DEGENERATE

>Be American
>Embrace degeneracy
>Break the law promoting your obscene degeneracy
>Cops pull you over
>They give you a chance to correct yourself
>Double down on being a godless degenerate
>Wah wah wah my actions have consequences

It's not your First Amendment right to be publicly obscene and degenerate. Look how far Americans have fallen. The cop was doing him a favor to help get him back on the right track.

youtube.com/watch?v=PfZM8v7A53M&feature=youtu.be&t=140

Attached: ieatass.png (700x524, 603K)

Other urls found in this thread:

orlandoweekly.com/Blogs/archives/2019/05/09/charges-dropped-against-florida-man-arrested-for-i-eat-ass-sticker-on-his-truck
youtube.com/watch?v=Z7aWhF3LIqc
sys.Jow
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

He deserves rope.

>It's not your First Amendment right to be publicly obscene and degenerate.


You were saying?

Attached: c82a6f1591e8a8d045843440400c9e9b.jpg (634x878, 70K)

Hahahah
/thread

White people always chimp out when they don’t get things to go their way like they are used to

Well since like 93% of the world is nonwhite, I dont see it as too much to ask to simply FUCK OFF from our 7%

Attached: 1557540735100.png (645x773, 49K)

Hello, nigger-lover.

Attached: 1530358795217.jpg (665x826, 85K)

Maybe he eats donkey meat.
The observer is inferring obscenity in a statement that could be considered totally innocuous.
Furthermore, until a determination is made in court, he is presumed innocent, meaning the text should stay up on his window, until a judge determines he is guilty, at which time the judge would order him to remove the text and dish out whatever penalty he deems fit at sentencing.
Cops don't determine guilt, that's for the courts to decide.

Were talking about America and it’s 72% white, you nonce.

Cop is total faggot
>MUH KIDS
>MUH OBSCENE
Meanwhile his kids are watching Ariana Grande and Miley Cyrus twerk for BBC on MTV. Good thing the charges were dropped.

Attached: 1557584723447.png (1062x884, 642K)

gas gas gas

it's literally your first amendment right to be obscene and degenerate, and it's society's responsibility to shame you for it. ironically the left's treatment of alt right types is completely normal until corporations intervened and broke the established system. ostracization is the classic remedy to bad behavior.

orlandoweekly.com/Blogs/archives/2019/05/09/charges-dropped-against-florida-man-arrested-for-i-eat-ass-sticker-on-his-truck

Better start pulling over fags or this is a retarded law

Want me to tell you how i know you're a jew

>getting pulled over for a sticker
And I thought the german laws about shit like that where crazy...

Attached: The Atomic Redpill.png (1550x827, 248K)

Retards ITT think this is a good thing

that's not how you spell nigger

>be me
>go in city center
>little procession in front of a old nice church
>interesting things getting said and a new bell for the church
>fat obnoxious americunt with a bounch of goblinos stops taking loudly about the church

reee stop coming here

Germany is the degenerate shithole of the world.

You wish America is non white majority under youth ages especially births and aus isn't fat behind we are more like 1% of global population at best

I'd say 1st amendment/Artikel 5 Grundgesetz are more important than beeing slightly offended by a car sticker.
(sadly my goverment sees that a little different and Art. 5 GG is basicly a joke at this point)

>its not your right to be obscene
But what exactly is "obscene" ??

In other periods of our country it would be obscene for a woman to show ankle. Do we go back to that standard?

Does Sharia become our standard?

Laws should be more clear so that it's easier to justify arresting people.

Is it the word "ass" that makes it obscene?
If it said "I prefer anal" would it still be obscene?

If it said "I fuck my wife in our marriage bed" would it be obscene?

"My wife and I enjoy all sexual positions"

At what point does it become "obscene" ?

Why can't we just live in a society? Plastering your car with "I eat ass" is degenerate. It fails the Miller test so it's not protected speech.

figures

The cop in the video power tripping too not letting the mom drive the car home because the guy told him he wouldn't take it off

Yes and no.
About 90% of our politicians indeed.
A good chunk of city population in NRW and Berlin indeed.
But the rural population and eastern germany is still pretty decent.

When hypothetical kids start to ask questions.

In my country the goverment puts you in jail if your opinnion on some matters diverges too far from theirs.
I'd rather have ''I eat ass" written on every fucking car than that.

