What's wrong with sexual degeneracy if it is done by consenting adults behind closed doors...

I don't care about private degeneracy as long as it's consenting adults or fucking an animal that is ok with sex. The Problem is when this shit gets pushed mainstream in order to recruit more degenerates, thus weakening society by creating a culture war. Degenerates who are too far (I.E don't just do their sexual kinks in their down time to reward themselves after working hard) and start "parading" or going to conventions, or promoting it in public are the same as your average Jew in my Opinion… (They also stastically are less productive and ofter require more social support and (((affirmative action)))

There are no closed doors when everyone has a webcam in their pocket.

That kid is high as kite. Also he looks 30.

Attached: how faggs breed.png (2550x3300, 238K)

You aren't going to find porn by accident bro

> behind closed doors
It isn't though.

It's a bit surprising that the femdom (sub-)culture flourished mainly in NYC and LA, and not in the capital of degeneracy, SF.
Until you realize that the ethnicity overrepresented in early femdom community is also overrepresented in these two towns, and that the femdom ideology is simply feminist extremism.
Pic related.
t. oldfag and former degenerate

Attached: Screenshot_2019-05-12 Category Feminists by religion - Wikipedia.png (1005x651, 53K)

she's attractive

I am old enough to remember when faggots used this argument saying it will not affect you. Now they fuck each other on huge parade floats on a public street

>she

Attached: unnamed.jpg (900x900, 77K)

>if

I just bought a fucking pair, same with Gillette when I replaced my BIC shit, always one step behind these fuckers :(

>femdom ideology is simply feminist extremism
How?
When was the last time you saw faggots having public sex during a parade?

But no. Fags do everything in there power to make it known that they shove their penis up other mens anuses and that's ok. Except it really, really isn't ok.

>What's wrong with sexual degeneracy
why give legitimacy to something we’re all vulnerable to? much of our success is based on recognition of our weaknesses!

i hate this world.
it doesn't even matter if you are right or not.
it's just impossible to look at it now and not think "something might be fishy".
5 years ago it would have been "wtf are you talking about retard"?

There's occult, jewish stuff in some of the femdom strapon porn. The painting in pic related has some weird turbaned figures photo shopped onto it. I think this is some jewish, Sabbatian thing.

Attached: VICIOUS_FEMDOM_EMPIRE_-_Queen_of_the_Campus._Starring_Miss_Love.mp4.00002-1.jpg (331x181, 22K)

Keep it off the streets, keep it in the sheets.

It's the same logic goes behind if more people had more guns we'd be safe.

>if it is done by consenting adults behind closed doors
Because degenerates can't keep their degeneracy behind closed doors. They're practically compelled to advertise it publicly

This! Fag degeneracy thread

>They're practically compelled to advertise it publicly
Vocal minority, when was the last time you've seen someone discuss degenerate sex other than homosexuality or transgenderism in public?

>What's wrong with sexual degeneracy if it is done by consenting adults behind closed doors?
Women cannot consent.
Literally everything can be rape.
So we got us a nice lil problem here.

It's pure female supremacism, by their own admission
vice.com/en_us/article/kzew8w/inside-the-strange-sexual-female-supremacy-movement

> Inanna is also an important figure in modern BDSM culture.[298] Author and historian Anne O. Nomis has cited the portrayal of Inanna in the myth of Inanna and Ebih as an early example of the dominatrix archetype,[299] characterizing her as a powerful female who forces gods and men into submission to her.[299] Scholar Paul Thomas has criticized the modern portrayal of Inanna, accusing it of anachronistically imposing modern gender conventions on the ancient Sumerian story, portraying Inanna as a wife and mother,[300] two roles the ancient Sumerians never ascribed to her,[300][1] while ignoring the more masculine elements of Inanna's cult, particularly her associations with warfare and violence.[300]

you excluded those 2 particular forms of degeneracy for a good reason, those 2 are the most public forms.
Honestly, if they keep it to themselves and away from kids then i really dont care.
but they never do

>behind closed doors
They don't keep it there

Exactly. The fags have proven that none of it will stay behind closed doors.

>Vocal minority
fewer than 3% of “Nazis” were charged with (((war crimes))), Vocal minority, right?

Because it's a fundamental character flaw that will eventually work its way into everyday life and harm those around you. Pedo transvestites openly grooming little kids to do drag strip shows is an alarming example of this.

