Hundreds of respected scientists are coming out against 5G networking and their voices go unheard. The 5G networks are being put up all across the country yet there has been little to no safety testing at all.
Is 5G network dangerous?
Other urls found in this thread:
wired.com
twitter.com
Yes.
Yes. I walked by a 5G tower the other day and it knocked me out. When I woke up I was being masturbated to the point of dehydration by a solid formation of 5G rays, dressed as evil Nazis. Something about them was able to warp time, because after I nearly died from having my skin turned into soap from the radiation they kept me alive for what seemed like 6 months on 5G Kohlrabi and 5G Gruel at this terrifying place called 5Gwitz. There were millions of humans from around the world there being herded into 5G ovens. By miracle I managed to bribe one of the 5G guards to let me out of the camp, but that was only after I sold my anus to his 5G cock. I managed to find the 5G portal out of there. I'm convinced they're extra-dimensional beings hell bent on destroying humanity. All of our leaders are probably already 5G.
Don't quote me on this, but isn't the USA going with mmwave 5G or something, to try and avoid military interference, while the rest of the world is using a different (safer) 5G tech, but which will interfere with current USA military comms overseas?
And that may be one reason for the Huawai pushback.
No idea what kind the U.S. is going to use. I haven't heard anything about "safer" 5G tech.
Get back on your meds
Kek. The only dangerous thing about 5g is gonna be the massive security issues, networks everywhere.
But not for the reasons you think. 5G means mass surveillance and a total loss of autonomy.
are you a fucking retard?
The idea is that most devices will be "dumb" devices streaming from the "cloud". The whole internet of things meme is going to be on 5G. It will be set up like a mesh network surrounding a local node.
I read an article the other day about how the FCC is getting ready to auction off more 5G bands and NOAA is trying to stop them because it will interfere with weather instruments. They said it reduce the accuracy of weather predictions by over 30 percent and only give 3 days preparedness for hurricanes instead of the current 7 days.
Here is one of the articles you are referring to: wired.com
Quite a few articles pop up when you type "5G messes with weather equipment" in google. Didn't know it messed with weather equipment too which is pretty scary stuff.
He can't, he had his brains scrambled by 5G
of course look at the shill responses, tells you all you need to know about 5G
im as quick as the next guy to immediately assume that the elites are killing us all, but isnt 5g the same as 4g just more powerful? where was all the outrage with 4g? seems like a meme desu, you might have more luck researching glysophate. that being said if anyone wants to correct me please do, i just dont really see how this is any different though
>scientists
not any particular field like biologists or anything? Just like how scientists in general supported global warming? What a non-story, visible light is higher energy radiation than anything your cell phone uses, it’s fine
98% of scientists agree 5G will cause ocean levels to rise
Living is dangerous user.
Will 5G make everyone more likely to get cancer and tumours, and decrease fertility rates? Probably, but so does breathing in exhaust fumes, eating junk food, and drinking alcohol, and that doesn't seem to stop all of those things.
I want UHD Blacked on the go.
>Hundreds of respected scientists are coming out against 5G networking and their voices go unheard.
*crickets*
To the American stablishment it is.
Some of the devices run rather hot, but wtf do you expect from Samsung it ain't the first time. Also it was their Snapdragon version of it not the Exynos that's for Europe.