Dillon Webb arrested and truck towed

basic gestalt?

Freedom of speech does not include advertising pornographic activities, drugs or alcohol. Still nobody here would mind it as long as it's in English.
The English language is inherently offensive. Nothing you can say in English can be any more offensive than the language itself.

He shouldn't have been arrested for it but he's an enormous manchild if he thought that was funny

reason.com/2019/05/08/yes-the-first-amendment-protects-i-eat-ass-bumper-stickers/

I wouldn’t do it, especially in Florida, which has a lot of sincere Christians
but the 1st Amendment is glorious
I could read the cases and watch the videos all day

Does France have anything like the 1st Amendment?
Salut. Je parle francais.

yeah, but
>HOW WOULD'VE A BLACK HANDLED THIS?

Attached: funwblacks307-shiiiieeeet-traffic-stop-shoot.webm (640x360, 2.18M)

Attached: funwblacks894-New-Britain-Niggers-wont-stop-police-shoot.webm (480x270, 1.65M)

Attached: funwblacks504-cops-stop-tyrone-get-run-over.webm (480x270, 2.12M)

Attached: funwblacks159-nigger-DMV-test.webm (282x500, 2.66M)

I wish a cop would arrest me for a personal reason under the color of law. I'd sue until the state was mine.

Me too
I’m not kidding—he’s going to get ~$50,000

Pretty funny and somewhat ironic to me that there are plenty of people with "Fuck Trump" stickers on their cars, but none of them have been arrested.

Attached: Hmmm.gif (720x846, 877K)

Not only that but he will probably get to eat some ass thanks to all this publicity.

Freedom of speech allows one to buy billboard space and put up a scantily clad woman for some sort of advertisment, butb 1A some how doesn't cover one proclaiming that they eat ass?

Attached: Screenshot_20190512-071312_Google.jpg (1415x1943, 1.06M)

kek
Dillon had a better nose for the law than they did

Dillon did great

In this case FLORIDA §847.011 Sec 2. is very broad and far encompassing. The solution would be for a state to ban all bumper stickers from vehicles with the excuse of them causing driver distraction or in this case obstructing a view or rear-view mirror. In some states hanging trinkets or items from your front-view mirror such as a tree air freshener is illegal.

>Does France have anything like the 1st Amendment?
ahahahahahahahahahaha

>Being a french thinker with a website about your political movement
>Don't own the website, someone else legally responsible of it
>Publish pic related
>Jews sue you for antisemitisme
>Publish the closing arguments your lawyer made before the court
>Your lawyer get sued for antisemitisme
>You get sentenced to 1 year of jail for publishing the arguments
>You get sentenced to a $20.000 fine for the picture

Attached: arton48460-c47d0.png (320x181, 119K)

A naked woman isn't obscene. A descriptions of eating ass is more similar to an image of a person eating ass than a naked woman. If he said "I like naked ladies" that wouldn't be obscene.

Attached: 1518021532566.gif (640x360, 3.93M)

Holy shit, that's fucked up. Even the Latin American shitholes still have free speech. Most copied the U.S. Constitution word for word. Feels bad man.

Thanks, user
I could talk about the 1st Amendment all day
:)

Believe it or not, the legal issue is whether people will be aroused
Which arouses you:
>naked woman
>I eat ass bumper sticker

Just cause some idiot doesn't talk to his kids about sex and degeneracy.

Dude really got fucked with? Fuck this country

imagine how much he'd get if some "backlash" happened on the internet? Also, on an entirely unrelated note...has anyone noticed how there are too few people helping other people get large sums of deserved money?

Attached: 1536777323898.gif (800x800, 382K)

That's a retarded definition. It's your legal system trying to find excuses to enforce common values when you have no such thing.
I don't want people shitting up my streets with obscenities like tales of ass eating, because we have shared values most people agree so we ban it. We also agree that naked women aren't obscene. Your society doesn't work because it's too diverse, any minor issue turns into an endless battle.

>Be a nigger comedian
>Make jokes about israel
>Your show get ban for disturbance of public order
>You lawyer up and win
>Peoples are waiting in front of the stadium for the show to begin
>Send the cops
>Wake up a "supreme court" (the french version) jewdge
>The jew decide alone to throw out the french constitution and ban your show 10 minutes before it supposed to start

youtube.com/watch?v=rv2FUY--E_Y

Attached: dieudonne-m-bala-m-bala-a-son-arrivee-au-tribunal-a-paris-le-26-mars-2019_6165422.jpg (480x270, 21K)

god damnit though hearing that guy argue with a cop that "I eat ass" isn't derogatory was fucking hilarious.

What's the problem? Ass is edible.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asinus

Attached: oh god!!!!.jpg (760x779, 361K)

"I'd be happy to demonstrate what "I eat ass" means to your 6 year old, officer."

