Evolution is not a scientific theory - problem of falsifiability (Catch 22)

youtube.com/watch?v=9QDoMaPOqi4

"Evolution is not scientific theory but a metaphisical research programme."

K. Popper

Challenge for evolutionists!!!! 100k $!!!!!100 gees reward!

To prove to me that evolution is not just mindless hegelian retroactive semantics/mythology but a predictive scientific theory, make a criterium by which you make a:
DISTINCTION BETWEEN A "NEXT EVOLUTIONARY STEP MUTATION" AND A "DEFECT".
100 000$$$$$!!!!!

discuss.

Attached: EVOLUTION723575.jpg (785x594, 102K)

Other urls found in this thread:

newscientist.com/article/mg23331144-200-desert-people-evolve-to-drink-water-poisoned-with-deadly-arsenic/
youtu.be/cHJ4zmNXhzg
youtu.be/Is63Y6jda-M
youtu.be/shyI-aQaXD0
youtu.be/TVuVYnHRuig
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>To prove to me that evolution is not just mindless hegelian retroactive semantics/mythology but a predictive scientific theory, make a criterium by which you make a:
>DISTINCTION BETWEEN A "NEXT EVOLUTIONARY STEP MUTATION" AND A "DEFECT".

is pic rel a "defect" (based on human body as is as a reference point) or is it a next evolutionary step (no reference point)?

100gees! reward!

Attached: fingers mutation.jpg (600x840, 76K)

Don't you have a kikesicle to worship?

our mutts here evolved to drink lethal dosis of arsenic

newscientist.com/article/mg23331144-200-desert-people-evolve-to-drink-water-poisoned-with-deadly-arsenic/

Evolution is creation. Please remember GOD made all life here INCLUDING us. What is special about us?

Attached: archangelmichael_web.jpg (1600x2284, 2.03M)

Funny that you retards use evolution to prove your race realisim. But then forget about the theory just because of your bible. You fucks are retarded cunts and you can't make up your mind.

>Don't you have a kikesicle to worship?

what an antiintelectual response, not that I expected an epistemiological response from person with an evolutionary demon

>desert-people-evolve-to-drink-water-poisoned-with-deadly-arsenic/

they dont "evolve" you "select" for that trait. Sink or swim. Same as with lactose tolerance in scandinavians. Track sprinters didnt evolved to run fast by running fast, you select for those traits.

Attached: lactose1548970182244.gif (602x526, 96K)

Imagine being this retarded.
The “next evolutionary step mutation” is a byproduct of the environment that the organism is in. Just look at the latest generation of elephants- they are growing smaller tusks because all of the large tusked animals were picked off by poachers. Why is survival of the fitness such a hard concept for brainlets to understand?

best handjob youll ever have

>creationist Croat has returned
stop eating ideas of american heretics. Catholic Church doesn't deny evolution

Gods the christians on this board are retarded

Attached: downloadfile-53.jpg (474x300, 37K)

This, evolietion is a joke.

Something that completely proves it weong is how sexual reproduction would have to evolve, male and female would have to have evolve
1. In the same place
2. at the same time
3. Would have to be close enoigh to reproduce (a lion and a tiger can have babies, but a lion and a giraffe can't)
Also that it would take a very long time to develop sex organs and would be poontless until it's fully working, so it either wouldn't keep evolving or get rid of it.

Evolution is a fucking joke

Attached: BB7E781B-4796-402D-B4DD-F58C91E3D95A.jpg (480x360, 47K)

Not an argument poo

Attached: A59DAEB7-1164-4304-9AB4-DA6FA3E2BE99.jpg (581x659, 48K)

>Catholic Church doesn't deny evolution
Because they're heretics

11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

anyone? what is the distinction from "unhealthy" and evolutionary mutation? what is the reference point?

>Funny that you retards use evolution to prove your race realisim. But then forget about the theory just because of your bible.

You can argue all forms of racial supremacy with YEC. Even more so than with evolution.

>Catholic Church doesn't deny evolution

intellectual cuckolds.

>Why is survival of the fitness such a hard concept for brainlets to understand?

because sub 120IQ retards present situational selection as cross species mutation.

>Im brown and I cant into most basic epistemiology

no worries, Ill take it from here.

