SO MUCH KVETCHING ABOUT THIS WHITE HOUSE CENSORSHIP QUESTIONAIRE
Other urls found in this thread:
northwestfront.org
twitter.com
According to the media, hate speech can be as simple as "you're a boy, not a girl"
So it's no wonder people with a brain aren't interested in it
Hate speech is protected under the 1st amendment.
Reminder that (((Mother Jones))) is a literal communigger rag.
Why was last thread deleted?
I guess because of kvetching kikes. Thee ZOG is losing bad.
Salty bump
Actually thanks to rulings against company towns and common carrier versus publisher rulings. You are owed a platform. If a company through natural monopoly controls your access to a public platform, they are obligated to provide the platform for you to exercise your rights. It has strong legal precedent and 100 years of case law supporting it.
yeah and im collecting names off twitter to .. correct when the happening happens.
So does this mean shill faggots will stop posting "Drumpf betrayed us" threads?
man i love all these people from other places in the world chiming in with their recommendations that i shouldnt have rights thanks jacinda and trudeau
Well duh, free speech can’t exist if only one side is allowed to talk. Ask yourself why the left is so afraid to allow people to speak.. could it be because they know that nobody would be a leftist if the right is allowed to debate?
By the way there is no such thing as “hate speech”
>left vs right
clearly you have a low IQ. Left vs right is a false paradigm.
bump
Goddamn they're salty! Should've been done before the midterms desu.
This needs to be spread to normies and boomers.
Social media needs to be brought to heel under first Amendment.
Their collusion to shut down alternatives like gab should have warranted trust busting and anticompetition lawsuits.
The internet uses public infrastructure and social media has become the modern telephone and town hall.
Its time to ensure freedom of speech is protected.
>Social media needs to be brought to heel under first Amendment.
The government cannot force them to host everyone.
Its their property, its their servers, its their software.
They could delete it all tomorrow and there would be nothing you could do about it.
YOU ARE ALL RETARDED AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND PROPERTY RIGHTS.
This is how I know the right are weak faggots - so many legal avenues to pursue but they do nothing except complain.
If only...
t. Another Jewish schizo spammer thread.
As it should be. Hate speech is protected. Labeling anything you disagree with hate speech is just silencing dissent.
why dont you tweet that bac to her?
They will or they will die.
>The government cannot force them to host everyone.
>Its their property, its their servers, its their software.
Then they should be made legally responsible for everything posted there. If they are going to exercise editorial control over content they should be legally responsible for it too.
They were given special rights and protections from libel because they were acting as a neutral entity not a publisher.
Sure they will buckaroo.
Almost like speech is a protected right in the constitution.
It's freedom or death.
Brian merchant? That’s a joke account right?
But yet only the right gets banned from social media, never the left. And don’t talk about Farrakhan, he was collateral damage. If you don’t believe that the right is being censored you’re a fucking idiot
Go larp about having enough balls to do anything about it more fag.
Because there is no hate speech. There's only free speech.
Just off the top of my head
>private universities accepting govt money discriminating against minorities
>cake bakers
>utility companies
inb4;utility
>recent federal court decision regarding Trump's twitter
>What is Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (1964)
Face it, the right is too disorganized, lacks competent leadership with a confident voice
It is protected in the sense that the government cannot censor you for it.
Private companies are a different thing altogether.
The government cannot force private property to allow you to speak freely while on, or using their private property.
This really isn't hard to comprehend.
They can force bakers and dating sites to accept fags.
Oh but they can (see fag cakes). The constitution applies to every single person in America, not just the federal government. Where did this idea come from anyways?
>Millions of retards think that the god given right of free speech as protected by the constitution means that non-government agencies can break those god given rights with no consequences.
Fuck this clown hellworld.
Farrakhan is far right and was buddies with Rockwell.
>BUT THE CAKE BAKERS!
This type of shit is why nobody ever takes you idiots seriously.
Facebook is not a cake shop. A cakeshop does not have you agree to a TOS before you even try to use their service.
You guys are comparing cake shops to social media, think about how retarded that is for a second. Please, just consider it.
They only banned him so that when the right says “the right is being unfairly banned” they can have someone not on the right to point to. No other reason
you seem upset
Free speech is free speech
A cake baker is a private business. Twitter and Facebook are private businesses. Why does one private business get to discriminate and the other one doesn’t?
Why do you think I am upset?
>Nothing to do with what is being discussed whatsoever.
Kill yourself.
>A cake baker, and a multinational corporation that provides a free way of networking, are the same thing because they are both private businesses.
Will you please kill yourself and spare us your inane retardation?
>botposting this hard
Who pays you to shill friend?
