Thoughts ?

>Killing cockroach eggs is morally wrong

Because the woman is deciding who gets to have sex and who doesn't.

4. Don't murder babies

Attached: gettyimages-487386121.jpg (770x514, 69K)

No sex before marriage was a thing for a reason

Just don't kill babies, we're not asking for much

I hope the niggers you save are gentle with your loved ones.

100 supremely stupid women.
Imagine being number 5 and up.
If a broad sleeps with a dude who banged 50 other whores, that year, she's essentially retarded.

Nice false equivalency, ya kosher faggot

An image for your point.

Attached: 1557760884008.png (477x637, 358K)

The question answers itself: Because women don't self-regulate.

So what's the comparison here? Is this supposed to be comparing baby murder to forcing men not to have sex? One is a ban on killing, the other is a ban on creating life, this makes no sense.

OP here, some roastie slut posted this on fagetbook and im looking to Ctrl C/V someones witty reply and start an argument im definitely not siding with my OP image

How many shitskin spawn would you like to sponsor? 1? 2? 100? 13% of the US population?

>in all fields
Imagine being this stupid

Hot take:
Women as the regulators of sex should keep their legs closed and stop whoring themselves around.

Sounds like focusing on women is 100 times more effective.

Also no one is "regulating women".

All this bullshit and weed is still illegal.
Why is everyone so retarded?

I just want weed to be legal so all the faggots from hs that think they are kingpins selling a few pounds of weed go out of business when everyone who smokes the shit can just go pick some up from the dope store

Not all women have vaginas. #transphobe

There’s a reason for not fucking everything in sight and building an actual relationship. All is lost when a high percentage of people view sex as a National pastime and life as forfeit.

Because when a man kills an unborn baby, he´s a murderer.
When a woman kills it in a botched abortion, she´s a victim.

Attached: 201424.jpg (500x351, 86K)

what kinda dudes are fucking 100 girls a year? Millionaire movie stars?

there is absolutely zero ways to "regulate" the male body. We don't produce the babies so its not our biological issue. Banning abortions for whites doesnt oppress anyone and it in fact secures the liberty of an unborn child.

Right. Far easier for a woman to have sex with 100(or more) men in a year than vice versa(not including prostitution). Although I wouldn't recommend that unless you're looking to catch a disease.

Kek.
Its kinda binary.
Either you can persuade women to have sex or not.
Once you do, you only have to get a little bit better to go from seducing a woman to seducing most women.
Then it all depends on how much of a whore the guy is really.

Free anabolic steroids for all men.

Exogenous Testosterone slows/eliminates sperm production. You can take HCG to revitalize the balls when you want sperm production to start.

Yes, please give us pharm grade testosterone as birth control. Armies of high test autists.

kek that cartoon

Attached: Anne Frank x University Greys.jpg (2147x2997, 1.04M)

If a woman has sex with 100 men in a year she SHOULD be having an abortion. There's no way she's fit to be a mother.

only if the women are having sex while ovulating, or close to it

Sex outside of marriage is rape. Done.

if a lock can be opened by 100 keys or more it would be considered faulty, if a key can open 100 different or more locks is considered great and a master key.

This isn’t about regulating births, it’s about regulating deaths.

She can produce a dual pregnancy if she has superfetation. Either way --- that's the point. She can have ONE to-term pregnancy. Why would she throw that away? Also, should she be having pregnancy after pregnancy if she keeps aborting them? Why the fuck are people treating this medical procedure like it's a commodity-- like a broken tv to be take to a repair shop? The law should be "abortion is banned, if you impregnate a woman you must marry her."

Attached: 1558415694947.png (581x831, 355K)

There is no argument here; the first two sentences are completely irrelevant to the abortion issue

Based Anne Frank poster

Men are desperate to gain reproductive freedom so they don't get imprisoned or enslaved by lying roasties, and they could.

There's a 100% reversible vasectomy that already works called VasalGel. It requires no surgery, only an injection, and is completely effective birth control for males.

Think about it: 15 minutes, and you can fuck without a condom without the risk of getting anyone pregnant, forever, and can just "turn it off" whenever you want.

The real question is: who is suppressing this technology?

The bottom 80% of men in terms of attractiveness should be sterilised. Only chads should be allowed to pass their genes on.

men are already regulated by women when they say "no"

if women weren't such whores nowadays there wouldn't be 100 of them for any given guy to bang

>Men cannot have an opinion on whether their child lives or dies
im more Pro-choice then the baby killiers

Fucking do it
Incels should be exempt

You realize that "no reason" may as well be "any of the above", right? why would anyone willingly give justifications for an abortion?

Men are held financially accountable. Women are protected and provided for by their new male slave and the state.

