Do you use BC and AD or BCE and CE?

Attached: 8da1a88dec758436a1239f36765865c4.jpg (1125x1377, 110K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

BC and AD.

race traitoring kike worshiper

Attached: boomers minds.jpg (1110x715, 193K)

>race traitoring
you don't even know your race, kid.

I use YBCY, years before current year, because it's always the current year.

Allah means God.
This makes Americans sound so ignorant.

BC and AD. BCE and CE are jewish terms.

>we wuz jews?
kek

Attached: 1557675873905.jpg (1279x835, 117K)

>Do you use BC and AD or BCE and CE?
I think it seemed stupid to most atheists even, to change convention for sensitive reasons. Why? It is what it is. Who feels emotional about it either way that isn't also retarded? I'll always use AD and BC, but it doesn't really affect people,. Its only used when telling time in reference to a certain date. Its a dumb thing to want to politicize.

Um ok. Love you too

Allah is a moon god

>Allah means God. This makes Americans sound so ignorant.
Thanks, I've never heard that 10,000 times. I'll be less aware now that Islam is crypto neo-Judism..

Why don't they change the names on the calendar from pagan Roman gods? Why is it only Christianity that gets targeted?

this. I don't think I even know what the other two stand for but I expect they are atheistic

If the US is Christian then why is a US state called an Islamic Caliphate?

California I'm looking at you.

Basically Before Common Era and Common Era. I prefer BC and AD myself.

What about AL

Ok justin

>American
>calling someone race traitor

Attached: 1553075433799.jpg (225x225, 6K)

>Why don't they change the names on the calendar from pagan Roman gods?
To what? The first of the year used to be the solstice in March in the early middle ages. The months of September, October, November, and December are literally latin for 7, 8, 9 10 (month); respectively. July and August fucked it all up with Julius and Augustus, but the first of the year changed quite a few times in history. Its old and its convention. Why waste time unless you're butthurt about it? I speak mostly to the Jews and atheists.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

BC and AD
Some times i write out "before Christ" and "Anno Domini" too
Not a huge thing but you can tell how shitlibs and poc get uncomfortable about it

Atheist. Use BC and AD. Tradition matters. Jews are shit.

Thanks. From a Christian.

It's like your entire nation was just set up to create rootless goyim cattle class kek.

BC and AD. CE and BCE dont make any sense. What the fuck is the common era?

Attached: 64b49beebd8d539c92ee5c0d184c48567768c7b079eb8cfd83e8739a69712373.jpg (466x265, 21K)

BC and AD.
only right answer. ce and bce are newspeak.
they became popular when atheism became popular, it was quite disgusting to watch people begin to use the term, in fact. yes, there is some wiki-explanation you can argue to rationalize their use, but its all essentially pozzed garbage.
deus vult.

Get some flouride, gopnik.

I'm not sure he even knew what he meant with that post. WTF does congress have to do with it?

>2771
>not using Ab Urbe Condita

Attached: tumblr_n8hzza9IQd1rgcqrbo1_500.png (500x421, 126K)

I use the based Japanese calendar this 11th day of the Reiwa era

Using the term "current era" to describe something 1500 years ago is pants on head retarded. BC and AD masterrace

Dumbass, CE stands for Christian Era and BCE stands for Before Christian Era. It's an attempt to fix the fact that BC is literally an English term while AD is a Latin term.

Not to mention it causes less confusion.
Try getting a school kid to tell the difference intuitively between 300CE and 300BCE, they look almost identical . Now compare with AD and BC. They don’t share any letters and have clear memorable meanings.

Every Jew I've seen use BCE and CE called it Common Era. They hate Christians too much to ever use the words Christ or Christian as anything that isn't inherently negative.

BCE and CE

BCE and CE make more sense. Also the United States is a demographically majority Christian nation with a secular government, and shariah here is illegal. So it cannot be Islamic. Please stop conflating global dating standards with Wahhabist infiltration of our government, or what ever this is turning into.
Tradition for traditions sake results in a stagnant backward society.
Don’t you think you should be able to answer that yourself before denigrating this acronym? No, of course not.

He's lying. Every textbook said Common Era.

BC / AD

>Tradition for traditions sake results in a stagnant backward society
Prove that using AD and BC has made our society backwards and stagnant. Glib statements are just that, glib.

Government is not secular. Don't make me laugh. Separation of church and state is impossible- that's why it's not in the Constitution.

BC and AD. It pisses me off when I see it the other way.

Lol, I’m not the one sperging over a decades old dating acronym because I feel it threatens my nebulous traditions.

Of course it stands for ‘common’ not Christian. The whole reason for the change is so they didn’t have to write the Lords name which they hate.

