There’s all these threads today wondering about why the US birth rate is the lowest ever even though the economy is doing well. I thought I’d help a few of you drooling retards figure it out. It’s womens empowerment, not the economy. Stop letting women go to college, stop letting women have jobs, stop letting women vote. The white birth rate will go back to 4-6 kids per woman like it was a hundred years ago.
Even fucking PBS admits empowering women lowers population growth. What do you think would happen if we disempowered women?
First off, once we get the "very stable genius" out of office and possibly in jail for life, then we can start reversing all the disastrious policies that President Cuck has put into place.
that would start settling nerves and give people the security they need to feel that they can start a family.
You do realize that the decline in birth rates have gotten worse under Trump.......
Most new jobs are going to women. Trump is even dumb enough promote this in his inaugural address. Women with Jobs don’t have kids. As more and more women go to college and enter the workforce the birthrate will continue to go even further down. Did you not read anything I wrote?
Nobody wants to start a family when most of their income goes towards rent/house payments, jobs are getting replaced thanks to automation, and the weather is going to kill all of us in 15 years. Why have a kid if you have to drag it through the apocalypse? I hate kids plenty, but not enough to birth one into the world as it is.
Remove women from the workplace and universities, and ban birth control.
Also line up and shiit all Marxists in the street.
Problem solved.
Chase Ward
I didn't know we were giving meme answers Yeah, gas the Jews and deport all the Muslims back to Kenya and then it'll just be a wholesome Christian fuckfest that makes the post WWII baby boom seem tame
Childfree Antinatalist/Nihilist here. Fuck off. Kids are annoying and it is immoral to reproduce. What would possess you to want a kid in todays day and age anyway?
Eli Stewart
Men need to stop watching superhero movies and go to church
>>Popular thing bad >>Do Jesus instead yes why is this so hard to understand?
Matthew Moore
>”The economy is doing great, why are birth rates so low?!?!?” >Must be the economy
Your grandparents were poorer than you will ever be and they had 6 kids. It’s not the economy. It’s the fact that your grandmother stayed in the home.
Josiah Perez
Exactly. Do what Edward Bernays did with cigarettes---make trad life fashionable. Don't pay attention to thots. Give attention to the good girls, the nice girls. Stop watching porn, too. It's as bad for your brain as ssoiyyy shit is bad for your body.
Anyway, point is women are natural followers. They followed their way into feminism, get them to follow their way out. And all it starts with is just one. Bernays got one pretty, fashionable young lady to smoke, and within a couple of years, smoking was common for women.
Fix trad life & you fix everything. Butyou have the commies, the Jew elite, the Anglo elite, the plutocrats and corporatists standing in the waybecause trad life is not as profitable as they'd like, those greedy mofos.
Jaxon Jackson
The economy is doing great? How old are you? That's patently false if you're accounting for macroeconomic trends. Silicon Valley is a series of bubbles, automation is threatening massive sectors like truck drivers, corporations aren't regulated enough, the tax code is broken--- no, wait, let's start off with the essentials. I'm 28 years old. How old are you? Christfaggotry is for the weak.
>Christfaggotry is for the weak. lol I am not the one complaining about the economy
Aiden Jones
Excuse my Masters Degree and thousands of hours spent reading/researching the topics relevant to the average American adult. Please condescend because your cult with a dead leader gives you an unearned sense of moral supremacy.
>gives women the right to vote >doesnt fight back >has 200ng/dL testosterone levels >blames the jews >is atheist >thinks women are children and shouldnt be shamed for their actions
>Excuse my Masters Degree and thousands of hours spent reading/researching the topics relevant to the average American adult. maybe you should have done useful like starting a family instead >unearned sense of moral supremacy. >atheist telling me about morality
Anthony Moore
I just can't put two-and-two together here. Climate Change is charted to cause a migrant crisis that will displace billions of people and destabilize the global economy in the next two decades. Income inequality is the worst its been since the gilded age and poverty has a 1:1 correlation with the rise of violent crime. The world's essentially becoming a Children of Men style hellscape--- and you think it's fit to birth a kid into? I thought Christians liked kids. Like I said before, I'm not a fan, but I don't hate them nearly enough to birth one just so it can experience the apocalypse and die in its early 20's getting mugged for an expired can of soup.
Joshua Hughes
>Income inequality is the worst its been since how is it a bad thing? I dont care how much money other people have > correlation with the rise of violent crime. I dont live in the ghetto
Luis Butler
Son I'm going to ask you this once and if you don't answer me you're not getting these flimsy responses engaged with. How. Old. Are. You?
>How. Old. Are. You? 32 also you type like you are from reddit
Austin Turner
You're 32 years old, chastise others for using punctuation that makes their responses easier to read, go to Church, haven't detected a hint of the economy's impending crises, think violent crime only happens in ghettos, don't care there's a class of Smaug-esque billionares exploiting our broken tax code, and think a having a child is more important than achieving a level of education wherin you're capable enough to PROVIDE for said child? God damn, you're living proof people can age while not growing up a bit.