Attached: chocolate.png (906x579, 487K)

The only shared value in this context is the freedom of speech. We have the right to say whatever we want whenever we want except for calls to action (yelling fire in a crowded room, bomb in an airplane, etc.) your beliefs and morals have nothing to do with me and my rights, and if you think they do I have the right to tell you to go fuck yourself

>your beliefs and morals have nothing to do with me and my rights, and if you think they do I have the right to tell you to go fuck yourself
This is exactly what I'm talking about. You're in constant conflict with yourself and your community because you're a mutt and your community is mixed. If you were a reasonable white person in a reasonable white community you would share beliefs with that community that would be enforced, mostly through social contracts but sometimes law.

There are plenty of avenues for retards to express their love of eating ass, forcing the public to be exposed to your obscenities is not your right. Jerking off in public does not fall under freedom of expression and neither do written public obscenities.

There was that time when David Attenborough was narrating some show, I think it was Planet Earth, and he said "wild ass" in that characteristic voice.
Lost my shit.

Attached: dc03d7ed85203cadd8c57afe7d7580e61e6e38b0.jpg (1416x1416, 360K)

Eating ass is degenerate, and broadcasting that you eat ass is even more degenerate, but this is yet another attack on free speech in the U.S.

Police are just lackeys for the globohomo establishment.

Wait, WAT?
What if you run out of deer, or cow, or pork? A man can not survive on eating chicken and fish alone.

Attached: Bunny_Boy_Collection_02.jpg (833x1200, 138K)

Another manlet cop.
>if I put on this government suit maybe people will think I'm a real man

Attached: eat ASS.jpg (720x720, 304K)

Attached: https___api.thedrive.com_wp-content_uploads_2019_02_assman-3.jpg (1440x810, 155K)

"Isn't that resisting???" FUCK COPS. LMAO. You cowardly fuck pieces of shit. If any of you had an ounce of SPINAL CHORD you would have joined the military like people who have BALLS do.

Fucking coward cunts.

KEK

Fucking America. You can own guns and shoot people on your property in self-defence, you can drive a car at 16, BUT GOD DAMN IF SOMEONE HAS THE WORD "ASS" WRITTEN ON A WINDOW WE WILL COME AFTER YOU.

Attached: 1548016251359.jpg (500x418, 52K)

Kek
You cant yell I eat ass in a crowded theater.

If user really wanted change they'd start killing judges instead of shooting up movie theaters and shit.

I don't think we want to change into Juarez

We have morals in this country. All of those examples you mentioned in your post are good American wholesome values.
Publicly displaying your into eating ass during sex is an embarrassment to himself. Who the hell cares if he licks peanuts out of an asshole? So what if he has a constitutional right to have this on his truck "There are some things you just don't say" This guy is clearly seeking attention.

Attached: 1553295336752.jpg (620x807, 84K)

a foolproof trigger for cops has been found
this is dangerous and you will be arrested (make sure there’s lots of cops and public observing):
“Eat a dick, you piece of shit.”
just one guy is terrorizing the entire state of Rhode Island, all the cops

It’s perfectly acceptable in (((Weimar America))). You can be degenerate as you want to be.

Attached: 653FF74C-14A3-4990-B5D0-716AD06D088D.png (1125x1525, 2.18M)

This cop is the biggest cuck. He should have just shot this nigger and been done with it.

You can't yell nigger repeatedly in comedy clubs either

That’s the thing about the 1st Amendment, everyone can have at the video and make their argument
I’m not patronizing you
Dillon may have cost himself in the future, job-wise for example

theres youtube personalities who intentionally put obnoxious shit on their vehicle and then try to get arrested or in confrontation over it, so they can tell the other person how its their right etc

its fairly common, was some faggots who did it on liveleak years ago

how do you guys feel about it now?

Attached: 17456353434.jpg (580x358, 60K)

>White guy gets pulled over and arrested because cop is an asshole
>White guy acts respectfully and fights his charge within the boundary of the law
>Gets 50,000 dollars
Black guy gets pulled over and arrested
>"FUK U HONKEY ASS BITCH" *runs*
>Gets shot

Gross

If the cop had made arguments like that, maybe I’d be for the cop
But here’s what happened:
>cop got triggered, which is bad in a cop who can maim or kill
>supervisor didn’t have any understanding of law at all—cites law that bans possessing obscene material in your own home, clearly unconstitutional
>escalates situation with idiotic option to remove one letter (what if Dillon removed I”
>arrests him and won’t let his Mom drive truck but towes it
>taxpayers pay ~$50,000
>cop will never see the glory of the 1st Amendment

KEK

I like it but I'd like it more if it Said 2D

...

This.

