Weaponized Drone Terror

Why hasn't there been a weaponized drone attack in the US yet?

Will the deep state do a false flag soon so they can preemptively ban them?

Attached: download (5).jpg (300x168, 5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

breitbart.com/border/2018/07/11/mexican-cartel-crashes-drone-ied-into-home-of-border-state-security-chief/
youtube.com/watch?v=HipTO_7mUOw
youtube.com/watch?v=TlO2gcs1YvM
highaltitudescience.com/products/eagle-flight-computer
youtu.be/IzUoe-9bKa0
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I've been wondering this as well. Consumer drones have been used in multiple terror attacks and it always gets covered up. Like they are trying to prevent the American public from being exposed to the idea of terror drones for as long as possible.

>Why hasn't there been a weaponized drone attack in the US yet?
there have.

there is a drone make to capture the rogue attack drones as well.

Attached: Capture.jpg (1905x1012, 193K)

Probably. I saw a YouTube video of a drone with a handgun attached to it not too long ago.

The CIA did this drone bomb in Venezuela.

Attached: 4EDD3A7400000578-0-image-m-55_1533514018974.jpg (636x358, 21K)

there was a failed one last year against an fbi or ice officer

Link?

Because those of us who have them don't wanna tip our hands to the glowniggers.

Hell if i know i just remember the threads. Wanna say southern california toward the end of the year.

Someone must be working on it.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 150K)

Google must have memoryholed it because I can't find anything based on that.

ISIS has been using drones for years now. They strap mortar rounds to them then drop them from above. Pairing those high performance stunt drones with grenades and suiciding them into groups of people will surely come soon.

Attached: isisdrones-[00.00.003-00.09.179].webm (1920x1080, 2.39M)

I have screenshots buried in backups somewhere. I know it happened whether the article got shoahd i dunno.

Also I forgot to mention that the cartels use drones to airlift their drugs across the border now. They just strap a brick onto the drone and fly it from Juarez over into El Paso to some random location arranged in advance. Drone lands infront of a car, cartel takes the drugs off and then it flies back to Juarez laden with cash.

Those run about $60k, btw, and require licensing

>require licensing
Not if I build it from parts on ebay.

I think its this shit

breitbart.com/border/2018/07/11/mexican-cartel-crashes-drone-ied-into-home-of-border-state-security-chief/

10 in 10 soccer moms agree drones must be banned right now.

Being able to display the camera feed to Oculus goggles was the real game changer. I can fly through buildings now no problem and have situational awareness. Just wish I had sound. All you can hear is the motors

i mean, it's still going to cost you, but yes you can circumvent most laws, which is why they are usually retarded.

Israel tested its drone machine gun in Las Vegas.

youtube.com/watch?v=HipTO_7mUOw

soon, user, soon

Who needs a drone?

Attached: shotshell bomp.jpg (749x948, 186K)

I hope they don’t start using them. I like flying my drone and a terror attack would probably end up getting them banned

Tell us more of your experiences.

>hat tip

Attached: kurt saxon.jpg (480x360, 16K)

They dont want copycats like happened with the trucks of peace

>rogue droned
We EVE online now

>Muffler bomb
Wouldn't this work with any kind of bullet?

>oi, you have a loicense for that drone?

Shotgun shells make a bigger mess.
In fact, there's a LOT of things that can be done with shells. They're basically small mines you can buy for dirt cheap.

but the muslim terrorists are already using them

You could just buy a couple pounds of smokeless powder and some pvc fittings. Much better than what fits in a shotgun shell

Then you're making bombs, and if you get caught with them you're looking at felony destructive device charges at the minimum. Shotgun shells are basically legal destructive devices.

>he thinks you can ban servos and radio transmitters
They can't ban them, the only parts unique to a consumer model drone are the propellers. Literally every other component is used elsewhere in industry and products.

if we can't weaponize drones how will we weaponize star ships???