Nothing if its behind closed doors. Same as anything sexual. The issue is that it's being made daily life and faggots and women only see value in how many cocks they mongle so they push it as the standard life style.

That's why life has gone to shit since women realised they vote as a bloc and noone can beat them.

If they kept it quiet it wouldn't be an issue. Problem is that they won't stop shoving their perversion in your face, and in your children's face.

Because it does not stay behind closed doors is the problem. Listen, if you like sticking weird things inside you, or doing weird things when you are by yourself, personally i dont give a shit at all and if anything would say keep on doing it so long as its not hurting anyone or anything and no kids are involved. The problem becomes when (((They))) Try to normalize the behavior and say oh its totally normal accept me!

NO its not normal, stop trying to say its normal, thats the fucking point of it, to not be normal, thats the point of taboo that makes it appealing because its socially not right. This is the exact same shit that happened in the BDSM community, where shit like 50 shades tried to make it normal, its not!

Im into some weird shit, like ill admit on an anonymous board, i get off to furry and drawn/animated beast porn. But i know its not fucking normal and degenerate and i dont want it to be.

(((They))) want to make it normal to make a profit off of it.

pedos cant even keep their goddamn mouths shut anymore
at least theyll be easier to identify for dotr

It's not behind close doors, it has spilled over to the outside and now you have shit like tranny children dancing in pride parades with naked grown men, women dressing up like back alley prostitutes and being celebrated because of it.
It's always the slippery slope

I garuntee you, if faggots just acted like normal people, and it was literally a case of, Oh btw i like to stick my dick in other dudes ass, or vise verse, and that was the end of the conversation, fags would have been accepted a long time ago and no one would care. But they parade around the fact they are gay, literally in some cases, and they get all pissed off when you dont like the fact they are waving their dicks and gayness infront of you, again, some times literally.

Keep that shit behind doors and no one would give a crap.

>when other than those most prevelant examples?
>moving the goalposts.jpeg

>vocal minorities, don't warp discourse goym
>ignore them when making a point, but dont ignore them when in the real world or you will get sued

Attached: knowledge will set you free.jpg (700x588, 44K)

Behavior behind doors is not some abstraction that has no bearing on behavior in public.

Saying it is behind closed doors is a lie.
If you ever give a woman the upper hand in a sexual or whatever situation, she will lose respect for you.
Degeneracy leads to destruction.

>Dominatriqua

do i get change on my $5

Attached: 2019-05-12 19_55_06-Inside the Strange, Sexual 'Female Supremacy' Movement - VICE - Opera. (830x545, 558K)

>What's wrong with sexual degeneracy if it is done by consenting adults behind closed doors?
Why do you think degenerates should be allowed to be degenerates behind closed doors?

>What's wrong with sexual degeneracy if it is done by consenting adults behind closed doors?
Literally nothing.
But that's now what's happening now. Degeneracy is forced upon everyone.

>buying anything without doing research
>buying mass marketed globohomo chinkshit products

This

I'm more into more degenerate shit than any of them, I just dont push it on people
I don't want it to be normal, because then it loses its charm

If you like a thing, you don't push it on everyone, everyone includes people that you don't want to be associated with
Why would you want to include people you don't want to include?

Because the people pushing this shit aren't into it, don't care about its quality, and they're trying to make a profit off of making it more ubiquitous

Tldr; Da Joos

Fpbp

The thing about degeneracy isn't the resulting consequences. The act of degeneracy itself is an abomination before God.

It's ok behind closed doors. Now tell that to the fag pride parade in the middle of the street fucktard

Attached: 1557160924656.jpg (600x315, 38K)

You didn't understand the post if you think its about god

>behind the closed doors

Attached: 1557665030989 degeneracy weimar.webm (640x480, 1.88M)

>Please explain how some people with weird kinks or whatever will supposedly ruin our civilization
So you're saying that people should be allowed to be as degenerate as they want in private?

Why?

Yes, one stupid nigger is representative of all dominatrices

Read the red text in

See

They also said "we're not coming after your children", now parents can lose their child if they don't want their child to be a degenerate, or worse, schools indoctrinate children with this shit, tax payers funded.

Because you faggots can’t keep it behind your bedroom doors. That’s why there are faggots in rainbow capes shaking their dicks around kids in the middle of town now.

why not?

honestly, I dont give a shit what people do in the privacy of their own home. As long as it does no involvement of parties that cannot consent (children, etc.).