>The only shared value in this context is the freedom of speech.
False. "Free speech" is just an ad hoc argument the left uses to advance degeneracy and subversion. No one in power actually believes in free speech absolutism.

Attached: 1537163676742.jpg (1560x851, 289K)

>>supervisor didn’t have any understanding of law at all—cites law that bans possessing obscene material in your own home, clearly unconstitutional
That sort of law is perfectly legal.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._California
>The question before the court was whether the sale and distribution of obscene material was protected under the First Amendment's guarantee of Freedom of Speech. The Court ruled that it was not. It indicated that "obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment"

>"Heroic policeman saves town from Maniac"

You're Iceland, dipshit. You don't know what freedom is. You have to pick your kid's names off of a fucking list.

Cops are still the bad guys in both those scenarios.

volokh cited Stanley v. Georgia (1969)
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_v._Georgia

KEK

>The Court reasoned that unless the pornography is presented in a way that creates a negative externality on others, especially minors (Roth), no individual can be stopped from owning and viewing pornography in private.

Not really relevant here.

Those Satanic Jews that control everything and mostly everybody! If they are your enemy, then you must, you must be somebody!

Because we value our culture and language. It means we have no Muhammeds. You rage against degeneracy but then undermine vital traditions that keep degeneracy in check like naming conventions. You think freedom means being able to jerk off in public when real freedom is being able to walk around without faggots jerking off everywhere. Freedom is the power to be able to enact your will, in a society where nobody agrees there is no possibility to accomplish anything and no freedom.

>ah ave fo khids

why do they let manlets procreate let alone be cops?

Agreed, but if the law is unconstitutional, it’s invalid
here’s Volokh:
reason.com/2019/05/08/yes-the-first-amendment-protects-i-eat-ass-bumper-stickers/

IS THAT NOT RESISTING, fucking lmao i hate cops

>Libertarian Lawyer

Can't trust them. They're generally only right in their heads, and usually lose in court.

Hell, I know he's full of shit because of this
>he also can't be prosecuted for resisting an officer, a charge that appears to be based solely on Dillon's refusal to redact the sticker.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heien_v._North_Carolina
>The Court published its opinion on December 15, 2014, affirming the lower court by an 8-1 vote. Chief Justice Roberts authored the majority opinion, with Justice Kagan filing a concurring opinion in which Justice Ginsburg joined, and Justice Sotomayor filing a dissenting opinion. The majority held that a police officer's reasonable mistake of law can indeed provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to justify a traffic stop based upon that understanding.
I.E. "You have to listen to cops and follow their orders, even if the cops are wrong about the law"

That's my point too. He is ALLOWED to have that on his truck. But his moral obligation should have exercised better judgments.
Unless this is his way to troll the cops for some gibs. If that's the case, well good for him then
On a side note though, I i saw that in the mall parking lot with my family. I would have scraped that off his windows.

Attached: 20190419_173206.jpg (4032x1960, 1.65M)

No, agreed
Volokh is talking about prosecution
Dillon’s charges were all already dropped

If a cop tells you to swallow his glob and you refuse that is resisting without violence. Trump's America is niggerfaggotland

Literally why police reform goes nowhere. We were close to a watershed moment back in the early 10s. White people were afraid of the cops, black people were. Then BLM showed up spewing their BS, and people like you started bitching that not enough white people were getting shot.
And guess what? Poor, rural whites realized that, like always with liberal 'reforms, this was going to skip over them and only help the inner cities. So they dropped all support for it.

user makes an important point
We have no right to resist cops no matter how stupid
Idea is comply, then sue the shit out of the deep pockets
But, I still wonder
It’s dangerous not to comply
But with the risk comes much bigger settlements or verdicts

he should have taken the sticker off himself, or had the truck impounded. fuck this faggot, anyone that says 'i eat ass' should be hanged by the neck

>to learn who rules over you, find out who you cant criticize

his kids probably look at /b/ and /gif/

Would you ban Joyce’s Ulysses?

You wish you knew......
Enjoy not having rights.

get a load of this retarded burger and his self righteous attitude. No other country respects you and I can't wait until the Chinese take over your country. Only then will America be great again, loser

How about people who have the rainbow flag on their car? That's basically the same as announcing I Eat Ass, I Pound Ass, I Suck Cock, etc.

>Guess who just won ~$50,000

dude hasn't won shit yet. his lawyer only announced friday he would sue.

I would not ban any books. You have to seek it out to read it. Advertising your book about eating ass on your car is pornographic advertising. Advertising is a form of mind control that exerts power over minds including children. To maximize individual freedom, creativity and expression advertising and public propaganda has to be heavily regulated. This like everything else is of course impossible unless you have an ethnically homogeneous and unified intelligent white nation.