Fuck this authoritarian piece of fag

surely

Attached: file.png (235x215, 66K)

How can you suck the dick of such a blatantly corrupt piece of shit like Putin? He's the worst russian leader since nicholas II

He opposed the Soviet coup of 1991 and the mutiny of 1993 and stands tall against Global Zionism.

Here, Rebe my friend.

lenta.ru/news/2014/01/19/liberally/

Bullshit you fucking Jewish stooge. If that was true, why did Medvdev rule from 2008 to 2011?

spasiba bratan

>Soviet coup of 1991

Are you talking about the "election" of Yeltsin lmao?

>stands tall against global zionism
he is the goodest goy behind trump and he is one of the richest people in the world thx to the fact that he's a corrupt oligarch. it really sucks how many people think muh based putin is a thing, russia is literally worse now than it was in soviet times because of putin.

Attached: Screenshot_20190428-214856.jpg (1440x1894, 627K)

You have no idea of Russian politics lol. Medvedev is a puppet of Putin, like that guy who rules Chechnia. Medvedev exists to fill in for Putin, the only reason Putin isn't a str8 up dictator is because of the term system, which he violated anyway at one point.

You fucking idiot kys

honestly, i'm sorry for all of the destruction the kikes have wrought on your country. if there was ever a real holocaust it would be what happened to your guys at their hands

Attached: 1548796338690.jpg (550x512, 34K)

>The guy who rules Chechnya
You sound like an expert.

To hell, yes. The road to Satan is paved with liberty and tolerance.

>Liberty
Nation wrecker

How did he violate the terms you lying nigger?

No, when the Soviet Coup tried to overthrow Gorbachev you fucking faggot. Putin stood with the rule of law, with Yeltsin.

I feel the same way. Holodomor was simply awful. At least now they aren't completely owned by kikes like we are. Instead they have a very predictable kleptocracy. At least their foreign policy makes sense, ours is incomprehensible unless you know about the man who sits behind the curtain.

Again, after the negro Obama intervened in Iraq in 2014, Putin spotted him by intervening in Syria in 2015. He's proven himself over and over again.

I'm not a fan of his Crimean intervention buisiness at all, regardless. But had the West armed Ukraine, Putin wouldn't be stupid enough to get stuck in a bloody insurgency in Ukraine. The West, not Putin, is to blame.

and with 101% of the votes, President Putin!

Putin would have left Crimea if NATO said we are okay to send troops to Ukraine liberate so it can liberate it's territory. But NATO are pussies.

Liberals claim that his team rigs elections. It's still non proved claims.

He influences federal TV channels in a way that most of them praise him, it's undoubtedly true.

But in fact he's democratically chosen president, lots of regular people support him, some support him because the opposition is no better than him.

Regarding if he's a liberal or a dictator. It's hard to say for sure. Russia is more or less free country. Its main problem is corruption which leads to the lack of the proper rule of law and lower common wages.

From 2008 to 2011 Medvev was leader. How is this the act of a dictator?

There was a meme from 2012 elections about 146% of total votes.

buttblasted burger defending his master

And Putin was his Prime Minister. Medvedev is a meme president.

He's elected without a doubt. Yes he has a harsh mandate, but the people keep voting for him over Gennady Zuganov and the open neo-liberal faggots.

It still shows Putin respects the idea of compromise and rule of law.

Now you want fucking Gennady Zuganov to become president? There's a wreck for you.

Liberals who call him a dictator, it's the same as leftists who call traditionalist centrists a right wing extremists. All of that are mere exaggerations.

Let's look at it with clarity, unless you want the fucking insane National-Bolsheviks or the biggest fucking faggot neoliberals like Navalny and the dearly departed Nemstov to be president.

Zuganov is a meme also, the Commy party (which they aren't since they vote for all laws enforced by Edinaya Rossiya) even proposed literal noname for the elections because they know they can't win.

Liberty is overrated

If you had full democracy in Russia, you would definitely have Liminov or Barkashov be elected.

That's why Putin's tough system actually is a check on the wilder tendencies of the far left and far right.

Dugin is pretty insane, he wanted to send Russian troops to Ukraine in June 2014. Putin's moderate and steady course is much less destructive than the insanities of a Navalny or a Zhirinovsky.

I don't agree with some Putin's policies but overall I'm not his hater. It's good as it gets.

Definitely not, nazi aren't popular in Russia.

What policies don't you agree with? I agree he shouldn't have left Crimea, but Europe is pussies. If they really wanted him out, they would have sent troops, not bitchy sanctions and resolution. Putin isn't stupid, he wouldn't risk any bloodshed.

What happens when he dies? He's getting old

They are. The skinheads run the streets. So the far right has the choice of Putin or Jewish Navalny, they will obviously pick Putin every time.

He will probably only lead for another term or two. He's not a dictator.

There are no skinheads now. All radicals either fled from the country or jailed.

What's the plan going forward? I can't see him not having a succession plan.

Remember Putin's "anti-tyranny" opponent Liminov is psychotic. He supported the mutiny of 1993, the coup of 1991 and the War in Chechnya. He's off his meds.

Putin is a cucked soviet boomer. He might be redpilled by he is is too stupid to drop it for the masses.
Also he imports fucking uzbecks and chechens, and allows media to promote race mixing with chinks.