>society has rules that change at the drop of a hat for no reason
Gee golly I wonder why there is a neet epidemic maybe we can't be fucked with this clown rat race anymore

My point is:
It's none of the goverments buisness what kind of sticker one has on his car.

converse is making a special shoe to celebrate this joke of a child.

>It's not your First Amendment right to be publicly obscene and degenerate.
Then it's not your First Amendment right to call a nigger nigger either.

Good.

>fails the Miller test
How so?
Are you aroused by the thought of a bearded man eating ass? If so, I would think you are in the minority, the statement doesn't arouse me in the least. It would fail the first part of the miller test. It's also pretty vague. it doesn't say "I vigorously tongue my gilrftiend's asshole". This wouldn't pass muster.
Also, most obscenity laws have pretty much been toothless since Larry Flynt won in court.

WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT
GOD

pornography, last I checked, has set about to normalize oral sodomy. excellent way to get STD's people. Don't lick another persons ass crack. your gf may think its kinky or say that she likes it but that doesn't change the fact that you are licking her sewer and eating her fecal matter in small quantities. the ultimate cuck...think about it guys. fuck porn to the deepest pit of hell where it belongs.

It is a good thing & the cop is a hero. This neckbeard in the video talking about his "God given right to free speech." Yeah God gave you the right to put "I EAT ASS" in the windshield of your truck. So that 90 years old grandmothers & 7 year old kids have to be subject to your degeneracy. This idiot should be caned on television

Zing

Free speech is absolute you dirty spic.

The issue is that if you make exceptions to free speach, like the german constitution does, you end up censoring stuff pretty quickly.
If you gonthat route, your 1st amendment will be as worthless as article 5 GG.
There are people in jail right now for saying things the goverment doesn't want them to say.

Attached: 2019-05-11_23.17.27.jpg (1267x336, 226K)

this guy is either a nigger or a jew

Freedom of speech means freedom of speech period you nigger.

Not god gave you the right to speak free, people fought and died for it.
Freedom of speech is essential for the freedom of society and the individual.

Attached: 1556094625303.jpg (562x600, 37K)

You're right. Clandestine mobs should just burn your fucking car in the middle of the night if you put shit like this on it. Other people have to drive on the same streets as this tool and shouldn't be forced to look at this shit. There are some spaces where we should be free from having to hear about everyone's fucking perverse sexual proclivities

Nobody forces you to go out and read it.
We have a situation as you described here in germany, just that the mobs are lwft-wing extremists and the offensive stuff is anything remotely right wing.

Bullshit. We've had the first amendment for about 250 years, and we had obscenity laws that were enforced for at least 200. Guaranteed you couldn't put "I EAT ASS" on your wagon in Boston in 1787, and when they wrote the first amendment. Free speech is not the right to say whatever you please wherever you please

Then it's not a true freedom/

You're too stupid to speak to me. Find a millennial with a 101 iq

The guy in the video says God gave the right, quoting the US constitution. You never had the right in America to scandalize old ladies & children with obscenity. That's never been what the first amendment meant until the last 20 years when they discovered gay marriage and gender reassignment surgery in the constitution.

Is it missing the sole?

Attached: 1549746170498.jpg (781x791, 53K)

Yes he is forcing everyone to look at it. The first amendment does not mean that every stoplight has to become a Weimar era Berlin sex club. At the same time all obscenity is being protected as free speech they are now telling us all traditional morality is "hate speech" and has to be suppressed.

Not according to the people who wrote our constitution. People are allowed to speak their mind, or should be. They do not have a right to yell fire in a movie theater, or to threaten to murder people. They also don't have an unlimited right to talk about what they do in their bedroom in every setting. To talk in graphic detail about sex acts in front of a child is actually an offense against that child. To have no public space that is free from pornography or explicit sexual talk actually destroys free speech because it destroys the public square.

hate speech and obscenity are both free speech

God didn't write your constitution, man did.
God didn't fight for it, man did.
Either you limit what can and can not be stated in public or you have freedom of speech.

charges were dropped by the way

Well, I guess the guys who wrote the constitution should've had you around to explain to then what they meant. However they didn't, so obscenity was banned along with gay marriage, because apparently no one knew what the first amendment meant until now. But now we know it doesn't mean the right to express controversial opinions about politics or morality. It means the right to force everyone to look at the filthy shit you do in the bedroom. Look at me look at me I'm a faggot bake my cake

try 41 years
Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988)
Even further back if you consider various works that would be considered indecent in the horse and buggy days.

