Jow Forums curriculum

>The Prince
>The Art of War
>The Communist Manifesto (you must understand your opponent)
Any more? We need to educate ourselves in ways the system refuses to. Unless you're doing something technical, college is the biggest racket going. These texts can be read in a couple of hours, so there is no reason why you can't read each 50 times a year. Burn the knowledge into your brain.

Attached: 518oe2WjJtL._SX384_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (386x499, 30K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ZKyi2qNskJc
casapounditalia.org/p/who-we-are.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche_bibliography
gen.lib.rus.ec/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_Genesis
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes

Candide

for what exactly? I have found out that if you wish to pursue some things, some books are better than others. There is not really a generic Jow Forums library thing. There are the various Jow Forums factions, like fascism which there is much from, like for my legionaries. If you wish to do better in real life I recommend learning about negotiation, the art of the deal by trump is great for that, 48 laws of power is great too for subversion. Many red pilled categories like that are strewn about everywhere really. Some jewy, but still red pilled, some less so.

Read Siege, faggot

The Other Path: The Economic Answer to Terrorism

You think you’re sneaky, eh? Fuck off and die commie faggot.

I have found that if you wish to pursue things, reading books are the last thing you should do. I generally feel bad for people who are over 25 and still reading books.

What else should I do from 9-10pm?

thats terrible advice man, reading books is great because it lets you acquire the knowledge, and the wisdom of another person who has toiled hard in his life to attain in, in under a week. There are many mechanisms of real life that take quite long to comprehend, and as such, reading about them gives you huge advantages over someone who does not.

I read "never split the difference" and it actually gave me real world results. The art of the deal by trump also made me aware how one can pursue goals in creative ways. There are many books like that. And many of them helped me. They are even well worth their money. You would have to be an utter fool not to read. But chances are that you are already reading in some form, just in a somewhat compressed form here on the imageboard...books are still great. Meme images are just meme images, not very in depth usually.

youtube.com/watch?v=ZKyi2qNskJc

Attached: mao-zedong-quote-lbn2n2u.jpg (1200x630, 57K)

200 Years Together, Solzynitzen

Thwarting your enemies at home and abroad.

BASIC READING LIST

National Socialism (NSDAP):

>Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler (Stalag edition is very good, but the commonly available (((Manheim))) is decent.)

>Zweites Buch by Adolf Hitler

>The Program of the NSDAP by Gottfried Feder

>The Manifesto for the Breaking of Interest Slavery by Gottfried Feder

Black Front / Strasserism:

>German Tomorrow by Dr. Otto Strasser

>Deutschlands Erneuerung by Dr. Otto Strasser (in German only,

Iron Guard / Romanian Fascism:

>For my Legionaries by Corneliu Zelea Codreanu

British Union of Fascists (BUF):

>Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered by Oswald Mosley

>Tomorrow We Live by Oswald Mosley

>My Life by Oswald Mosley

>Fascism v. Jewry by William Joyce

>National Socialism Now by William Joyce

>The Coming Corporate State by A. Raven Thompson

Italian Fascism:

>Origins and Doctrine of Fascism by Giovanni Gentile

>CasaPound Italia platform: casapounditalia.org/p/who-we-are.html

JSTOR Articles I've read on more obscure groups with little available material in English:

>Ação Integralista Brasileira: Fascism in Brazil, 1932-1938 by Stanley E. Hilton

>Integralism and the Brazilian Catholic Church by Margaret Todaro Williams

>The Chilean Movimiento Nacional Socialista, the German-Chilean Community, and the Third Reich, 1932-1939: Myth and Reality by Marcus Klein

>Nazism in Chile: A Particular Type of Fascism in South America by Jaime Antonio Etchepare and Hamish L. Stewart

>A Case of Non-European Fascism: Chilean National Socialism in the 1930s by Mario Sznajder

>Fascism and Sinarquismo: Popular Nationalisms Against the Mexican Revolution by Albert L. Michaels

Not everyone is a knuckledragger. Even the Third Reich had eggheads to develop them advanced weaponry and aesthetic architecture.

Attached: best buy receipts and stuff.jpg (458x650, 69K)

The art of war is overrated trash, chinks can't fight.

Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville

It teaches the dangers of overcentralization and the ethical limits of equality and how it would affect a society (he predicted it would lead to extreme materialism and a society living under a totalitarian nanny state)

If you wish to pursue things you should get off this board you nigger

1984, Orwell

>the art of war

Attached: 3CBAD681-5BAD-4CA3-BD69-616D3DA4F88A-11140-0000162410A83BDC.jpg (255x239, 27K)

Peter Zeihan's books are pretty good. So is The Peter Principal and Peter Pyramid.

