And then, for no reason at all, FDR swept to power

also need to remember that population has been changing while the absolute level of wealth (a) if a flat line:
50% of America in 1990 was 125 million.
50% of America in 2018 was 163.6 million.

same amount of nothing spread over 38.6 million more people. each individual in the bottom 50% has to be in absolute terms poorer now.

Then he ordered a bunch of crops and livestock killed trying to manipulate markets, causing people to lose their jobs and starve to death.

Attached: 1548106981256.jpg (1079x1064, 155K)

>absolute terms
The richest man in the world in 1950 couldn't have the quality of life our very poorest enjoy with exactly as much gratitude as YOU have: ZERO.
Kill yourself, you fucking parasite. You don't DESERVE equal wealth. You haven't EARNED equal wealth. And guess what, bitch: You will never GET equal wealth.

YOU
LOSE

Attached: SageHeil.png (500x500, 85K)

Attached: 1451006338548.png (968x634, 307K)

>San Faecisco is a nicer place to live
>While the literal breadbasket of the US is "mostly poverty"
Holy fuck you're so full of shit lmao

the implication was clearly "for the rich"
nicer place to live......for the rich.

>use anarchist flag
>shill for daddy government
which is it, retard?

???
how did you come to that conclusion?

fdr you fucking moron

it's a play on the "for reason at all [..] hitler" meme in response to degeneracy.
FDR is the clear stand-in for that meme in response to mass american poverty.

so you're supportive of fdr, a big government socialist

im in support of accelerating via socialist policy to communism as any anarchist is.
FDR is a pretty cool guy in general.
but no the meme isn't a show of support for FDR just as the original Hitler version isnt a show of support for Hitler, you tranny faggot.

FDR at least had good policies on deporting Hispanics and enforcing segregation. He totally failed in his "New Deal" however because unlike Hitler and Mussolini (Mussolini btw FDR was a big fan of at least in the 1930s) he didn't spend even remotely enough money to revive the economy until WW2 started.

FDR was ultimately a pussy that bent over for congress and the banks, hardly heroic at all. Then he got the US involved in yet another retarded overseas war.

The ultimate aim of most Marxists is anarchism, they know how dumb that sounds though so they don't usually mention it.

Attached: 1553583637103.jpg (852x852, 131K)

>pussy
he had a ton of pushback to fight against and he chad'd his way through it. like how he was preparing to pack the Supreme Court until they ruled his way.

"liberal policies" = jew has tricked you into fake and gay "free trade."

you acting like it's anarchists hiding.

Attached: 1532785562010.jpg (1280x720, 199K)

>the original Hitler version isnt a show of support for Hitler
are you braindead?

>there is only one type of capitalusm
this is your brain on marxism

take off your tranny memeflag, degenerate before i start heiling

read the title

>throwing around buzzwords to try and fit in
so you are braindead, cool

FUCK THE BOTTOM 50%

t. bottom 50%

Attached: 1550743433039.jpg (696x730, 49K)

Most of these 50% lurked over the boarder to be poor somewhere else. It isnt the burgers fault that these spics appeared.

>163.6 million came over the border to steal american poverty from americans
yeah right.

Attached: 1555359048298.png (750x611, 242K)

>jews increase their wealth and power over the goyim
>Hitler is not the solution but rather (((socialism)))

San Fran, LA, Seattle, and NYC are easily the best places int the USA to live if you have unlimited wealth.

>jews are the problem
>hitler didn't holocaust the jews
>hitler's germany was economic success
pick 2 neo-nazi and then get murdered as a degenerate

Attached: 1556440649134.jpg (2676x2024, 823K)

>t. bottom 50%
>t.
What are you? Finnish?

Attached: ohlel.jpg (762x1024, 74K)

Anarcho-communsim is dumbest shit i heard in my life. If you would put lower class on top they wouldn't know how to spend the money and everything would be fucked. Of you would put midle class on top shit would be better but still, they didn't get on top by themself's and wouldn't know gow to spend the money.

What about those people who did their best and through hard work got on top? Those poeple who are good with money? They would just fly out of America and then you dont get anything, on top of that, You are the top class now! So pay all your money to poor fucks who dont deserve it and would lose it to drugs and alchohol!!

if there were no poor people
they would never elect the rich

We the spics are the new burgers, Kraut. And you better believe we will make you based again when we take power. I also think some reparations are in order on behalf of what the mutt-whites did to you, your people and your fatherland.

