Are feminists pro sex work or against it?

youtube.com/watch?v=53lT9KEi-VQ

I don't understand their stance on it. Is it a mixed bag like some do support it while others don't?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 126K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=xkdnQM81EnA
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

They don't understand either. On the one hand, commercializing sex is the ultimate form of objectification. On the other hand, if women aren't free to monetize their sexuality then they are not being empowered.

They're for whatever benefits them in any given moment.

Radical Feminists and First/Second Wave followers are usually against the prostitution of women. They also would prefer to live in a society where a woman doesn't have to rely on sex for income.

Third Wave/Liberal Feminists want to give women a safer means of having prostituting oneself and worker protections, but I don't see how that would worth with health hazards and such.

0-5 Feminists in the lower/lower middle classes want to get paid to have sex and are for sex-work. 6-10 Feminists in the middle/upper classes want to use their vaginas to control their rich husbands and are against sex work because it directly makes their pussies less valuable. Sex work was originally outlawed by the middle/upper class feminists back when they called themselves suffereggettes, but after a hundred years of expanding their organization to include lower class women, they've been pushed out of their own movement by simple numbers so now the wants and desires of the lower classes are now starting to dictate what 'feminists' 'want'.

Modern feminism is dictated by daily social trends, so by definition it is one of the most malleable ideologies.

Like said, they don't actually understand feminism any more than you or I, the difference is they don't think it matters if they can't properly define their ideology. One day X is bad and the next day someone PC and famous says X is now good and the entire Feminist group now things X is good and if anyone dare challenge them they get crucified until the next week when X is bad again.

Attached: 1551586321709.jpg (500x535, 71K)

Essentially they want women to benefit from it but hate that men enjoy it.

Attached: 1A82CF8C-8F97-43EE-B764-54A72CA21B30.jpg (1000x1333, 240K)

Useful idiots do whatever the (((media))) spreads in the day.

it's pretty straight forward dude. If you are ugly and poor and have a vagina, then you probably support sex work. Laying on your back and collecting money with daddy government protecting you is a good plan-b when your woman's studies degree doesnt work out. On the other hand, if you've already won the game of life and are are married to someone with wealth and power and have a vagina, you probably don't want him going out and getting 5 dollar blowjobs from the local hookers because sucking him off once a month is YOUR JOB and there is no way he will keep your annoying feminist cunt ass around if he can just rent a pair of lips for 1/100000 of what he is paying you.

They are for women getting to do it, they are against you being able to enjoy it. All prostitution is human trafficking in their eyes.

Damn!

Feminists are not exactly a unified group, and "intersectionality" isn't helping them. You can consider there to be two main types of feminists: radical feminists and liberal feminists.

Radical feminists tend to have a greater disdain for men, and they tend to view sex negatively. They are more likely to view prostitution as a legitimate occupation. They are also more likely to view society as a patriarchal system that needs to be destroyed. There is a subset of radical feminists called "TERFs" that are hardline against most of the modern transgender movements, and often at odds with liberal feminists.

Liberal feminists are also known as sex positive feminists, and these are the kinds of people who think sex is empowering. They're also the SJWs who push for 37 genders and all that. Laci Green is a canonical example of a liberal feminist.

>do support it while others don't?
Yes: different people hold different views. Is this the first time you've encountered disagreement?

>You can consider there to be two main types of feminists: radical feminists and liberal
You could, but you'd be an idiot. There are 3rd wave feminists, radfems, liberal feminists, sex-positive feminists, black feminists... and about as many other varieties as befits approximately a third of all living Americans.

Feminist are pro sex work, if they aren't they face an angry mob of whores. Sex work used to be cool, but now it's basically for bugmen.

Haven't you realized it yet? Feminism was started by kikes, and feminists (kike or not) behave like kikes. They're for whoredom when it suits them, and against it when it suits them. You'll never pin them down because they have no clear agenda beyond harming men and breaking apart society.

>Laci Green
Who, like most women, changed her tune entirely the moment a man took charge and dicked her down.

Hey your post might have been too slow but at least your ID is neat Big Fly.

>Are feminists pro sex work or against it?

Yes.

There was a "feminist" here in Seattle that had a naked 1950's style pinup girl painted on her house that was vandalized by another "feminist". That's the thing with feminism, it means nothing more than general female superiority, it's female chauvinism in a broad sense that at a finer look contradicts itself at every turn. Of course this is what women come up with, ego based on absolutely nothing. To answer your question sex work is both empowering and liberating of female sexuality and also degrading and objectifying of the female body, depends which one you ask.

Attached: 1555777554425.jpg (640x720, 152K)

This.