Attached: evolutionSCIENCE!!!.png (754x396, 256K)

Denying evolution is basically denying the existence of genetics. We can see small changes in people over thousands of years. Obviously over thousands / millions of generations drastic changes will happen to certain species and the ones that aren’t fit to live in their environment die off. Why is this such a hard concept to understand??? Take a land animal evolving into a sea animal for example- all it would take is one mutation such as webbed toes or increased lung capacity, and that animal would instantly have access to a much more plentiful food supply. This makes that organism more likely to pass on it’s genes. Couple thousand generations later and you’ve got yourself a whale through natural selection.
But then again, you retards genuinely believe that the Earth is 6,000 years old despite the plethora of evidence disproving this. So why should anyone care enough to try and change your mind?

we were created in his image. animals weren't.

Just take the limit as t -> infinity, goy.

t. ''scientist''

>the truth isn't an argument
wow. genius.

actually all of your critiques are possible within evolution, if you want to catch it by the horns research some epistemiology/philosophy of science. Evolution simply isnt scientifically falsifiable.

Attached: dawkins.png (1000x618, 492K)

No you fucking can't. The only racial supremacy the bible talks about is Jews over everyone. You have to admit that Jews are the superior race if you want to be a christ cuck you absolute retard.

see pic in You're a fucking dumbass

>100gees
what's a gee?

if the catholic church doesn't deny evolution then they do deny genesis which i don't find surprising.

>chemical evolution is a myth

you have H-Bombs amerimutt, you must be a real subhuman to don't realize how works nuclear fusion at all

Attached: meirl3.jpg (579x960, 87K)

They sure as fuck deny it when it comes to the holy niggers.

I've been wondering about this. It is written that we are above the angels. Does that include the archangel? Is he below humans as well? That's a wonderful thought.

>spic intellectual
there is no analogue to the H-Bomb to prove evolution true because it is not falsifiable, hence not scientific.

>despite the plethora of evidence disproving this
There is no evidence the earth is billions of years old
youtu.be/cHJ4zmNXhzg
youtu.be/Is63Y6jda-M
youtu.be/shyI-aQaXD0

Attached: 961405E2-CE66-49E9-AC86-B2BF9B38BF55.png (1440x786, 1.4M)

It depends on the environment faggot. Are those extra fingers an advantage?

Attached: 1557696822303.jpg (733x1527, 273K)

Why doesn't she just remove one of the thumbs and one of the fingers and have a normal fucking hand?

calling someone dumb is not an argument

Attached: 6CE7A00B-499D-4BCD-9FAE-30CBF24C1ECF.png (1024x768, 353K)

An excessive amount of vestigial limbs or tissues would be very disadvantageous. Literally not an argument

“because sub 120IQ retards present situational selection as cross species mutation.”
Easy to claim if you just ignore the whole part about it taking thousands of generations for these changes to take hold as a new species. Also pic related is fucking stupid and a non argument. Land animals have digits on their extremities for a multitude of reasons. Seeing as humans (as far as we know) evolved from primates that basically use their feet as an extra set of hands, we may have less use for toes but they help us balance and travel across uneven terrain with grace, not to mention your toes are connected to your calve muscles which aids in running / jumping power.

>DISTINCTION BETWEEN A "NEXT EVOLUTIONARY STEP MUTATION" AND A "DEFECT"

Why does there need to be a distinction?

>man designs something
Thank you for seeing it needs an intelligent creator

>chemical evolution (aka how you get elements heavier than hydrogen)
>not falsifiable

every element beyond uranium is artificial

Evolution is a myth on an epistemiological level, NOT a testable theory.

Ask yourself, when is the last you heard about a testable evolutionary prediction?

>Denying evolution is basically denying the existence of genetics.

stopped reading there. Genetics is neccessery but not sufficient proof for evolution. Entire genetics fields fits perfectly within YEC and it existed before evolution. FANCY THAT!!!!!!

>No you fucking can't. The only racial supremacy the bible talks about is Jews over everyone. Y

nope. Japhet, Shem, Ham sons of Noah. 3 races of men, gues which one was cursed by Noah to be under his brothers and which one went north? Even a more racially supreme thery than "we are all africans"

>what's a gee?

a 1000.

>Are those extra fingers an advantage?

I say no. What would you say about 4 instead of 6?

