Confused.jpg

fake

> when you go full retard

Republicans have lost 6/7 popular votes. The last popular vote they won was 2004. 75 more ECs and there will never be another republocan president.
That being said I dont see where those other 75 will come from.

Remember when NV was a critical swing state in the 90s & 2000s?

>making it so the candidate with the most votes wins is hysterical and desperate
what the fuck?

This only takes effect when they have enough votes to win, no? Well you're not going to find a legislature in a battleground state that would be willing to pass this. The only way it becomes a reality is if there aren't enough swing states for an R to win again.

we're going to war you worthless fucking nigger, i'm not going to be disenfranchised. California will not decide every election for the rest of my life

judges will be killed for this. Die you stupid fucking leftist motherfucker.

> This entire post

Attached: 1558485804486.jpg (300x169, 20K)

You are literally retarded

If you don't like it then leave.

you worthless, myopic bolshevik rat. Do it then, disenfranchise the country, I'll enjoy killing americans. I've been preparing for it my entire life, i took an oath to do so

wouldn't people in those states be very upset if republicans won the popular vote but lost the electoral and their EC votes went republican?

>leave
i regret to inform you i took an oath to kill all enemies foreign and domestic. you disenfranchise me and i'm slaughtering americans, period. go pound sand you stupid fucking nigger, you asked for it and you're going to get it

Attached: 1557507916599.jpg (238x212, 12K)

Attached: 1557905984421.jpg (396x382, 41K)

Not really, even if they get a sizable block of electoral votes then the entire strategy behind presidential elections will change completely.

Interstate compacts are illegal, literally the biggest virtue-signaling nothingburger there is

Easier to just bury your corpse.

Attached: 1556607832768.jpg (1638x2048, 688K)

>democrat maggot telling someone else to go to plebbit
wouldn't even hesitate peeling the flesh off your face

>illegal
>this matters to Marxists

He just means you won't be dying of natural causes

Everyone gets upset when the other party wins, but it's bullshit when the other party isn't even the more popular one. Would you be okay with Hillary winning the presidency with 10,000 votes across 3 states but losing by 3 million votes because muh electoral college?

>projecting your own retardation and insecurities

She knew the game and got beaten at it. Democracy-direct democracy-leads to tyranny.

kek

yes you retarded blue state kikes, deprive the rural people of a vote

Attached: dumb cunt aoc.jpg (720x934, 54K)

Attached: 1556516777896.png (754x415, 857K)

What happens when a populist that promises to strip all other states except New York and California of their wealth and give it to the residents of New York and California wins the popular vote? All one would have to do is call opposition to such a plan racist. The game would be in the bag.

>She knew the game and got beaten at it.
Yeah, that's why the game is being changed at the state level to avoid bullshit outcomes.
>Democracy-direct democracy-leads to tyranny.
NPV keeps the electoral college system and simply makes it so that the winner must win the popular vote and the electoral college. That's not direct democracy.

Attached: 1557260579462.jpg (439x542, 76K)

>changed at the state level to avoid bullshit outcomes.
Literal child tantrums. Kill yourself

Only informed post in this thread

No. That's like playing chess and saying the one with the most pieces captured should win.

This. You can't nullify part of the Constitution by having an interstate dicksucking contest.

>You can't nullify part of the Constitution by having an interstate dicksucking contest.
They piss all over the 2nd amendment with no issue

This post got the shills mad, look at how they just froth and insult.

It's their 10th amendment right to decide how the state conducts their elections.
No, it's like a democracy where the person with the most votes wins.

Why not switch to the popular vote, then use state control of elections to remove Republicans from the ballot in blue states so they can't rack up any votes there?

>s their 10th amendment right to decide how the state conducts their election
>I only like the constitution when it helps destroy the country
Kill yourself kike.

You say that joking, they'll actually do it.

Wow it was this easy to cancel out established institutions. American Monarchy wen?

The electoral college was established specifically to address the flaws of a direct democracy.

ok. i propose a voter id.

So what happens when the more populous states vote to strip the wealth from the less populous states and white haters like you cheer lead it as long as you personally don't have to pay? You don't live around very much diversity, do you? It will be fun to direct your darkie pets to your door step with instruction to take your daughters and money. That will be a very vibrant experience for you. (Your kind already taught them to hate privilege, whites, white communities, etc.)

>tfw big T wins 2020 election and popular vote
>leftists cry even more

>all these democrat controlled states want a civil war

The fix to the current voting system is to introduce ranked ballots so that instead of a coin toss between two people half the country hates, you get the candidate that the largest number of people tolerate

It will result in balkanization and him and his ilk will attempt to escape their shithole states like they already do.

Man, a second civil war. Cant say im upset. I remember my teachers saying the first civil war was sad because it was brother vs brother. But man, I jate these people. Theres nothing sad about this.

I wasn't about the intricacies of American electoral politics. Ideas asking why the fuck Don Jr. liked it.

