feel the British should have white skin through time, is not at all something that is an immutable truth,” Dr. Yoan Dieckmann, a University College London who participated in the study, told the press. “It has always changed and will change.”
Stop being so close minded and racist, things WILL change, so stop trying to stop nature.
Other urls found in this thread:
dailym.ai
google.com
survivethejive.blogspot.com
eurogenes.blogspot.com
youtube.com
bbc.co.uk
twitter.com
fake and gay
>justice
>requires intervening
this is where the left always gets it wrong. they simply aren't content to let the chips fall. they have to intervene to make every race end in a tie. imagine how spiritually pathetic these people are.
if whites never had a homeland, then how do we exist?
That's not black. That's a Homo Sapiens from the core Near East and Mediterranean.
I hate jews and thier pawns so much
Aliens
Let the rewriting of history BEGIN! Britain was always black & mixed race :)
i've already seen them try to spin the story that beethoven was actually black as hell and wore white makeup
This literally makes no sense. Britain is basically the most cloudy place in the world,
ie white skins was necessary for survival
Off topic, but I was licking some hot sauce from my hot wings. Later I rubbed my dick and had an orgasism. Now my dick is undergoing this burning sensation.
Britain has ALWAYS been black.
>whites never had a homeland
That's starry old England, buddy. Remember, 'white' is a Marxist psyop. It's used as an in group signifier.
It originally was ONLY Anglo Brits, expanded to others from the Isles, grudgingly extended to Germans and Scandis, then transported with the Empire. In the US, it meant those people and no one else for 150 years, then all of a sudden Jews, people under Jim Crowe, Poles and Greeks were part of the in-group. It's a psyop to keep the Eternal Anglo in power.
>Skin determines race
>No mention of bone structure analysis
And the long pole in the tent is that English and American Anglos still don't think the Irish are even human, never mind 'white'.
remember the one where shakespear copied his work from a black woman?
whites came from North America , aka Atlantis.
>propaganda directed against them
How can wh*Toids even compete?
>eyes were blue before skin was white
Bull fucking shit.
already debunked. Cheddarman had brown skin but wasn't a nigger.
"Turns out Jews lie & subvert everything. True story"
Would love to read that headline one day
Was Cheddar man white after all? dailym.ai
Before them there were Neanderthals. And then they all got genocided by Indo-European colonists. Just like it'll happen to rest of the world eventually.
"Dr Yoan Dickerman" is a Marxist retard he's the same type of "scientist" that will say their is no way to determine biological sex at birth Dr Edward Dutton is a proper scientist and has debunked all his bullshit ! And racew does matter when the average African only has an IQ of 70 you fucking spaz !
Reminder that the first Africans were actually apes. Africa belongs to the chimp! Oh wait it already does.
*dabs* rekt
yeah cuz black people love to live by the arctic circle. and that skin colour isn't a consequence of heat/sun rays.
cuz its so hot, just under the arctic circle, that every one is black and that snow isn't cold. its just rely rely hot. fucking niggers
This has been debunked. He was deemed to be 'black' because of the absence of a skin pigmentation gene present in almost all modern Europeans. However the same gene is lacking in Eastern Asians, who are definitely not black. He had none of the genes responsible for dark coloration that you see in modern Africans or other. There was no evidence whatsoever that he had dark skin, this was pure speculation.
Total fabrication. When that representation was made academics from all over said it was impossible to know what colour skin that skeleton had. They made it black for political reasons and the acedmics were ignored.
Cheddar Man (pic related) wasn't the 'first' in Britain. There were groups of people living in Britain coming and going long before Cheddar Man.
But I really don't understand why people have a problem with this. Do people really think white people have always existed as they do now?
I'm fair, freckles, grey-blue eyes, relatively hairless (bodywise) but I have no problem accepting 10,000 years ago, people generally didn't look like me and looked like this. Most northern Europeans would have looked like this at the time.
Doggerland was still a thing then, which means North Germans, the Danes and the Dutch were like this too.
Who tested the Chinese?
>what may seem as a cemented truth, that people feel the British should have white skin through time, is not at all something that is an immutable truth
What should be and shouldn't be isn't really a scientific question, so it really begs a question why somebody who is presented as some kind of a scientific authority would claim something like this.
>The historical perspective that you get just tells you that things change
>It has always changed and will change
But it is a completely different matter that what is the change and should people embrace this possible change or not. If people don't want it, it is their choice not to establish this change. What is ultimately being discussed here, it is not some inevitable change, even though they want to create the impression that it is, but it completely depends on the political decisions of the people.
