We are going to build a wa-

We are going to build a wa-

Attached: Screenshot_20190525-170257_Chrome.jpg (1440x2025, 600K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theepochtimes.com/federal-judge-who-blocked-trumps-border-wall-donated-to-barack-obama_2936500.html
supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/17-965_i86b.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Activist judges should all be removed from their seats, judges should not get involved in politics.

Activist judges

When is there going to be push back on these judges

It's gonna get appealed and stayed a week.

Nigger donated to nigger, nigger makes nigger judge, nigger judge delays wall.

theepochtimes.com/federal-judge-who-blocked-trumps-border-wall-donated-to-barack-obama_2936500.html

If you read his legal opinion, he blocked Trump's wall because an activist environmentalist group named Sierra Club said the Border Wall would interfere with night time fishing alongside the border due to Border Patrol using Floodlights.

Obama Judge from California placed an illegal injunction on Trump building a wall in New Mexico because the Seirra Club argued to the judge that building a wall will interfere with their night time fishing along the border.

>Turning to Plaintiffs’ aesthetic and recreational interests, Plaintiffs provide declarations from several members, detailing how Defendants’ proposed use of funds reprogrammed under Section 8005 and then used under Section 284 for border barrier construction will harm their ability to recreate in and otherwise enjoy public land along the border. See Dkt. No. 30 (“Del Val Decl.”) ¶¶ 7–9 (alleging harm from border barrier construction and the accompanying lighting in the Yuma Sector Project 1 to declarant’s “ability to fish” and general enjoyment of natural environment);

Reminder that New Mexico is not even in the 9th Circuit but the 10th Circuit yet this California District Judge is ruling outside his district and applying his ruling to New Mexico, an entirely different state.

He also placed an illegal injunction over Trump due to Sierra Club who don't even have legal standing because they claim Trump's border wall will interfere with their fishing hobby near the border.

So yeah, this illegal injunction by this Obama judge happened because the judge granted illegal standing to some random Seirra Club with their argument that the border wall will interfere with fishing near the border and get this, the area affected isn't even in California or the same district the judge presides over but a completely different state and circuit.

See It's actually an illegal ruling because this California Judge is ruling on activity going on in fucking New Mexico which isn't even under the 9th circuit but the 10th circuit.

Basically, it's OUTSIDE HIS District by hundreds of miles.

a.k.a. another injunction that will be overturned by the SCOTUS

When is somebody going to do something about these Ninth Circuit judges blatantly exceeding their authority?

Yet it goes through anyway, he doesn't get removed, and the trump administration allows for it to persist.

Fun fact: the Sierra club used to list “Mass Immigration” as a major cause of climate change, but a Jewish billionaire gave them a hefty donation and told them to remove it. They’re a thoroughly kiked organization.

Why do libs celebrate such temporary hollow "victories" only to be slapped down with precedent so if can't happen again.

It's ok Mexico is going to pay for the wall/fence.

Attached: whatsawall.gif (450x450, 2.62M)

So Judges are activists when they don't rule how you want? State of MIGA's

Why would a California Judge have jurisdiction over New Mexico?

This is a pretty good case to bring to the Supreme Court over nationwide injunctions.

We have a California district judge ruling on actions committed in New Mexico instead of a New Mexico district judge.

It's pretty much disrespecting every federal judge in New Mexico.

The equivalent would be a New Mexico Judge ruling on actions committed in California.

This Obama judge really is cancer.

If the law says he does, then he does. Take it up with politicians if you don't like it. You can't be selective with what you approve of. Change the laws or regulations.

We need more threads of this, the boss is getting mad that no one is falling for it.

>judges shouldn't hold opinions that don't suit me

A federal Judge has jurisdiction over the federal government in certain instances, regardless where the federal government is.

"Federal courts have nationwide jurisdiction over certain types of cases, but the district court also has concurrent jurisdiction over many of those cases"

It will just get overturned (should be totally ignored but that won't happen)

Trump it a faggot, he's tasked with up holding laws, who the fuck is gonna enforce this law? Trump... He just needs to say and what nigger to judge. At this point the dems will cry either way, he let's himself get cucked because he's too stupid to see playing by the rules isn't how things are done in DC.

We are past the point of a peaceful political solution to the anti-white agenda.

True that friendo! Fuck drumpth!

>all those cheap ass flimsy designs

i feel bad for you faggots who dont understand the real power in this world wants open borders and they own the government so it wont change. Also the government is not just a tool the ultra rich use to give your tax money to themselves in the form of "contracts". I hate how stupid and retarded all of you are.

This (but unironically)

trump is a liar

Funny how you remain ambiguous but 2 Supreme Court Justices already say you are wrong.

supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/17-965_i86b.pdf

JUSTICE GORSUCH: We have this
troubling rise of this nationwide injunction,
cosmic injunction -

MR. KATYAL: Yeah, yeah.

JUSTICE GORSUCH: -- not limited to
relief for the parties at issue or even a class
action.

MR. KATYAL: Right.

JUSTICE GORSUCH: And, near as I can
tell, that's -- that's a really new development
where a district court asserts the right to
strike down a -- a federal statute with regard
to anybody anywhere in the world.

MR. KATYAL: Yeah.

Read it and weep, leftist shill.

A Supreme Court opinion is actually worth something unlike your useless post.

>he let's himself get cucked because he's too stupid to see playing by the rules isn't how things are done in DC.

Nah that won't work, if he attempts to override the judge, the republicucks in the senate would actually vote to impeach him

Cry more leftist shill.

No court can do this. Tell the 9th to eat a dick.

It doesn't matter what a Justice says unless it's dictated in the holding and in the majority. The holding in that case didn't change the current understanding. The argument in 17-965 was not about whether a District court had Nationwide jurisdiction it was whether the Presidential Proclamation 9645 violated the INA or the Establishment Clause.

Try again.