If ever there was a better advertisement for shotgun shells.

Attached: 1541565983455.jpg (934x834, 176K)

Further more, the 2nd amendment does not apply to just firearms. The idea that it doesn't also protect the right to bare modern weaponry is retarded. If the military is weaponizing robots, we have every right to do the same.

I like how you're already deciding a hypothetical drone attack is a mossad false flag before it even happens

Not when you apply a fuse. They cease being shotgun shells at that point. might as well have fun since you're already committing crimes. Incidentally, a kid got busted in my neighborhood with a felony for making dry ice bombs. He didn't even do anything with them other than explode them in his yard. He wasn't even aware he was in trouble when the cops showed up and gladly told him what he was doing.

You don't need a fuse. Just heat. The heat from a muffler will easily set off a primer. Chain some shells together for more fun. One shell going off hits the primer of another, and right on down the chain.
Also, replacing the load of a shotshell is not illegal provided you're not loading them with an explosive.

Attached: 1533693520237.png (1210x1016, 151K)

1-2 inches of pvc pipe, a corner brace, a nail, some super glue and a shotgun shell and you've got an anti-personnel mine

i didn't read your infographic. just assumed you were making ghetto m80's, because who hasn't at some point?

Imagine constructing a device that loads up .50 bmg rounds facing downwards in an array, similar to a claymore and having a firing mechanism to remotely detonate said device.
Now imagine something more efficient, but practical to be made by the common American.
>t. DARPA executive

>They strap mortar rounds to them then drop them from above
They are 40mm russian grenades with added fins to stabilize them. A mortar round would be too heavy for current commercial drones (I think) but those little grenades don't weight that much.

Attached: vog 25p.jpg (751x373, 35K)

the new whitehouse has fallen or whatever the fuck movie with leonidas from 300 has a drone attack on the president. so they are predictive programming it for sure.

You can get an Alta 8 for under $4k that will lift 20lbs no problem. They also are only range limited by their battery.

The deep state would rather use drones as thought police when it all goes full 1984.
The future of warfare will be using guerrilla tactics against robots and mindless drones of the ZOG.

Couldn't you use drones powered by solar to run guns to Europe from USA for the upcoming racewar?

Like a sub or boat drone.

how are you preparing? wouldn't it be a good idea to know how to manufacture a drone out of parts?

Shotshells are handy due to the primer cap they contain. For example, pic related can be made using pumpkin balls for an extremely effective weapon against certain forms of armor.

Also, for those who DGAF about the BATF(E), a shell can be loaded(CAREFULLY behind a blast shield) with a primary explosive such as HMTD(bad choice but easy), silver acetylide(risky choice but REALLY easy), or DDNP(great choice but hard), placed into a can of booster charge(modified nitrogel) which can be placed into a secondary charge of modified gelignite(replacing KNO3 with NH4NO3 and sawdust with bichromate-treated magnalium or micron-aluminum powder).

Of course doing so would be highly illegal so you should never actually do it. But in theory it would be highly effective and doable.

Attached: 1257728975780.png (720x2304, 291K)

Drug cartels have been doing this for years.

Yeah but the travel distance is tiny compared to crossing the Atlantic... I am just interested in whether the technology is there yet.

Fuck the number of qualifiers in that sentence. Homemade explosives are 3scary5me?

i like this user. let's keep him

The problem with depending on solar to recharge the batteries is nighttime. That's gonna be a problem over the ocean...but I suppose the drone could descend and float until it's batteries were recharged. This is doable with current technology, and a good programmer.

Maybe you'd rather load shells up with crushed Carolina Reaper peppers, rocksalt coated in Reaper juice, or dried rice w/ rice hulls treated with some chloroacetone(preferably stabilized). Such shells fired into unruly crowds of antifa would undoubtedly make them rue the day they stepped foot off daddy's upper middle class row-house. And no amount of pot smoke in this world will calm the fire.

