>sell out your nation because you consider yourself above later European migrants and poor people of European descent
>deal and eventually mix with Jews
>US dies
good job, fucking faggots
Sell out your nation because you consider yourself above later European migrants and poor people of European descent
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
archive.org
semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com
semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com
semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
ox.ac.uk
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
forbes.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
archive.org
eupedia.com
twitter.com
Anglos get the gas too
Yes, the story is literally the Anglo-American elite being such incredible classists that they sold out the entire white race
>Yes, the story is literally the Anglo-American elite being such incredible classists that they sold out the entire white race
but unironically
Anglo and Jewish elite have intermingled to such a degree they are really the same people
en.wikipedia.org
This is an interesting redpill desu.
>Anglo and Jewish elite have intermingled to such a degree they are really the same people
it's all true
The position of Sheriff really originated in england. The Sheriff was the judicial officer who regulated the one square mile of the city of london, the block of land owned by the international banking syndicate from the Netherlands let in by Cromwell. These sheriffs were often Jews, like this guy.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Does the sheriff badge look familiar?
Jews became part of the british nobility by lending money to the royals. Churchills family was completely controlled by jewish money lenders. Churchill himself spent summers vacation with one of the Rothschild heirs and met his wife at a party at the Rothschild mansion in England, his fathers estate and money was handled by a rothschild banker.
You realize this is wrong though, right?
>The title of sheriff, or shire reeve, evolved during the Anglo-Saxon period of English history. The reeve was the representative of the king in a city, town or shire, responsible for collecting taxes and enforcing the law
>responsible for collecting taxes
Jews were typically used as tax collectors all through the medieval period in Europe as Jews were typically owned as chattel property by the European nobility. This is also why Jews were allowed to make loans as Jews could not own land but the debts were property of the King and he could use this to seize land of debtors for the crown.
This thread is actually genuinely interesting. I expected no serious replies. Thanks to all who contributed.
Its a topic not touched on often as people dont like to admit the European nobility in virtually every European country used Jews as court factors/sheriffs/tax collectors. They made a great scapegoat for the royalty as jews collecting taxes and making loans allowed for some distance between the focus of the peasants anger and the nobles even though it directly benefited the nobles.
The entire central banking system was created by a court factor for German nobility.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Much of the Rothschilds investments are intermingled with those of the royal families of Europe (who are also all German) particularly with the British royals through British Petroleum and the Dutch Royals through Royal Dutch Shell. You could make the argument that the stupendously wealthy Royal families are using Jewish bankers just the same way they did in the middle ages.
Do you happen to listen to any podcasts, have any recommended reading, etc.? Doesn't have to be on this subject necessarily
Looks good, saving this for later. Already interesting skimming it
>The historical example of a state ruled by riches and possessions is Carthage, in which the Jewish element was also represented. It was governed by the rich merchants, who were represented by a kind of "lower house" named "the Council of the Three Hundred" and a "upper house" named "the Council of the Thirty". The people were, barred from excercising any influence on the government.
Carthage was a Jewish state. At that time, Canaanites (Carthage/Phoenecians) and Jews were for all intents and purposes the same people. Interestingly enough the elite of Carthage ritually murdered children in the thousands and there is overwhelming archeological evidence for this.
ox.ac.uk
>Children – both male and female, and mostly a few weeks old – were sacrificed by the Carthaginians at locations known as tophets. The practice was also carried out by their neighbours at other Phoenician colonies in Sicily, Sardinia and Malta.
>'What we are saying now is that the archaeological, literary, and documentary evidence for child sacrifice is overwhelming and that instead of dismissing it out of hand, we should try to understand it.'
Well, with mention of the Rothschilds/Banking system, one of the better researchers is Christopher Jon Bjerknes.
youtu.be
youtu.be
Explore this channel it has an enormous amount of interesting info.
Also this is one of the better channels more focusing on modern post 9/11 movements of the international Jewish criminal syndicate.
Fantastic stuff right here. Makes me think of the opening scene of the Kevin Costner robin hood with the secret societies of robed men led by the Sheriff murdering British royals to seize their land while their young men are off on the crusades.
Thanks!
Anglos are not Jews. It’s just that Jews are using the Anglos as a host and therefore take up host bodies in Anglo form.
Should also mention the fact that many of these rich American families were also German and Dutch. The Jews did the same in those nations.
>Anglos are not Jews
t. anglo
No one is saying Anglos practice Judaism. But among the elite, there has been inter marriages with jewish money lenders but more important intermingled generational business ventures/investments.
forbes.com
It is a very very small group of people who own most of the worlds wealth and many of them have been intermarrying for centuries.
Yes but the issue I have with that is that it exists in Scandinavia, The Netherlands, Spain, Italy, France you name it. It’s just so that the most powerful people (who as usual are mixed in with Jews) exist in Anglo countries. Why? Because Anglo countries are the most powerful in the World... it’s nothing complex.
