What impact would eliminating the 2nd amendment have? Would we see less violence?

What impact would eliminating the 2nd amendment have? Would we see less violence?

Attached: 1554244639892.png (1440x1099, 2.06M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/d7AtOlcHirk
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Whites would not be able to defend themselves and their downfall would be swift and total. It is why it must be our first goal.

We'd likely see guerilla operations in every city.

>What impact would eliminating the 2nd amendment have?
Civil War
>Would we see less violence?
You would see the bloodiest conflict in Western History occur.

"from my cold dead hands"

Federal government becomes rogue enemy force overnight
Massive military desertions all but ensuring the federal government will fall
Will cause the bloodiest conflict of the new millenium
Likely spells the beginning of the end of the zionist conspiracy, those who aren't killed will talk, documents and seized assets of the former puppet government will create cause for a renewed dialogue on the Jewish Question

It's why they are trying to do it frog boil style, any sudden attempts and the jig is up and disarmament of the gentiles is set back another 10-20 years

An armed society is a polite society

Attached: 1554399027662.jpg (608x941, 125K)

From my roaring helicopter's pit,
Will the commies' worthless body slip.

Attached: 1_n9k4sSzTfuk4wIeLSTmMEw.jpg (456x323, 27K)

You think niggers are rowdy now?
Take away the average citizens ability to protect themselves, and the real chimp-out will begin.

they'd start fucking eating us

Nope. Government is ALWAYS the biggest source of violence. Governments kill many thousands of times as many people as citizen gun owners. I have abundant evidence of this fact. it is called "history". Armed citizens will kill some people here and there, but for industrial scale, mass killings, it is ALWAYS government.

We are all ministers of death begging for war

Sure, just like Chicago has less violence with all their gun restrictions.
Guns are the great equalizer, lets one homeowner defend his castle against multiple agressors. Also equalizes a female against a male attacker.
Liberals talk a lot about equality, while denying basic biology, leaving women at the mercy of bigger men.

Women couldnt defend themselves against aggressors, homeowners would have trouble with burglars, and storeowners couldn't do what at the end of this video.
Stupid fuck tried to rob a gun store... dirt nap time, hahaha
youtu.be/d7AtOlcHirk

why are gun owners so paranoid? is a stolen toaster oven worth killing for?

Is a toaster oven even worth stealing in the first place?

Yes

imagine giving career to all these "porn stars" only to get #metoo'ed by them for inappropriately touching them at porn convention.

If some thug walks into my house? Absolutely. Would mean less filth on the streets anyway

Don't forget ethnic cleansing.

The blacks and mexicans would riot and start looting immediately. Whites everywhere would get red pilled instantly. Part of the revolution against the occupying government would also be cleansing over foreign and alien elements. Look at katrina. Now multiply that by a thousand and across the entire country.

It would be a bloodbath, and the worst catastrophe to ever happen in the 1st world. Then think of the after affects. Western world caught up in its own problems would ignore the rest of the world leading to massive and genocidal starvation in africa, the middle east, and south asia. Most countries not immediately affected (china, japan, etc) would have their economies crippled instantly, leading to insular policies overnight. Again, the 3rd world would be beyond decimated, and 50-75% of their populations would starve or die in wars for food. India and Pakistan would undoubtably wipe each other out with the west preoccupied, and the middle east and israelis would probably do the same to each other.

It would also kill any liberal politics and ideologies in all 1st world countries, and instantly sympathetic revolutions would probably kick off in a lot of 1st world countries like britain, ireland, germany, italy, greece, etc.

It would probably be the end of the modern world as we know it. The good news is in 20 years we'd probably have all kike and leftist cancer killed off for the next few hundred years, and the decline in mud populations would lead to a worldwide prosperity for a few centuries.

Attached: you may not like it.gif (386x280, 2.49M)

>everythingwentbetterthanexpected.jpg

There would be such little compliance and mass protest it would go down as one of the most short lived political disasters in history. I doubt people would die except for a few genuinely fascist leftist police officers chomping at the bit to stomp on throats.

a civil war is pretty violent.

go head

I'll kill


dunt give a fuck anynmore

>" The integrity of the upright shall guide them: but the perverseness of transgressors shall destroy them." Proverbs 11:3

Attached: 1544768298770.jpg (1024x768, 83K)

he's so fucking cheap he only ever wears clothing given to him

You would all be hunted down and killed.

Civil war 2. Invasion of other nations like China taking over. Pussies like you are the reason why we keep shooting you fuckers. Leave our guns alone and we won't have to shoot you in our homes when you break in.

Clothes is a funny way of saying women.

>Obligatory pic related
You come and take them

Attached: EC231662-D953-4ACE-8582-886C627E1067.jpg (1024x768, 171K)

We'd basically become the U.K where the government can basically do whatever the fuck it wants and you can't do or say shit.

This makes me happy.

I loved it when Ron Jeremy slapped women's faces with his schlong