Her body, her choice

Good. If someone would be charged for watching it, she should be charged for producing it.
Yes.
All the feds that have to sift through it all, watching every single second to document the crime accurately. I'm sure they're the biggest perverts of them all, and they're getting paid to do it.

Attached: pepe_panties.jpg (396x385, 29K)

is she going to be tried as an adult?

Normalfags on here are bound to disagree, but this 100%.

Attached: 781110aac871fdd0e529999c0137b9de7e75a359ad554ceb6939336a0df5c2a5.jpg (716x716, 144K)

I remember hearing that something along the lines of 70% of cp is self produced, and that a hefty majority of stuff that isn't is leaked online by feds themselves.
Sounds a little like bullshit but I still believe it.

thats because a nude selfie is considered CP

>16
>CP
Females are ready when they first menstruate. This is what nature intended. Age of consent is (((their))) making for the goyim only.

Good.

What's your argument here op? Kids should be allowed to make their own kiddy porn?

BASED STROGANOFF

careful, thats materialist thinking, you dont want to become a communist do you?

Do you think if this girl wanted to have an abortion in Alabama feminists will be defending her? But if she drops a sex tape using her body as she likes it’s a crime. Honk

This. Also anyone who does anything that I don't like should go to prison. It's the only way to secure a future for the huwhite race.

Too old

Agree. But making porn is not natural and it shouldn't be legal

>abortion being made illegal
>Roasties getting put in jail for whoring

Clown world is the oroboros.

Normally 1st amendment doesn't cover it because "the victim cant consent".
This case there is no victim/are the same person?
So.. first amendment?

16 isn't even a kid

LOL underrated, particularly for commie swine.

I'm not following that argument. Porn is definitely natural. Women are born whores, and porn is advertising.

Was this you Punjab?
m.youtube.com/watch?v=OERoL4KOAWg

No, in this context the State decides based on the Law of child pornography, possession, production, distribution laws etc. that a under aged child who films themselves performing a sexual act is both a victim and the perp. The state is over reaching as always.

Age of consent laws do not match legal age of performing pornography. This 16 year old just pointed out that under 18s aren't responsible enough to have sex - according to law, that is.

It's fucking amazing (pun intended) that nobody has actually had this discussion, and put something into appellate courts for discernment. As a matter of fact, I bet you that will happen, as the degenerates are pushing pedophilia anyway.

I thought that this would be praised in clown world.

If someone wants to make a video of themselves having sex, then I really don't care. It's their decision and their social consequences. On the other side, if you don't want to look at porn then don't and you won't be impacted by it. The consequences on both sides of this are a choice both parties can willfully make or abstain from.

From a financial perspective, prisons are expensive. It costs thousands of dollars per year to keep someone locked up. We have a limited budget and I'd rather spend it on other things.

Attached: 1517016679285.jpg (1080x1080, 230K)

Commie brought thinking cap tonight. Good job, Steinenbergermeistertrotsky.

This is the ultimate libertarian fedora response. It's not invalid; it's just libertarian a la Neil Boortz x2000.

This is why (((they))) invented the term ‘empowering.’ No one knows exactly what it means but it is used to convince normies that abnormal sexual behavior is somehow positive

You can kill criminals or make them perform labor to cover the costs. It's your own false morality that prevents you from improving the system.

>both victim and perp
>state being this retarded

fucking honk honk

Attached: 1548548487386.png (512x512, 81K)

Kek. Good point.

>you're under arrest for harming a child, which is yourself in this case!

Attached: 1558289522983.png (870x720, 918K)

No loicense for that self made sex vid, guv?

Attached: E5B5BB20-4796-490B-97F0-9F31487A84C7.jpg (590x350, 53K)

If the FBI or CIA or NSA ever gets their hands on all my under aged porn I made of myself as a teenager from 11-17 and all the cock pics floating around and gay shit I did for free RuneScape gold and items and other game currency, I'll be in prison until the day I die.

That new chinese facial recognition thot software coming out might fuck us all.

I see 3 cases here

A. made a vid and distributed it - criminal act of distributing underage porn

B. made a vid of her and her underage bf - criminal act of making underage porn (her bf is th victim)

C. made a vid of herself solo - no distribution to anyone, police finds her phone and find the vid - no crime was committed, because no victim or distribution

Attached: 07547AA7-FCCB-4EAA-9588-94DE3F14A24D.jpg (840x493, 127K)

So it’s A. and B.