Attached: 1522125955831.jpg (1920x1080, 468K)

Those are non-lethal rounds BTW.

>A fucking drone with a flamethrower
Not using cheap mylar and helium instead.

For now, basic /sig/ stuff.
Physical training, survival techniques and community building are necessary abilities for any dystopic world we may be heading.
Cities would be the first places to become no-go zones after open season for enemies of the system starts after all.
Now, on the matter of technology, knowing manufacturering or reprogramming are not essencial abilities but sure are welcome ones.

But losing the dependency on technology and society should still be a initial focus to keep in mind.

Why do people keep acting like shit's new tech? RC planes, vehicles and even amateur rockets have been out for decades. If you're going to ask why someone hasn't done a drone attack, why don't you ask why someone hasn't made some sort of sucrose rocket filled with phosgene and launched it at... wherever.

I specialize in balloon warfare.

There you go. Just launch a bunch of weather balloons with GPS and a phosgene payload, then release their payload when they invariably follow the wind over the target. This shit isn't magic.

We have become so immoral that this shit is only really a threat now. Which is why cracking down on technology is stupid and never works. Why don't the western governments crack down on immorality instead?

Also, yes. NEVER mess with explosives without some chemistry skill/training, nerves, and extreme care. Great power, great responsibility, etc. I recommend starting with plain old black powder. Learn to make your own, practice, etc.

Also, NEVER EVER mess with TATP(acetone peroxide). HMTD is the only organic peroxide that's at all safe enough to work with and even it should be avoided. TATP will kill you for shits and giggles.

Attached: 1556482173521.jpg (1161x585, 625K)

I thought about this, and came to the conclusion that you would have to get a drone with a capacaity to lift a large enough bomb to disintegrate the drone itself as to not leave any evidence behind. Otherwise you can bet your ass you'll be found.

youtube.com/watch?v=TlO2gcs1YvM

> 3:03 drone swastika off to hunt people

They could be used to deliver explosives. I'm surprised nobody has, yet. Fucking imagine if Dominoes sent a drone to deliver a pizza and someone put explosives in it. Ask for an Uber self-driving car, put a bomb in it, and tell it to go to your mark. That kind of shit.

CIA must be off their game

There has. It was the vegas shooting and everything the public was told was a lie.

Real talk you could do a shitty small version of Project Thor using high-altitude balloons and 1/2"+ rebar

Attached: projectThor.jpg (356x270, 21K)

That's exactly what is going to happen to self driving vehicles. lmao. if not bombs, then hypodermic needles in the seat cushion.

It's not like drones are new, really. Model airplanes have been around for decades. Drones are of course easier to pilot. But even an old-fashioned 1960s-1980s era model plane could be used like a slow cruise missile to deliver a package. And you can build model planes yourself with sinple parts. Hardest thing would getting a proper engine/motor and getting the radio set up right, but that can be learned if you have three IQ digits to rub together.

Attached: 1508038909467.jpg (600x600, 94K)

holy shit you could. we could literally build a ghetto god rods from Amazon

The difference is line of site is required for RC planes. Feed your drone's camera into a set of Oculus goggles and you don't even have to be outside. You can pilot the thing from under ground through a transmitter relay.

These were used in the Vegas massacre. Source is my ass

How fast would it drop?

You use a balloon to take it to the edge of space, then a gps and gyro to guide it to target.

Gods rod gets a boost from space though and flies at insane speeds.

Because the general populous has zero interest in committing acts of terror and the state's private actors have far more advanced applications of the same tech waiting to be sprung publicly first.

because the number of people who would go through with an attack to murder other people who would also go through all the shit needed to get and use the drone to conduct that slaying when they - in their derangement - have plenty of other far more accessible options (beating someone with a bat will kill them - ban assault bats) is nil or close to it

Terminal velocity is terminal velocity boyo, the main benefit of having them is space is keeping the system aloft and reentry makes the rods nice and spicy before impact

Attached: 1409292298973.jpg (1019x785, 312K)

>muslim
I think they're more worried about white people figuring things out because
>smarter = better with technology
>the bigger likelihood of getting away with it because drones are disposable and unregulated would make them more tempting to anybody with something to lose

Attached: Stevenjoinsice_eb623e_6674086.jpg (1200x759, 126K)

Thanks, I'll sleep MUCH BETTER NOW ASSHOLE!