Attached: Vr0Vz_d.jpg (640x306, 39K)

Incels should be exempt from oxygen

I want our police to do something else besides ruining lives over a small amount of pot.

There’s people with children locked in their basement but officer retard is too busy trying to run a sting op on weed dealers.

literally months into nofap, i give up

Women are the gatekeepers to sex

Fuck satan trips

And they can both spread a lot of HIV.
The amount of sperm in the sewers is astronomical we must regulate the toilets!
Seriously this person is saying women should have the right to murder?

>Women are the gatekeepers to sex

if you're an incel yes.

>women have so little self control that they need to regulate men having sex to not get pregnant
CLOWN WORLD

She was right... in 1914. That shit doesn't apply today.

Ah, based

If that's the case, there is no medical reason to have an abortion. Those options above the "no reason" aren't just some checkbox. Your doctor would recommend you an abortion based on that specific criteria, especially health threats to the mother....

>further proof this people are brainlets
He just said it himself. If you were to castrate half the female population you'd get half the offspring. On the other hand if you castrated half the male population you could get the same amount of offspring pre-castration.
Women are the bottleneck, not men.

Attached: IMG-20190521-WA0009.jpg (1280x720, 37K)

Idiopathic retard doesn't understand Biology 100 for 100 is impossible

Because we already did it.
We regulate mens reproduction by making him financially responsible for each offspring

Because men have self control

I agree.
Polygamy should be outlawed, along with premarital sex.

Abortion is a states right issue. Anyone who disagrees is a federalist faggot.

State rights > women's rights

Attached: 1538848185248.gif (320x240, 979K)

Does he regulate himself then?

Number 3, but I find abortion vile and definitely feel bad that diversity has made it a necessity

5. Women deserve choice as long as the foetus is still a foetus, unable of consciousness.
Meaning, 20 weeks or less.

Because women are far more important in terms of repoduction and your above point proves it

there is already a male birth control pill but (((they))) wont let it go to market because reasons

A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock

Great analogy, humans are inanimate metal tools

Yep, and men are the gatekeepers of commitment.

That's a stupid analogy but the point isn't that far of.
Females are supposed to select males for reproduction.
Males are supposed to try reproducing at any cost.
When the selection is wrongly made by a female, she tends to be ostracized for this reason.
Modern society kind of changed that. Still, women who sleep around too much are still deemed "sluts", mostly by other females!

>do not murder your baby
>regulation

We ARE regulating the men. It is called child support. The average man can only afford one or two children. The average woman can have as many as she wants, and get a monthly check for each one. If women can have abortions, they are in sole control of whether or not children are produced, so they should also bear sole responsibility for their choices. Child support needs to be abolished.

Only the top 1% of men can lay 100 women in a year, while 100% of women can lay 100 men in a day.

Sounds like Brad is desperate to get some liberal pussy

no one is preventing women from having sex with 100 men.

stupid analogy

Because, unless she was raped, her actions led to the creation of a new human life that is alive and genetically distinct from the mother (and father) from the instant of conception. "It's not a good time for me" is not a valid excuse to kill another human, but women think it is if the human is growing inside them.

Seething

We don't have to kill baby niggers to remove them from society. Just wall off their ghettos and let them kill each other.

Because weed and other drugs lead to degenerate societies. Alcohol is ubiquitous, and tobacco is just stupid. Weed and other drugs fuck up your brain permanently in ways that make you worthless.

Maybe we should regulate retards. That would include this guy and most women.

Friendly reminder all threads concerning Jews are capped at 150 or less

Right to life is an inalienable human right based on the Declaration of Independence, US Constitution, and the UN Declaration on Human Rights (to which the US is a signatory). Abortion for virtually any reason is already a violation of inalienable human rights and the Constitution. Sluts just want to kill their kids so they can keep being sluts.

Women are pissed off about the biological reality that pregnancy effects them far more.

Tough shit, that doesn't give them the right to murder babies.

imagine missing the point this hard

>if a person has sex with 100 random people in a year
hoooooooold the fuck up

Attached: 1485400628416.jpg (564x492, 53K)

disgusting, why aren't we talking about how revolting the idea of having sex with a hundred people is

Why not shame both genders for being whores? Is that too difficult or does it always have to be one of the other?

>Chad getting btfo
lmao, virgin uprising soon

Oh, so now suddenly biological science matters?

Attached: 519wShlrRcL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (333x499, 32K)

2 genders

>How many shitskin spawn would you like to sponsor?

Reflecting on the 33% tax bracket and the term sponsorship as it relates to the welfare state

Seems like the bottleneck is women. Therefore, it is much more efficient to regulate women and not men.