Also, unironically and completely seriously, I believe women should be enslaved.
Then we can all have what we want. Cunts get to be degraded, humiliated, abused, and used and men get pussy. Bonus: civilization will be saved from female stupidity and degeneracy.
Win-win-win.

Attached: real-rape-culture.png (717x999, 268K)

When a woman wants to act like a whore they're pro sexwork. When they want to pretend to be a nice girl sexwork is yucky.

Sweet!

This is a board for men. Men are anti-feminist.

Schools pump whoredom in to kids soft heads starting in elementary school. Kids learn from their peers, not their parents, and the peers learn from the media and schools. We have my body, my choice in this country, but you have to pay taxes to send your kids to Jewish brainwashing centers. Get people behind school choice. My kids, my choice. They RAPE their minds in public schools.

I had better not be accused of being anti-woman. I love women. Nothing is more anti-woman than the Jewish influenced system of institutions in the West. Women are like children, in motivations and agency. They need to lose all political and most legal rights, and we will take good care of them. Nothing is worse for women and better for Jewish capital than requiring women to wageslave. Expecting women to work outside the home increases production and destroys wages, and it wastes female lives in slaving for a company. Not only does it destroy the family, but male productivity also suffers from not having a trustworthy assistant in the home.

The age teens are expected to lose their virginity is the exact age they should be expected to be married. Marrying young means couples grow together. The only reason marrying your high school sweetheart isn't common is that college is hung over high schoolers like a ominous cloud. Nothing can get in the way of a college education or they'll end up bare foot and pregnant living in a trailer. Instead they sleep around and they trail through multiple relationships of convenience.

Public school and colleges are the problem. They are self promoting, Jewish brainwashing centers. Public schools and colleges have an invested interest in not seeing kids get married off and leave their system.

Attached: hitler time.png (400x400, 228K)

Well that depends on context. And what gives them more power in the moment.

Want to see Trannies REEE like it's 2016?
PRAISE KEK!!!

Attached: 1555668514227.png (1020x574, 142K)

>some do support it while others don't?
you mean people have different opinions.... shocking

Attached: images.png (238x212, 10K)

Being a prostitute is the ultimate form of female empowerment!

They are for whatever benefits them the most at that moment. Children are not big on planning for the future.

>They're for whatever benefits them in any given moment.
this called rationalization, i am pretty sure that's a common human trait

Attached: BwL5rgWCcAAynSq.jpg (600x800, 66K)

Over here ot's generational thing, oldschool feminists want to ban prostitution and hate porn, but new generations are both oro sex work and pro porn.

In Sweden they are against it, as long as it's women who are the the prostitutes. Still waiting for a feminist to say anything against male homosexual prostitution which is supposedly more common than the female prostitution.

>If you are ugly and poor and have a vagina, then you probably support sex work
it's a bit more complex than that.

The contradiction comes in that feminism supports free choice AND wanting women not be exploited. The contradictions arise when women themselves choose to be exploited... you know work

Attached: v6glesko6hd01.jpg (1920x1841, 1.01M)

pic makes some sense, honestly its why you will see alot of women with "that" guy, and you just think how in the hell did he land that, its because of womens need to feel desired. lower status men will do just about anything for a woman, where a high status man is much more aloof and wonders what women can do for him

God damn I’d marry her.

there are different kinds of feminists
Some are "sex positive" and some say, women shouldn't do this because it only benefits men who get whores for free.

>Children are not big on planning for the future
true dat, children take ONE view of the world and take it to it's extreme, pic. related

Attached: ak_bt_1803.jpg (780x520, 64K)

>marriage
according to Wikipedia:

> is a socially or ritually recognised union between spouses that establishes rights and obligations between those spouses, as well as between them and any resulting biological or adopted children and affinity (in-laws and other family through marriage).

trick question, what RIGHTS do men have in marriage?

they are like pol, they don't have a hive mind.

Pol says, Islam is based, Pol also says, Muslims need to be put down and are goatfuckers.
Pol says, mixing with Asian, Latina, Black women is based, Pol also says, racemixing is degenerate and racemixers get the rope
Pol says Trannys/Traps are hot/based. Pol also says, Trannies are degenerate and should get the rope
Pol argues all the time about who's white and who would be allowed in the ethnostate and if you can be white and have green/brown eyes or not et cetera.

Same with Feminists.

all I want to do is print a fucking firearm or suppressor because I can and fuck no everyone is going to prison. fuck these nigger doggies the time of the rope is now.

2nd wave feminists are against it since it's exploiting women
3rd wave feminists are for it since it's muh freedumbs

A lot of feminists fighting to legalise prostitution are trannies.

They are pro sex with hot guys who dominate them sexually but non hot guys are just toxic so should be blamed for everything that's wrong in the world because patriarchy reee.