Thinking you're tied to your economic "class", is the prison stupid commies put you in.

more people climb up the socio-economic ladder than ever in the history of mankind. displacing and replacing the undeserving.

FDR was a benevolent dictator

exactly what Americans want or we would have put a stop to the snowballing of presidential power a long time ago.

commies aint the ones perpetuating class.

Attached: 1537638387324.jpg (409x767, 67K)

Imagine if as of tomorrow we had anarchy (though I wonder why anarchists are waiting official permission for it....)

Let's say that it's a total anarchy, no governments etc. Total reset.

What keeps from people forming groups? The advantage of a group is the ability of implementing division of labour, which would make the more efficient, thus more properous. These groups probably have some rules, like don't steal your group members' shit, do not wank in their bed or sleeping bag etc you know rules.. or laws..?

What keeps those groups from choosing a leader? Let's say they voted for it. What if certain groups could hold their own and their values and beliefs were so good that people would join them? Then as these groups get bigger and bigger they'd probably form a council of decision makers. A council that governs the decisions of the group.

What if these groups, instead of periodically moving and using temporary camps, just settled down and started building stuff, like houses, fences etc.. And they could fight off other people who don't like this idea of them having this settlement.

Then these groups would probably end up making more rules like don't poo in areas, within this permanent camp, where other people frequent too.. they could call these areas public spaces.

You probably see where this is going.. And all the moral arguments are out the window because anarchy. No one can really be held accountable for their actions, unless they themselves want to be, because anarchy.

TL;DR: We already live in anarchy, we always have. We just happened to born into a very large group of people having a successful system. Go live in the woods if you don't like it, just leave the group. Meanwhile the other members of the group decide to stay because they want to.

It's all voluntary association, no one owes you anything you can leave at anytime. You are free to believe whatever you want, and other people are free to believe otherwise.

Attached: PartAndHitler.png (677x483, 65K)

Why are these raids always conducted by retards?

I havent had a good economics argument here in years and its looking like i never will again

>Imagine if as of tomorrow we had anarchy (though I wonder why anarchists are waiting official permission for it....)
we can do that. there's always room for anarchism. it's the default state of human interaction.
the point of aiming for communism is for the anarchism to be post-scarcity utopian.

>no governments
anarchy and democracy were born together conceptually and one simply cannot have anarchy without democracy. it's the difference of governance by a minority and spontaneous governance as needed.

going to ignore the rest of your post since you have no idea what you're talking about.

Why is inequality a problem?

it's the difference between the first and third world.

Attached: 1539248810043.png (732x1049, 917K)

Many of those in the bottom 50% in 1990 are in top percentiles in 2018

mANy SucH cASeS!

Everything, EVERYTHING is just a matter of belief: anarchy, democracy etc.. All the political ideas are just that: ideas. To quote that one game series: nothing is true, everything is permitted.

There's just bunch of people living on a planet believing in stuff. Some people believe that no one owns anything, and then get shot by people who do believe in owning stuff. But quality of owning is nowhere to be found in the object itself it's in the head of the "owner" and in the heads of the people sharing that belief system.

Some guy believes that it's right to meme a mosque, others believe it's wrong and the act should be punished.

>going to ignore the rest of your post since you have no idea what you're talking about.
I'm not surprised

Attached: WhatInTheJw.jpg (622x500, 40K)

>we can do that. there's always room for anarchism. it's the default state of human interaction. the point of aiming for communism is for the anarchism to be post-scarcity utopian.

Then go do that, what is keeping you? Whose permission are you waiting for?

>ton of pushback

Not really, FDR did his best to soothe the fears of the bankers by promising no real changes to them behind the scenes, and then only enacted very tepid changes. There was far more support for more a radical, populist movement under Coughlin and Long.

Kek this is actually true unlike Hitler who got appointed

the bottom 50% should have been on a logarithmic scale

>espouses moral relativism as a legitimate worldview
>implies others are jewish
fuck off

i do it every day, jew

Attached: Are_You_An_Anarchist_The_Answer_May_Surprise_You!_The_Anarchist_Library_-_2018-10-16_16.10.27.png (984x2076, 137K)

Fuck the 1% desu senpai.