No I will not. If anything the social media companies should be treated more strictly than r cake companies, after all there are a hundred bakers in town but only one twitter (and no, don’t mention gab.com, whose app is banned on both the apple App Store and the google play store). So either the fags can go somewhere else to get a cake, or twitter can allow right wing voices, tell me why this is so wrong? And don’t just tell me to kill myself, actually make a real argument like a somewhat intelligent person
I made an argument, you just don't understand it because you are a teenager and don't know about law or property rights to understand why it is important in the real world legal system.
i can't believe they're so fucking arrogant as to all sit in the same fucking room all at once. They rely solely on the good nature and unwillingness of the people they torment, to not lash out and inflict justice or violence upon them. They are completely insane. At best they are an accelerationist cult, at worst they are the dumbest and most undeservingly arrogant civil leadership in all of human history. These myopic, pompous fools can and will be wiped out in the blink of an eye if even a single one of their alleged chattel slaves has had enough.
Where were you when you figured out "western civilization" was worthlessly fragile and completely pointless? What was it all for, all the blood sweat & tears, just to make sure women can liberally slaughter infants to keep their crotch tingling?
Fucking joke. I'm immediately joining the first violent separatist groups in America the moment the opportunity prevents itself. It will happen if we attack Iran, all the ZOG mutts and cucks will go choke on their own blood, face down in the persian sands -- men that actually want to lead to greatness will tear this country apart by its roots. Nothing anyone can do to stop it, an unstoppable force of nature. Heebs and their globohomo counterparts are absolutely not an immovable object.
>Muh Christchurch
Fuck Mother Jones.
the mods tongue niggers assholes
You said something about twitter being a huge business with a TOS, then told me to kill myself. That’s not an argument so I’ll let you try again. If twitter can ban right wing people, why can’t the cake shop ban left wing people? Both are private businesses which (according to you and other leftist retards like you) means that the law doesn’t apply to them. It does.
>Non-binding pledge
So its a worthless piece of paper
you fucking worthless leftist pukes can't make any arguments at all.
For years ive been here on this joke of a website, and in every single thread ad infinitum when presented with a challenge to your globohomo beliefs you literally always sperg out and just start calling everyone a "retard"
i'm really shaking in my boots with your delusion of consensus, why don't you post an xkcd comic, i'll go in my room and cry that no one accepts me
I have a book for you to read. You will like it.
northwestfront.org
no such thing as hate speech
"mother nig" doesn't understand free speech.
they just want more censorship.
Nothing that exists currently can be secured in the future. They're all honeypots and floor traps. You have to consort with your closest friends, your family, vetted by blood or time. If you don't have prior service or history with law enforcement, along with all the connections you made and the men you've stuck with, then it will be very difficult -- the best of luck to you.
>SO MUCH KVETCHING ABOUT THIS WHITE HOUSE CENSORSHIP QUESTIONAIRE
But there really isn't. Anyone with half a brain is past the right or left bullshit. And no one is supporting this kushner built Q tier bullshit about "owning the libs!". The kikes are the censorship and they are the trump campaign. But hey trust the fucking plan right? No one but shills buy this anymore. Go start another "President Trump General" kike.
It's because the core of the white establishment liberal democrats are atheist humanitarian jews and the core of the neocon republicans are german evangelists.
If there were any evangelists left the christcucks would be fighting against the faggot agenda.
>T. #Herturn
i dont think the northwest republic is viable but still, book is quite an enjoyable read.
Thanks for confirming it kike. Go cash kushners check.
cope
It’s moot’s face obscured on the profile pic.
Coping for what exactly, rabbi? Seems my comments are attracting some attention? Why is that?
and yet the phone company (a private company) cant censor you, faggot. Look up "common carrier". FB and these retarded web sites will get their shit pushed in.
(((Mother Jones)))
>A cakeshop does not have you agree to a TOS before you even try to use their service.
so if a cake shop made people sign a ToS, they could refuse service to fags?
tip top fucking lulz
thankyou for shutting that idiot up
CONFESS WITH YOUR LIPS THAT JESUS CHRIST IS GOD!
this post is just insulting to my intelligence. who the fuck do you think youre dealing with exactly.
>who the fuck do you think youre dealing with exactly.
Oh i had no idea :'( I would have been nicer if I knew I was dealing with faggot. :(
seem to have touched nerve, you're so overwhelmed with anger you can't even type coherent sentences.
Uh huh. Go cash your check kushner shill.
Truth
>nobody would be a leftist if the right is allowed to debate
This.
The left is obsessed with censorship because their ideas completely fall apart when they're dissected.
Social media is the new public square. It's how everybody communicates now so it should definitely fall under free speech laws.
so now ''inaccurate definitions" are a concern for the left?? Why not have a discussion about 'racism'?
>Homophobia? Who the fuck is afraid of faggots?
>Vagina? You mean Front Hole, bigot
>Antisemitism? How dare you notice jews
unsurprising, really, considering his poor grasp of the English language.
Well I'm sure you happen to have even a few of the case laws from this allegedly extensive portfolio of rulings to support your claim, yes?
What a piece of shit
Naturally he's white too
Who the fuck writes like that.
What a fucking retard.
Dude doesn't even know the definition of censorship