This is the plan they have. Major writer for the Doctor Who series even admitted to presenting blacks in historical settings they weren't in for the sake of propaganda. BBC is just the UK Hollywood (probably full of fucking paedos too).
pic related
KARA BOGA
> "people feel the British should have white skin through time, is not at all something that is an immutable truth,” Dr. Yoan Dieckmann, a University College London who participated in the study, told the press. “It has always changed and will change.”
Fucking snakes. They take an observation about skin tone possibly being different historically and then use it to justify ethnic replacement of the current white British. They don't even try to view this solely through a scientific lens.
> "What should be and shouldn't be isn't really a scientific question, so it really begs a question why somebody who is presented as some kind of a scientific authority would claim something like this"
Exactly fucking this.
So you could conclude that white people turned Brittain into the green paradise that it is now. Instead of a muddy , dirty shit hole like niggers usually do?
Time to get violent fellow bongs
I don't see it as a justification. The fact is that skin colour has been different in the past and will likely be different in the future is also a fact, whether you or I like it or not.
That's a fairly scientific way of looking at it. The SJW element is in the reading if anything.
That's propaganda pushed to force people in the UK to accept "diversity'".
They are not even sure what skin color this man had:
>There's no way to know that the first Briton had ‘dark to black skin’ says scientist who helped reconstruct his 10,000-year-old face. Geneticist Susan Walsh at Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, says we simply don't know his skin colour.
>A Briton who lived 10,000 years ago had dark brown skin and blue eyes. At least, that’s what dozens of news stories published this month – including our own – stated as fact. But one of the geneticists who performed the research says the conclusion is less certain, and according to others we are not even close to knowing the skin colour of any ancient human.
They pushed different theories and pushed this one as a fact even though it's not. As a matter of fact, they said he had white skin, also and changed it recently due to Britons being against multiculturalism.
Ben Franklin literally believed that white people came from Mars to being civilization to the world. I'm not bullshitting you.
From the Incas, to the Pyramids my boy, white people are from the stars, we're on a foreign planet. That is why our tech is so much more advanced, some of our people are still in contact, or bred from the ancient ones lines.
thanks user, this kind of posting is what made Jow Forums great. Actual sourced information that cuts through mainstream propaganda.
You naive prick. The probable Jew has no reason to expect skin colour will change for the forseeable future if not for the current demographic trends. In the wider political context it is clear as day what he's alluding to. If you've ever spent any time in a UK uni you'd know that cultural Marxism is the default position.
There's always one...
This being /pol, often more than one
Found a good article:
>Another misleading headline describes the Cheddar man as a “first Briton” which makes no sense because as a 2017 study showed that over 90% of the DNA of the British isles was replaced in the late Neolithic by an invasion of Bell-Beaker people from Holland who were themselves descended in part from Indo-European steppe peoples. All Celtic and Germanic people in Britain are descended from these people, so 10,000 years ago, when Cheddar man's people were roaming about, most of our (British people's) ancestors were living in Russia and were not in any way black. Those people are the ancient Britons since they are the progenitors of our people and the ancestors of the first people to be known as Britons.
>The team behind the study, which includes Tom Booth, a man who is committed to preventing British people from feeling a sense of rootedness from understanding the genetic history of the islands, overplayed their hand and claimed they knew the complexion of Cheddar man when it was not confirmed. The absence of genes associated with light skin in modern Europeans does not mean the presence of a Sub-Saharan African complexion. Booth's team came up with a range of potential complexions and the guys behind the reconstruction then chose to go with the very darkest of these. Then the media photographed the reconstruction and made it look even darker, and finally the journalists used headlines saying he was "black". A descent into deeper and deeper dishonesty that many have come to expect from the media these days.
>The whole situation was exasperated by professional race baiter and grievance monger Afua Hirsch, of Ghanian and Jewish descent, who used the misreporting as an opportunity to promote population replacement.
survivethejive.blogspot.com
88s of truth.
SURVIVE THE JIVE
SURVIVE THE JIVE
SURVIVE THE JIVE
Has made a video on this exact topic, I suggest you look him up and subscribe it's a very entertaining and based channel
Also informative but not as strong as the other since it seems to be politically biased which would turn normies off it.
So what they are saying is that you have to genocide them to survive.
How do I collect my gibs?
No
know one knows what color they were they just lacked the gene that causes white skin but they were still Europeans this isn't anything new everyone knows Europeans used to not but white but they were the same race my god
Actually true and there is a book out recently that argues this point for a different reason. The white definition expands constantly and will absorb other groups. The us and Europe will be majority """white""" for a long time
>Turns Out the First British People Were Actually Black
How the fuck do they even figure this out?
They can't figure out what colours the dinosaurs were or make up their minds about if they had feathers or not - but they can precisely figure out what skin colour, how their hair was and what eye colour people had 10,000 years ago.
Fucking bullshit fairy tales
I knew from the start that Nigger Cheese Man was nothing but a ploy to brainwash brits into accepting rapefugees.
