Go to church. Start a family. Pray. Be healthy. Logos is rising

Again, I'm not denying that immigration destroys nations, but don't pretend degeneracy doesn't. It's different from immigration in a way because it's an internal problem.
Look at Egypt. Thousands of years of Egyptian culture gets superseded on behalf of a small Greek ruling class, happening right after the decline of Egyptian culture.

I don't really see the connection between the small ruling foreign ethnic group in Egypt with that of modern native degeneracy in the west.

If you're equating these Greeks with Jews or something then yes they may be able to destroy the native culture over the next hundred years or so. But the Greeks weren't ALSO pushing for replacement migration.

EMJ is an ambiguous figure... how does he earn an income?

Focus on the spirit, reject the material

What I'm saying is that the decline/degeneration of Egyptian culture before Greek rule can be seen as an example of degeneracy corrupting nations. Greeks were a minority ruling class in Egypt, and the Ptolemaics even tried to pander to the Egyptians. In the end however, Greek culture conquered Egypt.

>repackage Jordan Peterson's self-help advice
>sprinkle some conspiracy theories about Jews on top
absolute state of the alt-right

He writes books.

He’s not an overt white supremacist Pagan, so he must be paid by the Jews!

And we can see this now. Coptic culture today derives from Hellenistic Egypt.

Based

Why? Churches are hotbeds of degeneracy.

What is your proof that Egyptian culture had degenerated before Greek rule btw?

I think you're overstating the Greek cultural conquest of Egypt. Nonetheless i'm arguing against foreign invasions like that of the Greek migration into Egypt.

Greeks may have been subverting the Egyptian culture, but I assure you if they had also actively advocated for the migration replacement of the Egyptians then the Egyptians would oppose that more firmly than any slow Greco-Egyptian cultural integration. And there probably would be a bunch of Egyptians that were culturally crypto-Greeks would go around focusing on scantily dressed Egyptians and gluttonous upper classes.
Well Hellenistic culture was a lot closer to ancient Egyptian culture than was Muslim culture so I guess in the end the Copts win.

source on the pic

Nahhh...I’m in my hometown so I’m gonna creampie my (fat)ex with a 7-day nofap
One day I’ll repent though
youtu.be/TOkuZLxUjqg

>youtube.com/watch?v=mZmYk_XlBOA

Attached: efewgwe.png (1227x591, 67K)

>this one guy speaks for all of Christianity!1
Why are atheists so delusional?

took me a while to find it
wonder why he decided to even respond to that comment and what his line of reasoning is
i've been following him for a long time and he usually autistically abides by conditions he assumes everyone knows about without explaining them.
Like here i'd bet he agrees with this in theory but also agrees in the old catholic tradition/model which had almost no foreigners in it countries and made immigration extremely hard.

Not an atheist. The thread is literally about the guy.

He's right though, tribalism that is held above Christian universalism is a sin.

Attached: 1552684493376.jpg (672x545, 41K)

>What is your proof that Egyptian culture had degenerated before Greek rule btw?
The lack of papyruses and records point to a decline in Egyptian history (see the bronze age collapse), something that's true for most of the Persian period of Egypt.
What really points to an internal denigration of Egypt was that the Ptolemaics tried to pander to old Egyptian culture. The kings styled themselves after the Pharaohs, they rebuilt old temples and monuments, created a bridge between Egyptian and Greek mythologies (even worshipping their deities), and yet the Greek culture still ended up dominant among the Copts.

Nah, God created free will. Ifyou want to live with your own people that’s fine with God

You hardly can come back from either.
Also Christianity has a very simple counter argument against immigration
Render unto caesar.
Also the bible itself states there will nations even until the end of days. So protecting your own nation from becoming a colony or becoming a completely different nation is all permitted. Christian morality speaks nothing against opposing immigration. A refugee is ALWAYS meant to go back, that was the sole meaning. To seek refuge in another place because YOUR OWN place is currently unavailable. To be a refugee means to never fit in the country that hosts you, and it means you need to go back for the happiness of all.

Stay home. Jerk off. Be ok with yourself.

He wrote the slaughter of cities where in it he writes whole Catholic neighborhoods were ethnic cleansed by the WASP government wilt the help of Jews by forcibly moving blacks in them. Obviously he's not for mass immigration or the cleansing of whole Catholic countries. If the question was "do you support millions of blacks moving to Poland?" EMJ would say "no". Use your brain a title, fucking racist retards.

Attached: 1517001658845.png (645x729, 145K)

Good evening heng dai,
Will you post about our degeneracy, about allowing Confucianists to go through with scrapping the treasure fleets deal, and having a culture that hoards knowledge, functioning similarly to censorship, and the whole worship and reverence of central authority/seniority that criticism is impossible, and thus we do not have the developed long range gunpowder weapons not to let the Sassoons and their shabbos goys win?