I’m 24, and doing fairly well for myself all things considered. Wages are rising, gdp is rising and Job growth is through the roof. Yes the economy is doing well. Do you think it was the economy 100 years ago that made people have 6 kids? Even people who only had a shack to their name? Do you think it’s a coincidence the more equalitarian a society is, the lower its birth rate? It’s not a bad economy that’s caused the demographic decline of every developed country since the 1960’s. It was women going to college and entering the workforce.
kys faggot. someone should probably do it for you, though
Gavin Turner
>haven't detected a hint of the economy's impending crises, the only crises is with the rise of degenerate retards anyone who is reliable and has two brain cells is in high demand by employers >crime only happens in ghettos pretty much I live in a suburb of 40k people and in my lifetime there has not been a murder here that was not some domestic issue >billionares exploiting our broken tax code why do I want the government to have more money? >more important than achieving a level of education wherin you're capable enough to PROVIDE for said child? you dont need an education to provide for a child
Easton Powell
what a faggot
Jacob Robinson
First and foremost thank you for responding to my question. I appreciate that. Secondly I've got a few things to unpack about what you just said. >Wages are rising Where? According to PEW our paychecks are bigger, but our purchasing power has hardly budged since the mid 1960's. Only people in the top 9th percentile of earners have seen any real gains since Nixon. You know, people who live in gated communities and have houses with elevators in them. >Do you think it was the economy 100 years ago that made people have 6 kids Yes, I do. A kid used to be a helping hand when low-skilled labor like farm work and factory work was the norm. The economy shifted when computers happened, now it needs workers who've completed high school + college most of the time. Also what the fuck in general? Why are you prioritizing birth rates when the world's facing such imminent disaster? That's ethically dubious, tossing a kid into this thresher. Not the world or life in general, but the reality we've shaped with our recent carelessness and corruption.
You just said "degenerate retards" unironically. Did you pick the number 32 out of a hat because it sounded cool? I'm struggling to accept the idea you're 4 whole years older than me. You wield an American flag next to your ID, yet you question giving our Democratic Republic government resources? You haven't probed the job market long enough to amass the basic knowledge that having at least a Bachellor's is crucial to financial stability? Do you live in some tiny part of the south where the local factory employs everybody with a G.E.D. and rent is $200 a month? What created you? Your world and views on are so remarkably alien.
>excuse my masters degree Are you really going to pretend it was that hard to earn? There are PhDs here that dont feel the need to establish ethos when they get btfo by random anons (because they're smarter than you)
Jose Gray
Nice, here's mine. It's a bit more longitudinal by a factor of about 4 decades if you can dig it. >despite the strong labor market, wage growth has lagged economists' expectations. In fact, despite some ups and downs over the past several decades, today's real average wage (that is, the wage after accounting for inflation) has about the same purchasing power it did 40 years ago pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/07/for-most-us-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/
>You just said "degenerate retards" unironically. most people are that is why they are struggling >yet you question giving our Democratic Republic government resources? our government is run by satanic kikes why would I want to give them more money? >You haven't probed the job market long enough to amass the basic knowledge that having at least a Bachellor's is crucial to financial stability I make $130k coding without a degree
Jaxon Kelly
you said only the 90th percentile had gains even though the 75th clearing did too
Jace Phillips
That's a lot of typing you just did without many points about exactly how I was wrong. He said some pretty ridiculous things that I'm fairly certain even you don't want to debate somebody about. My Masters was in Electrical Engineering, so I'm going to hope you can estimate the gravity of that and understand it was no cakewalk to earn while working full time.
Ryder Bennett
>My Masters was in Electrical Engineering, so I'm going to hope you can estimate the gravity of that Nobody cares
I agree that wages have been stagnate since the 1960’s until recently. They’ve finally started to rise again. However, if purchasing power is the same, you’d expect the birthrate to stay the same. It hasn’t. It’s continued to go down for white Americans since 1970.
>Everybody having kids were just farmers In 1920, only half of Americans lived on farms. The birth rate was still much higher than today even in urbanite families. Everyone had more kids, not just farmers. The reason they had more kids is because women cannot be at 2 places at once. If a woman is in an office, she can’t be at home raising kids. All the government agencies and NGO’s and universities have agreed since the 1970’s that women’s empowerment is the best way to lower a nations fertility. Not improving their economy, educating women and giving them jobs. That’s why in my original post I linked a clip of PBS openly admitting women’s education lowers fertility.
>Children are bad, Mkay The entire reason we have an immigration crisis is because governments need to prop up their welfare states. If White Americans and Europeans had enough kids, there wouldn’t be any need for immigration. Companies would have their large labor pool and governments would have their taxpayers. If a country does not have kids, that country is going to die. If you don’t want America or White people in general to die out, we need to raise the fertility rate.
Julian Gutierrez
The economy is not benefiting most workers.
Jack Bell
The satisfaction of being a parent is a luxury in modern economies due to the fact that you can't use the child for any economic gain unless you own a business. In the old times you could have a bunch of kids and they'd either work in the textile factory or work on the farm with you, so there was no real reason to not have a lot of kids, each one that came out made your life better and was a generally good, or at least not bad economic choice.
The modern day is much different however as we've banned child labor, so now having a kid is exclusively for the satisfaction of having a kid, which is very, very low on developed nation's list of values when compared to things like having a good job and having a lot of money.
Rather anyone likes it or not, we've made having a kid equal to getting a pet that comes with a high degree of responsibility attached. People don't want to get pets when they're too busy with work, can't take care of it, or can get a much lower maintenance pet.
The only thing that's going to make more kids at this point is either the abolition of child labor laws, or giving money rewards to people who have kids. Things like removing abortions and birth control are possible scam solutions, but it'll just make people even poorer, make even worse single mother family environments, and cause moral standing to fall even faster than it already is.
You are honestly correct, or as close to correct as one could be without being an actual architect of depopulation: but you need to figure out how to state that in a very round about way that doesn't make it seem like we are just trying to be mean to women..
Jaxson Miller
The leader of the Dutch far right party, which is also the largest party in the Dutch parliament, just openly said a few days ago that women’s liberation has caused the demographic decline of Europe and was a terrible decision. Never say never. Having a goal is at least better than just sitting on your hands while your country dies.
Carson Johnson
I want to have sex with Lain. That is all. As you were.
Noah Morgan
Well, I think we should just tell them it’s for their benefit. They can be a wage slave for corporations that don’t care about them and die alone, or they can retire at 20 and raise children who will love them.