Attached: Read.jpg (244x207, 10K)

he can buy his own shoe company when he's finished suing all those fuckwit leftard media companies

Attached: 1486354414209.jpg (250x250, 10K)

>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
I fail to see any exclusions mentioning obsenity and I have no Idea what gay marriage has to do with it.

Do you have some inside knowledge about the founding fathers intending not to protect obscenity? Because I'm just going off what they wrote.

>the right to express controversial opinions about politics or morality
Do you even live in the year 2019? can we even do this these days?
You're getting your panties in a knot over three words, and they aren't even the worst words out there, you are imparting meaning onto them, so it's on you. Look up the word "ass" in the dictionary and tell me again how this statement is unequivocally obscene.

German education everyone. The text of the declaration of independence is that we are endowed by our creator with inalienable rights. Men fought for these rights in America because they believed these rights were given by God.

Freedom of speech was one of these rights. But it is simply a FACT that no American in the Revolutionary War died for the right to fly a bumper sticker that says I EAT ASS. They would have laughed at the idea that freedom of speech was the same as the right to public obscenity. And basically no American would have disagreed with them until the 60s when Jewish pornographers started calling obscenity "speech."

When you can't distinguish between speech and obscenity, you lose free speech. Both of you arguing with me are probably incurable degenerate and lost already because you don't seem to be able to take in the fact that we had the first amendment for centuries while banning obscenity. Do you really think that's because the founding fathers didn't understand freedom of speech as well as you?

Meme speech is free speech

quibble with me about how many years the point stands that there were obscenity laws when the constitution was written. Therefore the first amendment does not protect obscenity

>But it is simply a FACT that no American in the Revolutionary War died for the right to fly a bumper sticker that says I EAT ASS.
>It's a fact
>Trust me guys
>Even though there's no possible way to prove it
They died fighting people like you

laws can be unconstitutional

I bet he wears a MAGA hat

Attached: 1511532047716.png (741x630, 27K)

>1st amendment getting shredded by the cops
>Americans sit by and take it

OH SAY CAN YOU SEE

This occurred in a small town in North Florida.
Surprising to see people's Constitutional rights being trampled on in a place like that.
I hope everyone protest by putting an "I eat ass" sticker on their car.

In the end god didn't do shit and people fought and died for the right of free speech.
The issue with obsenity laws is that you have to draw a line at some point and said line is realy blurry and can be interpreted differently by different people.
Either you have freedom of speech or you have obsenity laws.

This is the same shit that leftists say about banning guns. 'Well the founding fathers never intended you to own an ar15 blah blah blah'.
Bullshit. Freedom of speech is freedom of speech, no exceptions. Anyone who supports arresting someone for saying the word 'ass' is a fucking idiot who is complict in shredding the US constitution.

youtube.com/watch?v=Z7aWhF3LIqc

>any speech i disagree with shouldn't be free speech

Attached: 1550702871848.gif (510x510, 1.92M)

>There are people in jail right now for saying things the goverment doesn't want them to say.

Wasn't that always the case in most European countries anyways? I heard Russia just passed a law banning criticism of the government.

I'm the second one you replied to. I was arguing for the guys right to have the sticker. Learn to read

>pig is going to get sued
>sys.Jow Forums.org/derefer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.orlandoweekly.com%2FBlogs%2Farchives%2F2019%2F05%2F09%2Fcharges-dropped-against-florida-man-arrested-for-i-eat-ass-sticker-on-his-truck

I find billboards of ten year old drag queens to be obscene and offensive when are you taking them down?

Freedom of speech was entirely about the freedom to say controversial or offensive things, mainly because those are the things that are generally under risk of censorship, as we see here...


I tagged you so you could see me agreeing with the sentiment.

GOOD.

It also does not bar it. Obscenity laws aren't federal dipshit. They were usually local or state issues. The process of federal review is slow, and it took a supreme court challenge by Larry Flynt to get it decided in the SCOTUS, You proscribe delayed judgement on the matter as being equivalent to the constitution barring obscenity, and you're just plain wrong.
It's always existed, society frowned upon it, localities created laws pursuant to the 10th amendment, and the supreme court struck them down as unconstitutional because they violated the 1st. The time that these laws were on the local books doesn't change the fact that they were unconstitutional.

You forgot to add that he won the case

>I'd rather have ''I eat ass" written on every fucking car

Stop posting.

Attached: Bishop_Georg_Heinrich_Maria_Kirstein_Colour_1.jpg (402x596, 149K)

I argued for freedom of speech by citing the first amendment itself, not against it.
Does that make it any better?