Jow Forums does not say Islam is based.
Some shills, Muslims and other types of seditious retard on Jow Forums say Islam is based.

Attached: 8345973450.jpg (1349x906, 492K)

Marriage material right there, boys.

The term SWERF is thrown at feminists that aren't okay with sex work. It's dumb and reductionist.
That's just stupid. Fantasy is not the same as reality. People that are into that do cnc and it's just fine that way.

>itt you're the bad guy
I just want to secure the existence of my people and a future for white children. The most precious possession you have in this world is your own people. For these people and for the sake of these people we will struggle and fight and never slacken. We will never tire and never lose courage. We will never lose faith.

Attached: 2019-04-12_01.16.48[1].jpg (4160x2340, 2.41M)

legalize prostitution and criminalize tinder.

yeah sure ...

It depends on the feminist, yes. "sex positive" and "sex negative".

Source on the tit whore?

i forgot f1 went fullfag

She said her name was Disco tits in the video I posted, I don't know if that helps

>itt you're the bad guy
I love my people and I would do anything in my power to protect these people from invading hordes or pestilent diseases.
>again I larp as a bad guy

Attached: 2019-04-12_01.09.33[1].jpg (4160x2340, 2.41M)

With al the refugee asylums we basically have state sponsored male prostituion for old worn out, over weigh female SJW's.
I don't know how many cases I have read about in the last couple of years about these discusting old walrusses fucking Afghan and other nigger/sandnigger men.

To be fair, they have stupider beliefs.

Feminists are against men. They don't want male sexuality to exist for anything else than their pleasure or their wallet.

Rissit

If sex work is work, sex work should be taxed at 40% like all the other jobs.

Fuck off, kike. You built this shit.

None

Feminists aren't one tribe. There's TERFS which are conservative aside from wanting equality for women, and in between them and the prostitutes there's a ton of other schools of thought.

Fuck you nigger.

40%... damn France you need to move.

3rd wave, sex-positive, and black feminists all fit under that big fat umbrella of liberal feminists.

>Of course this is what women come up with, ego based on absolutely nothing.

That is exactly it.
Feminism literally doesn't exist, it's just glazed over goldfish stomping around aimlessly pretending to be important.

It's also cargo culting to a huge degree. Women see men in suits and glasses doing 'important man things' which includes banking, teaching, working, science, business etc, and have created feminism as a parallel to this, 'doing important woman things'. Feminism is a mishmash of fields and fails to be any of them. Is it a philosophy? An educational subject? Is it a legal endeavour? Is it an informal club for women to socialise? Is it a charity? Is it political?
It's actually none of these. It's women in skirt suits thinking 'I'm doing important man busy busy things! The skirt suit proves it!'
Feminism is an endless circle of 'organising things' where women meet, chat garbage, and organise more meetings so that 'something' can be discussed and 'organised'. A march, a feminism book group or other pointless group, an onstage feminist discussion, a college social justice group for pressuring the campus into increasingly byzantine rules, they just find ways of having events, days, clubs, groups, and meetings to pretend that feminism is real and they aren't just ugly hags or fat and that they are just bitter about their looks.

where can I see this whore's bare tits?

For example I just found this upcoming feminist event near me
>An Introduction to Feminist Theology with Jaki da Costa
2-5pm Saturday 11 May
Feminist Theology developed alongside the Women’s Movement of the ‘70s and ‘80s. As an academic discipline it has encouraged women in particular to look with a critical eye at the male-centred religions that still dominate our world.This one-off session will touch upon those who still work in the accepted faith communities as well as those who have branched off into Thealogy (study of the goddess). We will also look at the re-emergence of Wicca as part of women’s spirituality, and the work of Jungian analysts in helping women rediscover the Divine Female as a positive aspect of female consciousness.
>Time allowing, we will end with a creative session.

What the fuck is a creative session? Fingerpainting?

Generally against it because if prostitution were legal most men could go to a brothel and fuck a QT for about 40 bucks and women would lose all bargaining power.

This is why the nordic model is the real feminist solution to prostitution

Doesn't happen in countries with legal brothels.

More utter garbage

Feminist Maps & Mapping Feminism: Lessons from the Women's Atlas

A unique opportunity to hear Professor Joni Seager, pioneering feminist geographer and author of the award-winning feminist classic The Women’s Atlas, whose 5th edition has just been released by progressive map publisher Myriad Editions. Professor Divya Tolia-Kelly and Dr Pollyanna Ruiz will respond.

We follow with a presentation of a developing map of the UK Women’s Liberation Movement from The Business of Women’s Words project and discussion with others working on feminist mapping.
>Please join us to celebrate feminist mapping, for drinks and nibbles, and a chance to buy the book!