It really bugs me when people say X are the Jews or X are working with the Jews. All powerful people are in with the Jews, they are a diaspora who go around attaching themselves to the most powerful families and in turn have ended up the most powerful people themselves.
t. Jew
Certain nations/cities played more central roles as EXPORTERS of this disease. Certainly the Dutch/Netherlands and England/London and the US/New York are major contributors. Btw the royal families for all those countries are all the same family, and its a german family (technically an Italian family going back to Roman aristocrats). Its really ONE family that has been using jews for 2,000+ years the same way. The british/german were the House of Welf/Gelf (various spellings.)
en.wikipedia.org
But one of the oldest roots of the family that put royal families in every European nation is The House of Este.
They actually descend from the Atti family, a family of Freedmen/Plebs that became powerful and very likely may have been jews themselves as many of the freedmen who rose to power were Jews who were brought to Rome because they knew math and could read to serve as tutors to the Roman patrician families children and run their businesses. After their owned died they were freed and often took up the business they had been running for their masters, took a roman name and usually a roman wife (often marrying their slaves). This is likely the origin of Ashkenazim as well, a group of these freed Jews who maintained their jewish religion instead of integrating into Roman culture.
This goes along with the British royal families long held claim to actually be descended from Jews/Israelites.
>claim
Hollow bullshit, and your chart is laughable. Those bastards are many things, paedophile monsters and much more, but not Jews.
Can't really blame them for hating lower-class whites, desu. They could start being more considerate and less adversarial with everyone, including their own race. Also, less fat and better dressed.
That charm is what the Royal family claims not me. It was important for their right to rule as christian kings.
They are clearly descended from the Attia family which was a family of freed slaves in Rome and most freed slaves who rose to power were those who could read/write and ran the businesses of Patrician families which were almost exclusively Jews or Greeks.
>Can't really blame them for hating lower-class whites, desu
WASPs shoot themselves in the foot by shitting on the lower classes in the long run
>yfw you're a WASP but without any of the money or status
why did my ancestors accomplish literally nothing in 350 years
Also there is fairly good evidence that late Rome was run in large part by freed slave families and was heavily Judeaized/Chaldean. Read Tenney Franks, Race Mixture in the Roman Empire.
Nearly all whites shoot themselves in the foot by acting like autists who don't know how to live outside of a village of 100 people and being bastards to one another.
>clearly descended from the Attia family
Bollocks. Where is this all set out to inspect, step by step?
I already linked all the info you need to inspect it step by step.
en.wikipedia.org
yeah, fuck.
So it's a load of bollocks then. Hardly anything can be traced back before the Barbarian monarchs in Western Europe. Even in the Eastern Empire, there was little continuity of prominent families.
I just read that. It says the City of Rome absorbed a lot of Greek and Anatolian blood. Common knowledge, and common sense.
>So it's a load of bollocks then.
Lines of succession and lineage were incredibly important for the elite and well maintained by the romans and the early roman catholic church. I provided you with all the information you need to link the roman Atia freedmen family to the Monarchs of europe through the Estes and Welfs.
>I just read that. It says the City of Rome absorbed a lot of Greek and Anatolian blood. Common knowledge, and common sense.
Yeah, no shit. Its the J2 haplo group.
eupedia.com
They just don't look right. You look at them and your brain starts trying to connect all the mistakes from inbreeding
>well maintained by the romans and the early roman catholic church
This simply isn't true. The vagaries of history meant that the original male lines have all had time to break, leaving us with the Y chromosomes that go back to the obscure henchmen and followers of the original barbarian kingdom founders. Anything else is made up nonsense, dating to a time when it became fashionable again to dream up a Classical heritage.
About haplogroups, this science is in its infancy and we need more early historical and prehistorical samples.
en.wikipedia.org
This is the House the British Monarch descended from.
en.wikipedia.org
This is the roman freedmen family the Estes descended from. This means the Estes were former slaves, but educated and literate slaves (some becoming doctors and merchants). This means they were likely Greek/Jewish or both.
Again, you have the evidence, you can see for yourself the lineage from Attia to Este to Welf to Sax - Coberg to Windsor. If you want to cite specific pieces of evidence and explain why its unreliable you can do so. Try to form an actual criticism instead of basic levels of non arguments.
>The first known member of the house was Margrave Adalbert of Mainz, known only as the father of Oberto I, Count palatine of Italy, who died around 975. Oberto's grandson, Albert Azzo II, Margrave of Milan (996–1097) built a castle at Este, near Padua, and named himself after the location.
A man called Adalbert, living on the Rhine in the 800s. It is just daft to give this man a Roman male line ancestry.
>It is just daft to give this man a Roman male line ancestry.
They had a Roman name before Este.
>the family originated from the Roman Attii family, which migrated from Rome to Este to defend Italy against the Ostrogoths.
Interestingly enough Este was the location of Veneto and where Venice would grow soon after. The Lombards would make an alliance with the Este to defend against the Ostrogoths and the beginning of European central banking would be formed.
Este was just a fucking castle. The Frankish rulers put their men in all the important castles when they annexed an area, in this case from the Lombards. Where did they get trusted men? From their own tribe, the Franks, who lived by the Rhine, as in the bloke's bloody name - "of Mainz".
Even the Lombards who were there before the Franks were of trans-Danubian male line ancestry.
If by chance a Roman had been coopted into the Lombard elite, it's still just a chance he was some random military officer, who could have been drawn from anywhere in the empire, though most likely from a barbarian Gothic group or the Balkans at this point in history, or a local Gallo-Roman landlord.