The (((Powers That Be))) can't risk their Mass Immigration Cheap Labor scheme being challenged in a serious way. This isn't Europe where Free Speech and the Right To Bear Arms don't exist.

I was*

>trust the plan

Because that's ridiculous and anti-democratic. The ideal system for a democratic republic is rank choice voting for candidates and initiatives to be debated and voted on in a congress.
It's okay to ignore the 10th amendment when it helps your cause? Fuck off.
Yes, NPV does not establish a direct democracy and keeps the electoral college in place. The person with the most votes wins the electoral college.
I do too, and so do most other democracies.

Cant trump just veto this shit or something? Im canadian visiting so not sure on how this stuff works

Nope. Not feeling bad

>If you don't like it then leave
Make me

Serious question
When Trump wins the popular vote, will they all just kill themselves or what?

Attached: civil-war.png (500x718, 189K)

California, Texas and NY wIll decide every election. i can't believe people are ok with that.

Yeah we need to go back to a Kingdom

No, this is not federal law. He could gather support against it and possibly sue though.

Based

No, the fix to is to take the vote away from non-Whites

Democracy is a rigged system, put revolution on the ballot, and take back your country from foreign rule.

Attached: 1528475320289.jpg (800x424, 32K)

>It's okay to ignore the 10th amendment when it helps your cause? Fuck off.
>we should only play by my rules :^)
Yea fuck you kike. Either play by all of the rules, or doesn't be surprised when others don't play by the ones you want.

4D chess my fellow MIGApedes!!!

This movement will only ever help Republicans win in Blue States. Liberals are actually retarded.

Attached: 1558144583171.gif (870x350, 3.76M)

The US isn't a democracy. And I'm not saying this to be a meme, it was never intended to be. It's republic. We elect people to "vote" for us, instead of casting direct votes. It's called the electoral college, and it's the system we've been using for over 200 years.
It was made this way on purpose.

You're all morons; there is no situation where this doesn't benefit republicans.

>Nevada is a blue state
>If GOP wins popular vote, they get the votes
>If GOP loses popular vote, they lose the state, but they probably would have lost the state anyway.

Last election this wouldn't have changed anything. The only states doing this are virtue signalling blue states. The only way this would help liberals is they somehow how the popular vote but lose the EC, which wouldn't happen ever.

But do keep raining doom and gloom about
>things that will never happen to begin with
>things that are inconsequential
>things that would be good if they somehow did go into effect
Fucking morons.

We already have the "fly over country" phenomenon, and those states are completely underrepresented and not even campaigned in the general election. NPV makes every state a battle ground.

>>making it so the 3 states with the largest population decides the future of every state in the union is hysterical and desperate
FTFY

Attached: 1539275199042.jpg (1424x1414, 167K)

The electoral college would be symbolic at that point. You are not going to get me with your semantics. You know the purpose of NPV would be to establish a pseudo direct democracy where the majority rules of the minority. Resulting in the end of this country as it stands. But hey you'd like that and it's going to happen anyhow so let's speed this shit up.

He doesn't care. People actually think an actual democracy would work better. Almost as if they haven't read and seen the flaws of it throughout history.

The only way this would help liberals is they somehow how the popular vote but lose the EC, which wouldn't happen ever.

This has happened twice you absolute fucking retard

W and Trump

How would it be the end? All that would end is the bitching after elections when the Republican wins without the popular vote.

>No, it's like a democracy where the person with the most votes wins.
durrrrrrrp you stupid ignorant person
this is not how it works at all, what countries have a direct popular vote for leader and are not corrupt shit holes?

Demographics. It isn't just about 2020.

>The only way this would help liberals is they somehow how the popular vote but lose the EC, which wouldn't happen ever.
You're a fucking retard

Are you 12?

Voting is an ILLUSION.
O
T
I
N
G

I
S

A
N

I
L
L
U
S
I
O
N

That was meant to be flipped
Win the EC but lose the popular.

In those elections the dems won the states that discussed doing this.

If california changed their law IT WOULDN'T DO SHIT
>R's win popular
They win and it's a blow out
>D's win popular
Doesn't matter, them getting cali is expected. They still have to win battle ground states and others
>R's lose popular
Dems would have gotten cali anyway, so they can still very easily win as they have done before without cali
>Dems lose popular
See above, they literally can't win.

The only way this can benefit dems is if they get 270 votes of states to sign on which will NEVER happen.

calm the fuck down and read this jesus

Funny considering red states consistent score as the poorest, fattest, dumbest and least advanced places in America.

The answer to the demographic problem is immigration changes and family building. Doing nothing about that and keeping the voting system as-is would just amount to apartheid politics. See South Africa for how that went.

is this even constitutional?

>implying they give a fuck

>The answer to the demographic problem is closing the border and gassing all non whites
ftfy

This is unconstitutional right?