Universalism is solely in soul and has absolutely nothing to do at all with the material world. Thank God the Lord seperated those two so you wouldn't run into the retarded issue of thinking everyone is the same. God made them different.

I'm racist as I can be without actively lynching subhumans. E. Michael Jones is one of the best anti-jewish voices the world has. If people could stop having a knee jerk reaction to his views about race they'd see that none of his doctrine precludes any of the ethno ethnonationalist ideas espoused here to begin with.
But, children like to do this thing where if a person doesn't 100% agree with them on all terms they must consider said person an enemy.
Children and certain (((subversives))).

Your reasoning is very lackluster and I don't have time to go through it all since i'm gonna go walk my moms dogger now.

You're just presupposing a bunch of nonsense. Equating historical happenings such as the bronze age collapse(which historians still don't know exactly why it happened) and its impact on Egyptian culture with the modern degenerate west. You're equating a conquered nation adopting the conquering peoples culture with modernity. And even your conclusion on the Copts are unfounded, more likely than not the reason why the Copts have a more Greek culture than the other Egyptians today is because they're Christian and not because they adopted pre-Christian Hellenic culture.

I wouldn't say dynastic China would've surpassed the western world had it abandoned its proprietary view on technology though.
>the bronze age collapse(which historians still don't know exactly why it happened)
I didn't even go over it in detail. I just said that the lack of Egyptian records usually points to a decline in their culture which IS seen in the bronze age collapse but also in the Persian period. It's common knowledge in Egyptology.
>You're equating a conquered nation adopting the conquering peoples culture with modernity
We're still going through "modernity" right now. I'm saying that the Egyptians with their denigrating culture ended up not recovering their old culture but adopting that of the Greeks.
>And even your conclusion on the Copts are unfounded, more likely than not the reason why the Copts have a more Greek culture than the other Egyptians today is because they're Christian and not because they adopted pre-Christian Hellenic culture
It's most likely because of their Hellenistic influence. The same thing can't be said for the Assyrian Christians (who didn't assimilate Greek culture).

wtf is a sassoon
>so much cope
lel you're probably wrong and don't want to see it. You do not need to conquer a country to tear down its culture. Just like western culture is now declining and all the nations adhering to it can feel the takeover taking place. But no, the swedefag just continues to ignore it, just like he does the moaning of his wife when her bull is doing her.

He’s not wrong. That’s a one in a million case. Most foreigners do not assimilate like that. For all intents and purposes aside from your race, you are a Polish citizen.

After that they were given the synthetic identity of white American.

All empires do this - they try to cobble together a synthetic nationality out of conquered nations.

Attached: Babylon.jpg (400x600, 54K)

Sassoons were a Babylonian jewish family, basically the Rothschilds of the east. They funded the Opium war.

I hope one you can let go of your racism, user, but at least you can see this tomfoolery. That Gas Station interviewer was one of the most embarrassing things I've seen.

I am really getting sick of EMJ's shit.

>Catholicism is the only way, any other sect of Xianity is crypto kikery
>Muh Irish ppl can do no wrong
>I'll side with literal muslim niggers over those fucking WASPS

At the absolute minimum, this guy is a divide and conquer faggot, trying to get us to ramp up the inter-Christian infighting to 11, and to literally start up the "are X white???" shit again.

I am a descendant of WASPs. I also have a fair amount of Irish and German heritage in me like this skeletor looking faggot, but I know who and what culture built this country (the fucking English Protestants, not Irish or German Catholics).

EMJ can go fuck himself.

Attached: 1502543023828.jpg (2048x1896, 242K)

>wtf is a sassoon

Sassoons were big into the far eastern opium trade. They took over from a zoroastrian people called the Parsis, who are the people from whom Freddie Mercury came.

Source: gatewayhouse.in/the-story-of-the-sassoons/

Attached: Opium trade.png (568x152, 41K)

That's because he's a Jesuit gatekeeper. He tells many truths, but tops it off with "Catholicism is the truth and everything bad derives from Protestants"

Dude, God explicitly forbids a universal, one world governing body or culture on Earth. Politics is separate to Gods will, but nations are the march of God on earth. Meaning, we’ll always be in an animal fallen state where society is ruled by hierarchy and might makes right.

That's the powerlevel of shills, its all they have

I don't know what he's gatekeeping, but I do know he gives off serious Jordan Peterson circa early 2017 vibes.

>Also Christianity has a very simple counter argument against immigrationRender unto caesar.
Can you explain?