Attached: science1523183862188.jpg (1484x1113, 328K)

midgets and down syndrome are proof enough of evolution

You already posted that in a different thread and has nothing to so with this one

Attached: 3D484C1F-6D6E-488F-A99E-B85F5ADE099A.jpg (598x687, 72K)

Retarded pictures since we have had this kind of feet for thousands if not hundreds of thousands years

>This thread
>again

you're mentally retarded user


you post the same debunked shit again and again and again

Vestigial mutations don’t catch on because humans naturally find them repulsive. You’ll still see the odd humans pop up in lower caste India, though, where people have like 20 toes and hundreds of teeth, or other weird shit.

You're the faggot who couldn't provide a satisfactory answer, aren't you?

Genetic adaptation is proveable, but Evolution into a different species is not. O.P. is correct you dumb feral niggers

Where is your evidence that it’s 6,000 years old besides a book written and rewritten hundreds of times over by people that believed the sun revolves around the Earth?

...no pierdas tu tiempo

>Why does there need to be a distinction?

If one is born with one hand instead of 2, what is the reference point on which you claim that 1 hand is missing? Same as with one extra limb.

pic rel- selective calling out of vestigiality as a proof, they never claim vestigiality when limbs are missing.

Attached: tailbone_child.jpg (640x360, 78K)

>DISTINCTION BETWEEN A "NEXT EVOLUTIONARY STEP MUTATION" AND A "DEFECT".
????
All "defects" that can propagate in a population for long enough can be considered "next evolutionary steps mutations" by the definition you're giving, i.e. none at all
What the fuck does "next evolutionary step" even mean? You're not progressing through a ladder, it's not a path you take or something you move towards/away from.
That's not what evolution means

And enough/alternate genetic adaptation turns you into a different species.

Don't even bother with fundamentalists

No the fuck it is not. Japhet, Shem, and Ham were not the ancestors of every human today. The curse of Ham was a bullshit narrative made by Creationists to explain the origins of Africans. Never before European creationism, did they ever believe that the children of Ham were Sub-Saharan Africans. While evolution is more of a racially supreme theory. You retarded we wuzzing Christians, want to Europeanize Christianity and Judaism.

Attached: 4AA0E69A-0F48-4C00-8DBC-841422419E58.jpg (750x1251, 523K)

Does he play an instrument?

>If one is born with one hand instead of 2, what is the reference point on which you claim that 1 hand is missing?
you can point to the process that led to the body to develop one hand instead of 2, and vice versa.

reminder that high school/secondary education is option in Croatia and the OP clearly did not take that option

God is morality, what ever he does is right. Just because we may not know why doesn't mean it isn't you dumbass

Correct. It's hilarious that allegedly redpilled people believe Jewish fanfiction based on Sumerian Phoenician and Egyptian fanfiction

Live on world thats mostly ocean
Didnt evolve to drink sea water

>satisfactory
nothing will ever be satisfactory to a fedora faggot there is no point in arguing with them because they don't argue in good faith.

The reference point would be whatever the norm is.

>Lived above ground
>Doesn't fly
Evolution BTFO

So you're saying that god's mind is incomprehensible yet the bible seems like the mad ramblings of an infuriated goat herder?

This is my gripe with your religion.

So evil is right since god created evil

I'm not atheist.

>All "defects" that can propagate in a population for long enough can be considered "next evolutionary steps mutations" by the definition you're giving

yes, by evolution you cant actually define "health".

>The curse of Ham was a bullshit narrative made by Creationists to explain the origins of Africans.

so you can infact argue WHITE POWER from a YEC paradigm. WHITE POWER! HAIL JAPHET!

>you can point to the process that led to the body to develop one hand instead of 2, and vice versa.

Problem is that "the process" is everchanging acording to evolotion so no reference point.

>Im a retard and think that epistemiology is a frech word for a meal

You are one indeed.

Attached: scienceTM1.jpg (1024x768, 314K)

That there is none for it being older. And recorded history is only arpoi d 6000 years old, also there are somethings that would limit the age of the earth such as the increase in the distance between the moon and earth, and the sun losing mass (if it were billions of years it would be too big)

the modern chicken came from this animal. completely different species. only took a few thousand years.

Attached: images.jpg (275x183, 10K)

evolution is a scam not once has anyone found any of the missing links for humans. current humans just seemed to have showed up. there would be at least 100 missing links to get to current human evolution stage we are at.

