In Norway we call Danes 'sausage Germans'

We call you söta bror

I still love you Danes

Attached: 7CEC3507-EC57-4E26-8495-9562A593976E.png (240x304, 15K)

>In Norway we call Danes 'sausage Germans'
never heard that

We make fun of u though
youtube.com/watch?v=tRRS8iH4Qo8

But now with the RETARDED Danes it has become serious.

Not heard of Pölestysker? Are you dumb?

U though.... (though kek)

I like the danes actually. But it is true
, they speak like retards. But we all know English and their beer is good so it's all good.

I've always liked hockey niggers, ever since I read it on hear several years ago.

Is Skåne really danish clay or has it been abandoned because its become such a shithole?

The word Wales is from the Saxon word 'foreigner.'

I don't think anyone want Skåne anymore. We swedes have fucked it beyond recognition. The only right thing would be to give it back to the snapphanarna if there are any left.

The dutch are based
Still, they are cheeseheads or keeskoppen
Walloon friends we tell them to go to work
But deep down theyre based too

dan marks do have the best flag of all the nord countries

Do swedes up north view it as a lost cause or are there areas that are similar all over the country?

As long as paludan becomes king. Would he be called Fredrik or Kristian though? I like Fredrik more.

I hate Canadians, around here we call the Hot Carls.

I call Mexicans spics, beaners, border hoppers, wetbacks, taconiggers, and occasionally desert gook

That should be Pölsetysker kek (as Jow Forums doesn't display REAL OE)

Danes are Pölsetyskere (sausage Germans)

Southerners. I've always had a soft spot in my heart for the Nordic countries though, we have a very similar climate and geography.

Attached: I have no strong feelings one way or another.png (5235x2483, 237K)

Skåne is rightful Danish clay. Skånsk is essentially just an east-Danish dialect, and is therefore closer to our language than Swedish.

Sweden (the upper-class leftist elite and Jews ruling from Stockholm) is committing genocide against ethnic Danes by planting niggers and muslims in Malmö.

youtube.com/watch?v=C0wEbm73Zp0

Attached: 159128571925.jpg (1240x1824, 117K)

FUCK YOU> I AM GERMAN. Why do we deserve to be called enemies

They love Skåne. They can't stop talking about how great their falafel is and how it's only half price then anywhere else in sweden. No joke

Danes won't get shit, you deserve nothing.
What will happen is that you will give us BACK Greenland and the Faroe Islands. THAT is what will happen. And if you don't agree we will invade and make Danish ketchup.

based and redpilled

We call the English "Island monkeys".

Based and curry ketchup-pilled

Also dutch people are moeras duitsers, swamp germans

We call Austrians "crucchi"

Frikandel with onions, curry ketchup and mayo

DELETE THIS NOW!!

We could literally take over Denmark within 1 week.

You can get Greenland back the second you give us back all the oil resources you jewed us out of.

my ancestor

Attached: 300px-Cnut_lands.svg.png (300x239, 43K)

Even our women could defeat tiny Denmark

youtube.com/watch?v=0dulb_lAh-0

We call Italians "Itaker". It has a negative connotation and is used to shit on you, but in reality its an abbreviation for "Italienischer Kamerad", which means "Italian comrade" in WW2.

A different negative one is "Spaghettifresser", which just means spaghetti eater.

Due to the Falklands War, we Chileans are called traitors or we use the name of their country disparagingly to treat someone as a traitor.

We didn't take "your" oil resources. That's a DANISH retarded myth. The ocean was divided exactly between our countries 50%. As did the UK with us.

The Skåne accent is totally different to the rest of Sweden and especially Stockholm. I often wondered was that because its proximity to and connection to Denmark. Even before the bridge was built it was pretty easy to go back and forth between Malmo and Copenhagen or even Helsingor and Helsingborg. Its seems like there would have been more of a connection Skåne /Copenhagen than Skåne/Stockholm.

Thats pretty sad user and that saving will come at a big cost in the long run.

The reason Denmark had to choose the "center line principle" was that they already did that with other countries before Norway.

>As did the UK with us.

At least we got something in return from saving them and winning ww2

To Norwegians now, Denmark is IRRELEVANT

>and winning ww2
Oh yeah, you definitely won that one, Håkon.