Yup, like little Towers of Babel around the world

It's true though, Protestantism is one of the causes of modernity and degeneracy. He proves that Catholic neighborhoods were the most ethnically "pure" ones in the states at its height and the good ol' prot goyim sought the help of Jews to ruin them and make them ordinary "white" Americans.

He also incorrectly ascribes "logos" to Greek philosophy, in reality logos is a kind of translation derived from the biblical wisdom tradition and cannot be separated from the Christ without becoming an impersonal machine god, which is exactly where Greek philosophy was heading.

Gatekeeping for Roman Catholicism. Anything against Catholicism is immediately going to be deflected as "jewish" or "anti-logos".

"Le modernity" was the cause of Jesuit-educated enlightenment thinkers. Look at Voltaire for example, he was Jesuit educated.

>I hope one you can let go of your racism
lol kys yankee mason jew

lol

Attached: 1553912295535.jpg (851x623, 206K)

Descartes and Spinoza were also Jesuit educated. Locke was an exception, not the rule.

Unsubbed

>Voltaire
>Jesuit

That man was one of the most rotten atheist in the history of Europe. Plenty of people get a "catholic" education without actually believing in any of it because they're thought a classical education that sometimes uses the Trivium and Quadrivium as it's basis. Why would the Jesuits think Voltaire, an enlightenment atheist, who would help sprung the French Revolution, to be a good thing?

>muh Jesuit chaos theory n shiet

You were always a stupid Mexican anyways.

He literally said how good the Jesuit education was later on in his life. They're the root of modern liberalism.

Because they thought him a classical education using the Trivium which Voltaire was very good with words. No matter how you spin it he was an atheist and hated religion.

parsis. I know pharsi or however you write it is still actively spoken by iranians. A mate of mine can speak it, it's kinda beautiful actually. Persians never deserved to be conquered by Islam.

Yes, and? Are you implying Jesuits don't tolerate atheism? Just look at Francis.

Based EMJ poster

>Persians never deserved to be conquered by Islam.
deserves got nuthin to do with it

Francis may be a "cuck" but he still believes in God, he's just a boomer with liberal ideas. Anyways i'm over this and the anti-EMJ anons because of some lame ass screencap. People who unsubb because of one comment they can't think for themselves are as dumb as the n__gers they hate.

sadly enough it doesn't. The strongest survive. That's the rule.

Francis literally said that some atheists are in heaven.

Also, by the way, the concept of "logos" as it is in Catholicism derives from Philo of Alexandria and applying his philosophy to the Greek version of the Gospel of John.

tripfags will NOT be spared on day of the rope

"Day of the rope" fits in directly with the depopulation agenda.

When you watch the video with Owen Benjamin and EMJ you can see Owen Benjamin is reluctant to challenge EMJ on his die-hard Catholic-or-nothing stance. And fair enough because Owen Benjamin doesn't want to be rude, as he states in the interview.

It is likely EMJ's age that is a part of his belief in Catholicism. The reasoning behind Catholicism itself seems incredibly weak to me. The idea of Peter being Jesus's rock being interpreted to the extent it has, with Popes and all that shit, just seems outlandish when you consider the source.

In the age of the internet what use is there for Churches? If I accept Christ in my heart and accept his teachings, and do my best to be a good Christian, what more do I need? EMJ makes an argument that you don't have an identity as a Christian if you're not Catholic; I may have heard him wrong but I think he said it makes you 'white' instead of Catholic. Or something along those lines.

If you look at us now in this thread exchanging information, and the fact that places like Youtube and Jow Forums (as well as future sites / means of exchanging information online) are available, then what is left in the current age of the internet is a shared belief in Christian values.

Honestly look at The Pope in his bulletproof car and try to find me a more Jewish image.

Do what Owen Benjamin has done and start a family, live off the land, stay connected to the world via the internet, and work doing what you love.

1. Love God
2. Love Yourself, and Love Others as You Love Yourself, and God

The real problem is that he puts all this emphasis on the Greek word "Logos", then is part of Christian denomination that is based on two Latin documents that disagree with each other.