>We looked at his bones and determined that they were all black
kek
Mars wasn't discovered yet
so you're saying:
not all humans are the same?
I refuse to believe anyone can be this stupid
this is some next level globohomo
That's not what that says, whatsoever.
1 post
Whites control all the weapons production and can easily annihilate every other race so stop trying to stop the nature.
That's really offensive, we all know race doesn't exist!
Blacks, is there nothing they CANT steal?
It's not about things not changing, it's about pace. I'm sure you financial situation is in flux as well, so why don't you embrace change give me your wallet?
Even though the gene for pale skin had not yet arisen, the original inhabitants of Britain are still far more closely related to us than they are to present day Africans
Race doesn’t mean skin colour
An albino African is still a nigger rather than a white man just like that brown skinned prehistoric Brit is still much more an indigenous european than an African
Implying that because an indigenous Brit who is our ancestor is brown therefore African joggers belong in this country is bullshit
Cheddar man is not more closely related to Africans than Europeans whatsoever
>Dr. (((Yoan Dieckmann)))
fuck man why is Jow Forums always right ?
Yeah Africans left Africa and came to Europe and evolved into Europeans
My dad said he thought they would have named the baby Leroy
>we
They "analysed" his bone dust and determined his skin/eye/hair colour.
Why can't they do the same for dinosaurs?
The big secret is Anglos do not exist. It is the largest scandal in western history. They are all Jews and Ottoman Turks role-playing as "true whites" on a fucking Island off the coast of Europe. An island where the native Scots, Welsh, Irish and Bretons all hate their guts.
It's all a massive scam.
What should be worrying y'all is the following question:
Why did all people with brown skin die out over an incredibly short period of time; only a few thousand years, leaving only the whites?
Everyone north of the 45 parallel is white, not even med complexion.
I don't worry too much about race mixing because as Dr. Dieckmann points out, nature's gonna wipe out all non competitive genes anyway.
Oh civilisation will save them for a while, but it's clear that our own is on a downward trend, there is a dark age coming.
And according to the genetics, the Cheddar man, had med colouring, not black.
sage
>a nigger came to Britain thousands of years ago and left no genetic legacy
>we should let millions of shitskins in to use our welfare
Why are the Jews always like this?
We're Beakers lad.
>But I really don't understand why people have a problem with this.
Really? You can’t figure out why another instalment in a constant stream of shaky science and history telling us that white countries have always been full of niggers might set some alarms off in the current year?
Historical revision has been pushed on us for years now. What can we do? Retards will lap it up. Intelligent humans will say hold on a second, this is rubbish.
haha so you mean colonization isnt a thing and when they concurred africa it was merely them gong home and getting involved in local politics?
guess they arnt so bad after all.
They put a bunch of the smelliest niggers with the worst teeth that were fucking up the nigger drum circles on a raft and they ended up on that shithole island and started inbreeding
That's because the people just decided it was black to push the shit you read in the first post. They admitted there was no way of telling the colour a week or so after this nonsense was shat all over the news.
They now all have a constitutional right to say the N WORD
>The historical perspective that you get just tells you that things change, things are in flux, and what may seem as a cemented truth, is not at all something that is an immutable truth
Funny how (((they))) conveniently forget this when fear-mongering about the climate.
also:
>(((Dr. Yoan Dieckmann)))
Kek get a load of this guy
I love bergers but why do so many of them have to be such retards
Hyperborean ancient giants, Lugh, Avalon, European mythology from the guy Himmler called
>a dangerous far right extremist
way more fun.
youtube.com
We Wuz Dukez and shieet
it's with two 'nn'' if it was with a single 'n'' then the name was a kike one.
Dumb gypsy.
so that is the reason they are so dumb
> should have white skin through time
So if I understand correctly then every brown/black skinned person that lives in Europe will become a white person over time? KEK
IDK man.
Pretty well known where "Anglos" came from, same reason English is a Germanic root language. Our genetics when tested show as Germanic/Scandinavian in the most part.
this
bbc.co.uk
This is on the front page of the BBC News website. I wonder if they're setting the stage to turn this guy into a kang?
yeah the author of the study responded to the sculpture by reminding everyone that it was not affiliated with his research, that it was artistic interpretation, and that no part of his research provided enough data to discern skin tone of any kind
the media, predictably, took the sculpture to be the gospel truth, and that is all you need to know about the academia to news propaganda-pipeline
so you be saying
Thats not what it says at all. He wasn't black, having darker skin (which isn't even confirmed, it's a theory that this was how Europeans were at the time) does not magically make you a sub saharan african. You are right about the genetic legacy part, his people have essentially been replaced twice over since and the English/Scottish/Welsh are barely if at all related to him.