Attached: 1401293349474.jpg (3264x2448, 1.43M)

Yeah.... over 1000 merchant ships DID INDEED shape your destiny. Without us you would not only be a sausage German.... you would be a literal German

We lost 500 ships

If everything goes well, this will be our new flag.

Attached: Flag_of_Nordic_Resistance_Movement.png (2200x1333, 31K)

Why do you two quarrel? Isnt Sweden the real enemy?

The US Merchant Marine did waaaaaay more for Lend-Lease than the Norwegians did, just pointing that out. Not saying you didn't contribute a lot, but you're also making the claim that *you* saved Britain. It was a collaborative effort.

>Isnt Sweden the real enemy?

Swedes are our allies.

You have no idea what you are talking about stupid Burger.

At the time of the worst need in Britain (when they almost lost to Germany) Norwegian ships brought over 50% of the supplies to Britain including fuel.

Do not talk shit about Norway.

No. They who rule sweden is the real enemy.
Sweden got Norway back and Finland got swedens back.

We had the worlds most modern merchant fleet at the time. All combustion engines.

>They who rule sweden is the real enemy.
The king?

Norwegians are true obedient cucks to Sweden. That's why they follow them in their political footsteps. Norway is just 5-10 years behind today's Sweden, but quickly catching up.

This is something I don't understand as we, Danes treated Norwegians 10 times better under Danish rule of Norway than under Swedish rule.

Attached: 1558221797733.png (1244x1136, 1.73M)

>Norwegian ships brought over 50% of the supplies to Britain including fuel.
No, they didn't, this is a straight up lie. I'm a merchant mariner, I think I know a little bit about our history. US ships brought over $3.1 billion worth of aid to Great Britain alone, amounting to over 10% of our wartime production. In terms of long tons of cargo, this amounts to about 10,000,000 long tons of fuel, munitions, tools, etc.

The United States lost over 3,000 merchant vessels during the Battle of the Atlantic, with over 36,000 merchant sailors dead. We had the highest per capita casualty rate in the entire war.

I know what I'm talking about. I'm not talking shit about Norway, but you appear to be both rapidly nationalistic while also not knowing what you're talking about, resulting in you making very untrue claims.

Niggers

The king doesn't rule us any more. They took that from us and him.

Also, the third largest in the world.
If this Norwegian merchant fleet had fallen to Germany there is a GOOD chance that Britain would have fallen to Germany. Then the US would had no base in Europe and probably would not had gotten involved at all!

No idiot, the juice.

>Danes treated Norwegians 10 times better under Danish rule of Norway than under Swedish rule.
Which is why I assumed that Danes and Norwegians got along better. Dont you also have a more similar dialect/language compared to Sweden?

>We had the highest per capita casualty rate in the entire war.
What are you smoking?

This is another lie, unless by "combustion" you're including steam, in which case the United States had an almost entirely "combustion" fleet as well.

The largest diesel engine in WWII was only about 1,200 HP, and it was installed on a tug. Every other merchant vessel at the time used either a steam turbine or reciprocating steam engine. Most US Liberty and Victory ships used reciprocating engines simply because we had to build so many that we couldn't afford to put a steam turbine in all of them. Not every single Norwegian vessel at the time had a steam turbine either, so don't even try to make that claim. I know this for a fact because my grandfather sailed on a Norwegian steamer in WWII, and it had a triple-expansion steam engine in it.

>No, they didn't,

God damn. I am talking about the beginning of the war when Britain was in DEEP trouble. That's when Norway brought over 50% of the supplies to Britain (or they would have lost to Germany).

The major US effort was later

Written Norwegian is more similar to danish. Spoken Norwegian is more similar to Swedish I would say.

Danes are best. (norway a close 2nd tho)

We did, at least for the United States. The Marine Corps had a casualty rate of about 3%, meaning about 3% of Marines died in combat. Merchant mariners were around 4%.

I know my own history.

usmm.org/casualty.html

>The major US effort was later

Without the Norwegian merchant navy there WOULD HAVE BEEN NO LATER. The US would have stayed out of Europe without Britain.

And Germany would have won the war.

WE, Norwegians made the allies win. FACT

We were bringing supplies to them as early as 1939. Many of the ships doing so were not flagged as American ships so as to disguise our involvement in the War.