Attached: Who to blame.jpg (536x790, 53K)

blame the rich people in the american government.

>green text crying
>fuck off
Yes, but am I wrong?
If there was a coffee cup in the middle of the room which is full of people can you prove whose is it? Without asking anyone. Lifting fingerprints etc only prove that someone has touched/used it. The quality of ownership isn't in the object, it is a belief in the mind of the observer. Now if you asked the people whose coffee cup is it and they replied that "it's John's cup." Does this prove it? What if the cup was in the room before all the people were invited in, and then the people were told by a person "Hi, my name is John, come on in I'll go have wank meanwhile don't touch the cup, it's mine." What if John lied and he came into a room with a cup and just decided to claim it. Now what happens if Bob comes into the room to get the cup he forgot?

You can't "prove" ownership you can only convince people of it.

Now me knowing this doesn't mean I myself don't believe in ownership. I will shoot any shithead who will try to appropriate what is mine.

Attached: SmileOnASnek.jpg (300x300, 20K)

>If there was a coffee cup in the middle of the room which is full of people can you prove whose is it?
who fucking cares.
i will give to you a free cup of kys

Attached: 1532439365172.png (640x480, 208K)

I’m not saying the bottom 50 percent should kill all of the top 1 percent but it would make sense.

How come Republican states are poorer?

This meme sucks. You can't accurately current commies with a bunch of shit from the pre glasnost period. Fuck you, weevil

>green text crying
>who fucking cares ubulubublu
Yes, but am I wrong?
If there was a bar of gold in the middle of the room which is full of people can you prove whose is it? Without asking anyone. Lifting fingerprints etc only prove that someone has touched the gold bar. The quality of ownership isn't in the object, it is a belief in the mind of the observer. Now if you asked the people whose bar of gold is it and they replied that "it's John's gold bar." Does this prove it? What if the gold bar was in the room before all the people were invited in, and then the people were told by a person "Hi, my name is John, come on in I'll go have wank meanwhile don't touch the gold bar, it's mine." What if John lied and he came into a room with a gold bar and just decided to claim it. Now what happens if Bob comes into the room to get the gold bar he forgot?

You can't "prove" ownership you can only convince people of it.

Now me knowing this doesn't mean I myself don't believe in ownership. I will shoot any shithead who will try to appropriate what is mine.

Attached: SmileOnASnek.jpg (300x300, 23K)

THEN FOR NO REASON AT ALL

AFTER MASSIVE VOTING FRAUD

AND RUNNING AS A LOWER TAXES AND GOV SPENDING ISOLATIONIST PHONY

FDR SLAUGHTERED MILLIONS, PROPPED UP THE JEW USSR AND CAUSED THE WORSENING OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION

Attached: jewbanking.jpg (1259x757, 123K)

>If there was a gold bar in the middle of the room which is full of people can you prove whose is it?
who fucking cares.
i will give to you a free gold bar of kys

Lovely. Who fucking cares right? Have you noticed that no one fucking cares about your points either?

Everything is matter of belief, you can't prove me wrong so what do you guys do? You always resort to saying "[trendy insult]" "whatever dad" "go away", like a child in denial - which still doesn't change the fact. This is what always amuses me about larpers.

How does it feel to have no ground to stand on? To know that you have no basis for your beliefs?

And since you are not winning you want everyone to change. You were dealt a shitty hand, play with it instead demanding everyone to fold for you. It's only fair if you win right?

Attached: kekWithTears.gif (377x372, 3.46M)

I like half the pictures on the right aren't even real just painted

Everyone but me gotta learn you have to read graphs

LMAO so extreme poverty is justified on the grounds that David Rockefeller didn't have a smartphone in the 1950s

it's displaying the fact that communists can paint.

It's called cherry-picking, but not having cherries to pick because they were all eaten in the beginning of the food shortages.

Attached: 1557201474391.png (234x255, 48K)

Nice, gonna send you a telegramm later

Attached: FD3DBAF9-0B87-423C-9CC4-56401FDE2066.jpg (397x490, 145K)