Did race mixing destroy Rome?

I am of the opinion that the North Africans in ancient Rome became contaminated with nigger genes at the end, and helped destroy the Empire.

The Romans meanwhile race mixed with Jews and Syrians.

Attached: download-1.jpg (288x175, 10K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bRcu-ysocX4
archive.org/stream/jstor-1835889/1835889_djvu.txt
history.com/.amp/news/8-reasons-why-rome-fell
history.com/.amp/news/8-reasons-why-rome-fell)))
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Nah, the Roman birthrate fell and the Teutonic tribes kept growing to the point where the Goths took Italy fairly easily. Even Augustus’ time, he had to take measures to force women to have more babies.

The Lombards moved into northern italy in the 7th century and found many abandoned or ruined Roman villages. The race of the Romans was just gone.

just look at the average Italian today, it's pretty obvious

also pic related, look at how the artwork degrades at the end

Attached: Roman Emperors.jpg (1447x2048, 2.07M)

race mixing with whites, yes.

Christianity destroyed Rome, not negrification. Look at some of the portraits of people discovered in Pompeii, they look about the same as modern Italians.

Early christianity was communism. The Roman elite gradually became cucked and stopped giving a shit about the empire, eventually they collapsed and got invaded by disorganized mobs of illegal immigrants.

christianity destroyed rome, or more importantly the genocide that Christians waged on all non Christians and "heretic" christians

Egypt was overrun with niggers and the global economy at the time collapsed.
youtube.com/watch?v=bRcu-ysocX4

>Nah, the Roman birthrate fell and the Teutonic tribes kept growing to the point where the Goths took Italy fairly easily. Even Augustus’ time, he had to take measures to force women to have more babies.
>The Lombards moved into northern italy in the 7th century and found many abandoned or ruined Roman villages. The race of the Romans was just gone.

Sounds reasonable, because it reflects our own times.

Eery.

Trajano and Adriano, 2 roman emperors of hispanic origin, considered the best of the best,the top 5 ,amongst ''the five good emperors''

Attached: the-five-good-emperors-2-638.jpg (638x479, 80K)

Crazy how history repeats itself over and over.
We're watching the collapse of the Roman Empire happen again, right now. In slow motion 4K HDR.
Best enjoy the last days of the Empire while they last.

Niggers didn't exist in sizable numbers. The Sahara was more or less an impenetrable barrier outside of the Nile. Berbers didn't have camels and uses horses until the Arab Conquest.

That could have happened to a degree but genetical data don't show any of that.

What is astonishing is the overlapping of the Siculo-neapolitan genoma with that of the Jews.

I have no idea of the origin of that. I guess the Jews intermixed with the Siculo-neapolitans at some point in the middle ages and then spreaded all over Europe.

It is not related with Roman times anyway.

Attached: siculo-neapolitans-equal-jews.png (1500x1200, 316K)

Christianity did.
Multiracial, multiethnic, universalist, communist.

The fact that christians genocided all the "pagan" philosophers, scientists, doctors and mathematicians did not help either.

Attached: 1528024737384.jpg (736x1088, 110K)

(((ROME)))

Attached: power-of-rome.jpg (840x1134, 178K)

>bronze age collapse
>roman empire
i could tell you're american from behind 45 proxies

Well up to 15 years ago I strongly believed that the Gothic war was the real caesura with the classical era. This war lasted 20 years with devastation of supply lines to the cities and collapse of agriculture resulting into a total demographical collapse.
Then the Lombard came and repopulated at least Lombardy and parts of central Italy changing the face of these regions.

Anyway this picture is false. Genetical data show that 90+% of the autochtonous population of Lombardy descend from the same Celtic population that lived there in pre-Roman times. There were no real genetical changes in the last 2500 years up to 50 years ago. Germanic blood is limited to 5 to 15% of the population depending on the area.

Attached: germanic-dna.jpg (1150x695, 161K)

Yes.

Read Tenney Franks, Race Mixture in the Roman Empire.

archive.org/stream/jstor-1835889/1835889_djvu.txt

The roman economy was taken over by freed Chaldeans/Jews who took roman names and married Roman slaves so their children looked more Roman. This is the origin of the Ashkenazim. They would later ally with the Lombards and move north into Bavaria/Germany.

Attached: Ashkenazi italians.jpg (1080x2220, 601K)

Muslims destroyed Eastern Roman Empire, and almost destroyed the Western.
Germanic barbarians at least adopted Roman culture, the same can't be said for Muslims.

Niggers are not able to reach the coasts even now,they are dying thousand of them, don't spread those bullshits,lombards did nothing as well,the problem who made fall Rome was the corruption,you can see now, it's just the same.

>Germanic barbarians at least adopted Roman culture

The strange thing isn't that the Roman Empire fell, it's that it ever rose in the first place. Mediocrity is the norm, and cultures which rise above it do so only temporarily, in response to special conditions.