It means America is not a Christian nation. Nor a Muslim nation. Nor a Hindu nation. Nor a Jewish nation. Nor a Taoist nation....or any other religion.
If you don't like it, go live in another country.

Sure it is. It cannot, among other things, recognize a religion. This makes it secular, and also makes shariah impossible.

we don't need more "deconstruction"

BC / AD functions as a good semiotic universal understanding of time. or would you rather each nation use some arbitrary time stamp of their own preference (to avoid being culturally "insensitive")?

While we're at it, let's change PM & AM since those are also too "Western"

AUC

Any other dating system is cuck-tier

>The whole reason for the change is so they didn’t have to write the Lords name which they hate.
So much this. Is it any doubt Jesus is the most loved and hated man at the same time? A tertiary proof that He is God. Its so strange, Jesus wasn't absurdly legalistic like Judism (as understood now), and Islam. In many ways Buddahism and Confucianism are closer as most forms of those are anti-legalistic. Not so with the other two Abramic religions. No name has ever been more hated or disbelieved for what He said He was than His.

it's not judiasm as well. They are the antichrists of the world the bible speaks so fondly of.

Ironically calling the birth of Jesus the common era is probably more insulting than the simple latin

>jews always target runes and shit
>do nothing about the fact that the days of the week are named after Asatru gods

>It means America is not a Christian nation. Nor a Muslim nation. Nor a Hindu nation. Nor a Jewish nation. Nor a Taoist nation....or any other religion.If you don't like it, go live in another country.
Nice post. What is it then? Where do its values come from? Even if you say Enlightenment philosophy, it came from the Bible. Would never support a theocracy, even if I was at its head. It tends towards corruption. You can take God out of official government, but not God out of man. What in the sam hill does this have to do with AD/BC or BCE/CE?

Based and Absolutely Civilised

Attached: 1494787262546.png (2000x1800, 806K)

I don’t know. Seems odd for a universal system when it applies only to one religion. Christianity is historically significant, but it’s only one religion. It’s just not that important, especially in the majority of the planet that isn’t Christian.

I'm a fedora tipper and I use BC/AD. BCE/CE is just a needless swipe at Christianity, and for no good reason. We all know what year is being referred to and the singificance of it.

America is a Christian nation. If you don't like it, LEAVE.

Attached: 6b06fb6a9babc5376f46ad3106d35657.jpg (704x890, 225K)

It can't establish a religion. It can definitely recognize a religion.

>prohibiting the free exercise thereof
When that entails honor killings, stoning. wholesale murder, and suicide bombing of nonbelievers, you gotta say fuck it.

Yeah, the Constitution has a point, but it also has a limit when it comes to islam.

Attached: im_calling_bullshit1.jpg (297x462, 30K)

î. Hr. and d. Hr.

0363019.M03
You fucking Heretics

Attached: 06d.gif (240x320, 663K)

We’d rather just keep secularism here.

>seems odd
>for two thousand years

Literally it cannot do this. Because Christians hate each other, so the founders knew that the only way to prevent catholic vs Protestant violence as well as Protestant on Protestant violence was an unbiased government.

Even Atheists don't like you. Good luck with that.

BC & AD
Atheists are retards
it doesn't matter what they choose to SAY
both use THE BIRTH OF CHRIST
as their focal date

Yes, but people used to treat blood loss with leeches. Best practices evolve.

I mean you need to go back and read the speeches, letters and prayers of the Founders as well as our official documents such as the end of the Declaration of Independence.

And people now kill a baby in the womb out of convenience. We progressed so much further than the thinkers who invented everything we build our technology on.

Christianity is the religion of the West. Japanese use regnal years, Muslims use AH. Only the West is expected to cuck out at its own expense, and the new system is also expected to replace indigenous systems of epoch dating. And to top it off it was invented by the same retards that cry about indigenous tribes in Niggerland giving up their culture in exchange for cellphones and bling. Liberals truly are the most retarded fucks ever.

I’m sorry I don’t think you’re belief system is the center of the universe. You do. Not everyone is there, sometimes they abandon the outdated trappings of relics left in culture by others. It’s both natural, and not a threat to your faith.

>We’d rather just keep secularism here.
I find fault in your logic sir, thinking that philosophy and politics isn't a substitute for religion when you disown it entirely. Take 'religion' away, and you'll form your own 'religion'. The truth is that many a 'leftist' and 'liberal' atheist is uncomfortable when secularism gets militant and irrational. Which it is in many ways today in the US. There's a better middle path.

Islam is a lie.
May all Americans declare it to the world!