That's because the True Church isn't any physical building with a hierarchy of priests, but is the communion of all believers in Christ.
>Ignatius, who is also called Theophorus, to the Church of God the Father, and of the Lord Jesus Christ, which is at Philadelphia, which has obtained mercy through love, and is established in the harmony of God, and rejoiceth unceasingly, in the passion of our Lord Jesus, and is filled with all mercy through His resurrection; which I salute in the blood of Jesus Christ, who is our eternal and enduring joy, especially to those who are in unity with the bishop, and the presbyters, and the deacons, who have been appointed by the will of God the Father, through the Lord Jesus Christ, who, according to His own will, has firmly established His Church upon a rock, by a spiritual building, not made with hands, against which the winds and the floods have beaten, yet have not been able to overthrow it: yea, and may spiritual wickedness never be able to do so, but be thoroughly weakened by the power of Jesus Christ our Lord.
>upon a rock, by a spiritual building, not made with hands

Attached: muhsaintpeter.png (411x611, 100K)

What the fuck
He’s an exhibitionist faggot with a foot fetish who is receiving adoration and praise for acting on his sexual fantasies
That’s literally the faggot wetdream. You’re a pathetic retard

What is your point? You haven't made it clear with that post beside the reaction image.

I'm just adding on to your criticism of Catholicism. It's that the Church isn't actually a centralised institution at all.
>has firmly established His Church upon a rock, by a spiritual building, not made with hands

I mean wasn't the point of Jesus saying 'I will rebuild this temple in three days' about him coming back and him being the temple? Worship Christ and love God, right? I'm new to these theological discussions so bear with me.

Not only that but their version of the Bible is different than the one that was read and used by the Church Fathers.

Then yes, I'd agree with you on that.

Are you so arrogant to believe you have the right interpretation? Protestantism = liberalism, because it rejects hierarchy.

Antioch/Alexandria split, wasn't it?

you just don't get it, Sweety

No...as you saw in my previous post where I admitted I'm new to theological discussions.

Also all this 'Protestantism vs Catholicism' shit is so fucking JEWISH holy shit. How about I take on the responsibility of trying to navigate Christ's message as best I can without some group telling me how wrong I am? And no this isn't me being like 'let Christ be whatever you want him to be be maaaan', I mean a conceited effort to educate myself in Christ and make up my own mind.

This Jewish squabbling over the right interpretation is a waste of time.

It's more accurate to say that people like EMJ believe that mass immigration is only a problem because of degeneration of the host culture. Would X country be having trouble with immigration if it had a TFR of 3, much less 5? I don't think so.

EMJ's position on the WASPs is that they were an ultimately failed ruling elite. Yeah, he ascribes this to Protestantism. Frankly, Catholic criticisms of Protestantism look more accurate with every passing decade.

That's correct. A good demonstration is Acts 8:37 which was removed from pretty much every new version as it is a "later addition" despite being referenced by Irenaeus who died in 202AD. I would have thought that he'd know considering he was two generations removed from John himself.

Papist shills here have really done a number on you, haven't they?

>Frankly, Catholic criticisms of Protestantism look more accurate with every passing decade.

And Protestant criticisms of Catholicism look more accurate with every passing decade.

>no u
Lol

It is literally the fucking truth though. If you are going to take a shit on something, don't propose something just as, if not worse off, as a solution.
Great rebuttal, I expect a totally legitimate response to this post.

I love EMJ for his analysis but I'm getting damn tired of the Catholic supremacy.

You'll never meet a single person you agree 100% with. I drop people the instant I find out their word can't be trusted. EMJ hasn't crossed that line yet.

>Hey user, you should believe in the supernatural
/x/

Then EMJ isn't the guy for you, as he's explicitly a Jesuit gatekeeper who tries to reinforce "Classical Catholic civilisation was good until anti-logos jewish Protestants came" all the time.

>Also all this 'Protestantism vs Catholicism' shit is so fucking JEWISH holy shit. How about I take on the responsibility of trying to navigate Christ's message as best I can without some group telling me how wrong I am?

Yeah it's definitely a problem, and one reason I ultimately can't agree with the RCC is their claim to be the exclusive source of salvation, it's just not correct.

That being said, differences in doctrine between church WILL come up in discussion, when it does one should follow the advice of Paul to Timothy and "instruct opponents gently" in the hope that God will lead them to truth.

FWIW, despite being by almost any reasonable definition a Catholic fanatic EMJ mostly just "recommends" Catholicism and would certainly rather that any given person go back to Pentecostalism or whatever than be an atheist.

>I'll side with literal muslim niggers over those fucking WASPS
He has a problem with thinking that Islam is basically just an early Protestant sect, IMO (nonsense, they deny the divinity of Christ among other things), combined with a perception that the Jews are a bigger problem and Islam is the enemy of the enemy.

Of course you should. It's all around you. If you believe even a single lie you are in fact living in a delusion.

Frankly, Orthodoxy resolves the paradox.

Attached: orthodoxy-9.jpg (979x617, 79K)

It also ignores that the abuse and pre-allocation of indulgences is the most Jewish shit ever, and for his talk about how Jews never self-reflect he never considers the impact of this on the sympathies towards the Reformation on the ground.