Attached: terrorfied.gif (480x270, 1.98M)

Yeah, it's one of my many open source weapons projects im working on.

highaltitudescience.com/products/eagle-flight-computer
Unlocked GPS

Thats mindblowing. Im just wondering if the terminal velocity of a rebar rod would be enough to cause an "explosion" big enough to kill anyone outside it's point of impact. Would a weather ballon, rigged with fans and rods be able to kill group of people. like an antifa counterprotest?

Drones can easily be banned though. Much harder to ban an RC plane, and an RC plane can have a small forward-mounted cam installed.
Drones use more complicated parts. Anything using VTOL is going to be a more complicated machine with tighter demands on engineering.

Also, before I go, I might also recommend getting into rocketry. Sugar-KNO3 is a dirt-cheap and fantastic fuel, and making homemade BP/solid grain fueled rockets isn't too hard. Chances are you'll have some explosions until you get a knack for pressing/tamping correctly.

You'd be amazed what a battery of shitty model rockets carrying aluminum chaff can do to the engines of low-flying jet aircraft. Jet engines don't like sucking up clouds of metal.

Attached: Jewcatorg.jpg (666x689, 67K)

I wonder why no one has put something like "laser bazooka" on one and went around melting people's skulls and houses. Seems like it'd be easy to do. Plus no one would ever be able to shoot it down because they'd all be blinded if they looked towards it.

youtu.be/IzUoe-9bKa0

I really don't think so. All the power from Gods rod comes from using the vacuum of space to get insane speeds before hitting the atmosphere. It flies faster than terminal velocity while heating up like an asteroid. I'm guessing the heated front explodes when it hits the ground also?

That shit is fake and gay nigger. The weather balloon is the best option.

>Much harder to ban an RC plane, and an RC plane
So much has been developed for quad copters but RC planes use lift and energy much for efficiently. If things had been developed as much for then then you could have DIY mini cruse missiles.

Attached: 2cc2b6-20180204-superbowl-color51.jpg (1400x932, 330K)

>laser
Those could be used against rough law enforcement air support when unconstitutional gun confiscations start happening.

Attached: jammer.png (800x642, 831K)

That is amazing. There are far more productive business uses for drones. Thats probably why any thing negative is being covered up.

They will probably sacrifice some leftard rally for this.

drones cannot be benned. they could make owning them illegal, but i build them all the time. the thing about flying drones, is you crash them, which requires you to either spend money, or learn how to repair them. RC planes usually have a combustion engine, which is much more complicated than anything on a quad copter. It's literally just 4 motors and an IC package.

What shit is fake and gay? Go drop a pipe on the ground and see what damage it does. Fucking nothing. Being dropped from the edge of space doesn't mean its going to hit the ground harder.

you could fly a drone straight into the tail rotor or engine intake of a police helicopter

>Being dropped from the edge of space doesn't mean its going to hit the ground harder.
Yes it does

>Implying that the rod being hot is more important than the rod striking with more kinetic energy
Monkey only think with eyes.

A 200w laser like that needs a huge power source. You would need a massive drone to hold it, far beyond a hobbyist drone. And it's far too weak anyway to actually cause physical damage through energy transfer to structures/people. It would be great at blinding people though, a laser of that power could cause permanent eye damage by simply looking at its reflections or in peripheral vision.

perhaps, but those old laser diodes from that Kipkay guy's channel that you could solder into high powered flashlights would be pretty light, and they could burn through plywood.