Again, I'm not trying to claim that Norway didn't do anything or something. To this day, Norway has a huge merchant fleet, I've sailed with a shit ton of boxheads. They did a lot for the British in WWII. This whole argument only started because it seemed like you were trying to make the claim that Norway had the largest contribution or something. I'm not even trying to say "USA #1 hurr durr," I'm just saying it was a collaborative effort between a lot of countries, and the sailors of all of those countries should feel a comaraderie about it, not try to one up each other

>This is another lie, unless by "combustion" you're including steam,

KEK, we were lightyears ahead of America at the time. We didn't use steam.

Wew, I almost thought you used ushmm.org as a legitimate source on Jow Forums.

I was just about to question my sanity.

Attached: 1518994197040.gif (248x172, 1.05M)

>This whole argument only started because it seemed like you were trying to make the claim that Norway had the largest contribution

Attached: 2019-05-19_060147.jpg (821x99, 65K)

Never replace Danebrog. Go fuck yourself.

Weil du die falsche Flagge zeigst, Missgeburt. Ich hoffe du wirst abgeschlachtet.

We do.
This is just Ahmed falseflagging against true nordic love.
And to Sweden. Please come home, we miss you.

>This whole argument only started because it seemed like you were trying to make the claim that Norway had the largest contribution

We had
Absolutely VITAL

Attached: 2019-05-19_060926.jpg (959x625, 167K)

IN America we call Canada "who?"

Attached: image.jpg (555x517, 36K)

time to go back Paco

>unironically taking pride in betraying the entire european continent together with the traitorous anglos and ultimately destroying EVROPA for all eternity

What the fuck is your problem? The Soviets (thanks to 10:1 k/d zerg-rushes) won that war, not you, LARPing burgers or fjordniggers.

Attached: 1535922034640.jpg (1600x1185, 565K)

Why is Iceland always a tiny apu helper?

Taking Holstein is unrealistic and you know that, Gustav.

Gringo for americans
Centro cacas to central americans
Sudacas for southamericans
Negro balseros for cubans
Gallego and gachupines to spanish

Beaner for beaners.

>The Soviets (thanks to 10:1 k/d zerg-rushes) won that war, not you,

That is a child's perspective.
Without the Norwegian merchant fleet Britain would have lost to Germany... and then the Germans could have focues 100% on the eastern front (without wasting MASSIVE resources on the Atlantic Wall etc). They would have CRUSHED the Soviets.

GODDAMN YANKEES

30% of our Lend-Lease went to the Soviet Union. We shipped 16,000,000 tons of cargo to them in material aid. Their factories would never have been able to produce enough to win the war without it.
Alright, if you're going to be a dick, I'm just going to be one right back. No, you did not have the largest contribution at any point. The US, even in the early stages of the War, shipped more materiel to Great Britain, provided more manpower on ships, more escorts, more merchant vessels, and had more casualties than the Norwegians at any point in the war. This is all factual information, you can look at statistics from the Battle of the Atlantic and see this. You are flat out wrong. A British politician thanking the Norwegians for their support is a nice gesture, but it was ultimately the might of the American merchant fleet (which was the second largest in the world at the time, and the largest in the world after the War), which ultimately made the Lend-Lease a success. I salute Norwegian sailors for their contributions, but you are not one of them, and lying on their behalf is disrespectful both to my country's mariners and to your own.

The Germans had 300-400K troops stationed only in Norway

Imagine them being free of a possible western invasion (after defeating Britain)

>Alaska has a culture more similar to Greenland and geography closer to Europe than Canada.

Right, okay.

Danes own greenland

>my ancestor

Attached: untitled.jpg (685x506, 40K)

>, but it was ultimately the might of the American merchant fleet

No, it was the might of the Norwegian merchant fleet in the start of the war. Brits were almost losing, and we saved them (and they saved us).

Don't make yourselves bigger than you are (the US had a big role later though and without U the war would have been lost - but without Norway the war would have been lost earlier).

youtube.com/watch?v=LcSmx05zR4M

That means that the other 40% is the British Isles and 60% is on the continent. Its either ignorantly worded or deceptively worded but its not using Europe in ethnic terms.