What's causing this recent outburst of fake news in the last few years? Has it always been like this? Is it as bad on both sides of the political spectrum? What can we do about it? How do we know what we can trust?Please post examples of double standards and out-of-context reports like pic related in this thread.
Fake news
Isaiah Gomez
Ian Wood
Andrew Ross
Cameron Ward
Connor Wood
Brayden Bailey
Robert Allen
old tricks are the best tricks
Thomas Nguyen
Michael Powell
Bump
Jordan Peterson
Bump for memes
Chase Young
Jaxon Bennett
Fakenews cnn BTFO
Wyatt Garcia
Bump
Alexander Brooks
This made plenty kek
Thanks user
Aaron Brown
those are pre written articles you absolute tard
they're composed in anticipation of news, then the one that actually comes true is released
that's how the 24/7 news cycle is able to operate
Evan Walker
Both of these articles were released to the public according to politifact. WSJ's excuse was however that the story developed during the day, thats why the headline changed.
Mason Parker
>It's okay that they take quotes out of context, release lies about what people said, and double standard when it fits them
kys shill, nobody cares about fake news.
Jonathan James
you are fake news. your first instincts are to protect and defend them. you’re literally a traitor to your own. disgusting.
Hudson Cook
OP once again has not defined his terms and circumstances. He puts his foot into his mouth. News articles gets published continually all day long and articles get updated as more info flows in. If you read online articles, you often see them updated and changing. Sometimes, they have bibliographic references at the bottom saying it was updated by X1, X2 (different from the byline author) at a certain time. Other times, the article doesn't have a bibliographic change reference yet it has been updated.
The world is not a static place, OP. Get used to it already. Even you have "fake news" since you change your mind about what you tell other people based on your changing stream in new input info.
Adrian Richardson
You're saying the same as the article I linked earlier:
Still, physical newspapers are different than online ones, they're not that easy to update. According to the politifact article the people who received the first paper, didn't receive the second one. So the people who only received the first paper have misinformation/incomplete information. Maybe this is unintentional, but don't you think news agencies should be held responsible for spreading objective news? Even the headline shows some sort of bias, in both versions. Why would a newspaper be released if the event is still going on? They want to sell papers of course, but I think articles with incomplete information for events that are still going on shouldn't be released.
Zachary Brooks
It's just another case of Trump will start WWIII against Russia, no wait, he is a Russian pupet, no wait, he want conflicts against Russia.