Attached: trump.jpg (859x724, 128K)
Uh oh
Jason Miller
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
supreme.justia.com
irs.gov
assets.documentcloud.org
twitter.com
Carson Myers
I'm sure this time they'll get him
Jace Evans
Drumftptf is sure done this time!
Austin Sanders
>trumps fate
Lol
What? No the the judiciary has no power over the executive
Do-equal branches
Isaiah James
>trumps fate
I’m sure some tax records will be the end of drumpf
Noah Smith
I'm sure this is 100% factual headline and it contains no editorials.
Jaxon Harris
Its over.
Jose Williams
>Vanity Fair
Man, the MSM just doesn't get tired of being wrong do they?
Benjamin Cooper
All one must do to process the news cycle on a daily basis is put the word "Opinion" after every headline, because that's what they should be doing, because it's all opinion.
Amen.
Matthew Evans
MIGA! Before he gets impeached, wait for WW3 to happen.
Lincoln White
its O V E R .
Justin Fisher
>Vanity Fair
Do I need to type more?
Justin Harris
Didn't they tried this a long time ago and failed? What's new this time?
They Dems got the House and they can demand it to be release but they should have a legitimate reason and evidence of wrong doing which I don't think they have.
Mason White
lil drumphfffie is finished!
Benjamin Robinson
How do you steal a supreme court seat?
Isaac Perry
same as your opinion or fox opinions?
John Torres
THIS IS THE ONE, I SWEAR!
Aiden Smith
Same as all opinions. Not a single one of us knows the real truth. There is an exclusive club and we ain't in it.
Amen.
Lincoln Miller
Jaxon Brown
Speak for yourself
Brandon Carter
>Drumpf is done This time.
The absolute state of the left.
Kayden Brooks
Up your dosage.
Amen.
Brandon Morgan
good goy
Jordan Lee
I’ll believe it when I see it :3
Luke Cox
>a-a-a-any day now
David King
>MIGA
>impeached
>shit-tier meme that won't catch
You couldn't glow harder if you tried.
Gabriel Jenkins
Is there any legit reason to look into his finances, though? At some I WANNA turns into a witch hunt.
Charles King
This
>:DDDDD
Ryan Hall
Austin Morgan
Oh yeah I always catch up on current affairs via Vanity Fair editorials......
Nathan Long
>legislative and judicial branch have more power than the executive branch
>judges and congresshits can force President to do anything they want
Totally what the founding fathers envisioned
William Morales
That's typically what you Jews call us. Thanks for confirming that. You have rendered your argument irrelevant.
Amen.
Nolan Foster
Tiffany Trump once charged 500$ to her credit card at the bar. We have the statement we subpeona’d from the bank right here. Impeach now!!!
Noah Bennett
Actually yes, the Executive branch is supposed to be the weakest and just carry out what the Congress and the Judiciary direct him to do. That's how the constitution is set up.
Lucas Carter
What a retarded post
Cooper Fisher
That is a lie.
3 Judge Panels are randomly assigned.
Garland may or may not be part of that 3 Judge Panel.
That is unless the House Democrats appeal for an En Banc Full Hearing after losing at the 3 Judge Panel.
After that is the Supreme Court
Hudson Brown
He's not on the SCotUS, or it actually would be
Alexander Miller
You can stop lying. The judicial branch is suppose to be the weakest.
Leo Martinez
good goy
Ethan Wood
he looks severely retarded
Luis Davis
They can subponea it, but you can fight those in court.
They may even win, but they won't find anything. They're on a fishing expedition, and the surrest way to deal with those is to drag everything out as long as possible. Otheriwse, they find nothing and cast a new line, some other BS investigation.
Brandon Williams
Soft news companies are important so they can pump out this shit while still going "hey it's vanity fair they're not journalists!"
Julian Roberts
Nothing will come of it because they are in violation of the law to even ask. This is all political theater and is back fireing on the Democrat party. The only thing that will end is the tyranny of the liberal party either because they are voted out or because their leaders are removed for treason. If liberals want civil they will get it.
David Diaz
>Didn't they tried this a long time ago and failed?
Yes.
>What's new this time?
Absolutely nothing.
Colton Taylor
youtube.com
>My name is Donald Trump and I'm a BIG fan of Israel.
Murifarts actually voted for this faglord
Jason Jackson
When did that stop Republicans and their witch hunts?
17 in jail under Trump, handpicked by him
Dominic Cruz
suuuuure
Andrew Bennett
>I'm smart but you can't see my grades
>I'm rich but you can't see my tax returns
>I'm innocent but you can't see the report
>I'm a nationalist but we need immigration in the highest numbers ever
Parker Barnes
Oh yeah I forgot.
When was the last time we saw Justice Ginsburg?
I swear she's dead and they're hiding it.
Trump probably knows, too. He's just letting enough time pass that it looks bad for them.
Juan Russell
Don't worry iran, we won't kill all of you. Just most of you.
Levi Bailey
Friendly reminder Jews and government are trying to assassinate white men
Kayden Nguyen
Yes, especially catholics
Justin Jackson
Sounds like a conflict of interest to me
David Phillips
That's not how it works.