Disgusting that people on Jow Forums are using the exact same logic as the leftists in order to destroy the 1st amendment.
What you're saying is literally no different to leftists saying 'hate speech is not free speech' or whatever other bullshit they come out with to justify the police state.
Stop being a tool of the NWO. The 1st amendment does not need twisting and reinterpreting in order to justify thought crime laws, because that's what 'speech laws' are.

>Florida Man arrested for refusing to stop Eating Ass.

Attached: 1528427557384.jpg (600x600, 35K)

I know.
I am backing you up.

kek

>Does that make it any better?

No, but I meant that to say since Europeans never mentally shook off monarchy (not necessarily a bad thing) it's not as shocking as it would be if it happened here.

If freedom of speech exists, why cant people call fags faggots, or trans people by their original gender which is now a federal hate crime?

Guy in video may be right, but is he going to pay an attorney to keep this going possibly to the supreme court where he may lose anyways since if public obscenity was allowed, I could go build a wall in front of every sinogague that says GAS THEM ALL!!!

Attached: 1528427557376.png (355x280, 125K)

No, I will not.
I'd rather have a ridiculous sticker on every car than people going to jail for saying offensive things.
Ursula Haverbeck did nothing wrong.

Attached: haverbeck4-1-800x420.png (800x420, 509K)

Gay marriage has to do with it because the Supreme Court and millennials think it is unconstitutional to not let fags "marry", yet fags were prohibited from marrying when the constitution was written. In fact there were criminal penalties for fags then. There is no right to gay marriage in the constitution. It has been invented.

There is also no right to obscenity. Everyone knows "freedom of speech" does not cover using speech however I want. Freedom of speech does not give me the right to lie in court, or cry "fire" in a theater & cause people to be trampled to death, or to threaten to murder the President. Nor did anyone think until very recently "freedom of speech" means I am free to commit sex acts in a public park. Why? Because it's indecent. Because people should be able to go into a public park and not have to see men fucking in the bushes. Up until recently people realized it was possible to use speech in the same way--so as to sexualize the public space and corrupt the morals of children. This is why there were obscenity laws. And people understood for the most part that stopping pornography or graphic sexual language in the public square was not taking away the right to speak. It was similar to not allowing people to walk down the street naked or masturbate in the town square. You think that has to be allowed in order for there to be free speech but that is a very recent recasting of the idea of free speech.

In addition the constitution prohibits Congress from limiting speech or establishing religion. It does not--and historically did not--prohibit the STATES from doing so. Massachusetts and Virginia both had established churches after the constitution was written. According to the original meaning of the constitution the state of Florida has liberty to limit speech in ways the federal government does not.

You are truly stupid

So would you get the same treatment for a sticker that says "I have sex" or "I put my penis inside vaginas"?
Because that seems kinda retarded.

Why the fuck did he get out of the car? The cop had no right to open that door or pat him down, what the fuck?

Attached: 1537732994697.png (300x300, 120K)

>people fought and died for it.
>Freedom of speech is essential for the freedom of society and the individual.

You dont have freedom of speech, you cant shout fire in a theater. You cant walk into a sinogague and start yelling GAS THEM ALL NOW.

You dont live in a free country, you cant watch some movies without proper ID. Most of your elected leaders arent even American their foreign agents using their influence of the media via ownership to rule over you.

Democracy and the freedoms you speak of you are dead and a lie. Only way you are getting change is if Revolution is on the ballot in 2020.

Your founding fathers kicked off the American Revolution over a tax on tea. Today, EVERYTHING you buy has built in taxes, their called back end taxes, and most of that goes right overseas to a foreign country, or stays local to fund the people from the foreign country in the hostile takeover of your country.

Isnt it time we the people take it back? Whose country is it?

Attached: 1528475320289.jpg (800x424, 32K)

You're arguing that the people who wrote the constitution didn't know what the first amendment meant because all the 13 STATES in 1787 would have said it did not protect this bumper sticker

Marriage is a totaly different issue and besides the point.
Also the 1st amendment clearly says:"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;"
It doesn't make any exceptions, it is your right to disagree with it, but that doesn't change it.

Obscenity laws are NOT federal, they are local and toothless. This guy won, and he's stupid.
You can't post your wall like you want because the Synagogue is private property, not because of hate speech. it's called vandalism, look it up. Keep moving goalposts and maybe you'll score a point.

If this is what the constitution means Fuck the constitution and fuck the USA and Fuck you.