TL;DR: We must begin to view ourselves as a conspiratorial elite, a vanguard of Western civilization, in order to effectively pursue power and lead the normie masses. For this to happen we must organize IRL to seek genuine economic, institutional, and ultimately political power. Without these things, we cannot effectively place before the people our concerns. As long as we are solely dependent upon one forum, which our enemies allow us to have, we cannot effectively seek this power. We must become, not one conspiracy, but a thousand conspiracies.
Are we though? Jow Forums is too scared to organize outside this board, lest the magical FBI come and whisk them away for talking about the Jews.
Thomas Flores
god your a cringey memeflag kike
Jace White
>GOD MOM! GET OUT OF MY FUUUUCKING ROOOOOM! report for underage
Henry Mitchell
>God you're a cringy fucking larper By this standard so were Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin, etc. Everyhting has to start small user, look in your own pants for proof.
Grayson Hall
If you going to play pretend, why not pretend to be useful instead of larping
Lucas Barnes
I'd probably agree if you weren't american
Jose Johnson
Its 02:10 in Tel Aviv, aren't you supposed to be asleep?
Jeremiah Murphy
Thismtoo
Dominic Taylor
>why not pretend to be useful That's exactly what we're trying to do, kike. We want to be useful and not blackpilled. To do this we must organize in a safe place. The safest place is in a small cell among friends.
Xavier Brooks
>Encourage people to organise >Reeeeeee do osmething for real
Cooper Butler
I wonder what does Lee Goldson think of the jewish question
You are not a vanguard. You are at best, an anonymous mob with no political consistency larping about vanguards. And you should stop. You waste your precious time that could be spent on something more substantive, like backing words with action, instead of words and words and words and words..
But you have to stop being a larper first
להישאר שחור, החברים שלי
Austin Kelly
WHAT IS A VANGUARD PARTY? (replace 'the masses' etc. with white people; replace 'the party' with Jow Forums) socialistworker.org/2012/07/20/what-is-a-vanguard-party >SOCIALISTS WHO consider themselves Leninists are often criticized for wanting to create a "vanguard party."
>To the extent that critics of Leninism are denouncing what is, in fact, a caricature of Lenin--that any vanguard party will be top down and autocratic--there's little to be said. There are, no doubt, self-declared "vanguard" organizations of a few hundred people or less that lead nothing and repeat worn-out clichés.
>But Lenin himself was a leader of a mass party in Russia that led a successful revolution. Lenin and the Bolsheviks were a vanguard in the true sense of the word--not isolated cranks.
>Lenin's insistence on the need for a revolutionary party is based on the idea that the working class can't be liberated by anyone standing over or outside its ranks. That's why Lenin opposed individual terrorism, for example--since it created a passive majority waiting on a small minority to take action for them. He also rejected parliamentary socialism for viewing socialism as something accomplished by politicians on behalf of the working class.
>You are not a vanguard. You are at best, an anonymous mob with no political consistency larping about vanguards. Yes we know you insufferable kike. That's exactly our point.
Samuel Lopez
Anons, the most important thing is that this starts with you. The individual actions that one takes for the betterment of society first affect the individual. To better society you must first better yourself, to preach against degeneracy you must first stop practicing it your self, to jave any influence over others you must have power, power is wealth. By improving your economic situation you will be able to make a difference. >No more basement dwelling >No more hypocrisy >No more excuses >TAKE ACTION IN TO YOUR OWN HANDS