I do, however, have a problem with degeneracy as soon as they bring it to the public and try to normalize or 'celebrate' it. That's why I am against pride marches and similar events. These kind of people all deserve the oven, unironically.

>why not?
Answer my question without another question.

Then I'll state "why not".

There's only so much of this shit God is going to tolerate before He snaps.

Attached: 1.jpg (660x275, 27K)

Attached: behind the closed doors03.png (1154x1356, 2.42M)

>that pic
Top kek, saved.
>oldfag and former degenerate
Same and I also have the same views about it as you. It's also no wonder that the BDSM is generally full of leftists. It is also deeply tied with pornography addiction and the conditioning you are doing to yourself by frequently consuming porn. Whatever it was done deliberately or not, it is like perfect machine for subversion and destruction of a nation's male capital.

>my personality: gay
>my hobbies: gay
>my job: gay

/thread

Attached: begone.jpg (300x250, 13K)

...I don't think it's about God, big guy. I was just adding my own thoughts so my post wouldn't just be a useless "fpbp" post.

Hell fire WHEN

>t. godless heathen trannies

Am i a cuck for letting my girlfriend grind her pussy on my face i love when shes on top like that

Attached: college_house_fuckfest.jpg (350x400, 86K)

Attached: behind the closed doors04.png (1500x1186, 2.92M)

Your opinions damaged the fpbp, for both being not relevant to the quoted post, and being fucking gay

Posts are not a limited resource you can always separate them
Multiple backlinks are one of the indicators of a fucking moron
Keep quote chains topics clear
KYS

Ianna's consort was allegedly Lilith...
scary stuff user. stop looking.

I've realized another paradox with these people lately:
> there is no such thing as race
> raceplay is pretty popular

> Have to subscribe to netflix and actively seek out the show to see it
yes user, they are practically shoving it in your face

Yeah, it's based on contradictions. There literally isn't a single part of their "ideology" without it.

Nice dishonesty
Go be a Jew somewhere else

Well, we can broaden this to libertarians in general, actually.

If libertarians have a golden rule, it's this; we should all be free to do whatever we want except where our freedom to act harms the freedom of others.

This is a pretty neat and elegant rule, absolutely. It defends freedom to act while still covering for most of "the basics," things like murder, theft and rape. You would never be able to defend absolute freedom to most people and the ones who would be convinced would be primarily people who think they can leap ahead in chaos, i.e. bad actors.

There's a flaw here, however, and it's in the word "harm." What degree of harm counts? Let's consider bonfires for instance. Having a bonfire on your property with wood you own seems pretty libertarian. But any wood fire produces fine particulates, and according to the EPA;
>Fine particles can make asthma symptoms worse and trigger asthma attacks. Fine particles can also trigger heart attacks, stroke, irregular heart rhythms, and heart failure, especially in people who are already at risk for these conditions.
The risk is pretty slim, but still present. Maybe you say "fine, don't have those conditions around my bonfire" but your smoke goes on other properties. So we must ask; did your neighbors consent to you raising their risk of heart attack/stroke by whatever infinitesimal percentage you raised it?

But if you can't have a bonfire on your own property without this kind of infringement, what CAN you do?

So let's get back to sexual deviance (I'll be non-judgmental in terms). If a woman likes having sex with strange men with no protection, the libertarian might say that's her right and it doesn't infringe on anyone. Well, she eventually gets pregnant as was only likely, but it's still her choice to have it, says the libertarian. All self-contained, right? Get out of her bedroom!

Attached: Z5-sLJTUqo0.jpg (500x500, 76K)

Yes
christianorigins.div.ed.ac.uk/2017/10/25/the-sin-of-cunnilingus/

>We just want to live a normal life without being judged. What we do in our intimacy is our business.
>Well, it'd be nice if we could be represented in the media to help people understand a little bit better.
>Haha really? I mean... Umh... I gues you could also give tolerance lessons in schools and all, right? Now that we've come so far...
>HAHAHAHA BIGOT! WHAT DO YOU MEAN I CAN THROW MONEY AT THIS LITTLE DRAG-KID IN A PARADE GOING AROUND THE MAIN STREETS OF YOUR CITY HAHAAHHA

Attached: 57358339_556250451531039_3206866104750212857_n[1].jpg (480x480, 29K)

yea this concept of females taking over the planet for a 6,000 to 10,000 year reign is not new in fact it puts all the trans/LGBT/ww3/mass starvation stuff into a new light.