Navalny is literally anti-immigration candidate you American degenerate.

Yes, you're right. Which proves my point that while Putin was definitely undemocratic from 2000-2005, he was legitimately elected in 2012 and the most recent election.

Limonov has no political power, he's old and unpopular. There are no radical right-wing politicians on the arena.

It's a complicated question. There's a crucial Navy base in Crimea, he paid a lot to Ukraine to keep it, there're lots of people who support Russia.

E.g. usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/01/04/crimean-essay-soviet-union-collapse-25th-anniversary-russia/95419178/

After Ukraine turned to the European Association it was obvious that NATO eventually would take control of it. He has no choice but to organise the independence referendum in Crimea.

He supported Ukraine's semi-genocidal War on the East months after America began invading Iraq again in 2014. That makes him a traitor.

I agree, I'm saying from 2000 to 2011 it was the alliance of far right radicalism and far left liberalism against the Putin consensus.

Again, that's no excuse for intervening in a sovereign country, anymore than America can invade Iraq after 9/11.

But Europe is a coward for their sanctions. If they wanna send a message to Russia, send troops to Crimea. Be a fucking man.

Not for Russia it isn't.

Nah, russian leftist can't ally within their own ranks, they never were the friends of rightwingers.

NATO are pussies. Why didn't they send weapons to Ukraine to take back Crimea? Why is Europe so cowardly, so feeble.

Bro...there are pictures of Limonov and Kasparov. Even Kasparov visited the funeral of a NazBol skinhead in 2007. The fags like Kasparov think Putin is too right, and NazBols think Putin is too left.

Why didn't Ukraine join NATO?

EU made sanctions because US told them to do so, they would never made any sanctions at all if they could.

Why didn't Europe invite Ukraine to join NATO? Why does Europe want to sanction Putin, but not fight him? Why are they cowards?

Kasparov is a prostitute, today he is left and tomorrow he is right.

It's still cowardly. Sanctions are the act of a coward. If America, France and Germany cared about Crimea, they would send troops to Crimea.

Yes but Dugin is insane. He wanted Russia to send troops to East Ukraine in June 2014.

Putin is the only option because his opponents are psychos.

It's a rational decision. To distance Russia and escalate not further. Why would they risk keeping the peaceful first world for Ukraine, it's not even in the EU.

The fuck? No, you either let Putin take Crimea, or you take it back.

By putting sanctions on Putin, all you did was make him sponsor Donetsk and Luhansk two months later.

Europe, not Russia, is to blame for Donetsk and Luhansk.

Had Europe let Putin take Crimea, there would be no insurgency in Donetsk or Luhansk. I promise.

Russia is to be blamed for not annexing them, the population wanted it but our government wanted only Crimea.

There're lots of similar undecided politically territories. You want to sacrifice your people for a country which is itself full of Slavs and is corrupted even worse than Russia.

So then let Putin take Crimea! Don't create diplomatic tension like sanctions or resolutions!

Technically yes.

Attached: IMG_4800.png (550x372, 84K)

Europe is to be blamed for not letting Putin take Crimea, which is the reason he began funding an insurgency in the East.

The far right and far left are two sides of the same coin. The idea that Russia should invade East Ukraine is as nutso as the idea that Ukraine is correct in the East.

Hitler was actually elected, no one denies that though...

"insurgency". definitely not the regular russian army whose soldiers were captured and killed there...

Poroshenko showed himself to be a Zionist pig by not agreeing to let Crimea be free in February 2015 in return for keeping Donetsk and Luhansk.

I don't deny there are some irregulars and obviously Russian funding for separatism.

But this is the natural result of Europe putting sanctions on Putin in March 2014.

Poroshenko is not the best either. Donetsk and Lugansk actually required some sort of independence from Ukrainian politics to be something like independent American states with their local political laws and so.

He didn't wanted it, he spent (read stole) shedload of the credit money from IMF which were given to improve their economy.

Putin is the biggest fag of this century. No doubts. Russians are fucked with him.

Putin would stop funding Donetsk and Luhansk if Europe would remove all sanctions and diplomatic difficulties. Donetsk is the price for Europe besieging Russia.

Yeah we do. Shitler was never voted into power. The NSDAP was as part of a coalition and then Hitler was installed as chancellor and then the construction scrapped.

Bullshit. He was DEMOCRATICALLY elected. He showed his power hungry side with the 1934 Purge however.

I don't know much about what's going on there. As a human I feel compassion to the people there living in a warzone.

But I can't comment what actual reasons, why everything is still going on and the governments don't want to stop it with compromises.

there is more evidence of voter fraud in germany and the US than in russia. by that logic we must dismantle the entire west before we even think about touching putin

Because Poroshenko fucked up the deal in February 2015. Do you pay attention? Putin said to Poroshenko, release Crimea, and I'll release Donetsk and Luhansk. Poroshenko refused. He's a wild Zionist agent.

Poroshenko and Obama torpedoed the deal in February 2015.

He was himself a relatively quiet background top bureaucrat before becoming prime minister. He has had time to groom many possible successors. If anything the risk is having a retarded troika of competing pseudo-putins with no clear leader.

Hes the strongest leader in the world fuck off.