International cooperation doesn’t make shit cheaper or “spreads the costs”, it makes stuff more complicated, slower and more expensive.
The best cooperation in space is friendly competition. NASA should only do US stuff with US companies. Let ESA do their own program, let Japan do its own stuff, Russia, China, Canada etc.
It’s so stupid to baselines critical items as “international cooperation items”.
Other urls found in this thread:
bitchute.com
twitter.com
It's a cover story to give the illusion they are working hard on advanced technology. They are faking it. We have eGravity. I know how it works.
run by Jews: bitchute.com
>more complicated, slower and more expensive
In other words, they can get more money for less progress. Why wouldn't they?
Because nobody benefits from programs that don’t do anything. NASA could advance America’s interest in space, if it wanted to. But for some strange reason politicians use NASA to bind its allies in space with stupid international cooperation that hasn’t worked ever.
Make an ufo then and fly over my house as a proof.
Why do you think so? Do you work at the german aerospace center and can tell us how progress gets slowed down?
I don’t want to tell you where I work. But yes, international cooperation has a chilling effect for innovation and time schedules in space projects.
You don't know shit
If you want to use the ISS as an example every problem came from the Russian equipment. Without the Russian contribution you could have knocked about 50 billion off the price tag.
Maybe because they are being told too, like to hide the fact we have had a more advanced space program
I don’t agree. By far the biggest cost driver of the ISS was the integration of STS in the construction plan. Followed by Western cooperative integration.
Without Russian involvement, the ISS program would have bern abandoned in 2011.
How much of the Russian gear just didn't work and needed to be fixed or replaced?
Not that much. Plus this is not a concern of the US, the Russian segment is completely run by Russia and has its independent power and life support system detached from the Western parts.
The Russian segment can actually be decoupled from the US/European/Japanese/Canadian segment and run without it. However, the Western segment does not have its own station keeping/propulsion module and would crash if the Russians cut the station in half.
The original international space cooperation shit from the 90s happened purely because of the fall of the Soviet Union. Americans feared that not having anything to do for all those rocket scientists etc. would cause them to find greener pastures developing missiles for Norks, Libyans, Iranians and so forth.
it has nothing to do with NASA, its the lawmakers.. everything in NASA is designed around creating jobs. That's why they use disposable non reusable rockets.
>Not that much.
For being the literally most expensive machine every made in human history you'd hope that by the time they put it in orbit that would have been NONE rather than "not that much".
I am.
Penner style is the new lifeform.
Be ready for my hih tech yurt to land on your fucking roof rent free.
The global religion is celestial worship and mnemonics, truth is unfolding.
Celestials switch to settlers religion's once they embrace a tentless lifestyle, moving into the tent the global religion will revive, for the tent to develope into a UFO.
Your festivities are astronomic events, everywhere in the world, the true religion, nomadism, pilgrimage, haj... semi nomadism is the true engine of the ufo enabling global religion.
NASA has never achieved anything of value. Their only accomplishment is transforming billions of dollars into wasted effort.
The more expensive and complicated a project is, the more flaws and problems you get. That’s a universal law.
>implying we would use our arm to decouple them
>implying we wouldn't snatch them back if they blew the bolts
I wish a nigga would test the pimp hand
Yes sir!
Fuck you Wayne you colossal faggot
good shit user, you will be spared on DotR