—-

Maryland's highest court will soon decide whether a 16-year-old girl, "S.K.," can face child pornography charges for taking a video of herself performing a sex act and sending it to a few of her close friends.

S.K. shared the video, in which she performs consensual oral sex on an unidentified male, with two close friends and fellow students, who later reported her to the school resource officer. S.K. was the only person charged in connection with the alleged crime.

The Special Court of Appeals upheld S.K.'s conviction, ruling that the consensual nature of the sex act in question was irrelevant, as was the fact that it was not illegal for S.K. to perform the act. Taking a video of the act and sending it to other people constituted distribution of child pornography, according to the court's decision.

"The First Amendment to the United States Constitution did not protect conduct of a minor who distributed a digital video file of herself engaged as a subject in consensual sexual conduct," wrote the court.

>D. Possession of cp (vids/pics on phone)

I wouldn't say it's a libertarian response. The only victims are the people who partake in it.

Drugs on the other hand lower the amount a person can contribute to society. Thus we all suffer the consequences. Drugs should be illegal because the victim is spread across everyone.

She was only charged for A. - distribution. Which makes sense, otherwise underage kids distributing cp would be a huge legal loophole.

it's called boomer posting, because boomers have begun to post like Trump does in his tweets.
You know, posting Something Like This where you Capitalize either All Words or just seemingly Random Words that either belive To Be Nouns or just want To Emphazise or Some Shit like that.

I'm sticking to our current prison system for this argument. Otherwise we'd drift off topic.

A majority of crimes are committed by younger people. It costs a lot of money to raise them to the age where they can contribute to society. Killing them off or keeping them in prison is like severing your investment before you can see any returns.

Off topic: I 100% agree with labor based prisons. It covers costs, builds menial job experience, and teaches prisoners how to do what they're told.

Attached: 464631254455.jpg (1080x1350, 236K)

most of them already do, snapchat, whatsapp and other ephemeral messaging services allow for it. Combines with social media and that our reality is now online used to mine likes for dopamine rushes.

Attached: 0DABE7BC-7A33-4864-B36C-41261FA4B04A.png (200x200, 29K)

She should be put on the cross. Filthy animal. At least Czech pornstars have some decency since They start producing pornography for their jewish overlords when They have 18 years.

That bitches skin looks like leather.

its not for what you8 think its for

Attached: dgb_info3.jpg (2541x2269, 1.39M)

those are some big titties

charged for watching/producing it
they call it porn, and charge them for commerce crimes. but making video and uploading them to the internet for free, on free speech internet isnt illegal.
except they false flagged all internet as hacking. to save the little kidsread that infograph

There are no social consequences. Being a porn star is an accepted career.

>Nearly 50 students caught up in sexting scandal at north Georgia high school
>New Jersey School District Dealing With Another Sexting Scandal
>North Carolina Police Department is investigating a report of a video of a topless student at Jordan High being sent around the school
>Minnesota Prosecutor Charges Sexting Teenage Girl With Child Pornography

Honk, Honk, Honk......

If I remember right Asia Carrera was dismissed from her teaching job soon after they found she was a porn whore.

Put that on a job resume or say it at a dinner party and you'll see quickly enough. Dating as well.

Attached: 1529986124357.jpg (1080x1080, 118K)

a police officer literally got busted for this EXACT sentence a few years back

Wonder if anyone has found the vid.

Id hire a porn star they have good work ethics

>making porn is not natural
...neither is cooking food, nor is 90% of everything else humans do.
What is your point?

mate, you are fucking dumb. Porn stars rely on emotional fucking around and manipulation, rather than honest work.

Women who do sex work aren't good laborers

dem titties tho'

>Being a nihilist

Good, its about time these dumb sluts were held accountable for their actions as opposed to the poor cunt who ends up receiving it or downloading it not knowing shes underage then has his house raided by the cops and his life ruined.

>fellow students reported her actions
Why would any little snitch-bitch do that?!

Honestly, I don't agree with this but it needs to happen.

Child pornography is illegal no matter who produces it. Even if it is of herself, the law states its illegal so she must be charged.

Suppose this scenario: she is 16, she makes a video of herself having sex. Grows up, dates other guys. Shows them the video. Is she a criminal now? How about if she decides to sell it?

Is the video itself bad or is the exploitation bad? If its the exploitation that's bad, then a willing child should be able to make a video of themselves and sell it, right? If the video itself is bad then she should go to jail.

Laws have real life consequences. Moral panics always create these retarded situations.

