I've got to say Bongs, you truly have fallen quite a ways. Look at this, you were masters of the world at one point...

I've got to say Bongs, you truly have fallen quite a ways. Look at this, you were masters of the world at one point, you made the Roman Empire look like a pittance. Now you have a crying PM likely handing over the reigns to an equally foolish PM replacement. Just sign over your territories to the U.S. and become a protectorate of Nova Roma (Goblino edition).

Attached: British Vs. Roman empire.jpg (799x439, 53K)

They are now Muslims. They arnt white like us brotha !

What the fuck is up with that map?

It doesn't show the best colonial empire

I couldn't help notice Rome was marked as British territory.

Well when you hit rock bottom you can only go up.
Also the western United States shouldn't be red, but the Eastern should. Also we never controlled Eastern Russia nor Alaska. Although given the loose definition of the British empire, China should probably have been light red as well, since we controlled their foreign and trade policy for most of the 19th century.

>Sweden
>former British territory

Amerimutt education.

Attached: a7f.jpg (652x380, 23K)

Yeah the definition for some of these territories is kind of loose. We controlled the south of Itlay for the later part of WW2, so I guess that is what the map is trying to say.
Also I think the German part is from our personal union with Hannover and significant economic influence over North Germany.
I have no clue why Sweden is highlighted, but Norway, Denmark and England were all part of the North Sea empire under Cnut the great, so whilst it's a bit of a stretch there is at least a loose connection there.

Sven is rightful British clay, you heard it here folks.

Argentina was never part of the British Empire. They sacked Buenos Aires twice and were forced to retreat or surrender.

No, Britain is rightful viking clay.

So we still sacked it? Good times.

Still got the falklands.

>Just sign over your territories to the U.S. and become a protectorate of Nova Roma
You're not Rome. You're one of Alexander's retarded successor states from Britain, like Australia, Canada and the other losers.

Yeah this map is a mess.

It makes a little more sense if you consider the map to be maximum extent based on large economic influence and ownership over all of time, but if that's the case pretty much the entirity of the map should be light red except for Russia and central Asia, since Britain was that much of a powerhouse in the 19th century.

Seriously though there is no reason to expand the empire anymore on the map, we were already in control of 25% of the globe, which is more than 1.5 times the size of the second largest empire in history, the Mongols at 16%.

Blocks your path


Also it was Denmark that we had to remove, not Sweden, which we all know was a loyal British colony.

Attached: Alfred the great.jpg (768x1024, 93K)

Somewhat, yeah. The Viceroy and the spanish troops tried to escape carrying the gold and got caught. The Brits got into the city, then the city got surrounded by Criollos and they surrendered and were let go after giving up their guns. The second time it happened was the catalyst for the independence war against Spain.
I used to think you guys did us a favor. But now I realize democracy was a mistake.

Attached: invasiones-inglesas-rendicion.jpg (530x292, 36K)

Alfred the Great was God-Tier.

Damn straight he was.
Alfred was the only genuinely great king we got in over 1000 years of history, but it was all worth it just to get him.

delusional map

Athelstan. There were a lot of good Anglo Saxon kings, less English kings.

Attached: King-Athelstan.jpg (640x480, 97K)

This card is not an indicator. To conquer Africa with India is not an achievement. Any European country will easily conquer Africa.

Thailand has never been colonized
cringe

This map is all wrong.

Attached: 1550764682229.png (1012x798, 171K)