Take the USA for example. In the 14th century, the Black Death had temporarily reduced the population density of Europe, shaking faith in God (or in how He was worshipped), generating a new demand for labor-saving devices, and creating cultural changes from the following period of painless repopulation in which land was plentiful and workers were welcome in many places. Then came the printing press, bringing Bibles and Protestantism, firearms started to get good, undermining the rule of the professional warrior elite, and new cleverly-rigged sailing ships that needed less crew to transport the same loads (thereby enabling them to carry provisions for very long voyages, while still bringing large loads of trade goods) opened the oceans. This led to religious wars, revolutions, and access to the sparsely-populated lands of North America.

The American colonists were independent-minded fighters with strong religious convictions. They fled Europe to gain the freedom to follow their beliefs, and for the opportunities offered by vast amounts of available land. They, and the settlers that followed them, were kept in shape by the wilderness and the wars fought with others who also wanted the land, or who wanted them under their control, and then they became something quite different, through the intense techno-commercial competition of dawning modernity, in which faith and strong principles were eroded by the need to please customers and get along. Finally, came the post-war era of comfort and safety, which promptly reduced the children raised in it to individualistic decadence and hedonism.

When the struggle ends, the strength shaped by it evaporates.

Race mixing is a sign of a dying empire, not the cause of it.
It's one of the final nails in the coffin, nothing more.

Attached: cave.png (693x720, 676K)

يا محافظة

انشر طيزك و اجاوبك

That is likely due to migration from southern Italy in the intervening years.

Somehow people cant see this correlation...

Pupienus.
Poopy-anus.

Epic

Attached: Screenshot_20190515-074033.png (1440x2880, 2.21M)

Dumbass

history.com/.amp/news/8-reasons-why-rome-fell

fuck off retard, pre christian rome had plenty of civil wars and crises itself

Don't forget about the fact that they fought almost as many civil wars within their own borders as they had emperors after Commodus. Filling the legions with non Romans helped allow for Lord of military insurrections, and when almost every single emperor died on the end of a knife I think there's a lot more problems than just Christianity.

>history.com/.amp/news/8-reasons-why-rome-fell

(((history.com/.amp/news/8-reasons-why-rome-fell)))

Read Race or Mongrel. It tackles this question in detail.

Christianity destroyed Rome and destroyed the Roman ethnicity aka their faith.

Attached: kure.jpg (1293x2000, 681K)

Kek. Cope varg

They were born in Iberia, they weren't ethnically Iberian.
>Christianity did.
This.

Attached: 1554488862706.png (1321x1161, 967K)

rome couldn't control the world, who gives a shit about the roman empire?

Women's rights destroyed Rome. The government used women to tame conquered tribes. In return Rome educated their children with the values of Rome. The father of the children now had a vested intrest in Rome's continuation.

fixed that image for you bro

Attached: the genetic toilet.png (1500x1280, 375K)

If Jews converted from their religion that is for the power and cultural survival of Jews into another religion you don't think this will be the death of the Jewish nation?

Converting to the God of another nation destroys your nation.

Rome had isolated ethnostates with elected officials. The values taught were the values of Rome. The women used as tools to tame the conquered tribes. The system worked because the fathers had a vested intrest in Rome's future.

Christians believe converting to the God of your enemy and holding them as holy is how to beat your enemy, should begin worshiping allah to defeat arabs.

God isn't part of the equation. It's about having a stake in your countries survival and the values taught to the future generation.

And you believe worshiping the god of a different race and nation is how you preserve the purity of your people, culture and your peoples authority and continual survival?

Attached: thm_goetterdaemmerung.jpg (600x495, 68K)

neck yourself

You live in a hemisphere where most of the people are Roman Catholics, speak a language descended from Latin, even English is almost half Latin based, and uses the Latin alphabet
You live in a representative republic based off the Roman Republic which symbolizes itself with an Eagle
The final redpill is that it has always been the Roman vs the Jew for world domination for 2000 years

Islam didn't begin until more than 100 years after Rome collapsed.

Are you a edgy pagan cuck? Our ancestors ate mushrooms to get high and practiced cannibalism. It wasn't until the Renaissance when our race became the jewel of modern civilization. Because we abandoned bullshit fairy tales to embrace technological advances. Rome did the same with philosophy and architecture. In spite of religious dogmas.

>You live in a hemisphere where most of the people are Roman Catholics
Most of Muslim land used to be Christian, Europe is Pagan not Christian.

>believing propaganda

Attached: walkuure.jpg (472x728, 100K)

Our civilization is based on Roman and ancient Greek Indo European religion culture, not in Christianity, Christianity is an occupant cult from Israel.

Attached: snap.gif (600x251, 3.5M)

This was the west pre Jewish-Christian cult.

Attached: pagans.jpg (729x425, 50K)

Rome destroyed Rome. Nothing good comes from Rome.

No Christianity killed Rome and white niggers a.k.a Germans through immigration(that also got a little help from christianity)

>The Romans meanwhile race mixed with Jews

No they didn't,they killed almost all of the jews at that time and the ones who survived got expelled from the empire

>muh Gibbons
Christianity didn't even become popular enoug until the crisis of the third century. It finished the job but didn't start it

it wasnt Africans it was Germans you fucking retard

leave it for a rome thread to bring out all the hick tards

after they’ve eaten squirrel for dinner