Wrong. That kid grows up the child of a single mom with a carnival of men in her life. That kid is significantly more likely to be poor, socially maladjusted and criminal. That affects everyone that kid is ever around and affects the society as a whole. But let's also consider that other women in this woman's community can see her getting away with this. They now know that you can have tons of unprotected sex in your bedroom and have a kid out of wedlock and nobody will do anything to punish you. And so at least a few women who might've not done that instead do it because it seems fun and it's their body they can do what they want. It's not in their rational self-interest, but people, especially young people, don't always act that way. Now you've multiplied that one child of a single mom to be many, many children of single moms, who when they grow up will have the same deleterious effects on the society around them that the one kid did, except magnified several times over. Given enough time, poor socialization and lack of discipline, eventually everyone might be like that.

Oh, wait...am I discussing a theoretical example or the actual trends in America? Roughly 3 out of every 4 black children are born into single parent (single mother) homes. Roughly 1 in 4 white children are too, hispanic somewhere in the middle. This is up from a percentage of practically none at the beginning of the 20th century for ALL the groups listed above. Yes, ALL of them. All those kids are sabotaged, and will go on to sabotage others and the world they live in, all because of a decision that we thought was private.

The trick of the libertarian philosophy is that it looks at humans as individuals, when humans do not live or act as individuals basically ever. Aside from the most remote wildman hobo, all humans live in and depend on groups of one type or another. The neat divide that the libertarian perceives is not real, we all affect each other just by living in the world.

Attached: Z7BLU5osMgk.jpg (500x500, 55K)

>instead of making white babies?
check his flag

Yes faggot, they are. Fuck you and your degenerate bullshit. Die slow.

>animal ok with sex
>checks flag

Attached: C3F17C00-93D3-473D-AB4F-4F1122F5FC6C.gif (320x240, 1.95M)

i only found out about that because of someone posting it here dummy.

I find it very interesting how the people who claim to be fine with degeneracy "just as long as it's in private" can't actually explain why it's fine in private.

It's so tiresome.

>behind closed doors
>wedding cakes
>gay marriage
>pedo gay parades
Hey, behind closed doors, it's fine. The problem is, the only people you can trust to keep it behind closed doors are normal, regular, law abiding, non degenerate people-if you can call them that for the sake of this argument. It's like expecting bad guys to respect gun ban laws. In an idealistic utopia, it'd be great. In reality, it's naive and stupid. The only people you can trust with degenerate behavior is non degenerates, making a ironic twist catch 22 situation.

Attached: how-quick-it-happens.jpg (2421x4900, 3.96M)

Attached: coachella-herpes.jpg (745x975, 118K)

Also this whole "behind close doors" argument is retarded. If you are interested about doing it just behind the close doors, then why the fuck do you care what others would say about it? They will never know, thus there is no need to talk about it. This is top tier intellectual dishonesty.

Enlightenment is understanding you need to match consequences with behaviors

The Libertarians error is they axiomatically deny group responsibility

The Socialists error is they axiomatically deny individual responsibility

There are both individual and group responsibilities, and some in between

None of this matters anyway, because the con-man will always extort any system devised till it breaks, it's only a matter of time
There are also known as Da Joos

>Hey, behind closed doors, it's fine.
Why?

Kink has existed since at least the invention of tools. Arguably far before as fucking your women while she's wrapped in the furs of your kills is arguably furry cosplay.

I've had a small revelation once regarding the divine law. It was in the period when I was an atheist. After becoming and atheist I have very quickly noticed that although I don't care about God and commandments, I still have to follow the commandments, because not following them has negative consequences. If I steal something, the owner will call the police on me. If I fuck a neighbor's wife, he will beat me up. Etc., etc.
At this point I realized that it helps to think about the commandments not as LAWS, but as RECOMMENDATIONS. Since these are recommendations, you are of course free to do otherwise, and God respects that. (And no, God does not keep detailed accounts of your transgressions, and even if He does, He does not care). However there is inherent risk in doing so, so most of the time, you will find out that you are following the commandments out of calculation.
This is also the problem with libertarianism: it does not understand the risks.