Hobbes- Leviathan
Hannah Arendt
Adam Smith
Anyone here into Cicero or recommend reading his works?

just read BBC headlines t b h

Myth of the 20th Century
For my Legionaries
Men Among the Ruins
Metaphysics of War
Brigade

Attached: 1555591582500m.jpg (1024x640, 166K)

The Tactical Guide to Women
The Definitive Book of Body Language
48 Laws of Power

Reading is a waste of time unless its non-ficiton

What fiction work has been posted in this thread?

As much as I love The Prince, it's more of a history book than a personal manual.

>Reading is a waste of time unless its non-fiction
Absolutely retarded statement. The novel is the vehicle of culture.

Wrong. Also, read Voltaire.

>The novel is the vehicle of jewish culture.

>Dostoevsky is pointless
You dense fucker, fiction is how philosophical principles are propagated through for the masses

Philosophers form ideas
Artists immortalize ideas

Attached: C89DE65D-6D5D-45E8-AC91-BD884EBFF7FC.jpg (1245x552, 282K)

without understanding this you have no idea why humans really act the way they do.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche_bibliography

>the communist manifesto
>read it 50 times per year
Hi leftypol put me in the screencap for your report

>no one mentions the Bible
Well, that settles it, Jow Forums is full of faggots and is neither based nor redpilled.

Attached: 1554935026191.gif (800x800, 681K)

art of the deal by donald trump

What's a great place to download books for free ?

gen.lib.rus.ec/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_Genesis

>Under a week
Woah, it takes me months to finish a book.

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins

if you really cared, you could even finish most books in like 8 hours. At least I can. All of this reading and writing here on the internet gave me incredible reading powers! But yea. The problem that I have is that while I may actually read a book really fast, I dont know how long I should take to mentally digest all the things it brings forth. There is much data inside of it, and I have to go through much previous data mentally to see if it fits and how it can be of use.

Some books are kinda like that, in which I have to take a slow approach. But not sure if one book like that is more useful than another. Many books still I read fast and just felt completely useful still.

>Hanna Arendt

Attached: 1518023205374.png (406x406, 89K)

I honestly diddn't know what I was expecting reading this book.
Very fucking basic shit, not compairable with real philosophical books.

Attached: 1556374350816.jpg (600x756, 121K)

Just visit small local secound hand book stores.
You support small indipendent businesses, you get the physical copy with text that is the way it was written then, are non trackable by it, always find other interesting stuff and frankly, have a good time in there, because nothing goes over the smell of used bookstores.

Attached: RareBooks2.jpg (750x500, 97K)

I gotta try reading faster. I tend to get stuck trying to get down every last word. Plus I don't read every day and I take big breaks. I'm just lazy sometimes, but it really depends on the book I'm reading. If it's popular fiction like ASOIAF, I read all 5 books in 4 months, but with Brothers Karamazov, it took me 6 months for the one book. Hell, I started Neuromancer back in December, got half way and stopped. I just picked it up again yesterday.

Probably because you like different genres differently.
And beware incomming >ASOIAF

well if your browsing habits are like mine, perhaps they are not, then you may find joy in extending your dopamine kick that you get from here, to books, which can be quite bountiful at times. Non fiction is what I enjoyed best, facts, and strengthening my own knowledge is what I enjoyed most. If you feel like its useful to you in your every day life, you will feel naturally inclined to read.

From Dictatorship to Democracy, there is a free ebook and a documentary.

Ranger handbook, ranger medical handbook.

It's good to know the Jew. She has influence for a reason.

The doctrine applies.

You could sum up the art of war as this:
"You probably shouldn't be retarded when you're fighting, in fact, be as unretarded as possible."

Read Locke you fucking nazi moron.

Part 1

Attached: 1479322024879.jpg (2641x5802, 1.87M)

Atlas Shrugged
Guns, Germs and steel
Basic Mathematics by Serge Lang
Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell
The Manipulated Man

read all of these

That summed up my experiences with htis book

Attached: 1389719212132.jpg (395x450, 69K)

Part 2

Attached: 1479327116627.jpg (4063x6565, 2.83M)

Part 3

Attached: 1527689540218.jpg (4063x6657, 2.47M)

Here's a small list I saved

Attached: 1546104670619.jpg (1500x2247, 1.04M)

>The Communist Manifesto (you must understand your opponent)

Ok Jordan Peterson.

>meme chart tier

Attached: 15166139117.jpg (2027x2461, 647K)

>doesn’t understand metaphor
Fuck off low iq nigger

There's not even a metaphor involved you sperg, unless you don't think warfare is an art in which case you have a pozzed definition of art.

>The Communist Manifesto
Read Lucy Parsons first for context (the homeless in those days had jobs, so she wasn't defending drug addicts). Marx' job was to subvert legitimate worker's rights movements.

>The Prince
You need to read Discourses on Livy too.
Most people only read The Prince and get the completely wrong impression of Machiavelli.

>ctrl-f Industrial Society and its Future
>no results

Take the Tedpill

Attached: 73115ee1-b827-4072-b828-6873bedfca9a.jpg (274x253, 20K)