I'll by saying \if she is NOT charged, then it would be more offensive to me. If you make laws, you have to enforce them no matter who commits the infraction

Attached: 764.jpg (498x400, 25K)

>charged for distribution. Which makes sense
...in our present Bizzaro World of State persecution, yes.

Attached: Bizarro-World.jpg (334x371, 85K)

>being a nattering nabob of negativism

>held accountable
...Right-Speak for "blamed".

You think they care? They mutilate infant boys daily and no one cares about their body or their choice.

Fuck this country, fuck abrahamic shitheels and fuck this world.

>If you make laws
You don't seem to understand.
*you* do not make laws, *they* make laws.

Yeah except nowadays some women get their first period way to early. Thanks to plastics and everything else that has contaminated our water supplies.

Her body; my fap.

>reason
dropped
reasontv is very unreasonable

Attached: nah.jpg (250x250, 14K)

Here's the archive for anyone who doesn't want to give clicks to those turds
archive.is/FD04x

No shit dumbass

where's the video and who was it with

>ywn go back to the golden days of jailbait threads on old /b/

It hurts bros...

Attached: 1240393095655.jpg (639x595, 76K)

(((Media))) just want an excuse to legalize CP.
Journos deserve the rope.

Let me guess. No father around to slap some sense into her.

This, fucking degenerates.

>The state has asserted that S.K. needs guidance
...so they are helpfully guiding her into jail -- oh good.

You think distributing cp should be ok just because it is the teenager who distributes it? I don't think so. It is a criminal offense and she should be in prison or at least parole for it.

Do not presume to know what I think, faggot -- especially when it is about the abomination known as The Law.

All of western civilization pretty much only views women 18+ as being sexual in nature.
This gives huge power to roasties and feminists. It gives them artificial boosts in value.
It also allows the men of these societies to be naive to the idea that their daughters are out fucking random men every day.

Check this video out: youtube.com/watch?v=KguLrvJj8gM
It is by a troll candidate who said he wanted to legalize early marriages, and to decriminalize child porn.

You don't have to watch the whole thing, but just look at how scared the three women look during the whole video.
Their faces... those are the faces not of disgust, but of ABSOLUTE FEAR.
They know that if his idea catches on in any way (where the sexual marketplace shifts to younger ages) that they will become completely worthless.

This is a good thing.
Feminism is the single most destructive thing any society can face and it needs to be eliminated, decimated, and violated in major ways.

I think it makes sense to help society realize that women should be viewed as sexual things from younger ages than what is currently acceptable. This will give power back to men and also bring us all back closer to reality.
I don't know where the limit or cut off is but right now things are way out of wack.

By the time a woman is 18 she's pretty much already at the end of what an actual proper marriage window would look like. To only start viewing women as sexual by that age is genetic suicide.
This is a big deal.

Attached: 5_1024-Cropped-640x480.png (640x480, 107K)

>I see nothing
Full Stop

It doesn’t matter how smart teens are or how well they scored on the SAT or ACT. Good judgment isn’t something they can excel in, at least not yet.

The rational part of a teen’s brain isn’t fully developed and won’t be until age 25 or so.

In fact, recent research has found that adult and teen brains work differently. Adults think with the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s rational part. This is the part of the brain that responds to situations with good judgment and an awareness of long-term consequences. Teens process information with the amygdala. This is the emotional part.

In teen’s brains, the connections between the emotional part of the brain and the decision-making center are still developing—and not always at the same rate. That’s why when teens have overwhelming emotional input, they can’t explain later what they were thinking. They weren’t thinking as much as they were feeling.

>Go kill yourself pedophiles!

Attached: just do it..png (1440x1720, 417K)

I think there is another picture of her somewhere....with a cat or something.

BTW, there is a way for the government to stop degeneracy in its track. Increasing the age of cp distribution to 21 for men and women. So you gotta be 22 to actually get into porn.

This makes quite a massive difference, as women will have to actually look for a career path after school and porn won't be an option - not even during college.

Attached: maria_mandy.jpg (2560x1920, 1.11M)

>there is a way for the government to stop degeneracy
Yes, and it is known as totalitarianism.

Post video or gtfo. For research purposes only.
t. Kurt Eichenwald

>cp distribution
I cant read anything but "cheese pizza" but I think you mean something else. Whats cp?

>Good judgment
>good judgment and an awareness
This issue is not about *good judgment*, it is about governmental control.
Try to focus.

Attached: TRP-FemaleAgeAttractiveness.png (936x560, 59K)

cp stands for "criminal pictures" and involves any pictures which the government thinks are illegal.