>We have no idea what the fuck we are even doing, but there are drinks and nibbles!
This is feminism, this is physically what feminism is in real life.

A woman's worth is in her holes
When fembots become mainstream they will become obsolete

There's no such thing is a double standard, so there's something else going on. The easiest way to analyze this is by looking at power.

"Sex work" is good when it increases the power of a particular woman or the group with which she identifies. It's bad when it decreases power. So -- just for instance -- when a feminist is able to make a bunch of money by selling pictures of her tits, that's good because it gives her power. When younger, hotter Filipinas or whatever does it, that's bad (because it decreases her power by increasing supply).

Individuals can obviously be mistaken about this for a number of reasons, obviously. There's also a second level to this, namely that prostituting yourself has a bunch of more or less natural negative consequences, and it requires a fuckload of POWER to mitigate these consequences. In many cases, the ideal is basically that feminists get all of the power needed to manage the fallout of sex, without having to actually literally whore themselves out -- though a few saps will end up doing it. Sexual war profiteering.

They aren't sure if it will help or hinder the genocide of white christians, so they're divided. As soon as that's clear, they'll all be on the same page.

Attached: leftists plt oc.jpg (247x237, 18K)

All of this sjw crap boils down to one thing 'Fuck laws and borders and shit'. They have no logic to what they support or don't support. It's all about power. If they aren't making the rules, they are against the rules no matter what. So stop trying to understand their arguments, they aren't real.

>they are against the rules no matter what
No they want whatever helps destroy the west and white men. Once you understand that, everything makes sense.

I'm against sex work for ugly chicks

That's my point.

same as any social hierarchy.

the hot girls do well. the fat undesirable pigs do poorly.

The hookers say they are feminists that patriarchy forced them into this role to wash themselves clean.

She could be a good mommy.

Pro sex work when it hurts goyim anti when it doesn't or profits him.

>It's also cargo culting to a huge degree. Women see men in suits and glasses doing 'important man things' which includes banking, teaching, working, science, business etc, and have created feminism as a parallel to this, 'doing important woman things'. Feminism is a mishmash of fields and fails to be any of them.

That's en excellent description. Just like when niggers enter the White World and Think that as long as you wear a suit and live among successful White people then they will be successful as well.
Women are truly the niggers of the sexes. youtube.com/watch?v=xkdnQM81EnA

>When fembots become mainstream they will become obsolete
Obsolete Child creating facilities.

I don't really see a contradiction there.

eh, i'd do her for 50 bucks

Who the fuck cares what feminists think about anything?

So what you are saying is that women belong in the kitchen or the bedroom, should be barefoot and pregnant, that we should lower the age of consent, and engage in a little domestic discipline when required?

That we should vote for far right christian fringe groups that have no chance of winning, so that the mainstream parties (conservative / republicans) politicians will start to represent the above values and people like you? (moving the needle)

stop bitching and do something about it

Where does a Aussie get a big titty prozzie and how much?
Nsw

Probably the best explanation of feminism I've ever read.

Don't expect principles.
All women (feminists or not) are for what is expedient.
is it expedient to be for sex work?
is it expedient to be against sex work?

ive married a girl like this, im happy

>Are feminists pro sex work or against it?
who cares

These feminists Always comeup with a new way to distance themselves from responsability and put any blame on the patriarchy.
In Sweden women started tanning topless in the 80-ies. With the new wave of feminist hysteria in the mid 90-ies women stopped sunbathing topless because of muh patriarchy. then more than a decade later some feminist protested against not being able to swim topless in public bathouses and that was ofcourse because of "muh patriarchy" she wasn't allowed to do so.
The constant use of feminism to get personal benefits is what at the same time tears their "movement" apart.

>Are feminists pro sex work or against it?
Neither.

They want "sex work" to serve their agenda.

Both. Their ideal is the wench or the slut. Mothership is too extreme.

>degrading and objectifying of the female body
Which is what makes it so great, although I don't believe any of the prostitutes believe this stupid shit. They're overwhelmingly in the business because of the easy money, secondly for the reason they don't have any real skills. After those two come the actual nymphos and the ones being exploited by others, but those are minority in the business (or so I have been told).
What the fuck do these cunts consider "sex workers" by the way, do they include those annoying camwhores and patreon cunts as well? Cause those should be hated by everyone with a half a brain, why the fuck would you pay some dumb cunt for a cam show while you could spend that money actually fucking.

There is a point in wut ya saying

Both. Their ideal is the hag or the slut. Mothership is too extreme.

This is women forever, even before feminism. Women went back and forth on wearing stockings because not wearing them was too sexy then wearing them was too sexy. They claim all we do is sexualize them but we don't even want them around. It's so irritating.