Attached: image.jpg (1275x1650, 329K)

Worshipping undead is pretty hardcore desu

Attached: cc3d8b661fd78f44d7618e624441f401.jpg (476x479, 52K)

Muh aborshun screed status: active. Sorry. I can’t even pretend to take you seriously now.
Please. Pagan Southern Europe was part of the whole Silk Road historical transit system. Christian Europe did amazing things, but was a cog in a larger apparatus. It only took over with the industrial revolution/age of sail.

And you have fun burning in Hell.

Attached: 0c33a64be64ce7dae364511aee9ebd99.jpg (390x468, 54K)

and what is the rationalization for this particular change? a smug attitude, needing to go around correcting everything, not wanting to acknowledge how the sacrifice of one man changed everything in history?

>Don’t you think you should be able to answer that yourself before denigrating this acronym? No, of course not.

Historically the year 0 was rather boring aside from the birth of Christ our Lord. Is there something uncommon about the world that existed before that? Theres no reason for Common Era to be used other than hatred for Christ and God.

Attached: 6acd25819da6064c1514754eb41b9e7bb34fe12db70ef7ea7e3967d0d4dfdb87.jpg (1280x720, 126K)

I have a religion. I’m just not Christian. I value secular government for this reason.

Because I'm supposed to take you seriously.

Attached: Screenshot_20190418-080419~2.png (951x1023, 780K)

Yes. The birthday of Lord Yakub, creator of white people. He is our one, true progenitor.

> Before Christ and Anno Domine
> Before Christian Era and Christian Era
what's the big difference? I use the traditional form though

Moo. Aborshun. Moo. Jeebus fetus greet us amen.

>I have a religion.
> I’m just not Christian.
Fine with me.
>. I value secular government for this reason.
You value secular government because you're not Christian? I said I was, and would not support a theocracy. Are you young or a journalist?

No. I just lived in a very Christian place. Aggressively Christian. Theocratically Christian within social norms. Awful way to live. Invasive, no privacy, constant judgement. The only difference between shariah backing jihadists and fundamentalist Christians is language when it comes to goals.

I don't worry too much about details like that. Kikes like to think if you say words they connivingly invented and tricked people into using wrong that it means you are more bad and they think this justifies all the disgusting shit they do. The evil people will burn in hell.

Where is it? I really have been looking for a place just like that.

Attached: 7a5b2972f66cfe627db73875e24c9083.jpg (476x612, 82K)

Oh boy!

fpbp

fuck the jews and their revisionism
>nuke israel

Attached: water-polo-ass-smack.jpg (640x426, 203K)

I see, a young Jew. Maybe you're sensitive for a reason. I'll leave you with this brother.
You can't Love God and Hate your brother at the same time. Have a good day.

>Aggressively Christian.

you fucked up slomo
get a new proxy

Attached: jews.jpg (1217x598, 138K)

we're in CY+4, newfag

>Please.

Your entire response had nothing to do with my post which is that it's both arrogant and retarded to expect foreigners to give up their system of dating while simultaneously giving up the Western system merely to appease shitskins who will never actually care what liberals do because they are apes.

>religion
>not christian

Just a jew then

BC and AD at home.
BCE and CE at work.
[spoiler]I work in a church

> Before Christian Era and Christian Era

Nah its because a certain group of people didnt like using the Lord name. Its always one big coincidence.

"The expression has been traced back to 1615, when it first appeared in a book by Johannes Kepler as the Latin usage annus aerae nostrae vulgaris,[6][7] and to 1635 in English as "Vulgar[b] Era". The term "Common Era" can be found in English as early as 1708,[8] and became more widely used in the mid-19th century by Jewish religious scholars. In the later 20th century, the use of CE and BCE was popularized in academic and scientific publications, and more generally by authors and publishers wishing to emphasize sensitivity to non-Christians, by not explicitly referencing Jesus as "Christ" and Dominus ("Lord") through use of the abbreviation[c] "AD".[10][11]"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era

Attached: 1538603851109.gif (666x716, 1.72M)

Common Era is just a delusion as it still admits that we count years since Our Lord has came down to Earth

fpbp

Look up Mikey Weinstein.

The reason for the change is because the monk who calculated our BC/AD had Christ's birth wrong. He wasn't actually born in 1 AD. He would have been born between 6-3 BC. But since you have the actual birth year of Christ at a time other than the fulcrum point of the dating system built around his birth, it then seems silly to keep it. The alternative would be to recalculate every single historical date in every single publication. This year would actually be between 2013-2016 not 2019. What a tremendous mess, right? Well, we just change BC to BCE and AD to CE. The Common Era is the era that we've all just been using in common, even though it's not actually tied to Christ's birth like we thought it was. This is not an issue to be upset about. It's factually more accurate.