Supreme Court will have final say. Too bad Merrick aint on it lmaooooooo
Jonathan Fisher
Why?
Scotus would punt as it is a clear Congressional power
Adam Clark
lmfao
Tyler Jackson
How did they steal his seat? You can go to Ikea and buy a new one for $50 its not that big a deal.
Chase Phillips
Congress's power is not to persecute the sitting president, nor go on fishing expeditions.
Josiah Martin
Yep!
Majority of Senate did not agree (which is 100% their right) to confirm Merrick to the Supreme Court.
>stole
Hunter Sullivan
Caleb Anderson
1 post by this id
Wyatt Barnes
Oh, explain 2009-16
Grayson Edwards
>He stole
The Senate would've said no even if he had his hearing. Also where's "justice is blind"?
William Collins
jewish shill
Iran did nothing wrong
Daniel Richardson
Majority got shit
Mcconell refused to hear, which is not a right.
Lest it be Trumps yiddosh kosher for dems to deny him everything
Tyler Rogers
Indeed
If Kavanaugh easnt going to overturn roe v wade, why alabama?
Logan Moore
I hope he gets impeached
Brandon Thompson
the moment when wwe politics trumps the left. circus beats your lazyness. what a great time to be alive
Samuel Wright
And Merrick Garland isssss... JEWISH
Julian Ross
less jewish than Trump
only Sheldon Adelson is about the same amount of jewish
Jack Stewart
They've got him this time scooparinos!
Nicholas Smith
Trump has been dragging this out to amplify the effect when nothing unusual is revealed.
>nb4 muh 12D backgammon
It's fucking obvious there's nothing there otherwise it would've leaked 2016
Andrew Richardson
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Kek
Cameron Adams
en.wikipedia.org
Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the power of the United States Congress is not unlimited in conducting investigations and that nothing in the US Constitution gives it the authority to expose individuals' private affairs.
Leo Gutierrez
its not a right to hear an appointment either
Owen Jones
interesting you bring up Jewdaism, cause Garland is Jewish. You want the majority of the SC to be Jewish? Cause it woulda been.
Bentley Wilson
>Merrick Garland the Jew will decide Trump's kike cock sucking fate
Poetic
"Born to a Jewish family, Garland was raised in Conservative Judaism."
>en.wikipedia.org
Austin James
Such lies commie lover
supreme.justia.com
Gabriel Taylor
3 years in
>w-w-we'll get him this time
Charles Roberts
Yeah where is trannie Michelle Obama now?
Jacob Robinson
blormpf
Jason Morgan
This nigger is Hoggle from labyrinth prove me wrong
Grayson Evans
So shouldnt garlic recuse himself?
Grayson Moore
Why?
Recusal isnt needed since Trump is well known.
Parker Rodriguez
Vanity Fair.
Totally well known for its "factual" reporting and unbiased "news".
That rag is nothing but libtard fap material.
Samuel Campbell
Chase Torres
Like Trumps ramblings
Samuel Ortiz
how many times can one man's endeavours be over?
Chase Powell
Dunno, what is Soros and Pidesta up to?
Jaxson Nelson
He may have feelings of revenge for not becoming part of scotus so how can his ruling be trusted
Ryan Perry
How can Trump be trusted to lead the country when he feels no pride init and is antagonistic to its functions by supporting Israel first?
Owen Morris
THE BEGINNING OF THE END, MY FRIENDS, THE BEGINNING OF THE END
Adrian Lee
>I'VE GOT YOU THIS TIME, DRUMPF!!
Jack Rivera
The House can request any tax information. That's in the Constitution. There's also more than enough reasonable cause anyway.
Carter Murphy
Here are the relevant statutes governing the disclosure of tax information. irs.gov
Leo Allen
You thought the world was going to be like 1984 but really it's road runner.
Angel Bell
The relevant law, from the Revenue Act of 1924 :
>Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives ... the [Treasury] Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure
There is zero wiggle room. The committee is sitting in closed executive session. The chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means has made a formal request in the capacity of chairman.
This is not a police search and seizure. This is the government institution specifically granted the ability to review such documents in the laws setting up the existence of such documents.
Jordan Cox
This the end for blunff for sure
Nathan Moore
Case 1:19-cv-01136-APM Document 35 Filed 05/20/19 Page 1 of 41
assets.documentcloud.org
pages 23-24
Finally, a congressional investigation into “illegal conduct before and during [the President’s] tenure in office,” Cummings’ April 12th Mem. at 4, fits comfortably within the broad scope of Congress’s investigative powers. At a minimum, such an investigation is justified based on Congress’s “informing function,” that is, its power “to inquire into and publicize corruption,” Watkins, 354 U.S. at 200 n. It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct —past or present — even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry.
On this score, history provides a useful guide. Cf. Tobin v. United States, 306 F.2d 270, 275–76 (D.C. Cir. 1962) (relying on historical practice to determine the scope of a congressional investigation).
cont.