Attached: hoved-paleoprimatologi-1100x550.jpg (1100x550, 127K)

Yes, however:
>When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains that either after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parent of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents.
>Now it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the Teaching Authority of the Church propose with regard to original sin, which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam and which, through generation, is passed on to all and is in everyone as his own.

i didn't call you an atheist i called you a fedora fag.

>And recorded history is only arpoi d 6000 years old
We have cave paintings far older than that
>also there are somethings that would limit the age of the earth such as the increase in the distance between the moon and earth, and the sun losing mass (if it were billions of years it would be too big)
This just screams that you have no idea what you're talking about...

This is retarded. You can be a Christian and still believe in evolution set in motion by God.

>what is Amino acid dating.
Archaeomagnetic dating.
Argon–argon dating.
Uranium–lead dating.
Samarium–neodymium dating.
Potassium–argon dating.
Rubidium–strontium dating.
Uranium–thorium dating.

fuck off creationist retard

>humans breathe and swallow food in the same pipe
“Intelligent design”

All that emergency food growing out of your body.

Is this where retards congregate?

Fuck off, retard.

Kek good one. Imagine having a cloaca

>We have cave paintings far older than that
Oh, did they put
-By Ooga, 130,000 BC
on it?

>This just screams that you have no idea what you're talking about...
not an argument

it's all fucking retarded, best not to put too much thought into the schizophrenic ramblings of a jewish farmer

No you can't. You can c*Tholic though.

The descendants of Japeth are the Ashkenazis, Turks, Southern Europeans or Meds, and Central Asians. Never once did anyone note Germanics or Scandis before European Creationism. The Jews only interacted with the Meds and the Turks so they gave their own assumption of their origins. That is why they don't explain the origins of the Germanics or the Africans or the Abos or the Natives of America, because they did not interact with them. So please shut the fuck up.

Oh my Bruce!

>yes, by evolution you cant actually define "health".
can you?
please elaborate, first time I hear that
>Problem is that "the process" is everchanging acording to evolotion so no reference point.
You can still study it, the fact that it is ever changing in a population does not mean that it is ever changing in an individual. Point to in in an individual and see if the cause of the "defect" was genetic or environmental, to which you'll have part of your answer

Not if you are a bible believing scripture adhering christian you can't.

Weve dated them. You don't know shit, that's an argument.

Most of us have heard or read of the theory of reincarnation where one returns to individuality, either going up or down a zoological ladder, based on the theory of Darwin, or based on the theory of evolution, going back into an animal or progressing until we become angels, all based on the theory of so-called Karma. This concept of reincarnation is completely the opposite of the truth. It is not based on evolution rather it is based on involution. Man did not descend from the monkey, the monkey descended from man as a degenerative change, involution. The same thing has happened with man today, he is a degenerative form of the divine world, the God-man. The physical earth today is nothing more than a degenerative form of a spiritual earth.

Therefore, what we see is the result of the complete breakdown of morals where vice and
corruption has become king. But there existed an ancient Earth and there exists an interior of the earth where nature is completely different and will return once the earth becomes transfigured. The purpose of reincarnation is for one to return to one’s homeland, to one’s own divinity, the individual's place of origin. Reincarnation is repetitive attempts to repeat the same history over and over until you find your own perfection. Once you find that perfection you are immortal. The memory inside your chromosomes makes it an obsession. This is the memory we have with our own God.

What game is that?

Also proven wrong. You can't say the rate has always been the same and it's been proven that it can change
youtu.be/TVuVYnHRuig

fuck off evolitionist retard

you can use radiocarbon dating on the pigment or Uranium-Thorium dating but you're too stupid to understand such things

Stop fucking talking about shit you refuse to understand.

May I ask how? Same with fossils, all you know is the nigga died, doesn't say when, and carbon dating is wrong

Stop being heathen boy

Attached: 64F6D655-FE6F-4CD3-A4BF-F1C992BF166E.jpg (852x476, 84K)

Its not wrong. You don't know shit. Stop fucking posting please.

stop being mad*

>actually using Kent Hovind, a man who is shunned by young earth creationists for being too stupid, for your argument
LMFAO radiocarbon dating is locktight please take your fundie retard shit elsewhere

Seriously why do you lie? That's a sin in your book.

As in we are sapient with self awareness you fucking brainlet. You probabl tok that literal and thought we look physically like god.